I Can't Take This Anymore - This Is What You Get? With All That Treatment?! - www.AcousticFields.com 

You're comparing an REW measurement with probably 1/12 smoothing to an RTA measurement with 1/3 band. That's completely pointless. Show a proper measurement of your room and it probably wouldn't be very different from the other room. You've mentioned sharing measurements from your rooms before but I don't see anything beyond these RTA responses. I've measured empty rooms that look like that. If you're confident in your rooms' performances then share some REW measurements include spectrogram and ETC.

the second measurement doesn't seem like a great result to me... in any case the two measurements are of a different type, why compare them?

"Apples & Oranges": Different room + different graph. Undoubtedly different systems. "Before & After" would be better.

Good sales video for your product and service. And I mean that sincerely. If there's a better solution out there, I encourage people to use it. However, I am a big believer in room correction EQ. That could be manually done, through software on a laptop, a standalone device like miniDSP or IK Multimedia ARC Studio, or a combination of all of them. In the case of using room EQ correction, that frequency curve with +/-20db in certain ranges could be easily flattened. And I guarantee you the room was worse before the treatment. A more forgiving video would have been you saying that with building insulation it will get you halfway there, and room correction EQ will get you the rest of the way. Alternatively, you could use your superior materials and designs, and not have to use room EQ correction.

You should compare empty room and room with acoustic treatment and RT 60 also before get some conclusion.

Thanks for the video, Dennis. Many don't realize it right now but we're fortunate to have your expertise. To the commenters: step outside the usual box and approach room acoustics with a scientific mindset. It’s all about understanding real energy in the room. I challenge you to fire up REW, turn off all the noise, and observe how even a distant ding or doink travels through your space. Sound energy is powerful, and ignoring it just because it’s invisible is a big mistake.

2:30 These speakers seem to be dipoles. Care to comment on how one should approach room treatment for dipole speakers vs. that for monopoles, which one is harder to do and to what order of magnitude? I should think that treatment for dipoles should be far more judicious as with dipoles you actually *rely* on the reflections to get the desired response from the speakers, (i.e., the response they were designed to produce at the listening position)? Am I correct?

Your treated room have almost 20dB difference between 80 and 125 Hz, so what is the difference ? Yours at least as bad...

Apart from the problems with the sound, the sheer amount of panels uglify the entire room. Even if it were to sound good, it' would only do so in the dark.

Thanks for another lesson. Cue the people who 'know better''.

What an ugly room

im in love with those GR-Rsearch NX Oticas