Joker, white male Penguin, white male Mr Freeze, white male Two-Face, white male Riddler, white male Kite Man, white male Catman, white male Bane, Hispanic (white) male Catwoman, white female Poison Ivy, white female, retroactively lesbianizec Harley Quinn, white female, retroactively lesbianized Hmm, white people, and mostly men. Yes, let's say he beats up on minorities 🙄. He defeats villains, but to the left, villains are heroes
Remember that Poison Ivy at first was a woman that was obsessed with Batman. (yes, she actually was Batman's Black Cat but on a more psychotic level) And now they lesbianized her because if two person of the same sex get along together, it means they surely have the gay.
These people need to stop watching the Harley Quinn show and watch the real Batman that tries to help his enemies even at his own risk Wesker/ scar face 2 face Baby doll Killer croc Mr Freeze Joker especially is Batman's most quintessential example of his empathy towards the insane and shunned Idk who this caricature is who they keep going on about beating up the mentality Ill and "minorities" but we're clearly not talking about the same batman
Sadly it is what they believe. They think Joker just needs a hug, Mr Freeze needs to die, and Croc is just misunderstood and the penguin is a nice businessman with no problems. Just ignore the clown laughing with the bodies around him, the mutant who does enjoy being a brute, or the illegal mafia and brutal abuse of power (both political, and physical if his henchmen get you). These are pretty much the people who would be running Gotham city in the comics and show why the city sucks and why the government in the city doesn't have a freaking death penalty for the psycho murder clown!
@@qwefg3 imagine how orderly Gotham would become in short order if the death penalty was reinstated. You wouldn't have to worry about them constantly escaping Arkham.
@@scottcantdance804 I remember a comment that said "Batman's biggest consistent blunder will never be not killing his villains, it's not taking them to a justice system from outside Gotham".
This right here. They see the situation Mr. Beast is in, and now they can run with the narrative that he's trying to atone for his sins, or something stupid like that.
The worst part is that it is not even him, it is his trans friends. So the left now sees Mr.Beast as an ally of trans gr00mers, he proved his compliance
Originally yes, but even in modern comics Gotham is still mostly white. It was only in the early 2000s that they addressed the race issues of Gotham (a fictional city) had one major concentrated area of black people, The Hill. Thing is, Batman's rouges gallery is 99% white (save for Great White Shark and Killer Crock). They recently brought it back up, with Red Hood... who did not want to get involved or be seen as a white savior. It's all shit this days.
@@vernonhampton5863 all people are teknikually a shade of brown but whatever, people will always side first with their immediate circle anyway i. Most matters if they need help, thats just human nature..
Gotham is supposed to be in New Jersey but take place in like the 1900s or whenever the Goth aesthetic took center stage. It honestly seems like it takes place in Victorian era London more sometimes. Specifically in the Keaton films.
It's like those ppl didn't actually watch Batman animated series. He was a damn HERO in that series. He constantly tried to save the villains from themselves.
Episode 68 had the criminals try to frame Batman as the one who created them because of his extreme vigilantism (basically The Dark Knight's plot) but it turned out that even without him, these freaks would just fall down the criminal path anyway. In short, it was the freaks who created Batman, not the other way around. But don't expect normies to do any kind of research.
@@YarugumaSouI remember that episode. Great episode that had one of my fave puns by Joker. Justice League Unlimited had a great one revolving around the Flash’s villains as well.
i always remember a quote from Plastic man in the Injustice series where he mentions he needed 6 or 7 chances of redemption before he finally took it. all the problems in the world of DC or Marvel could be solved by just killing the villains, it requires a omnipotent author that exists outside of the universe to ensure something bad happens if heroes kill villains. being heroic isn't about killing villains, it's about saving people, innocents or villains.
They know. That's why they hate him. Evil people want to be coddled and enabled, not saved. They detest anything that shows them their own flaws and encourages them to change.
Not to be pedantic with your pedantry, but I'd argue the way his brain processes his radar sense could be called sight. Snakes are described as 'seeing' heat.
@@ComicGladiator his sonar sight just paints a mental image for what the world could be like by displaying everyone and everything that has a certain strong odor/smell/sound as being outlined figures. Aside from that everything is pitch black to him. It's sorta like that one video game Lurking.
@@ComicGladiator Infrared light is still light, so it's still seeing. It just happens that hotter things emit more infrared light than colder things (of course, given that the comparison is made with 2 objects made of the same material)
Hating on Batman for fighting the "mentally ill" is so ironic. Batman is the mentally ill, he is suffering from an extreme case of PTSD after watching his parents murdered in front of him at a young age which has caused delusions of being a vigilante. However, unlike the criminals he fights against, Batman doesnt use his mental illness as justification to commit heinous acts and still tries to make sure that everyday people can live their lives without fear that the Joker is going r*pe their daughter in front of them. Harley Quinn has done things comparable to Dahmer or Gacy, yet we act as if she is a victim and Batman is an abuser. Out of touch people. Thats all there is to say, Also, notice when these modern writers create a scene where the hero stops to analyze the situation and consider societal trends when a person is being mugged, the situation always turns out ok. Like the mugger always happens to be some decent guy who is trying to feed his family after he lost his job because his boss is a jerk and the person he is mugging happens to be some rich b*stard who was rude to him earlier. and nobody gets killed. Never in these modern comics when the hero stops to analyze the situation does the mugger stab and kill the person they are mugging, the mugger is never just some a**hole who wants money to buy drugs and and victim of the mugging is never some single mom coming home late from her second job. Stopping to "analyze" the situation always works out and nobody dies in a way that could have been prevented if the hero simply acted and stopped the mugging in process. While in the real world, when you stop to consider societal issues while a crime is being commited, someone gets hurt and the cops get blamed for not acting. Im sure the Uvalde police chief was thinking about societal issues and just being considerate of the shooter and his mental health instead of stopping him while he was murdering children.
Yes. This is one of the main problems in modern writing. There needs to be bad guys that are just bad. Just like there needs to be good guys who are just good.
I've been violently mugged. These modern writers care more about the bad guys than the victims. They don't care how badly the victim is traumatized as long as they look like good people.
Ah yes, DCAU Batman. The guy who never gave up on Harvey Dent, showed sympathy for Mr. Freeze and saved Nora on his own dime, gave Dick Grayson stability after losing his parents, and kept Terry McGinns off the streets. How dare he.
Let's not forget him staying with a dying psychic girl until she died, even though he was told he needed to kill her in order to stop her from nuking a huge part of the city. And it worked.
@@deadturret4049 Considering the insane level of continuity the DCAU had (that same episode also briefly brought back the main villain from Mark of the Phantasm, who until that point hadn't appeared anywhere for over a decade), I refuse to believe that detail wasn't thoroughly intentional.
@@inendlesspain4724 I mean, Ace was also the name of the Bathound, to be fair, but there's definite logic to the idea that, in this continuity, he was named after her.
These people are literally the liberal characters out of Frank Miller's 'The Dark Knight Returns.' I'd say you can't make this up, but Frank Miller already did.
Well. Those characters were also not that wrong. You can't have people like Batman going around, beating up other people (even though they are criminals), because he also commits a crime by doing it (allegedly at least). To arrest criminals is the police's job. Then on the other hand the police in Gotham is deeply corrupt and powerless against all those criminals and super criminals walking the streets. So Batman is needed. Also those liberal figues iirc were part of the system and surely on the payroll of some mafia boss.
In the DKR animated movie when the liberal who was virtue signaling for the mutants was asked if he would live in Gotham "Oh I would never live in the city"
I am becoming less surprised when people see examples of clear goodness as evil. It comes from numbness, envy, and nihilism. I really do want people to be healed of those things-no human thrives when in their thrall.
Ironically you think a lot like Batman does, because a huge part of the reason he doesn't kill is that he believes everyone, even villains as twisted as the Joker, have the potential to get better.
@@inendlesspain4724 That is such a kind thing to say ❤️ I really believe anyone can change, although I have to pray about and meditate on it at times to keep believing it.
Last time I recall Batman didn’t harbor known predators like Kris Also, funny how now they’re standing by Mr. Beast when originally they were shitting on him for doing this…
They where never really anti mr beast. You just had some fringe groups that complained, but the majority of the left wing establishment supported him. Unlike how they all hated Pewdiepie.
I recently started playing the Arkham games (already beat Arkham Asylum and found all Riddler's trophies, currently playing Arkham City), and something I noticed about the in-game bios for the characters is that, there's an awful lot of characters with blue eyes. Seriously, I think the only prominent villain who can be considered a "minority" would be Bane, and as for the regular street thugs, exactly half of them are white and half are black (there's potential for a 13/50 joke there).
Evil Superman has become too repetitive, even for the smooth-brained. Now it's the age of Evil Batman to flood EVERY piece of current entertainment. Gatekeeping works. Note: I had a brainfart and didn't clarify that we will see this everywhere and far more frequent than before. Just like with Homelander, Brightburn, and Omniman, there will be far too much. Or the tech-bro villain/antagonist to try to riff Elon Musk for buying X or Zuckerberg for being Zuckerberg.
@@deadturret4049 Just 3? In comics there is such an absurdly huge amount of them that one of them literally started recruiting them to form a whole inter-dimentional league of evil Batmen. Everyone knows The Batman Who Laughs, but do you know the Batman who sacrificed Damian Wayne to an aboriginal dark god in order to turn himself into Gotham City itself?
I agree Vee. People picking on Batman is really annoying. It says a lot about the left that they view the guy that goes around helping people he doesn't know to be the REAL villain and the criminals to be the REAL victims.
And of all versions they picked Batman TAS to do it, the most charitable and caring version of batman who went around opening homeless shelters, charaties, housing and work programs for ex-cons who served their time, etc. Hell, as Bruce Wayne he did so much to try and help the villains get better that in the episode where the doctor tries to sell the information of his secret identity all the villains outright refuse to believe it because of how much he's tried to help them and instead think the doctor is scamming them.
@@rwberger6 And in the comics we literally read his thoughts so we know for a fact that his motivations are literally nothing like what people Eric Kripke think they are. His motivation in most versions of the character is simply "I want to prevent other people from having to go through what I went through". Now you can argue about the morality of vigilantism or about his infamous "no killing" rule but Batman is no way some sort of sadist.
I am not that happy with all the "right wingers" who complain about Batman too, because he does not kill. If the people of Gotham wanted Joker dead, they could just vote to get back the death penalty. But instead, they blame Batman, who gave them Joker on a silver platter.
I forget which film, but there's a movie where Joker makes an appearance on a talk show, and fills the room with gas that kills everyone there aside from Joker himself. I never saw the full film, but I thought there was no way anyone would ever knowingly agree to attend a show with Joker as a guest. These memes and modern takes have made me think otherwise...
That’s Batman: The Dark Knight Returns. Joker even tells everyone what he’s going to do to them, but his therapist gaslights them into thinking he’s harmless and reformed now.
The segment where the liberal doctor brings on Joker to a talk show and the doctor gets ended by a mug Joker broke after asking the host "Do we get to keep these?"
The truest sense of Batman is when he genuinely helps his enemies. Buying Harley a dress, staying with Ace until she dies, or helping Frieze reunite with his wife is when Batman's story and character is at his best.
that is the point this meme is making ...that's how meta-irony works anyone who would agree to this description of batman unironically, is insane its no wonder the same people who look & act like the penguin, also hate the batman & desire a gotham like city of crime pervasiveness
If i recall theres a scene in one of the Justice league comics where batman plays with a child while wonder woman and aquaman get info from the parents. Then theres his handling of ace and her passing. Batman is the epitome of selfless and kind. No wonder they hate him
An observation from people who don't read Batman. It takes so little research to find Bruce Wayne has multiple charities and spends a lot for the betterment of humanity.
I wish Bruce Wayne existed in the real world, my third-world country could use the job opportunities he could provide if he opened up Wayne Enterprise factories over here, which is something he also does, and is much better for the economy of a country than just giving away money, despite what leftists might think.
that’s the thing they take a surface level meme like Batman abusing the poor and ill and then start preaching it like it’s gospel when people have been saying this stuff for years about the character of Batman as a JOKE. anybody who actually cares or knows about the character of Batman knows there is much more to him then just abusing criminals. especially the animated series version of Batman, who is probably my absolute favorite version of the character.
@@inendlesspain4724 Someone like Bruce probably does exist. But thing in the real world is, it's impossible to be perfect, even less possible to be depicted as such by everyone else.
Hold up, hold up, hold up Batman just indiscriminantly terrorized people and beat them up? I remember Batman saving innocent civilians from deranged lunatics hellbent on murdering people and destroying society, and DELIBERATLY never killing anyone, because killing is wrong. There was a whole thing that contrasted Batman against Nightwing and Red Hood. Nightwing was very much against the violence Batman committed, but ultimatly relied on the teachings and philosophy of Batman. Red Hood felt Batman wasnt violent and radical enough, but ultimatly relied on the teachings and philosophy of Batman. Neither character ever replaced Batman, because they were the polar 'Wings' of his teachings. Batman was the true Centrist opinion. You have to handle situations differently, you cant speak to and reason with Darksied, but you also dont just beat up scared little girls close to death.
After watching the hacks at Marvel destroy, reinvent, break, break again, and attempt to bury the Punisher; Some things are better left unsaid. 🎩 🐍 no step on snek!🇺🇸🇭🇰
Makes me wonder how well all this anti-Batman propaganda works for people who aren't terminally online, because even normies know now that the MCU went to sh1t because of subversion and deconstruction saturation, which is what they're trying to do to Batman now.
@@danin900 Ennis is a woketard now sadly and if he's given back his rights to a Punisher like how he wants Marvel to do, it's likely that's what going to happen. It's a shame because he wrote the best Punisher in the past. But anyway yeah Frank is the most based White Man of all time.
They used to. That is what I find really strange. Before 2012, they could make good meme's, but they have lost it. And now, the same change seem to affect every left wing story writer. Even the ones who used to write good stories have lost it. They really seem like the NPC's that got a new software without humor or reality check.
I saw a clip of that episode of the powerpuff girls with femfatal. It had a strong message that her brand of feminism was obscene, evil, and hypocritical
I honest to the Lord want to know, did these people never watch TV as children? Like Avatar:TLA is something that will passed from generation to generation. Courage the cowardly dog had many, many episodes about outward appearances, to ulterior motives, to overcoming being fooled.
@@PhyllisLane-xj5uf Sadly a lot of zoomers grew up with the internet rather than watching television due to television being almost completely irrelevant these days (doesn't help that millenials are awful at parenting and would rather hand a tablet over to their 3yo and forget about doing any actual parenting). Growing up mostly on the itnernet is already bad enough for any growing kid's mental health, but then the pandemic made things even worse. It's ironic, my mom hated most shows I watched as a kid (2000s cartoons were pretty heavy on gross-out humor) and said I grew up during the worst era for kids shows, yet the stuff I watched as a kid was thousands of times better than what zoomers and gen alpha kids are growing up with now (and besides, the gross stuff was the least trancendental to me while growing up and the stuff I least want to go back to).
There was an episode where Batman fought with an adult who took advantage of children (the Sewer King episode). It was the only one where Batman wanted to punish a villain with his own bare hands instead of the police.
@@The_Last_Data_HoundThat was a really good episode, I remember Alfred was tasked to look after one of the kids, and shenanigans ensued. Some comic relief in an otherwise dark episode covering child abuse and exploitation.
Diversity Hire: "Okay, in my story, Daredevil sees a guy robbing a store, and- Human being: "He what?" Diversity Hire: "He sees someone robbing a store." Human being: "He SEES?" Diversity Hire: "Yeah. Why are you looking at me like that?"
Bleeding charity into 3rd world countries is like trying to fill a bucket full of holes - no matter HOW much water you put into them, in the end, it will always just drain away...
the very same charities then take the money and hire militias to invade the very towns they were claiming to assist. real charities are not billionaire-backed. they occur sporadically and unpredictably except during mass casualty events. i have yet to see an actual legit charity organization that actually helps ANYONE. it's always some form of money laundering, *NO EXCEPTION*
Yep. Thing is those countries have learned to rely on charity being turned away from its purpose to fill the pockets of the higher ups. And the condition for charity to keep coming is for things to never improve... So what cant be pocketed like infrastructure is often sabotaged instead. These countries will remain poor as long as the same people remain in charge and no effort is given to actually improve things, which they have no incentive to do right now
@@AncestorEmpire1 The evil security guard in arkham that abused the inmates. Inmates whom I unfortunately have no sympathy for..... Except the ventriloquist.
In a world where villains like The Joker exist... yes, a Batman is superior to a Mr Beast. Lord, it's like when they complain about The Inquisition in 40k and the fact that they have access to Exterminatus, while completely glossing over the fact that in that universe there are actual, literal Space Demons that will do far worse than kill you.
The problem I have with the well thing is that it's like fixing the engine on a sinking boat... it doesn't help the boat, still sinking... wells won't really help Africa... so it's really just a publicity stunt.
What will help is to just, stop helping them. After had the means to build up after the end of the European Empires, much like how Central and South America had and did take that option after resisting the Spanish. But refused to actually do the correct thing. They succumbed to the Enslaved'd paradox. Believing the things that made their masters wealthy enough to Enslave them was simply evil to them. And they went with Communism. Then the West only made things worse with this obsession with making the world a better place. And what little Economic development they began to have was smothered in the crib by the west's endless charity. In Short. Africa is shit because Communism is shit. And the solution to communism is to stop feeding communism.
The well is "water availability" one can use to drink, grow crops and entrepeneur in general. I don't understand why people treat mr.beast's wells as being a "providing fish instead of teaching how to fish" kind of thing.
If you had to walk for an hour+ each way on a dusty road to fetch a bucket of putrid water... one would hope you'd find out why the trees in your "waterless" village are so lush. Surely the thought of seeking a more convenient water source is a thought that occurs to these people during their walks.
@@serphence8566 There was a documentary where I lived about a village in Africa. The women were the one going to take the water, but here's the thing, that walk was the only moment of the day where they could be alone talking with each other and not just being subservient 24/7. Once the well was built, that moment was not possible anymore. Let's just say it's morally more complicated than just "hey we gave them water yay".
Gotham would be destroyed multiple times over without Batman. Batman existing allowed Jim Gordon the muscle to clean up the Gotham police department. Organized crime had it's back broken by Batman. He's a magnet for costumed crazies, but they are, ironically, better for the city then the organized crime that existed before Batman. Joker killing 10 people every 6 months is better then the Mafia killing 30 people every month. This is not even taking into account all the good Bruce Wayne does for the city. He very much does fund various programs to help the city. Trying to get people jobs, affordable housing and education.
@@randomduck8679 He was not responsible for them existing at all, but the specific form they took as supervillains was a result of them emulating him. The thing is that them existing as theatrical villains is better for Gotham then them existing as more mundane evil doers.
@@planguy9575 Even the DA who was defending Batman against her will (she was a huge Batman hater herself before that episode) acknowledged that at most their gimmicks would've been different but they all would've ended up as crooks and criminals anyway even without Batman being around.
Lets not forget how the Joker was treated. Then a mentally ill was bullied left without job and medication and ended up killing a show host and yuppie in a metro. Those people condemned that movie. Funny how those people go. One day you're glorified another day shunned and cancelled.
And why would those in the other side of repressive tolerance - the mentally ill who are allowed to harm others and the poor who are allowed to steal - ever improve? If you disadvantage can be used to your benefit, its not a disadvantage. Those who don't apply their morals unanimously are only enabling.
But Bruce Wayne is a Philanthropist. There's literally two foundations - The Thomas Wayne Foundation which funds free clinics and medicine, and The Martha Wayne Foundation - which funds free schools and orphanages. This doesn't even include all the other unrelated causes Bruce donates his money towards. Edit: Wayne Enterprises even offers its employees a collage scholarship program.
because as Bruce Wayne all he does is build factories and industry to bring jobs to Gotham. Also donating to charities to improve the communities. I mean Wayne Enterprises employees most of Gotham. So how is that different from Mr. Beast building wells in africa?
Wait...the meme is supposed to make fun of batman? Then why did they put a great montage of batman the animated series? Also with the things that are being revealed about mr.Beast now I don't really trust what he built for "solidarity". Either way both ways to help are good
@@lxNOLUCA but look at the quote "terrorize the mentally ill and minorities" batman doesn't do that. But I guess this could be "post ironic" stupid meme
@@lxNOLUCA If it's a joke, it's making fun of the "Batman is a psychopath who does more harm than good for his own ego" narrative that leftists have been pushing for years and is still pretty prominent to this day. The fact that it's so prominent that there are already parodies of it (despite the arguments it's based on having been debunked or parodied by official Batman media decades ago) is really sad when you think about it.
@@lxNOLUCA I'd say you missed it instead. The caption clearly wants to paint mr Beast as the morally correct one and Batman as the irrational one. The soyjack/chad montage role-reversal is an ironic punchline.
or you've read a single shred of history / know the basics of economics and criminal psychology enough to make a pretty decent educated guess that maybe (this ideology) is a bad idea to exist and you're already 'right wing' before it was cool...
People who make the argument that Batman is just some crazy rich guy who blows millions so he can run around in a bat suit and beat up the disenfranchised seem to forget a few things: 1) Drug pushers, mafiosos, murderers, serial arsonists and bloodthirsty mercs are not poor little babies that don't deserve to get their faces stomped. Batman beats the devil out of human scum. You're not beating the "Identifies with evil" allegations if you think otherwise. 2) He's multi-billionaire Bruce Wayne, whose company not only invests heavily into technology that makes peoples' lives easier the whole world over, but is also a major employer in Gotham, doing as much as it can to lift as many out of poverty as it can. Alongside, and through, the Thomas and Martha Wayne foundation, Bruce has spent metric craptons of money to improve Gotham and provide various programs for the poor and mentally ill. On top of that, he also has a seat of the board of directors at Arkham, and strives to ensure that the place can finally stop being, essentially, a makeshift prison, and provide good treatment for those who go there for help. 3) A ton of Batman's villains are not the result of poverty. They are, in fact, _ideological_ villains, and money wouldn't make them go away. The Joker, Riddler, Two-face, Ra'as, Mr. Bloom, Dr. Fries, Scarecrow, and the whole goddamn Court of Owls would still be around even if Bruce decided to just invest in more social programs and free gibs. A bunch more are either career criminals, like Catwoman, crime bosses like Penguin and Black Mask, or mercenaries, like Bane and Deadshot. 4) You're talking to someone who actually has an understanding of Batman as a character that runs deeper than the tired, surface-level, postmodern deconstruction you subscribe to.
Agree, how many tons, of water, food, medicine, have been send to africa and it doesnt progress, watch empire of dust and you see how it ends, also those wells, acording to mr beast, is that those well will endure more than 30 years, but knowing that area they wont last
@@Krysnha The help itself is detrimental, and it's detrimental on purpose. They know they become dependent on the donations, which makes it all the easier to collect rare earth for their iPhones.
@@ClockworkGearhead Bingo, totaly agree, i mean there are many african companies, that try and at the end people want to be dependant, they want foregein aid, even when at last make the area stagnate and worst it only make the area more unstable, but doesnt mather, and yes agree, and why, because the powers to be want to extract there, wich is cheaper than extract the rare minerals in theyre lands wich is more expensive, i mean come on rare minerals in the moon are so coomon if we mine the moon we will never have low quantity, but noooo lets continue do it in places that people are near slave
The really funny thing is that if you actually read Batman comics or watch any of the Batman shows from over the years… Batman does BOTH of these things with his money.(use his vast wealth to help people and fight crime) Whenever Wayne Industries gets brought up it’s usually in reference to Bruce attending or hosting another fundraiser for a charitable cause.
@@xdomeman right, showing Gordon his daughter in a helpless and humiliated position. Almost like it’s a metaphor or something; like a comic book version of something a real life sadist would do.
@@Shade7x except the writers outright said that wasn't the point, you're looking at it that way because Barbra is a woman. And we all know that Joker is a sadist. Let's not forget what he did to Jason Todd.
it might be controversial, but i also hate that people admire the joker so much to the point of saying the joker is justified to be an agent of chaos, which is pure bs.
Steve Ditko nearly called it long before. People believe in Black and White, but they want to be the one in the White, so first they'll create that "grey" area where nothing is really good or bad, and after a while, they can bring that reversed Black and White where they are the good guys akshually.
I first noticed this with the rise of "Breaking Bad." I found the public's reaction to a show with no moral characters disturbing. I would have just shrugged it off, but then _every_ show started imitating it, and it wasn't long before there were no moral characters left for people to aspire to. And then it got even worse, as that cynicism and moral ambiguity started pushing its way into children's media. You have to teach children about moral black and whites before you teach them about moral grays because their brains aren't developed enough yet to handle nuances. It's just like how Common Core tries to teach children to speed read instead of how to sound words out. The result is that they can recognize the specific words they've been exposed to, but they're helpless anytime they encounter a new word. They can't actually read. You can't skip kids to the end result because they won't be able to understand or properly apply it.
2:15 I think that this detail is the hill we needed to fight on. When they say: "[Media] has always been full of politics!" We should respond with: "Yes, correct politics with good moral values. Not the shit you spew." When they say: "Feelings and lived experiences matter more than facts!" We should respond with: "Yes, and I feel that I no longer wish to experience you or anything you say or do in my life."
MrBeast exploits the young and vulnerable to aid the young and vulnerable. It's a frickin' circle while his and his buddies' wealth increases. If anyone still consider Mr. Beast to be a white knight, there is nothing left to say.
I would say hazbin promotes redemption, perseverance and personal growth, strive to fix your mistakes, keep at it if you fail and growth no matter how small is to be valued
Batman never kills, he always sends them to the asylum to get treated. He protects the weak. There are even some criminals he has sympathy towards (i.e. Baby Doll) and his kindness is enough to make them cry. He has a lot of heart beneath the frightening appearance.
My initial guess is twatter hates batman because he's a super hero who's normal identity is a rich and successful huwite male. (He lost his parents early in life to a murderer, but that's not important right, twatter?) They probably hate Iron Man for the same reasons.
They attack all that is good. There’s a reason they attack Batman. They wish to undermine all your heroes. All your legends. All your aspirations. Don’t let them.
I understand their point...but it's flawed. First, Bruce makes donations to different ONGs. Second...they are not just "mentality ill minorities" (what he knows exist) but Mafia, corruption and very dangerous criminals...i mean, a drug victim is not the same to freaking Bane or The Court of Owls. Plus he stops ppl who are ACTUALLY hurting innocent ppl. And just in one city. And third...Bruce Wayne is insane, he losed his parents in front of him as a child BY crime itself...and never surpassed it. But instead of becoming an evil being, he uses that mental trauma to help protecting ppl in that INSANE world he lives on. MrBeast? I don't know if he does it because he really wants to help people or just because he wants to be President...but unless he is fighting warlords...he is not in the same situation as Batman. But at least he is helping innocents in the weird world we live. So yes, that "critique" is flawed.
My guess it is because batman went outside the state. Instead of paying taxes and letting bureaucracy screw it up. It was the ideal that every man should strive to help their local
Moral gray areas used to be used to present hard choices and have moral characters struggle with finding the best option. Now, they're used as excuses for immoral characters to indulge in hateful impulses.
Reminder that Batman tries to SAVE the villains from themselves before they went over the edge because he believed they coukd be saved but most of the villains ended up being pushed in some form or chose to continue down a life if crime. Yet, he still tries to save them.
I genuinely hate them both. 1. The guy on top uses other people's money to pose as "generous" while taking a hefty cut. 2. The guy on the bottom is a sick in the head vigilante that, at least in the comics and cartoons, was carefully not to kill people, just to immobilize them and let the cops arrest them and such, but in the movie he become a true sicko. In my opinion both characters (not the real people behind) have mental issues. They suffer from narcissism and the hero complex, and exemplify how the American society can be "fascinated" by the likes of Bonnie and so on. Not my coup of tea. The thing is that one of them is a comic character, so it's normal to be exaggerated, break the rules and so on, so criticizing it is kind of pointless, because that's what fictional characters are, over the top and exaggerated. Over all the characters are weak, the plot are idiotic, the audience is brain dead and the meme is pointless and stupid.
"Doctor, I am so sad. The world is fucked and I feel like I'm gonna lose it!" "You should go see this 'Joker' movie. It's about a man with a mental condition that dyes his hair green and riots through the city." "You don't understand, doctor... I AM THE 'JOKER'!!"
Batman also helps the ill. People dont see that today because Its so easy to say bruce uses his money to become batman but what they dont understand is most of his investments goes towards charaties and his foundation to help gotham. Anyone whos read comics or watch the animated series would know this
I remember Joker feeding a child into giant flour grinding stones in this one book I got from an elementary school book fair Child was white, so ok, I guess in the eyes of the modern reader
I think it's like a midwit curve with heroes and villains. The naive take is that the hero is good. Then you progress to considering that maybe the villains' motivations make sense. Then the enlightened take is the same as the naive take: of course the hero is good.
I once pointed what you said out to my older sister this when I was 10 and she was 17. About when she ask me why I did not like Hanna Montana. I noticed that all male characters where write an as idiots. I could see that Disney would become what it was today when I was 10. My sister could not and she was 7 years older. She still shills for Disney to this day.
I don't really get into Marvel or DC comics superhero's but out of all of them including Spiderman, Superman, Batman was the most memorable and badass, but in the 1950's Batman and Robin were gay asF
Batman as Bruce Wayne uses his money to help the poor people of Gotham and Batman's rogue gallery are not mentally ill. The Penguin is a mafia boss, Poison Ivy is an eco terrorist, the Joker was never mentally ill he is fully conciouss of what he does, Killer Croc chose to be the monster everyone thought he was, the list goes on.
thank god i never grew up needing media to teach me morals. having a GMRC class in grade school might have contributed to my morals, but man it just feels like common sense that you'd learn organically.
According to their logic we shouln't stop grapists and women beaters, because we don't know the socioeconomic factors that drove those future doctors and engineers to make those choices! 😊
