Really Valuable, thank you - IMO one table P+Es are much more valuable for the viewer than 2+ tables - the latter it is difficult to follow the action sometimes and as you stated you will have less time to explain your thought processes. I'd maybe like to see some 25 and 50 ZOOM P+E's as I feel the exploitative approach vs pure theory is more profitable at those stakes and I really enjoy you explaining your exploit strategies.
This is the best "in action" video I have seen. Many hands were played or folded; you stated your plan for each hand, and you kept your commentary short and to the point. I would be interested in seeing your hud when you refer to it during a hand......maybe not every time, but once in a while when there is lots of hand history on the player. Thanks for this one. Cheers
Very good content, keep up. Detail commentary. I currently grind at NL5, NL10 and NL25 zoom full time. I am learning and improving my game, all the time. Your bet sizing is very solid and you have a plan for all the value/bluff situations. I believe that adjusting vs different types of players and bet sizing are the 2 main things to master in zoom format to be a profitable player in the long duration. There are no shortcuts, study and practice. Study hard and win. Interesting there are a number of weak players at NL100 zoom, despite all the professional players but that will continue to decline with time as the median standard of poker improves. The fold with Queens was correct, I am confident your opponent had Aces, Kings or a set and you had the blocker to AQ spades and Q10. Have to trust our instincts and make the solid folds. I folded Kings preflop today vs a 5 bet all, preflop because I was 90%+ my opponent had Aces and his 3 bet % was >5%. I was happy with my fold but never enjoy folding Kings.
Fantastic stuff, such a pleasure watching this! This is my very first time leaving a comment on RU-vid but you totally deserve it sir! Your style resembles mine a ton with post-flop board texture analysis and exploits, yet you’re definitely more disciplined pre-flop. I consider my pre-flop game pretty solid, but having watched you play on this 6-max NL100 setting, I should emulate your tighter EP open range and less flatting with marginal hands even in position. I observed that you rarely put yourself in tough spots (especially OOP) that I sometimes get myself into due to pre-flop leaks. Thank you for this great instructive session. Subscribed and look forward for more!
I really do not understand the fold with QQ on the final board of J9255. The paired 5 changed nothing so if you thought you were ahead on the turn why fold the river getting 3 to 1?? And if you thought you were beat the turn call made zero sense.......
Hello, because I think vs the average unknown player (probably a recreational since I know tagged most regs at the stake) we'll have enough equity with 2 overcards + NFD. I should have raised bigger though.
@@asurp7173 What rake and sizing are you referring to? KJo is a pure open in 6max UTG 2.5bb for 50NL on Stars' EU rake. Tho I understand why he wont open UTG, since its 0 EV anyway and can swing easily to -EV when you face often flats IP/3bets and can turn +EV when it's the opposite. So it depends on many factors. I was just curious because I believe people dont flat often IP in zoom games and under 3bet a lot.
Hi, I chose to fold for 3 reasons: - we have the worst possible blockers to make a call (we block main bluffs such as spades, QK and no value) - villain looks tight - that runout is probably underbluffed
