Boris Johnson needs to start doing something about our lack of freedom of speech/expression. He could start by getting the 900 police who's job it is to look for mean tweets on social media, off their backsides and on to the streets tackling real crime. Seems to me that most politicians are either not interested, or even opposed to freedom of speech.
Union Flag like everyone in the media, education, social services or politics they are shit scared to exercise common sense and say what they instinctively feel.
A lesser man or woman would have crumbled under these circumstances. A brave man who fought against the corrupt lying police force who now should be accountable for their deceitful behaviour. Not that it will happen though.
There should be massive support for organizations to protect the ordinary men from this corrupt and simply political policing from the likes of Humberside, Cambridge and South Yorkshire police until they are massively reformed. That must happen. They are sliding further and further from justice towards a Stasi like set of behaviours. This pattern has happened before. It has to stop now.
Nobody and nothing in our society should be a "protected class". The law is there to treat each and every person in our society with exactly the same standards of care and protection. The moment you start making certain special categories more protected than others, is the moment you go full Animal Farm.
@@ebikescrapper3925 Or just meaningless. The term toxic has no real meaning even in medicine and it has been usurped by the left to imply actual harm when what they mean is they don't like it.
Please see our most recent episode of CounterCulture, in which we debate this very subject. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-mID1LCR_Z_c.html
Hate is but an emotion. There is no such thing as a “hate crime”, just like there is no such thing as a “crime of passion”. Just “crime”. Voicing an opinion publicly and/or directly is not a crime either.
so would you say a person that premeditates the murder on another and shows no remorse should be viewed exactly the same as a person that looses his temper after provocation and his actions result unintentionally in death should face identical punishment and are equal of the same crime? I believe it is correct to consider intent and context in crime
"Crime of passion" is a well-established concept: it is the crux of the difference between murder and manslaughter. What is wrong in this case and the millions of others like it is the definition of "crime" as hurting someone's feelings or expressing an opinion they don't like.
Well done, you did what many of us neither have the money for nor the backbone for. I hope this is the first step in returning this country to some levels of normality.
Lots of us have fought racially aggravated harassment cases .. and the similar so called hate crimes. I won mine .. but by the skin of my teeth.... many just go down the plug hole I suspect.
SteveL I lost my job over a case that was nonsense and full of lies where some SJW took offence and made a case against me, my employer had no backbone and fired me. I did not have the means to fight this and it almost broke me. Luckily justice was done and I got a far better job and opportunity overseas which was hugely successful for me and the business I joined. Today you can’t even tell the truth without someone taking offence it’s just ridiculous.
@@johnblack4382 When I was accused you could still apply for costs against the cps. They removed that only a year or so later. My case was in 2008... now they have the stats to show how many guilty cases there are because many will plead guilty than face crippling legal costs to defend themselves against the lie perpetrated against them. I was found not guilty much to the chagrin of the magistrates (I suspect). It's weaponisation of minorities nothing more , nothing less... to divide and conquer.
Thank you for exposing this 'hate ' culture - the PC brigade seem to have gone absolutely bonkers. I would 'hate' to find that others may 'hate ' the truthful way you expose those that define so called 'hate' in such a 'hateful' fashion.
This madness must be quashed. Protect free speech. The Home Secretary must take steps to reset the police mindset. Police have totally lost the plot! Bring them to heel, they are supposed to be public servants not public oppressors.
To have believed in the British Police, and then to have discovered that not only the Officer blatantly lied about their phone conversation, but the Police covered it up to deceive the court. Your protector, was really your controller. It took a thirty mile walk to reality. May the Public's be shorter
Harry has done society a great good. He has made a great stand at great personal cost against some terrible, irrational and dangerous people. I’m sure Harry is not an angel ( who is) but on this occasion he has stood up for truth and integrity. A lesson: before we judge others - take a hard look at yourself.
@@Philshki82 You might well be right. I ( perhaps naively) hope that all people of integrity and truth will prevail...but very sadly it seems that those who subscribe to honesty,fairness and truth have to work very hard to overcome injustice. Only because of my profession in legal knowledge can I successfully push back on injustice - but not all can.
Humberside police also dont like photographers... Yet they consistently ask for peoples dash cam footage. Anyone else see the irony? At one time I would have helped the police in any way I could... Now a days .... Even if my video showed in 8k clear as day what they needed. I'd be reluctant. What if it was determined from my video that I may have been speeding at the time? Im pretty sure some jobsworth copper would go for the easy motorist. Where was my police help when I was being burgled? They turned up 2 months later, had a look around, gave me a crime number and a leaflet. If they had turned up when I called they would have caught a scumbag in the act.
The Beatles used to sing about this. " All you need is love, love, love." Let's go back to the 60's. " Make Love , not war." BUT PROTECTED! Oh, dear. How we have lost our innocence, but not our health if you pay attention to the rules. But even the rules are forcing people to change.....not for the good.
Carolle Enkelmann On the cover of their seargent pepper album they had famous peoples faces on it that they described as the most important people in their lives. One of the faces was Alister Crowley,he proclaimed himself as the most evil man in the world. Deeply involved in the occult.
Isiah 5:18-20 "Woe to those who drag their sins behind them... They say that what is right is wrong and what is wrong is right; that black is white and white is black; bitter is sweet and sweet is bitter."
Have a look at the Home Office report for Hate crimes in England and Wales, 2018/19. It is shocking! The concept that a ‘perception’ of hostility or prejudice made by ‘the victim or any other person...’ should form the foundation fir legislation is utterly mad! The report goes on to say how the increase in hate crimes is probably due to greater recording by the police. So, not necessarily a result of increading criminal activity. Also, look at the patterns of this crime across the course of time. There is a strange rise in this type of crime every summer, starting in June, then falling through the Autumn and Winter .... every year?!? Why is this not explored. Does society become more hateful as the weather gets warmer? The report singles out two specific events one being the Brexit vote in 2016, yet does not then say that the numbers of reported crimes then fell back to the same level as the previous year, within weeks of the EU referendum result. The report says how Police accounting deadlines may lead to rises towards the end of their financial and reporting year. What a surprise?!? Specific terrorist incidents are highlighted on the graphs, giving the impression to the reader that their must be a direct correlation. I would argue that this is potentially misleading, even provocative, and certainly not a secure and objective way to present data in a government document. Surely I am not alone in wanting to question the validity of the data presented by the Home Office, the methodologies of the police in recording and collecting this data and even the very basis of the legislation and the agreed interpretstion of it by our legal and policing bodies? Obviously, as a teacher I would like everyone to use respectful language towards each other but I am extremely worried that we are facilitating police and legal actions on the basis of the feelings/perceptions of people ... anyone not just a genuine ‘victim’. The idea of ‘hate crime’, especially so poorly defined, is a basic threat to the freedom of speech which, we are told, we have in England and Wales. Declaring someone to be a ‘victim’, when they are simply making a complaint or allegation means, in legal terms, that there must be a level of assumed criminality. This undermines the concept of ‘innocent until found guilty’. How the hell did we allow this to happen in our country. George Orwell was correct in his prediction of Thought Police, in his book, ‘1984’. We need some sort of campaign to repeal this law or, at the very least, to redefine the policing and recording of it on more sane, objective lines.
Do not the police qualify as conspiring a hate crime every time they question a suspect for any reason or gather verbal evidence against a suspect, the best part is that they write it down and put there name to it before handing it to a court who then become part of the hate crime just by reading it then enact hatred by fine or imprisonment.
He's very naive if he's really so shocked to see policemen telling bold faced lies in court. They've always done it, mate. Maybe you didn't, but I sincerely doubt you never saw a copper lie when you were still in the force.
So Harry you don't believe in conspiracy theorists. Don't make us laugh,are you saying that certain agencies are not conspiring to stop freedom of speech.
Must be really difficult being a middle-aged, middle class cisgender white heterosexual male getting stopped and searched by the police all the time, eh?;)
Interesting thoughts manifesting in relation to the difference between common sense and mandatory. I'm thinking specifically about vaccines and the so-called anti-vaxx movement. I say 'so-called' because it is my belief that these people are not anti-vaccination, simply cynical. Having your children vaccinated seems common sense, and the more common it becomes, the more societal pressure makes it mandatory.
Sorry, but like it or not, I do not have to like you; like what you stand for; like your ideology; or like the people you support. You call that hate. I call it my right. Only when I let my likes or dislikes shape how my actions against you, is that even remotely a hate crime.
