If you enjoyed the video, LIKE and SUBSCRIBE❗ Follow me here🔽 🖤TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@ytpasta 💙Twitter: PastaYt_ 💜Twitch: www.twitch.tv/grandmaspasta #nhl #easports #nhl24
I 100% agree with you on that but at least in this one all the players that were made 99 for the most part were at the top of the standings so it wasn't too hard to tell who each team's player was.
@@Pasta-_- He took a leave of absense but I don't think thats worth bringing him to a 70 overall especially since he played a little this season. If Landeskog is still at a normal rating after missing two seasons than so should backstrom.
@@Pasta-_- I am aware but I feel like they shouldn't move the player to a 70 unless they are sure the player isn't coming back like Seabrook or Weber as Backstrom still has a decent chance of returning unless there is something I haven't seen yet. Also I believe they still have Lehner at an 86 overall and he has been out way longer than Backstrom and many people think he is unlikely to come back although I don't know if I necessarily agree with that.
I am pretty sure he has already done a video where he made all the players 99 and the goalies low rated although I may be confusing him with someone else. Regardless I have definitely seen that concept done before so if you want to see it all you have to do is search it up and I'm sure you will find one.
It is based on EA's ratings not on who is actually better. Like Ryan Ellis is not the worst player on the Flyers but he is the lowest rated on the team because he was placed in LTIR.