I Took Hedge Fund with Fortune (8 on Stage 3 with 100g) | Rank 1 TFT Set 11 

bruh dishsoap doesn't care about your metaTFT calculator. he's been ranked 1 most of the time he knows what he's doing

@@peytonsmith1062 1: if you actually watched the video you’d know that Dishsoap wasn’t sure if the play was even correct and says that in the video directly. I was trying to help and give info to anyone watching. 2: the 10 people who liked my comment (and any number of others who see it) aren’t rank 1 and might take useful information from it. 3: I have nothing to do with meta TFT and it’s not “my calculator”

​@@peytonsmith1062could've gone to bed without having to read that one 💀 but you chose not to...

do you get more stacks the later into the game it is? i dont really understand fortune too well

@@veswacitocorrect, you get more stacks later into the rounds. Eg. losing at stage 3-1 will give u more stacks than 2-5

He said it was for breakpoint, so probably so he can cash out exactly at stage 3 neutrals and hit the breakpoint at the same time

He was considering that he might win one of the matches, so it made more sense to sit and keep the fortune luck accumulated, instead of risk winning and losing it.

He rolled a 6 early, and he plans to lose those 6 rounds and then cashout. If he loses 2-5, 2-6 (which is moved to 2-7 cuz encounter), then 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 3-5, he'd gain 27 fortune stacks (according to metaTFT fortune calculator). But stage 3 fortune stacks _faster_ than stage 2. So if he instead loses 2-5, then takes out fortune for 2-7, then loses 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 3-5, and 3-6, he will get MORE fortune stacks (31 in this case) despite the same number of losses, since 1 more loss on stage 3 vs stage 2 means more stacks. The 30-stacks breakpoint is important, so he wants to get to that point. Dish says "I didn't see the option to take [fortune] out" for the calculator, but in my second calculator input I just assumed he started fortune at 2-6 (2-7 in this game) rather than 2-5 and skip 2-6, since stage 2 stacks work the same throughout stage 2.

@@sagittariusa2145great explanation thank you so much 👊

​@@sagittariusa2145brilliant

Later stages gives more points for a loss so removing fortune aloud him to reach next break point for cash out.

@@viliusvaisvila4510but fortune just adds score to the cash out each round you lose right? Why would it be better to take fortune out? Wouldn’t you just get whatever you would have gotten for the loss at 2-6 plus whatever you get in the later stages?

Oh another comment explained it properly. Dish soap rolled a 6 on fortune and wanted to hit his fortune cashout at neutrals, so he needed to lose 6 fights with fortune, but he had 7 fights until neutrals so he had to remove fortune for one of the fights. stage 2 losses give less fortune score than stage 3, so removing it at 2-6 is better than removing it later. If he hadn’t removed it at all the cash out would have happened at 3-6 before neutrals, so the rolldown would have been harder

It had nothing to do with the rolldown. He removed Fortune on Stage 2 to get the last five losses on Stage 3, which guaranteed him 30 Luck. If he hadn't skipped the loss on Stage 2, he would have missed 30 Luck and gotten a worse cashout. Keep in mind, the rewards below the 30-39 breakpoint are generally not worth sacrificing so much HP. Additionally, the 30-39 range is where a Tome of Traits becomes a possible reward, so you'll notice a lot of players will aim for that number if they're going for a quick cashout.

@@jabooodee ohhh right thank you for explaining, so he wanted all 6 of his losses to be at stage 3 to maximise cash out for those rounds, and it was just an added bonus that he had more time for rolldown