I Watched Peter Pan & Wendy So You Don’t Have To 

I watched it with my daughter today. She turned it off before it was even over. Disney, when a 10-year-old thinks your Peter Pan movie is boring and stupid, you've failed.

Wendy's whole character is based on being a wonderfully nurturing, smart woman. Making women more like men is not empowering. It's erasing women.

Wendy is gentle, nurturing, soft spoken and loving, she is one of the most feminine characters, she reminds the boys that they can't stay there forever and wakes them up from their trance like state without being harsh or mean. She embodies the mother and makes them miss home. All the kids see a mother in her. She's pure and kind. That's why I like her so much. Why is that apparently not good enough? That's divine feminine. Why are women only good enough when they act like men?

So basically they took a character that cared about strangers and turned her into a character that wants to justify only caring about herself? What a great moral to the story.

The original Wendy was a girl boss. She created so much peace and love without raising a fist, a sword, or her voice. Want a hard job? Be patient and loving to a pack of wild children

If a woman can't be powerful without beating men or degrading men... She is not strong, just an agenda. A strong woman shows you she is strong without having to tell you.

Actually the lost boys being all boys does matter because lore wise only boys were able to be “lost” because girls had more common sense and were smarter. This is why Wendy was so important, she represented maturity and a feminine loving perspective that the boys never had.

In the original, Wendy has no issues with Tinker Bell. She even compliments on her beauty and defends her when Peter decides to banish her forever.

Wendy blames her brothers for the mirror she broke. No accountability... How very modern of her.

wendy was supposed to be a feminine girl and that’s what made her such an incredible character, it is so sad to see that today girls need to act like boys to be deemed as good characters

Their Wendy is self-centered. They also contradict themselves: "You're not all boys." "So?" "I guess it doesn't matter." "This magic belongs to no boy." But you said it doesn't matter...

They changed Wendy from being a literal mother figure as she is supposed to be, and as is the WHOLE POINT of the story! They fail because they made Wendy INTO Peter Pan. Peter Pan is the spirit of childhood freedom and adventure, the boy who never grows up, constantly being pursued by Captain Hook, the spirit of bitter adulthood, cruel responsibility, and the _Fear of Death_ *tick tick tick* awareness of one's mortality! Wendy is the only girl _chosen_ to come to Neverland BECAUSE of her mothering nature, because she knows stories to tell the lost boys, Lost Boys who desperately want a mother, and learns that she wants that life of her OWN not just playing pretend and that growing up and having the authentic experience of adulthood *_IS WORTH IT._* But instead this Wendy has to validate her insistence that the right path for her is to spend her days going on adventures, only to write about them and making no deeper connections as she is _happy_ to die completely alone. (projecting much, writers?) *JUST LIKE PETER PAN.* An admirable yet tragic figure as he can NEVER grow up and will NEVER understand to enjoy the real world on deeper levels like Wendy does, and like the FORMER Lost Boys do at the end, as they get a happy ending by finding their purpose and growing up to LIVE. When you're a child, you want to be Peter Pan. When you're growing up, you know you can't. When you're an _adult, you _*_know you shouldn't be._* _"To die would be an awfully big adventure."_ -Peter Pan *_"To LIVE would be an awfully big adventure."_* -J.M. Barrie (as The Narrator at the end of the Play.)

It's ironic. In the original story, Wendy serves as a feminine counterbalance yet still upholds a sort of leadership role. This version basically dismisses any power that femininity holds and claims that girls/women can only be "super" if they behave exactly the way that boys do, rather than embracing their own innate capabilities.

You know the movie is bad, when it went straight to Disney Plus, not movie theaters.

My kids were screaming at my sister to turn it off. It was a tortuous perversion of an amazing story. We just now watched 2003’s version and we’re so happy. Every detail was so well thought out. Each character is forever irreplaceable. So much emotion.

I think it's sad that being gentle and loving and kind are now seen as weaknesses. Why can't Wendy retain these qualities and still be depicted as courageous when she needs to be?

Tinkerbell was a firecracker FULL of personality! She was super jealous and protective of Peter Pan and the Lost Boys. She was full of attitude and sass. Peter Pan was known for his bravery and fearlessness, which beautifully harmonized the dynamic between him and Wendy, who was the "Mother" figure. She was nurturing and caring and brought a sense of comfort and order to the otherwise chaos and immaturity of the boys. Absolutely NOTHING in this version resonates with the original. Another Disney disappointment.

It's disgusting that they can't leave the woke agenda out of children's classics. Just let kids be kids. They don't need political pandering.

In this version, Wendy DEFINITELY turned into a "I'm not like other girls" girl 💀

She hit the nail right on the head! My husband and I were so disappointed. But not surprised. Even my 13 year old girl could see through the bullsh!t. She even got inspired to write her own "alternate scenes" where she took some of the most disappointing parts and rewrote them to be more dynamic and be more in line with the original. 😂

That’s crazy because a big character trait of Wendy is that she is motherly. To her brothers and to the lost boys and it makes them want to go home

It's good to know that being misgendered "doesn't really matter" anymore. About time!

I love rotten tomatoes scores. Terrible movies get good scores, but the audience score is always more accurate. You can buy a score but you can't buy an audience

One of the biggest takes also is that there’s a reason why it was lost boys. As in Victorian times boys would tend to end up not picked in orphanages, or would have to work in factories or mines more often than orphaned girls. I think “Hook” did a way better job of depicting the lost boys.

If I remember correctly, Lost Boys and Peter was immature and just doing whatever they want. Wendy was the voice of reason and trying to get the boys break away from those habits. Tinker Bell don't like strangers due to always wanting to be capture for her magic. Wendy eventually becomes homesick and Peter didn't want her to leave and become a Lost Boys and never get old or have worries. Wendy wanted to have a family and grow old with them which is why she left. That was the driving point of Wendy character. This is what made Wendy special to the plot and what she got the Lost Boys to understand that being young and playing forever isn't a fulfilling life.

The fact that this show can get a 65% on Rotten Tomatoes just PROVES the "critics" are in the pocket of Disney.

In the original book, Tinker Bell drunk the poison intended for Peter Pan saving his life & saved Tink by believing in her & asked the readers to join in. In the 1953 animated film, Tink pushed a bomb in a present box. That was her redemption ark. Wendy was a damsel in distress & a charismatic mother-figure & Tiger Lily didn't have much of a role at all & both of them were not tomboys. Not to mention the book had dark elements like Peter being sociopathic.

I am a black 18-year-old girl and I’m so mad what they did. There’s nothing wrong with having a diverse cast what they could’ve done was of course keep the lost boys or boys but then just have boys of different ethnicities and races Keith Peter Pan how he did in the original, and as much as I love your history, she is such a beautiful, talented actress. It’s sad that they did her so dirty in this movie.. especially keeping her dull, and just turning her into a another silly agenda to push through her, like the whole, hearing my voice thing. It was so corny the whole time I was bored I had to skip throughout the whole movie. I also think there’s nothing wrong about trying to fix their mistakes with the Native Americans but tiger lilies. Character was completely useless in this movie. She was just there standing giving expiration quotes There’s nothing wrong with her being saved and they completely missed an opportunity of showing the tribe. When do you herself she was just mad the whole time. They pretty much ruined every character.

"forced diversity" is the exact phrase I've been waiting for!! Brilliant Amala!

"But it just feels so forced." - I think this is the real problem. It's not your race or sexual identity; it's not a Black Tinkerbell. It's a movie that isn't intended to entertain us, but to lecture and virtue signal to us. I think TV commercials are doing it now, too. Remind me why I should pay to watch?

Funny how they can make Tink talk and at the same time give her less character depth than when she didn't

Wendy is canonically a mom by the end of the original book and play. And was always meant to be from the story's beginning. I'd go as far as to say that one theme going on in it is that being a mom is a higher calling than swashbuckling adventures where boys play with swords.

What I love about the girlboss trope is that it's done so horribly. They'll try and gaslight you by saying "you just don't like seeing strong women" when in reality, they're just poorly done. I watch anime, there's tons of insanely strong, yet still feminine characters, who are often times stronger than the guys. Disney just writes male characters, takes away their family jewels, then calls them a "strong female lead".

The scripts are not only bad. They're so bad that they break the ultimate rule of writing by telling and not showing. Plugging in lines like "I thought you were boys. I guess it doesn't matter." Is a line that not only doesn't matter to the plot, they're going out of their way to tell you what their agenda is.

I rewatched the Matrix trilogy this weekend. Incredibly diverse and incredibly good, because it's not forced. It makes sense.

I adored the original Wendy, she was adventurous and creative, and sure she liked boyish things like sword fights but that didnt take away from her pure and nurturing persona that attracted Peter and the rest of the lost boys to her. The story was about her finding value in who she is, not becoming another (better!) boy. If you want a great Peter Pan movie watch the 2003 version or Finding Neverland which is the story of how it came to be. Thats what the story is meant to be.

I really loved that Wendy was a girl who lived happily in her femininity and nurturing nature originally. I was the opposite as a young girl, but even though I related more to Peter, seeing Wendy made me more comfortable in my girlhood and nurturing nature. It’s so important to see those qualities as a young girl. It also allowed you to see her true strength as a person through her firmness with Peter and her compassion. They ruined her.

This movie had nothing to do with what J.M. Barrie intended with this story. He was a lost boy himself in a way. He despaired at the inevitability of losing your innocence and the magic you see in the world as a child when you grow up. He was very in touch with his inner child. He befriended a woman, a single mother, and often visited her and played in the garden with her children. The story of Peter Pan was a result of these imagined adventures. The characters are gleaned from Sylvia's children, John, Michael and Peter. Peter is the inner child in Wendy that refuses to grow up and Captain Hook is her father that wants to force her to grow up. That is the essence of their antagonism...there was never supposed to be a story behind it because it is an abstract idea come to life in the forms of Hook and Peter in Wendy's mind. Neverland is the "place" where Wendy keeps her imagination, her "wonder" if you will. So Neverland is Wendy's sense of childhood wonder. Hook is her father. And Peter is her inner child. Peter was never supposed to be the bad guy nor Hook have a backstory of why he was in Neverland because they were never supposed to be rounded characters as they are simply allegories, symbols, that represented how Wendy felt about the inevitability of her womanhood approaching. Her father being the image of adulthood and a rather dull and depressing one that she eschewed. So, Wendy was always a strong young woman also at grips with the advent of her womanhood - and at the end she comes to terms and is ready to grow up, yet she seems to not think that relinquishing her sense of wonder in the world is necessary to do that - even in the Disney cartoon, right after she states that she is ready to grow up, she looks up at the ship-shape cloud in the sky, eyes still seeing magic in the world, and she even reels in her parents into it, and for a moment, they too are like children again. Her father, whom she fashioned Captain Hook after, suddenly forgets he is Mr. serious working adult for a moment and gets this glint in his eyes that he lost a long time ago and says "you know I think I've seen that ship before, a long time ago, when I was very young". And for a moment, he remembers his own childhood wonder, the innocent bliss that comes with it and sat there with his wife and daughter to admire the clouds and see shapes in them, as children. That was what J.M. Barrie wished to express. I mean you're talking about a guy that enjoyed playing with kids as a kid himself. Peter Pan is more a message to adults than to children - about not relinquishing you inner child so completely, like Mr. Darling, who is constantly spazzing about work related issues and social status. What in the world does Disney thinks its doing by maiming his story to tell one of their own, one that has nothing to do with adults stopping for a moment and remembering how wonderful the world looked when we were children, (or telling children: you're gonna grow up but it doesn't mean you have to let go of your innocence). How sad. Walt Disney too would be rolling in his grave along with J.M Barrie.

There has been a fan theory for years that pan is the bad guy. Pan kidnaps boys and when they eventually want to grow up he kills them or they turn pirate. This would put hook as the good guy and originally a lost boy. It seems disney has taken a fan theory and softened it a bit for this movie

They took out all the heart and soul with no cleaver writing Wendy meeting the lost boys not only showed her how to have patience and understanding for the kids she one day wanted in a family of her own. But she was able to confirm she didn't want to conform to Peters ideals of being a child forever. The lost boys also learned so much from Wendy. They also realized what they lost by leaving their mothers/ parents before they were mature enough to truly be on their own. This modern Wendy might have saved the boys for a minute in a stupid sword fight But 1953 wendy gave the boys skills to save & think for themselves with her wit for a lifetime.

One of the worst things about these “remakes” is that they all try to justify the villains’ behavior because they had a hard life. While the truth is some people are bad just to be bad

When I was a tween, I used to hate that Wendy didn’t want to stay in Neverland with Peter. But as I got older, I realized that at least in the 2001 remake, that growing up and letting go of love that isn’t right for you was important- and I’m glad to see that Wendy made wonderful realizations at that age.

I'm so sorry you had to go through that for us. Bless you

Yours is a brilliant analysis. Thank you.

There's nothing wrong with women being kind, soft spoken and motherly. Wendy is strong in her own way, which is that she's kind and loving to her brothers and the Lost Boys no matter how rowdy they are. I loved how she never yells or loses her temper (except for that mermaid scene, but to be fair they were literally trying to drown her) but still stands her ground when the boys don't listen. She also doesn't retaliate against Tinkerbell's insults, and rather still treats the fairy with kindness, which I think is a good example for girls. I don't understand how that isn't considered strong anymore.

They made Peter and Wendy the biggest a**holes in their own story. BRAVO, Disney!

the fact that wendy was such a mother figure in the first movie and now in this new one she doesn’t even want to be a mother

I highly recommend 2003 Peter Pan for everyone who felt like this movie was such a massive hit and miss. It has every ounce of vibrancy, magic, Victorian accuracy, and love put into it that this version is lacking.

The downfall of Disney is both fascinating and really sad.

In the original, it was the same voice who did Captain Hook as well as Wendy’s father’s voice. It was kind of a wink and nod that in her fantasy the bad guy was her father 🧐😂

Bravo! Very well presented and said. Thank you!

Totally agree. Appreciate your review.

Its funny too, cause Wendy is the definition of a strong female character. She, in the original story, is older and wiser (still a teenager but ya) then the little boys (all male) and has to teach them (a girl knowing more then boys, gotta set them straight). All the BOYS realize the GIRL is right and learn to grow up. I have 0 idea why they had to change things, when it already suits the narrative they wanted. On top of that, nearly everyone already liked it, so.. NO CONTROVERSY!

I watched the cartoon and the Robin Williams films when I was a child, and I enjoyed them. In the last month I read, one chapter a night for some days, the original novel to my son. It was a whole lot darker than I anticipated. Wendy being a mother was basically the most important aspect of the story. The boys wanted a mother, Peter wanted a mother, the pirates even offered to not kill Wendy if she would agree to be their mother! Theoretical adult male pirates were still clearly boys at heart. Wendy after returning home went for a short period each year, if Peter remembered, to do spring cleaning for him and as she got older her daughter and then her daughter's daughter did the same for Peter. The idea of what Disney turned that story into... my husband called it stupid, I said it was far, far too awful to be summarized by just calling it stupid. Normally I just ignore Disney, but having the original so fresh in my mind, its genuinely way worse than stupid. They actively take material and try to use it to demonize the source material. They can't just dislike the past, they try to use that history to actively attack what it was. Edit: Additionally, Wendy brings the lost boys back home and her parents adopt them all so they can grow into adulthood. Except for Peter, because he refuses to grow up. Its... taking away the idea that she'd want to be a mother... feminism really, really hates femininity.

Wonderful review Amala!

When I heard Disney was gonna make a live action remake of Peter Pan I was actually excited because I have always loved the 1953 Peter Pan. I thought they were gonna make it similar to the 1953 version but not the same. I watched this movie and I swear I felt like crying.

I pointed out a while ago that having other girls in never land defeats the big point to the story. And it underminds te role that wendy played. A boy who doesnt want to grow up so he runs away to a magical land with a fairy, where he doesnt have to. He gets lonely and doesnt know why so he thinks to himself ill get friends, so he gets the lost boys, all was good and all was well, nothing ever changed. They played, and lived forever, up untill wendy showed up, and she reminded them of that one thing that they all missed when they are playing house. Wendy was the mom, they realized they all missed their moms. Wendy reminded them of that by telling them stories. When wendy left, the lost boys didnt want to stay anymore. Leaving peter and tink alone in neverland to live forever. Under and behind the fantastical story that is peter pan, its just a story about the importance of parents, growing up and acceptance. Some can do it, and some cannot. Some can do it, and still they choose and will not. While some just cant, and yet still they try. edit: this was just my way of looking at the story. Its always been my favorite story, i was pter pan every year for holloween up untill i was like 11 and the it was a ninja. Needless to say, alas, i am not a big fan of these changes they have made. edit: not to mention it was wendy that inspired peter to finaly face hook instead of running from him. He and the lost boys even said that hook had previously put other lost boys that got capture to the gallows. Indicating or at least implying that peter couldnt or wouldnt save them. But for wendy that changed. And same goes for the indian's, they were at war with them untill wendy showed up, she helped make peace. The fact that she was a girl and one of the only girls aside from the girls OF never land, via indians, which are debating if they are even real, is a huge fact that fed the whole arc of the story.

People assumed Princess Peach in the Mario Movie would be a "girlboss" but it turns out that wasn't entirely the case. They just based her off the cartoons and comics. What they did with Wendy is just alarming.

Brilliant review.

Another thing I notice in these new renditions is the blurring of the line between good and evil; while in these tales the good and evil in characters is more black and white than in real life individuals, they are effectively representative of the objective good and evil that DOES exist in real life. These movies used to teach us why good is better than evil and now they have been twisted to make children ignorant to the discerning of these two things.

Wendy able to defeat grown man with sword fight is ridiculous. Especially, when her only experience with sword fight was when she played with her brothers. I guess Grown Man = Boy. Plus, its kinda funny her "Happy Memories" is her being alone till she old. Maybe, Disney want to tell girls, "Being Independence is being alone. Being Alone = Happy"

Thank you Amala for your sacrifice of watching this train wreck on behalf of all of us! Disney has been trash for a long time. Disney shareholders are the biggest victims.

Great review, my compliments!

The 2003 live action movie was the most faithful to the spirit of the source material, the most visually gorgeous, and very well acted. Particularly by Jason Isaacs, who was the definitive Captain Hook. It's sad that this movie, due to poor marketing, was a box-office failure.

One of Wendy's main characteristic and the reason Peter took her in is because of her motherly traits.

I love that they got rid of Wendy's gentle, nurturing personality that taught the lost boys about how important and natural it was to grow up. Which led the change in them. I adore how they got rid of the fact that the reason there were no girls who were lost was because girls were too smart to get lost. I love that they made everyone much less likable versions of themselves, even when they try to make Hook a more tragic character, all they manage to do is destroy Peter's character without improving Hook at all. Why does Disney think "modern audiences" want terribly written stories with forced diversity and bad messages that don't really stand the test of time like the original ones did? I’m sorry, but nothing in this movie was inspired. I was bored throughout the entire thing. Law's performance was great, but it's not enough to save this movie. Tinkerbell had no real personality-even Peter apparently can't understand her anymore despite them having been friends for many, many years. Wendy, of course, can take on full grown men in actual sword fights because she pretend dueled with her little brothers with wooden swords. Tiger Lily insists on speaking her native language, even to people who don't understand it-when she knows English and knows that they can't speak her language. This movie is very bland. Neverland is missing pretty much all of its charm, and there's very little color in this movie. Also, I wasn't convinced Tinkerbell actually cared about anything happening, even in scenes where it's assumed she'd be upset. They made Peter much less charming, not only due to the acting, but just the actions and dialogue given to the character. Wendy had no real reason to slap him like that, but it's framed like she's in the right because, I don't know, go, girlboss Wendy, with her happy thoughts of growing old and dying alone.

You are quite brilliant at what you do. Well done.

Excellent work here My Lady

😩😩😩😩😩😩 this was a story about boyhood. Growing up (or rejecting the obligation to grow up) as a boy/man. It's about being a lost boy, not seeing the way to adulthood clearly and instead finding your leader in a Figure who completely shed his responsibility of becoming an adult and does whatever he wants to. It's having so little to do with women/girls (because you are too childish and undesirable to them) that you don't even really know what a girl is. It's a Story of a "i want to do everything i want to do with my imaginary Fairy-girlfriend"-boy coming in contact with a normal earthly real girl, who does ultimately NOT want to be a part of this lets just do what ever we want world. Who ultimately understands her earthly life and the real adult like pathway through it. It shows the tragedy of a man who refuses to grow up while not denying but showing the benefits of this being a child for ever, but the biggest flaw of this pathway: That it's not real. BUT HEY F*** this story about boyhood. It's girlboss time yet again, slap the sh*t out of that peter f**boy Cause overpowered fierce bossbabe in training is here!

It's amazing how these lunatics love the term "Girl Boss" but when you have real girl boss like Riley Gaines, they hate with conviction.

Awesome review

This is the fifth review that I've seen on this movie and you pretty much touched on the same issues the last four reviews did.

Wendy went from a motherly figure to a nihilistic loner. Dy¡ng alone, not even with a cat, or a lesbian lover. Nothing.... Alone. That's terrifying. Edit: I'm talking about Wendy, not about you. Yes, you that want everybody to know that "i'm different" 🙄🙄

Thank you for your sacrifice. Truly. All Disney movies get an automatic "no" for me unless there's sufficient proof that it isn't woke. Haven't seen any lately...

Great video, thanks for telling it like it is.👍

Nicely done critique!

What they did with Wendy was severely disappointing. My younger sister (who forced me to watch the movie cause she was curious), and I both agreed that Wendy's mother was more "Wendy" than Wendy was.

Just for fun, I re-watched the original Peter Pan last week. If you just stand back and look at it, it's really the story of Wendy. It begins with her and ends with her. The whole tale is very much seen through her eyes.

This makes me think of the original story that Peter Pan was based on, where Peter was indeed the villain.

amala your on fire lady spot on!

I remember seeing the trailer and just thinking about how GRAY it is. It seems like they just took the saturation to the lowest level on the scale as an effort to make it modern or adultish or something. One of the biggest things that is lacking in modern entertainment is MAGIC. The story of Peter Pan is magical and colorful! The best example of an adaption/sequel being done well is Robin Williams’ Hook. That movie was MAGICAL. The sets were incredible, the effects were slightly dated but exciting, and the whole movie made you want to jump into the story with the characters! Peter Pan and Wendy looks so drab and depressing, no adult would want to watch it, let alone a kid.

Both of my daughters watched the trailer and refused to even try to watch it. They mentioned the girls in the lost boys and said they hate reboots eventhough they’ve watched every rendition of Peter Pan and love them. This was an innate reaction by them and at first I wasn’t sure why but now thanks to this video I can see why.

the biggest crime of this movie is taking away captains hooks lustrous locks

I love Amala!

Hi Amala! I don't think I'll watch this new version of Peter pan, but that "ThIs MaGiC bElOnGs To No BoY" sounds so pathetic compared to the previous version of 2003 where Wendy asks Peter why there aren't any girls in neverland and Peter says something like "girls are too smart to fall from their beds" (can't remember the exact quote). I found that short phrase from Peter so #girlboss when I was a little girl 😂

I love that Wendy's happy thought was pretty much identical to that of a spoiled brat woman in 2023...

awesome video, even better title!

Thanks for taking one for the team.

The casual violence of girls hitting boys demonstrates exactly how the writers/directors/producers/Disney feel about boys as a whole. Disney has jumped the shark and into the waiting arms of violent sexism. Way to go you putzes!

In the book it is true that Peter is painted as an antagonistic figure because he’s SO immature that he often neglects the Lost Boys and Tink, leaving them to wonder if he’s died somewhere. He’s completely self absorbed and self aggrandizing, but it plays into the theme of growing up and serves a purpose. Also he did feed Hook’s hand to the tic tok croc in the book and he tells it as a grand exploit. But again, these things tied into a theme in the book. This retelling makes everything meaningless.

Hey Amala. Love your show, really appreciate your bravery in sitting through what was obviously another crash and burn masterpiece by Disney. I would love for you to watch next, if you haven’t already. Super Mario Bros. Prepare to have a smile on your face throughout the entire movie.

Lady, I watched your channel now for the first time and you earned my subscription! Thank God there are still decent people in this world. I liked the review of this movie very much :)

The minute I saw the Black Tinkerbell I knew it would be a travesty. I highly recommend the 2003 Peter Pan with Jeremy Sumpter as Peter Pan and Rachel Hurd-Wood as Wendy Darling. Also Captain Hook should always be a villian not a neutral character I'm so sick of the neutral villains in disney movies now. But Jason Isaac is wonderful in the 2003 Peter Pan he is conniving, he lies, and is a true Coddfish.

The 2003 Peter Pan movie was extremely well done for those who have not seen it.

Appreciate her taking one for the team.

Peter Pan is a pretty chaotic character. In the books he’s abusive to the lost boys and is even insinuating that he steals some boys away from their families. He’s supposed to be wild and immature and in need of a mother. There are so many great studies on this book and it’s one of my favorites of all time. This movie did what it wanted to do and that’s fine. There are so many different adaptations of peters story. The movie wasn’t great but it’s also not the first to change the main story.

I dont mind the idea of Tiger Lily rescuing people and being kind of cheeky by speaking a language the others won't understand. She always felt like a crafty, talented character to me. Done correctly, it would fit her character and personality just fine. I'm pretty sure it wasn't done correctly, though.

I love how you put a spoiler alert disclaimer at the beginning. As if anyone is going to watch it anytime soon. 😂😂

I died when she said a vessel for pixie dust🤣🤣

Spot on, Amala.