John F. Nash, Jr., Ph.D., nobel laureate at the Harry Mullin, M.D. Memorial Lecture on November 16, 2011. His topic was "Ideal Money and the Motivation of Savings and Thrift."
He was talking about I think the ideas of equilibrium when applied to maths. As in money being too do with a natural idea rather than a man made idea which is not as perfect.
Awesome explaination of using money ideally. As charity, donation, social welfare including Islamic theory of money. Business and economic stimulate benefit. ICPI (Industrial Consumption Price Index) to measure Ideal money. etc... 👍👍👍
This man was Satoshi Nakamoto. Toko "I am Nash" Sato, his idea of using electricity as a basis for a global reserve currency will radically change this world for the better or the worse.
Yesterday I watch the movie againBeautiful Mind with my daughter.. I prove to her that the movie is base real life and showed to her in google I was shocked knowing Prof. Nash and wife was dead in a car accident.R.I.P.
Interesting. Between 3:50 and 5:00 we are told that the movie, Beautiful Mind, deliberately misrepresented the facts of John Nash's life, so that "they" might create a commercial to promote "the Mental Health Authority" as a legitimate policing agency, of the New World Order. There is a French proverb : The more things change, the more they stay the same. Treating "mental illness" with "antipsychotics" is a way of controlling prisoners (political dissidents in the Soviet Union were oft declared, mentally ill). Are not illlicit and allegedly dangerous drugs such as LSD, angeldust, PCP, and crack cocaine also classified the same as antipsychotics such as Risperdol and Olanzaene? Consider the Vatican ("Spanish") Inquisitions, where "they" desired to "know many", and how heretics were dealt with. Galileo Galilee was sentenced to house-arrest, and declared "mentally ill" for his pronouncement that the earth is a planet which travels around the sun. (He was wrong, of course, for the earth is not a planet, but relatively flat, with hills here and valleys there, but that is besides the point. The point is, for expressing his opinions, he was persecuted - called "mentally ill", or "heretic", or whatever the label was back then.) I think the movie, A Beautiful Mind, could have been a better movie if it had been truthful about how John Nash Jr. overcame mental illness with not only force of will, but by "concentrating on rightness", remaining logical, keeping his emotions in check, etc. It could have been a movie with a simple message : A little math now and then, will keep the mental illness away : This prescription, being in stark contrast to the "star search", song and dance, musical numbers young persons are encouraged to pursue. Oddly, "they" do seem to be discouraging the gangsta-rap genre. Of course, it is not paranoia, when they really are after you. No, it is "being safe". Rewriting the script would not be enough - for a catchy title helps draw them in : A Beautiful Mind, is a great title, speaking of something invisible - but does it really get across to people the threat to individual liberties the "mental health religion" poses? How about another title? : Tom Cruise was right about psychiatry. And Brooke Shields, wrong. .. Does that title work for you? Not too subtle, huh? No, I think "they" definitely got the title right.
You write "Interesting. Between 3:50 and 5:00 we are told that the movie, Beautiful Mind, deliberately misrepresented the facts of John Nash's life, so that "they" might create a commercial to promote "the Mental Health Authority" as a legitimate policing agency, of the New World Order. "
I think what happened there was the responsibility of keeping the mentally ill safe. Some can do without drugs, better even. But some people who are severely ill may do themselves a lot of harm if they're not properly cared for. In a lot of cases, psychiatric or neuroleptic drugs are not mysterious. They are like insulin. And until a better solution is found, they keep you alive. Literally, in many cases. Literally alive. I'm not suggesting the mental health care in some places is not a fuck-you, broke-ass system, because it is. But I don't think that has anything to do with what the producer was trying to do.
Dont it make you sick that they invite the great Dr.Nash, and immediately start talking about his weakness, instead of his greatness, and all he accomplished.
you didn't understand the depth of the introduction, it wasn't talking about his weakness at all , it was talking about his strength and correcting a misconception.
@@boliussa yes and this is true as well but they didn't even give a preamble to the actual subject. Which is just a basic academic courtesy. I suppose academia isn't used to somebody like this. I don't know.
Hey guys, actually the speaker within the first few minutes of introduction made it clear that on their program broucher there is an extensive list of Dr. Nash’s accomplishments. That he didn’t want to bore the audience but rather engage then and talk about how he over came his own illness as a warm introduction
Ridiculous that a modern university should have so many problems allowing questions to be heard on the stage - it must be embarrassing. And why not solvable?
questions coming from the public, i have not understand it at all (bad sound quality)...answers from Nash, ware almost the same (well, hard to understand the point)...until i turned on the subs (wich is not that great made, and i was mostly confused)...all in all i dont know why i wasted time watching this video...oh yeah thats right,now i remember... he is the man from "Beautiful Mind"...well, i geuss, it was time worth spendig, cause that is one of the best movies i ever watched...ore is it maybe that just my english sux, oh i dont know im wery confused
Money is tainted with this sense of immorality because it has no immediate value beyond trade. If I trade a cow for ten chickens, I'm getting ten chickens. That has a value that I can quantify. It's not just something tradable, it's also meat and eggs in its own right. Even gold or diamonds are only valuable because they're hard to find. That feels like an unstable value. So people don't trust it. The value of money (or anything whose only value is it's own trade value) is subject to a lot of arbitrary and unrelated impacts. A chicken is always as valuable as a chicken. Chickens are stable. Paper or elemental solids are not.
the value of trade is inestimable. trade is a keystone of humanity. give you ten chickens for a cow in a bird flu epidemic any day. so products as a store of wealth have their own issues. the word value denotes a generalized quantability. applying a monetery value to goods and services is a much simpler system than having to relate everything back to chickens or cows. plus if you want to go to a concert and it costs 5 chickens or half a cow and you only have a cow, well how is Bessy going to feel about that. gold is gold, it stays as gold. a chicken turns into a bad smell and flies. chickens are not stable. there are zero chicken parts in your cellphone but there is gold. question, what is the value of ten chickens?
Unfortunately nowday the genius John Nash is still too far from the ignorance of the average people... and the fucking and deadly capitalistic philosophy... You were one of the most genius person in the second half of the last centuryJohn... RIP
Capitalism provides you everything you got. Government, with moneyprinting or otherwise, take it away. Capitalism offers you goods, because you value them more than the money you trade for it. Government just takes your money, and gives pennies in return, mmaybe. Local government is always the most deadly thief in any geo location.
Haha he reminds me of the average very old person. They ramble a bit I think because of the brain slowing with age. Lots of filler words so they can think of what comes next. I like it though. I was raised largely by elderly so I'm used to it.
Also I don't know if economics is your subject but it's not mine. Math is, but not econ particularly, and certainly not questions of money, so I miss a lot of the subtleties.
