I think Movies Get this Wrong About Time-Travel

Подписаться 736

50% 1

(Maybe). A theory about time. We always see time-travellers in movies and TV being careful not to change things, lest they impact the future. But is this the case? Do we actually have the power to change anything? Or is our story already written?

Кино

Опубликовано:

17 апр 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 11

@echopho Месяц назад

Art is art indeed

@eprohoda Месяц назад

Thisischristor, Super~ fantastic uploading~ sleep well.

@PostAGIPhilosophy Месяц назад

beautifully made

@beltranaceves767 Месяц назад

Really hoped you'd bring Laplace's demon at the end 😁. Exceptional quality, as always. Maybe next time, one inspired by atom uncertainty?

@thisischristor Месяц назад

I have no idea what that is but it sounds AWESOME. Thank you :)

@Erickhetfield Месяц назад

Great video.

@Erickhetfield Месяц назад

Even though it's mathematically possible, traveling to the past is extremely unlikely. Mostly due to the possibility of violating causality. But if eventually this type of travel become possible, it would still be deterministic. There no way around it.

@TaylorTheOtter Месяц назад

It's both surprising and completely on brand to make a video about causal determinism 😂.

@thisischristor Месяц назад

Well they say good stories should be surprising yet inevitable, so I guess I'm going in the right direction haha

@ChArLie360115 Месяц назад

The theory of quantum uncertainty doesnt support this hypothisis. However, I guess thats just a theory. Maybe one day we will understand the chaos of quantum physics However, if we dont the unpredictability of the quantum world is a good indicator of free will and a non pre-determined timeline

@Erickhetfield Месяц назад

Quantum physics is not random, it's probabilistic. Meaning that the outcome might not be determined, but it's also not a realm of infinite possibilities. There are a set of possible results, some more likely than others. And this interpretation is not a consensus, since Shröedinger's equation, for instance, are deterministic. Only the result of the measurements appear "random" due to interference. But even if it was random, it wouldn't change a thing. Because random is not determined by anything. Definitely not by will. The universe would still be 99% deterministic and 1% random. No combination of the 2 would result in a world where a miniscule human being would be able to shape the future with his ego making a "choice".