Get 10% off your first month of therapy with my sponsor BetterHelp: betterhelp.com/jackgordon follow my Instagram: / jackgordonyt Thank you to the Oregon observatory: snco.org/ but what IS a planet?
For what another "informative" video? You were so much cooler when before you started doing nick news and now you're lying in your video title like what? You've changed...tbh I might unsubscribe! Like my comment If you agree and if we should unsubscribe I'll definitely unsubscribe if I get 1 like or more on this comment!
This is actually really cool! That you are one of the very few people that have (most likely) seen this planet, even though it’s so far away, and only a speck.
Although some of the science is skimmed over lightly, it’s still a very cool video that shows us how astronomy is done in the modern day, and it’s actually cool that you managed to find Eris. From what I know (which admittedly isn’t a lot), that takes a certain level of work. And that last stare is literally daring NASA or ESA or some other space agency to send a probe there. Also, “The planet will just keep sitting there, alone.” Well, it has a moon, so it has that going for it.
yeah i love physics and astronomy, and i wont lie, the science in this video is just mostly wrong. The fact that he said that it (the picture of Eris at the end of the video) was likely the best picture of Eris taken from Earth, is just completely wrong. One of the astronomer said that their telescope is not good enough to find Eris, and there are many many many telescopes around the globe that are able to capture a picture of Eris, combine that with long exposure, and you probably have a decent picture. The intro is also completely fake, he should've mentioned what he was actually going to do. Honestly, this video is an ofense to physics, astronomy, space, and to the people that actually care about these topics. Complete waste of my time.
Although some of the science is skimmed over lightly, it’s still a very cool video that shows us hos astronomy is done in the modern day, and it’s actually cool that you managed to find Eris. From what I know (which admittedly isn’t a lot), that takes a certain level of work. And that last stare is literally daring NASA or ESA or some other space agency to send a probe there. Also, “The planet will just keep sitting there, alone.“ Well, it has a moon, so it has that going for it.
Jack, I’m so proud of how far you have come. I still remember you having less than 100k subs, now look at where you are now. As a huge astronomy fan, I highly appreciate this high-quality video. Amazing job, well explained
Jack, I’m so proud of how far you have come. I still remember you having less than 100k subs, now look at where you are now. As a huge astronomy fan, I highly appreciate this high-quality video. Amazing job, well explained.
Jack, I'm so proud of how far you have come. I still remember you having less than 100k subs, now look at where you are now. As a huge astronomy fan, I highly appreciate this high-quality video. Amazing job, well explained
Excellent video but my one issue with it is you didn't actually find a new planet. It was discovered in 2005... And Eris is a Dwarf Planet, missing at least one characteristic of the classification of "planet." But nonetheless, you've earned a subscription and keep up the great work.
@@DevenHamlin56871 not exactly, but i think he overexaggerates "Earth 2.0". If anything, Eris is the exact opposite of Earth. You are right on some level, though. He was wrong about wormholes. A negative mass (theoretically) causes... nothing. A negative mass doesn't exist as far as we know, and if it did, it wouldnt make a wormhole. Black holes are a bit more simple then what he explained. Black holes are just pieces of mass confined into such a small space that it gets infinite density and an infinite gravitational pull. If he wanted to search for Earth 2.0, he would have to look far, and i mean far beyond our solar system. Even then, no telescope on Earth is capable of detecting signals that imply life or potential life (with exceptions.) So yeah, not all the science was wrong but a lot was.
It would have been interesting to delve into the history of the initial discovery of the Dwarf planet in 2005 in the mount Palomar observatory, as it would have given a more solid story for the video to explore. You can find more information about it on Wikipedia, along with some other interesting photos of Eris taken from Earth. I understand that creating content for RU-vid can be challenging, but it is important to avoid using clickbait in videos that are based on scientific facts. The original title, “I Actually found a new planet," is quite sensationalized, and while clickbait may work for other types of content, it is important to avoid exaggeration when presenting facts, as it can lead to misinformation and leave viewers feeling disappointed and misled. The video discusses topics that are more suitable for older audiences, but it is presented in a simplified manner, which may result in losing important information. So I feel that this video could have benefitted by dedicating more time to explaining the complex concepts of space and improving the way they were presented. The discussion of wormholes and black holes is explained without really understanding them. For example, the arrow pointing to a star cluster and labelling it a black hole, is like pointing to an ocean and claiming it's a shark. While there may be sharks in there, you're still referring to the whole ocean. So it wasn’t really a black hole pointed at. The story of the video also seems to change throughout, which can be confusing. I understand that Jack is probably new to learning about space, so it's understandable that he might not grasp everything fully. However, it seems misleading to state things as facts when they are not completely understood. Despite these points, I like the idea of the video, as I’m really interested in space. It was the execution that I felt could have been improved with more honesty and thorough research on the topics discussed. The pacing of the video was top tier, and the chosen topic was ambitious, which I found enjoyable.
This is known as as Planet 9, it use to be in the solar system billions of years ago, then Jupiter and Saturn’s gravity collapsed causing Planet 9 to fling out of the solar system, it’s pretty impressive that you found Planet 9, wonderful work!
I hope you start putting the names of the background scores used in the video because I love them a lot but I can't seem to find them at all. Especially your outro and the classical music that you usually use. ❤
I am 15 and I’ve been into astronomy for 4 years and I can say once you get a good telescope you will see shit your eyes cannot comprehend something beautiful
you got a lot of the science wrong, but still very cool video! (I know things are hard to explain in a short time for people with a 10 second attention span)
why does this only have 10000 views. jack you are seriously so underrated and the fact that you can keep anyone entertained watching a longer video than these terrible 1 minute videos is awesome!!!!
Your definition of black holes are wrong, what does happen is that it’s gravitational pull is so strong it sucks lights making it black, they aren’t actually heavy since they dont basically eat the stuff that it sucks, what it does do is that it destroys items and turns them into atoms, and they could be restored but that would be in like 1M Light years or more, it also has a gravitational pull so strong it could probably destroy galaxies.
Looks like Jack is cooking up a new astronomy series---I'm all for it 🔥 Interesting Factoid: According to NASA, Eris was first discovered on Jan. 5, 2005...from data taken almost 2 years earlier!
Technically speaking it's not a new planet, not even a planet. A dwarf planet in technical terms, we know of it, but not many has seen it with their own eyes. It's new to our eyes, I suppose?
Did you know that Eris is not the planet that went missing? When the solar system was young there was actually a 5th gas planet but it flew out of the solar system.
@@kepeca1 Aren’t dwarf planets just a subcategory of planets, different from true planets, that didn’t clear their neighbourhood, and which also are in hydrostatic equilibrium?
so maybe I was a bit wrong he didn't technically find a planet but he was the first to take a good picture of it therefore being the first one to take a good visual of this planet and also giving us the first good look of eris and yes I do know eris is not a planet and also for whoever is late the title was changed btw but the first title was "I found a new planet"
How come when someone does a little dance on RU-vid it can get to 1M views, but when someone finds a whole planet they only get like 30k. Anyone please tell me how this works?
