"I want to run some checks on you!" He practically admitted he was going to find out any warrants for you, any criminal records, any unpaid fines and then if he had the ID, fit you up for being a potential terrorist, when they are the terrorists.
Loved his videos at first and subscribed, even though the name of the channel was worrying. Then on some video he said something that confirmed my worst nightmare. He was a fan of genocidal and murderous communist/socialist regime. With great sadness I had to unsuscribe
You are truly a talented and exceptional individual. Not everyone is as brilliant as yourself so we need the help and advice of the police to keep ourselves safe and secure ;-) Will they ever learn..... It would have been funny if PPTP started giving him equally useless directives like "You should wear sunscreen on your bald head, have you not heard of skin cancer ?"
There seems to be a much higher concern for public safety outside of police stations. Those bright coloured vehicles with lights and sirens can really creep up on you
If I were her sargeplod I would be very unhappy that she engaged a member of the public and then effectively ran away and hid once she realised she had dropped a bollock.
I think everyone should give a big thanks to this officer for letting us all know about this thing called "cars", apparently if you stand in front of these "cars" when they're moving, they can move all the way to where you are, and sort of 'hit' you, this can cause injuries. I'm surprised this sort of information is not more widely known, I've certainly never heard about it. I wonder if he'd be willing to share his insights on 'eating', I've been pushing the food into my face, but hardly any of it goes in the food hole, do I need to open it or something ?
The UK police feel so comfortable walking all over our human rights it's an absolute travisty and I respect you so much for standing up and also educating us plebs 😂, how else do you think we can inform the public of our rights and what the police can and can't do
@@nathansmith7153 Holding police personnel accountable to THE LAW is interfering now. What if your information wasn't safeguarded by those entrusted to handle it?
PC Big Nelly needs to quit flapping at the public like a flustered bird as that was very nearly an assault .Nathian missed his calling in life , he should of been a lollipop lady . Big up PTTP . respect .
This guy is wasting your tax dollars and does nothing to improve the police. Who would want a job having to deal with these dishonest interfering frauditors as well as criminals, though there isn't much difference.
Or maybe ask them if they are accusing your mother of not bringing you up properly and teaching you road sense. When they say no, say you can understand my concerns.
Seeing as we're giving obvious advice I'd just like to remind you that breathing in comes after breathing out and to try not to murder anyone while on or off duty thanks.
Liked the way you asked then how giving your ID would tell them why you're there. Too many auditors miss that obvious question. The other one I'd like to be asked when they say they want to see if you're known to the police is why would that matter? Would their treatment towards you differ if you were? Would they feel they could talk to you however they felt if they found you were a "criminal"? There's some interesting dynamics at play during these interactions, which is why I love watching them.
My thoughts exactly. This line of questioning makes no sense, along with ‘we don’t know who you are, you could be anybody’. Does showing your ID mean you’re no longer anybody, but somebody?
Q: "Why are you filming police cars / personal vehicles?" A: "For the same reason you do, to check they are taxed and MOT'd." An auditor found one the other day, in fact, of a policeman's motorbike that wasn't MOT'd.
Yes another one of my favs. The foxtrott oscar apecialiat. I did kind of keep aaking him to drop a few foxtrott oscar yankie charlies in and he did. The recipient was gobsmacked🤣🤣🤣💪💪
@@nicotoscani1707 Haha, more like blatent disregard for the law. He was an arrogant Charlie too, and probably thought if he ever gets pulled over for it he'd just flash his gang ID and no further action. The sad thruth is he's right about that.
he was going to go with the dont go places, then he minded he was just informed of that by the person he was about to order, then his brain failed and he then informed the person who just told him to watch the car, to watch the cars
In this day and age PC Bignall doesn’t know that video recording from publicly accessible areas is perfectly legal. Her lack of awareness of the public she serves is extraordinarily embarrassing for a PC working at HQ!
I’m very careful about not getting run over. About seventy years ago when I was going to school my mum used to say to me “are you wearing clean underwear in case you get run over by a bus”. So I was especially careful not to get run over 😀. I presume PTTP is just as careful, getting run over causes no end of trouble and inconvenience, especially for our overworked ambulance/paramedics and hospital staff.
Why does that constable, with his head on upside down, think he has the right to ID somebody in a public place carrying out a legal activity? #EssexPolice more training needed!
He has the same ingrained ego and tyrannical beliefs that all police have that when they put on the blue they have the right to have there questions answered.
Isn’t it funny how they are concerned about getting private number plates on camera, yet they have a big blue sign openly advertising “ Essex Police orchard car park” with employee cars in it , for everyone to see. 🤯😱
Yes it does qualify as a stop and account, the beauty is, you're not obliged to do either, ----stop or account. You choose not to go ,and to stick around,----- just blank them.
it is "stop account" but just 😁 and walk on if they put hand on arm or similar to ask question , then you may ,swipe ,kick or scratch to prevent , further incident ,it will not be obstructing an "officer in his duty "case Wood v DPP also Collins v Wilcock (common law)
If they could do it in the voice of James Earl Jones, or Darth Vader, I for one,would be impressed. Ssssh wheeze, Don't cross the road Luke-- there's a car coming, sssssh wheeze.
Unfortunately, Robin probably then said '' thats got rid of the fker.''. I did notice a portion of fakeness from him ! Remember, bacon is salty and that one merely had the wisdom to smile and release the salt diplomatically
And yet should you or your family encounter any criminality in your life you dont phone pttp or any other auditors..........you phone the entitled people ........funny that .
@@meichong8278 infact according to essex police, kicking on someone's door threatening to smash their heads in with an iron bar isn't a crime (we'll if you are ex special police constable) masturbating in a public place whilst watching children isn't a crime. Creating a false fb page and using that to threaten someone's life isn't a crime. Perverting the course of justice isn't a crime. Making a false statement to police isn't a crime. Punching someone in the stomach isn't a crime. Drinking energy drink is a crime. Dropping your own towel in a publicbplace is a crime. Visiting your mp to complain about lord Hannigfield stealing tax payers money is a crime. Filming a police officer or building is a crime.
Often all a user has to do is reposition their pc and then they can have windows open as much as they want. Management and Occupational Therapy should have advised on this. Further I suspect the reason they don't want reverse parking is because the windows are open more than they are closed, which allows fumes in. This suggests there is the potential for data breaches all year round. Just report the potential breach of data protection to the ICO. Let them investigate. I would also report the potentially flammable materials being stored next to the smoking area to the HSE. On this and the data issue, the police are not above the law.
@@nathansmith7153 I think you're misunderstood, they don't have to change everything because an auditor said so, they have to because it's the law. I don't understand why someone wouldn't care that all their details are on show to any member of the public that walks past the window.
@@nathansmith7153 when it is your personal data that is inadvertently shared with a fraudster, you might appreciate GDPR. Whether or not you agree with the tactics employed by auditors is your call. However in this instance multiple potentially serious breaches of the law were identified.
@@jsteadman9262 They are not "any members of the public" they deliberately sneak up with their cameras running. So, according to you, the police and any company must board up their windows and put fences and roofs over everything because of these interfering rude frauditors? Wow - you must be an advocate for anti social intruders.
Who's responsibility is it when there's vehicles and pedestrians using the same space, the driver of the heavy non forgiving vehicle or the squishy meaty soft pedestrian. answers on a postcard to police officers talking bollox.999 lets-be avenue UK. It would be a good idea (going on his logic) members of the public being able to get police officers details so we can do background checks on police officers as they interact with us after all how many corrupt and criminal police officers are there out there
It's more likely that it is to try and establish or reinforce a power dynamic they belive exists where by the officer is the superior and you the inferior.
Beautiful buildings and scenery, " WE THE PEOPLE " spare no expense for our public servants in order for them to enforce the 5h17 out of us, 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
I normally love when you get them to recite their identification, but I liked the fact you read out the guy in the blue's ID. Well... you did just establish that you could read the sign and have 306deg of awareness. 👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿
Standard responses should be: "You cant" "By going away" Or my favourite of saying nothing back. Watched a video of a silent audit. It was great watching the cops tie themselves up trying to get a response. I also thought it would be great if they try to go hands on to pull out a card that says "I'm mute", just to see their face of discrimination shame.
Am I missing something? What 'checks' need to be done on someone with a camera? Make sure he doesn't have a history of 'aggravated photography'?! Now there's a terroristic tactic keeping us all awake at night 😅😅😅😂😂😂
Once again, hilarious that they are concerned about a man with a camera and yet the police station is overlooked by residential properties where ANYONE could be surveilling them 24x7. duh!
And that would be the Charlie Veitch that changed his evidence Ian Tomlinson till it fitted the required narrative hhmmm cult of personality is alive and kicking
It makes you wonder how we got this far in life not getting run over by vehicles, when we don't have police officers warning us about traffic around every corner ;-)
PC Bignall apparently has something to hide. Maybe she’s informed her family and perhaps her insurance company that she does not smoke? I am of course only speculating here. However, as a serving police officer she must surely be aware that photography is not a crime, and she has no expectations of privacy in a public space. Therefore we are bound to speculate why she chose to behave so unprofessionally in this instance…?👀🧐😎😜
What is the actual law/right of a member of the public to record/photograph public areas of a police station? This on for instance had a sign up saying NO VIDEO OR AUDIO RECORDING ON THESE PREMISES. Other stations will have no signs at all, others will say you need permission.Some other stations with no signs will have an officer tell you, "you can't record" and are liable to tresspass and or arrest We all know most coppers are sly, underhand, lying scum and are not to believed no matter what they say, but what is the actual law ??
Well these places are public access, but that access can be restricted, so I suppose if you break the terms of service conditions of entry you could be refused access or have that right removed and be trespassed which is a civil matter but still law, as such the land owner or agent can ask you to leave and if yiu refuse they can use reasonable force to remove you, if you resist it is likely to be seen as aggravated tresspass which is a criminal matter.
@ryanfleming6833 it only becomes a criminal matter if you are intentionally obstructing, disrupting or intimidating as well as trespassing. Without both, you are really just an unwanted visitor in the area. Unfortunately, the Police consistantly ignore the law in the belief you must do as they say.
@@Mr-J... yes those elements would also elevate it to aggravated trespass. But as they have a lawful right to remove you, resisting would be obstructing them in their peacful enjoyment of property. Which I believe is article 1 protocol 1.
09:00 Nothing private or personal on those computers she proclaims with vigour. What are they for then ? It makes no sense. Are they for surfing the web. Sending messages via email or WhatsApp that are not personal. I don't understand. Are they playing Call of Duty ? I can not think of a computer other than playing games on, where the information is neither personal or private. Please enlighten me.
She'll be head of the hurty feelings department monitoring twitter all day for mean tweets. The PCs all look up to her as she single handedly keeps them all employed. Only second to the "what rights?" dept. who's main job is to stop people peeping through the open windows.