I have been making homemade telescopes for years", if you replace the lens with , say a eye piece from a pair of old binoculars and if you add a prism placing the eyepiece top of the prism, now you can slide the tube back and forth to focus the image you will also find the image will magnify right side up. The main pieces here are the eyepiece and prism. Nice video 2 thumbs up"!
Great, instructive introduction! If you take a note card, cut a neat, round 1-inch hole in it, and place the hole over the front of the front lens, you would probably greatly sharpen the visual image of the moon and reduce the chromatic aberration (fringe colors), just as the quality of an image from a cheap manual camera lens is improved by stopping down or increasing the f/stop. I have also made a fuzzy telescope from a pinhole and an eyepiece to illustrate how the magnification is directly proportional to the distance from the eyepiece divided by its distance from the pinhole, whatever you choose it to be.
I also built a 20$ refractor telescope (in indian currency. 20×80=1600rupees) except it provides me with 116x optical zoom and it is made from pvc pipes so its pretty durable + it has a focuser too + there is no chromatic abberation in this telescope that i built.
@xorpdnap4246 the focal length is 700mm and the focal length of the second lens ( eyepiece) depends. Like if i want more magnification for planets, i use a 6mm lens i.e. 700/6 = 116x optical zoom. And lets say i want low magnification for deep sky objects, then i would use a 25mm eyepiece i.e. 700/25 = 28x optical zoom. So basically the focal length of the main lens is constant while the focal length of eyepiece changes as per the object
I wrote my previous comment before watching the full video ... now i have watched it full.... thank you sooo much for explaining this much about telescopes .. i couldn't find that in internet so i was disappointed.. but you saved me bro 😁
That’s awesome that you are showing people these “low tech” solutions and options for Astronomy. Sadly our hobby is plagued by marketing and its turning people away. Everyone is under the impression that you need all this expensive equipment, when in reality you don’t. And even worse, people have the equipment, and have no idea of how it works. Don’t get me wrong, technology is great, and we are able to do things we could only dreamed of just a few years back. But when you are introducing people to the hobby, this technology can actually turn them away by making them think “they absolutely need ths to do astronomy”.
I'm just impressed you could hold your arms up for so long in front of the camera...!! This would be fun, educational project for kids in a classroom by the way.
Bro i have been watching you for a few months .. and i liked your content really..... and i like this video too ... i would appreciate it if you make more diy videos like this ....... btw i had a question in my mind for a while.... I've seen many astrophotographers including you using mostly refractors or sct .... is there any advantage in using refractor over reflector ? ...
this explained more about telescopes than Feynman's lectures on physics, insane... and I watched this for the fun of it cuz I like cameras, not for studying for my exam
I like how hard he pronounces the T in duct tape, even though duck tape is made from material called duck and it's sticky so it's tape so it's duck tape and it's not made for ducts at all
I think that you took a photo with the water stamp “astrofalls”, does that mean that it is your picture? Is there any chance I can download the picture in a higher resolution? I really loved how it looked!!
I have a question and was wondering if anyone could help me. I’m trying to make one of these with my niece and have a 38mm diameter 50mm FL for the eyepiece lens and a 50mm diameter 200mm double convex for the front lens but I can’t see anything. Does my tube need to be a certain length? I switched to a 50mm diameter 200mm double concave eyepiece lens and was able to see the moon but it was blurry, nothing like what he had. Then put the 38mm eyepiece lens back in with a 500mm double convex front lens and got nothing. I’m lost and nowhere near smart enough to understand he was explaining lol.
A bit late here but yes the tube has to be a certain length that is (focal length of objective + focal length of eyepiece) but make sure to make the eyepiece bit slidable to be able to fine-tune the focus
1:31 what he doesnt tell you is singles are trivial (which is in this video), doublets are trivial (because you can buy the optics as a set) but triplets are nearly impossible because its nearly impossible to find them as a set (i hqvnt thus far ) and there is no reasonably explained info on hiw to select the elements individually. I so far have only made a doublet.
It seems like this is a lot more complicated due to the simple fact that our eyes have lenses of their own. I wonder if you could replace one of the lenses in the telescope with that of your eye… except the eye is effectively already an objective lens focusing onto a sensor… damn, as if the physics of light wasn’t complicated enough on its own
This was part of physics 2 curriculum in US and u fortunately, most students get stuck at physics 1 and never really got to learn about physics 2. 🤦🏻♂️
I have made 2 telescope in my life 1 Refractor and 2nd Dobsonian. From both the telescope i can see planets and enjoy moon with my family. Even captured jupiter and satun by the same telescopea all home made.
Damn it, I was hoping I could buy two cheap magnifying glasses, each the same and built this. Welp shit, I don't know where to get two different style magnifying lens
