Check out the film called Nitram which spelled backwards Martin. The film came out few years ago and the American actor Caleb Landry Jones who played Martin Bryant along with Australian actress Judy Davis who plays his mother and Anthony LaPaglia who plays his father. The Tasmanian government back then tried to banned the movie.
He was deemed fit to stand trial. You clearly don’t know how the Australian legal system works. If someone pleads guilty to all charges against them, then their isn’t a trial
@@David-tg8vc after the final lawyer was appointed only then did he plead guilty all along he said he was innocent until that lawyer told him if he didn’t plead guilty he wouldn’t see his mum again. Say that to any 8 year old and see what they say.
@@David-tg8vc For five months, up to and including his 30 September court appearance Bryant said he was not guilty. It was only after David Gunson his then lawyer “stepped aside” and John Avery was appointed that Bryant changed his plea to guilty. Avery admitted that he did not want Bryant to go to trial and he admitted to getting Paul Mullens the psychiatrist to assist him to get inside Bryant’s head. Despite Bryant changing his plea we know from the police and court transcripts that Bryant was interviewed without legal of guardian representation, despite his low IQ of 66 and mental impairment. We know from those records that Bryant mentioned his lawyer numerous times during the 4 July interrogation but again, despite his mental capacity of an 11 y.o. his requests were ignored. We also know from those records that it was the police who informed Bryant that he would not be represented. We know from the 4 July interrogation video that Bryant was questioned by a women who has not been identified in the transcript. We know from the Court transcript that Mullens ‘interviewed’ Bryant for 3.5 hours on 4 or 6 May 1996, some days after the shooting and while Bryant was still in hospital suffering from his burns and just days after Bryant had been charged with the murder of Kate Scott. Who authorised or requested Mullens’ early intervention, or why, has never been disclosed. Despite Bryant changing his plea to guilty there is NO FORENSIC EVIDENCE in the public domain or in the court records that identify Bryant as the shooter despite all the items left in the cafe by the gunman. The meal tray and contents, drink cup and can, the sports bag and contents, the video camera and camera bag and the discarded AR15 magazine were all perfect sources of forensic evidence but nothing was ever produced. Irrespective of whether Bryant changed his plea or not the DPP/Police still had to prove Bryant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Between 28 April 1996 and 16 November 1996, three days before Bryant’s third court appearance the best the police could ‘find', using according to the DPP, “special techniques” was a dodgy DNA sample that was only consistent with that of Bryant but not a match.
Believe it or not. I was in the royal Hobart hospital getting my cast cut off my hand after breaking it. N I seen a bloke in handcuffs walk down the corridor with 2 cops with him. N I asked the nurse was that martin Bryant. She didnt say yes but the facial expression was enough. That was about 17 years ago.
Martin Bryant had the intellect of a 7 year old, yet he made some long distant head shots with military precision, if you can find the original police interview, he told a different story
I think he the shooter shot from the hip with a lot of the headshots according to witnesses, the first police who would of arrived on the scene where called to a heroin hoax of a jar of flour on the steps of a church or something along those lines. One witness also said the gunman had freckles
Same as alot of the "Dead" were all ready dead. Seen alot of shows about this topic as I'm Australian and love true crime but yeah it doesn't add up. Yes there were people killed that day but not the amount they say and your correct too many headshots for that distance.
@@bulldogbryant5909 i used to shoot rabbits when i was a kid too and we also used to go spot lighting too but that didn't make me a crack shot and i don't have the intellect of a 7 year old
Can somebody please explain why the files to this case have been locked away for 75 years ? Isn't that odd ? And why no colonial enquiry into such a major incident ?
Bingo … when anyone suggest that things were covered up in relation to this atrocity. There seems to be a cast of thousands ready to spit hateful remarks, like it’s disrespectful to the victims to suggest things have been covered up. But when you ask a question as logical is what you just have to them, they become juvenile sarcastic or won’t even reply… There’s allegedly 8 Individual statements from people who did not know each other some residents some were tourists, all claiming to have seen men in black Full military swat type outfits running around the place, and low and behold for some incomprehensible absolutely disgraceful reason. Those statements were removed from the brief and not even submitted to court and have been suppressed From public access….. To $64, million question isn’t a real hard one , to all those who say disrespectful to the victims to enquire about such things, I say with all respect, please explain why those statements have been removed from evidence weren’t shown in court and have now been suppressed for almost 100 years before any public view. The statements… It looks like a duck swims like a duck quacks like a duck Last time I checked, it’s a duck . Is anyone I can think of they were not submitted in court as evidence and have been suppressed for almost 100 years from public access … ummmm You can have three guesses and don’t worry about the first two.
Martin John Bryant (born 7 May 1967) is an Australian mass murderer[1] who shot and killed 35 people and injured 23 others in the Port Arthur massacre between 28 and 29 April 1996.[2] He is serving 35 life sentences plus 1,652 years without the possibility of parole at Risdon Prison in Hobart
You think this fkwit just open fired on people randomly? The whole thing was planned and was created to disarm Australians that owned semi-automatic weapons. This was a staged event and Bryant played the part well right down to acting like a little kid and laughing about it.
@@mitchellschmidt7885 hey I didn’t say he wasn’t guilty bloke,I said the whole event was set up by the people that wanted law abiding shooters with semi-automatic weapons to hand their weapons in.
Nice work Jamie,Who to believe?Graham Colyer or Ian Kingston.Both there at the time of the PAM.Thank you Paul Moder,it takes guts to publically go against the official story.
Bit of a shame you went all that way and didn't actually find the location of the memorial at the broad arrow cafe. There is a beautiful reflection pool and shrine. You can even walk through the ruins of the cafe. Where you were standing and saying the tragedy occurred behind you, it was actually in front of you by 100 metres or so, just through the trees. The "memorial" you show is just a graveyard. Anyone interested in seeing the actual location can find images on google maps.
That was the darkest day in Australian history but it was also a wake up call to Australia and in case everyone’s wondering no I am not related to the shooter. I just have the same surname as him, and even if I was related to him, I would still hate him for what he did. It was cowardly and downright evil I hope he never fines peace, and I hope he suffers for the rest of his life rest in peace to the victims they will never be forgotten.
The guy that was making the movie has taken a single statement and make a conclusion, rather than looking at all statements and evidence. Multiple witnesses against 1 victim who may or may not have the best memory of the incident. Im not saying hes wrong. But i aint taking paulines claim seriously when there are multiple witnesses who all have the same story. Im not saying either are right, but the person charged had a weird interview and shows no remorse. Even if he didnt do it, his interview seems like he doesnt care which is weird for a small town when everyone knows each other. The accused acts very weird for someone who is innocent in a police interview. He could be a psychopath who did or didnt do it, but we all know he did it, lets be real.
Guns are not banned. There is alot of law abiding legal gun owners in Australia such as myself. Only certain ones got heavily restricted after the Port Arthur massacre.
There always were restrictions, weren't there? Category H has had some amendments to it, semi autos are off the table to recreational shooters, as are pump action shotguns (why?), but Australia has had pretty strict firearms laws dating back to the 20's. They just weren't particularly well policed as Australians aren't exactly known for running around willy nilly and shooting one another. There was a rifle/shotgun or both in every third house when I was a kid. There was an air rifle in every second house! We just didn't shoot each other. As for AR 15's, they were really expensive and few and far between. Who had those things? Oh well, I voted for Howard in '96 and I've never voted Liberal since.
@@davidbrayshaw3529 Yeah my dad told me when he was young about the good old days. He said he used to go to kmart and look at guns. The buy back did absolutely nothing it was rubbish. Criminals do and will always get guns illegally.
@@aussienation4979 guns are bands here almost no one has automatic or semi automatic rifle like in 🇨🇿🇨🇭🇱🇹 one of my mates was refused to gun licence, just because he had dyslexia
was a complete false flag,i could go on for a while but i'll just start with the fact the gun martin supposedly used was handed in to victorian police under a gun buy back,was sold to a ballarat gun dealer on the condition it was sold overseas and somehow ended up in martins possession?,check out the vid thats come out with chopper read relating a true conversation he had with martin(martin didnt do it),and a book by a victorian SOG officer that also casts doubts on the offical story
How can you not see watch is going on here. Look at the fact of the case and witness statements nothing adds up. More holes than Swiss cheese in the police and msm reports
Well the people who say it wasn’t Martin because he didn’t have the same type of skin are exaggerating a bit because they say that means it 100 percent wasn’t Martin when Martin could have had that kind of skin at that point so he obviously did it
The facts are all there The shooter had the accuracy of a highly skilled highly trained marksmen. Even navy seal commanders and sargeNts have said there’s no way that Bryant could have pulled the trigger that day the facts are all there. Logic and common sense will always win no matter what you spinners say. Oh yeah when bryant was asked in his police interview how he held the gun he picked it up with the opposite hand unlike the real shooter who witnesses said was right handed I could have it mixed up I haven’t touched on this shit in a while Once again logic and common sense will prevail Stay strapped
1:24 you did literally no research, behind you are the old colonial prisons, the cafe where the massacre happened is on the right as you leave the visitor centre, nice lies to make content tho
IF only America followed Australia's lead & banned guns like us. I realise it wouldn't stop the mass amount of killings in the U.S....but it sure would decrease the amount of deaths. We have never had another mass shooting like Port Arthur's...since our Govt bought in the new gun laws. God Bless the victims & their families. Its one of Australia's darkest days & one where all of us Aussies like myself, will never forget...& remember where they were at the time we first heard the horrible news 😪
If America followed our Nanny State idiocy and also confiscated lawfully purchased property, they’d be joining us on the “Highway to Hell” of totalitarian tyranny. Oh and Australia has been oh so safe since 1996. Ever watched Underbelly? This is to John Howard’s eternal shame, and I admire him for his other achievements. PLUS, the “Nannies” didn’t stop at semi-automatic and pump action firearms. Here in the “People’s Republic of Victoria, they subsequently banned cross bows, swords and knives. You risk arrest even taking a bait knife on your fishing expedition!!!!
Oh come on! He did it! I live in Tassie and you said you want to respect the victims but only pushed conspiracy theories and did not talk about the evidence that MB did it, not balanced or respectful!
Been to Port Arthur about 5 years ago and that you did not even go to the memorial. I would not have been going asking locals as it was a very very sad day in Australian History. All guns have not been banned - do your research. Clickbait.
I did. Do you know how hard it is to qualify under the current licensing laws, Margaret??? You have to be a member of a gun club (with attendance requirements just like a pistol licence), or be a farmer, or have the support of a farmer or other landowner of acreage to qualify. It’s just incorrect to imply gun ownership was anything other than very severely curtailed. It was a one in a lifetime opportunity for the petty totalitarians and they certainly took it.
I was completely unaware that there was even a conspiracy surrounding this mass event. But just from your short video and governments past displays of dishonesty; im not curious to look further into this theory.
Look at the rules. Unless you live in the bush or are prepared to be an active member of a gun club (with mandatory attendance requirements), you can’t have a gun. Practically, for city people, they are banned.
This is a rabbit hole that is so deep. No one is getting anywhere near the bottom of it, until everyone who personally cares about it is long gone. The courts made sure of that, by sealing the information for 70 years.
I live on the Tasman Peninsula, and the half arsed way you approached this sensitive topic is very poor form. Just rolling in to town, unresearched and sticking your camera in workers faces. All of the community was adversely affected by this for years, some still to this day. Don't come back.
Went to Port Arthur and saw the memorial a couple years ago and It was really sad but it's good that this video has been made to remind people how thankful we should be that guns are banned
Firearms are not banned in Australia. They are better regulated than prior to Port Arthur. By the way, Martin Bryant was unlicensed and in contravention of the laws that existed prior to the Port Arthur Massacre. Exactly the same as some bikie that commits a drive by shooting today, with no license and an unregistered firearm.
Guns are not banned mate. Love your stuff and have followed you for a while, but you should correct this. Plenty of law abiding firearms owners in Australia that do the right thing, and don't need further negative stigma or misinformation.
Rubbish. Try being an urban dweller that doesn’t want to be forced to attend Gun Club every second weekend and doesn’t have a convenient cocky for a mate. Also you obviously didn’t own a semi-auto or a pumper back in 1996. It was a disgrace. I respect much of John Howard’s opinions and policies when in office, but this was appalling Nanny State nonsense.
Born Martin John Bryant 7 May 1967 (age 57) Hobart, Tasmania, Australia Known forPerpetrator of the Port Arthur massacreCriminal statusIncarceratedConviction(s)Murder (35 counts) Attempted murder (20 counts) Inflicting grievous bodily harm (3 counts) Inflicting wounds (8 counts) Arson (2 counts)Criminal penalty35 life sentences without parole plus 1,652 yearsDetailsDate28-29 April 1996Location(s)Port Arthur, Tasmania, AustraliaKilled35-37Injured23Imprisoned atRisdon Prison
To all the conspiracy theorists, all I can say is, congratulations. You have made flat-Earthers look intelligent, a feat I would not have thought possible.
The 8 “SEPERATE” statements to police by independent people [tourists + residents of the area] who did not know each other all claiming to have seen men in Full military SWAT gear running around the place that have very quietly been SUPPRESSED from public access and not submitted into evidence .. NOT 1 individual who made a similar statement was contacted back by the police at all ??? The reason for that mate ? All people have the right to plead their innocence, or at least have their say in court … Bryant didn’t even get that scumbag lawyer submitted a guilty verdict without speaking to him, and he was convicted without even being heard. ? Just another coincidences mate can you explain that not being a Smartie I’m asking seriously and sincerely BOTH SCENARIOS HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED BUT NO EXPLANATION STILL
Oh wow I am disgustingly educated about this specific issue. Hi there. I actually created an 11 hour series right here on RU-vid about the conspiracy theories you allude to. I am technically the world leading expert (as I am the only person to analyse the movement in an academic sense - I hope to write my thesis on it at the University of Tasmania.) ru-vid.com/group/PLpLoMfTebZ1CgS5mOXbvwnfG6rdR6tgII&si=1q6pKNd7LOYZUsQw I personally think (as a Tasmanian local) that your investigation is a touch reckless and ignorant. I get that clickbait is a way that you can pay the bills, but you really should have researched this one a bit more.
Then you might care to explain, as the world’s leading expert, why there is no forensic evidence proving Bryant was the shooter. Then there is the matter of the reckless and fatal actions of the four occupants of the BMW at the tollbooth and the contradictory statement attributed to Nicholas Cheok. Then there is the little matter of Senate Question on Notice 760, dated 26 March 2018.
@@stevepunter3704farmers need guns to keep food on everyone's table, guns are scary when someone is committing a crime. Not when farmers are shooting a pig that are eating corn or crops, cops need them for the public's safety. Guns laws are already strict, the only people who actually use guns often are police in training, farmers and enthusiasts who shoot for fun in a controlled environment. Us aussies don't like guns and I feel the same way, but at the same time we need them for lots of reasons
@@thefunstuff6121 Fun Fact: A 2015 Federal Senate inquiry concluded that 99.5% of shootings in Australia were committed by unlicensed shooters in possession of illegal firearms.
@@thefunstuff6121 you’re right that it doesn’t stop imported firearms (or 3d printed ones), but it’s a bunch of extra layers that bolster public safety. I think guns are an important tool, and shit do i think they’re a lot of fun. but i think that having the access locked behind a list of genuine reasons to obtain, firearm categories, safe storage requirements, and background checks is such a good system that keeps gun possession a privilege and keeps them in the hands of the right people (for the most part)
Entertaining conspiracy theories while trying to be “respectful” about what happened is on the fringe of spitting in peoples face of what happened that day. Poor form.
/ Explain how someone with a mental age of 7 can use a semi-automatic rifle with the same skill as a special forces soldier, employing the classic "double tap"? Listen:- ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NzE8rM2WHZ0.html /