I was wondering how were the games at the lowest elo since I played a 435 elo friend. Just thought they'd move almost randomly but it seems like they are making gameplans but without taking in account the fact that you can move when it's your turn
That’s what you generally do, now in this video I wasn’t playing serious chess of course but in every opening generally you have some common middle game plans that you can see a bit further out !!
I dropped to 100 when i first started playing so i looked up to 400 rated players. When i saw how they play i had a mine heart attack because of all their blunders.
Brilliant moves are kind of weird, I find that I get them the most in blitz games for some reason, but yea that 100 Elo Magnus Carlsen impression was insane 😂
If you make a simple piece sacrifice that saves the game or makes an even game a winning position thats an automatic brilliant, so just look at what you can do to create weakness you can exploit
Well great moves and brilliant moves are tied to elo, so a 1500's brilliant move has to have alot of more depth, than a 500's brilliant move. I'm 400-450 elo and I got 6 brilliant moves in my first 3 months. In this range a simple queen sack, that leads to mate in 1 is a brilliant move.
@@-AxisA- No I have sacked my queen once for a mate in one and thought it will be brilliant but actually it was just a best move.( I was at 370 something)
It was a brilliant move cause the queen could keep checking the king forever and there is no way the king can escape the checks without getting a draw by repetition
If anyone is confused about the brilliant move so after he sacs his ROOOOK he will be able to force a draw by checking the king with queen on f7 then f8 f7 f8... until draw which is after 3 moves repitition
Yes of course, but if you watched the rest of the video the theme was playing winning moves that don't knock the opponent out right away, like in the first game we had plenty of mates as well
