I Challenged AI to Create a Better YouTube Channel Than Me... Here's What Happened 

There's a certain irony that YouTude named you @Human-279

Sup!

You sound like making videos is easy, actually?

@@adumb_codes hey could you make a tutorial on how you made the ai RU-vid channel in more detail

And also how you made the videos I think it’s a really cool concept

ive seen ai shorts with 1000x the views of this video though

@@fergalhennessy775 tis luck in the algorithm

​@@fergalhennessy775They are talking about quality, not success

@@silviocupica2521 nobody goes to yt shorts for quality lil bro

@@fergalhennessy775 You agree with him and then call him lil bro? ok kid

Brilliant basically sponsors any educational channel lol

@@Trifect69420 to be honest you are accurate. I have seen Brillant sponsorships from other educational channel. Not as much flex.

That goes crazy 😂

Listen to how this guy works, he doesn’t need sponsors dude is guaranteed a millionaire from his day job.

dsa

Yes

_audible gasp_

Yes

Yes

Yes

@@youbetyourwrasse if you like the content then what's the issue?

People love junk food.

thats how much subs i got on my youtube channel that i put weekly effort into between ages 14 and 17. not that im jealous or anything..

@@thedistinguished5255 tbf, short form content is a much easier way to get subs than long form

Nuts 😋

It's a real fight to get the algorithm to stop suggesting ai generated garbage

On RU-vid they are called shorts 🤓☝️

​@@icyboyy6177nice face reveal.

_audible gasp_

Lol ikr 😂

You can tell by the voice 😂

lol

Suggestion from gpt?

Uhhh...you get the AI to run python. You don't write it yourself.

​@@yougeo You do write yourself the code, the AWS instance he created didnt appear magically

LLM's (unintentionally) are an exceptional way of representing the collective unconscious of WEIRD countries (Westernized, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) and GPT 4 manifests this intangible "average" pretty eloquently. The problem with this lies in the famous quote by Schopenhauer: "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." Which is to say that yes, until the gears of society shift to accept the currently exceptional as codified and self-evident, the exceptional will remain fringe and speculative - outside the radar of LLM's. Although the same (speculative and fringe) attributes can be assigned to the unfalsifiable ramblings of a conspiracy theorist. The benefit of humans is that we can physically test hypothesis in the real world and receive actual feedback and experience, and this is what differentiates genius from actual insanity: truth - both in terms of accuracy, precision, and frequency. The point here is that to excel in excellence or brilliance, an AI (or AGI, to be more precise) would need to: 1. Be able to interact with the outside world and receive appliable feedback and experience from those interactions. 2. Be able to transfer that feedback to different (or unique, if taken one step further) scenarios, in essence mimicking the executive function and higher-level cognition of humans. (GPT 4 can already do the former, to an extent.) 3. Push boundaries and consequently face doubt, mockery, ridicule, or even violent opposition from the conclusions it generates. Speaking of speculation, since we're on the subject of hypothetical future AGI, I feel it helps to have a rough idea of the difference between consensus truth, empirical truth, and axiomatic truth. In my opinion fields like psychology, political science, ethics, economics, etc are too "fuzzy" for AI to have an opinion on, or to try to influence - at least until we have a complete mapping of the human brain and can understand more empirically how the brain works in its entirety. Until then its genius should remain confined to pushing the envelope on empirical and axiomatic truth.

LLMs are capable of producing far more compelling content if you prompt smarter and keep it more focused on something specific rather than just asking for generic lists, assigning the AI a personality/role with your opening prompt or custom instructions goes a long way on its own.

We are clearly doomed

the opportunity to find something inspiring, and yet you go for depressing.

Only if people decide computer > human

@@gavine2363Obviously it has already been decided

@@mummyjohn what’s inspiring about people subscribing to dumb shit Not everything needs a positive spin and that’s coming from someone who despises cynicism

Prtobably them Simps working there have no way to detect it.

It would probably be good for everyone... except youtube. What's the difference from youtubes pov? They have content that generates views. Why would they care if it is human or AI generated?

@@asdads3948 Probably reducing bloat on the servers? The problem isn't that they get a couple of viral bot channels that make them money, the problem are the millions upon millions of bot channels that do nothing but take up space on their servers. Because lets be real here, if you can fully automate a channel people won't just have one channel. There will be bot farms with 100+ channels constantly uploading junk content daily that all belong to the same group of people, multiply that by many groups doing the same thing and the situation can quickly become unsustainable. Banning fully automated channels from receiving money won't stop all channels, as there probably would be loopholes but it will stop a lot of people from even attempting it.

@@asdads3948 I dont see any problem in it even for the viewers like dude as long as you're getting all get the information or entertainment in it or whatever you seek , viewer should be cool with that they are here for entertainment not investigating the creator.

Based on the diagram in the "complete automation" section, that's exactly what they did

Yeah, there’s probably an ideal intersection that maximizes the benefits of both approaches.

I was looking for someone who would notice that

RU-vid has already reported that it wants to filter by AI content + there is no need to underestimate people, they will forget without revelations that something is wrong here)

That can only be the case with these disgusting shorts invention, long form content even if its being made with the help of Ai, there's no harm its still gonna provide you correct information or entertainment as obviously majority people do research and script at least by themselves or else its not gonna last longer.

And to be honest some Ai voices are so calm and deep that even without emphasising words we just want to listen it more and get relaxed, making us forget who made it.

same

Try newpipe or RU-vid revanced.

Try using the Brave Browser. I find it is good at cutting out adds.

.ass is a respected file format

a s s

only a fool would disrespect the ass. …or something 😛.

we can only hope

NL lore in the wild