If Shrek Was Charged For His Crimes 

I gotta say, the first charge looks a lot like scaring off intruders, since at least that part of the swamp is obviously his territory

The 15 counts for assault technically doesn't count because Shrek is technically participating in a gladiatorial sport and the soldiers are attacking him, so it is self defence

When it comes to Shrek fighting in the knights, Farquaad had the knights attempt to murder Shrek. I’m pretty sure that Shrek can get away with it being self-defense.

The happy, idyllic music into TERRORISM: +DEATH SENTENCE got me

2:57. How could Shrek be charged for trespassing in an abandoned castle? No one owns it and I highly doubt the Dragon is going to be pressing charges instead of simply frying him to a crisp, nor would Fiona or her parents considering he rescued the princess from the tower.

5 possible 6 charges need to be removed from the first movie 1: the intimidation charge those villagers were trespassing on his land he has every right to chase them off given their intentions. 2: him entering Dulock (i think that's how it's spelled) was perfectly reasonable as he went to see their ruler to find out why every fairy tale creature was getting dumped on his land. 3: they were trying to kill him, self-defense as they were told to kill him and all that over him wanting Farquad to get all the intruders out of his swamp 4: does going into Fiona's prison castle truly count as trespassing the only way she could be rescued is by entering the place 5: the sexual assault was accidental as I'm certain it wasn't his intention to do that 6: False imprisonment cannot be applied her as it's a dangerous fire breathing dragon if anything he leashed an animal that could have done a lot of damage if left to roam free (which i know it was free after that point but Donkey reined her in pretty well

the first charge and the 15x assault charges are bogus. one is his property, and he is removing trespassers. the second is clearly self defense as they all want to kill him first

Two charges in the first movie should be removed. The guys were literally going to kill Shrek, so the intimidation charge should be removed, and then there's the brawl in the wrestling ring. That's textbook self defense

Several charges could be removed from this list. The intimidation at the beginning was simply protecting his land from trespassers, him entering Duloc would be legal as he had a legitimate concern over his land and the uninvited fairy tale squatters, and all the knights were in self-defense as he did try to negotiate with them first and only resorted to violence as an act of self-defense when he couldn't negotiate with the knights.

Saul Goodman: your honer my client was simply just defending his territory he wasn't harming anyone just self-defense

A lot of these were either unintentional accidents (like the dragon kissing shrieks bum) or donkeys doing (like the dragon being let loose on the town which technically donkey didn’t even do)

🎶Somebody once told me the world is gonna roll me.I ain’t the sharpest tool in the shed🎶

4:45 He’s gotta have some sort of negligence charge for letting Donkey fall on the floor with nothing to break his fall.

The 15 counts of assult are self defence because the knights attacked Shrek and Shrek wanted to settle it over a pint

1:46 This is self defense. Same with Shrek imprisoning The Dragon.

If Sesame Street Villains Were Charged For Their Crimes

I think you he should have also gotten a squatting charge since no matter how much he claimed "my swamp," the swamp belonged to Farquaad. It was only at the beginning of the third act that he got the official deed.

Technically the fourth movie doesn't exist considering it was an alternate reality where Shrek never existed, so those charges would be null and void when Shrek returns to his own reality.

2:07 im not sure if i could count that as assault looks like self defense

What are you doing In my swamp? -Shrek

on 1st charge. shrek was defending himself and his home. that's not really crime.

You forgot charged him assault where in the first movie where Shrek steps on donkey’s hoof to shut him up

If monsterverse villains were charged for their crimes. Part 2💪

3:31 Objection. Your honor, seriously?! She thought she was kissing the donkey and he had no intention of landing there!

2:07 Objection! They were ordered to *kill* him! He acted in self-defence! The fact that he seemed to enjoy toying with them doesn't help his case, but still!

I think he was self defending in his first charge. And he didn’t even assault any of the men that came to FRIKIN KILL HIM

0:30 objection, they were traspasing on his private territory. And The Dragon is her own creature (argubly intelegent), so she m or donkey (since it's his idea to ride her to Duloc)should get charged for most of her crimes 5:05

I think that after the crimes, Shrek was pardoned

Thanks, Animated Courtroom *LONG LIVE FOR ANIMATED COURTROOM*

If smg4 characters/villains were charged for their crimes

3:30 let’s be real here, that wasn’t Shrek’s fault.

When Shrek was fighting the guards it should’ve been self defence bc lord Farquaad said whoever kills the ogre will be the champion Five-oh don’t get the meaning of self defence -Lamar 2013

Day 6 of asking for "If Eric Cartman was charged for his crimes"

All The charges from Shrek forever after should be taken off because Shrek changed the timeline so those things technically never happened

If it really assault if they’re trying to kill him?

Counter Arguments: ~Shrek 1 It's not intimidation if it's his property. Shrek's property, he can do what he wants to people who trespass as long as he doesn't kill. First charge is nullified. You even gave the reason for the 2nd charge being nullified. It's not resisting arrest if there's no arrest being made. Could argue that there was, but with no enforcement there was no threat. Trespassing one I get, but there was no one at the gate aside from someone who was knocked out due to fear. Everyone else is at the arena. None of the assault charges go through, it's all self-defense as they were attacking him. All Shrek wanted to do was talk things out before he had to get defensive. Fair Deal, you give me the princess after rescuing her, I give you full entitlement to the land you own. All parties agreed with an entire kingdom as witnesses to the verbal exchange. Contract of the exchange, however, was made under duress, and therefore cannot be properly enforced, which would rescind the contract. Crop Field does not look to be destroyed, even with Donkey's 4 hooves. Only destruction is pulling onions off the plants for food. At best it's theft of edible goods, which only would be a minor misdemeanor at best. Needs changed. 2nd trespassing charge, nullified. He is there to bring Fiona to Farquaad as his champion ogre-knight. Old, decrepit castle, unowned. Charges cannot be placed without proper ownership. Not sexual assault. The Dragon kissed HIS ass, not the other way around. Sure, Donkey was the one who was going to receive the kiss, but Shrek getting in the way was accidental. The Dragon has been at that castle for YEARS at this point, so it was false imprisonment before Shrek even showed up. Can't pin it on Shrek for outwitting the dragon protecting the Princess as a crime. Kidnapping, I'll give you that one. She expressed no desire to go, he forced her and took her with him. It may have been his job but that is no excuse for his actions. Shrek didn't let the dragon loose on the town- Donkey did. Terrorism Charge removed. Crashing a wedding / Disorderly conduct, yeah, that's fair. He wasn't invited, no matter his feelings about Fiona. 2nd Resisting Arrest charge. Yep. No fault there. It's not 2nd degree murder- it's a person of royalty. That means REGICIDE. However, for the sake of your argument, killing Farquaad was never truly intended. The Dragon decided to do that on her own. Regardless of the fact that the dragon was called to attention, she is not a pet and therefore Shrek nor Donkey can be held accountable for her crimes. ~Shrek 2 Union member fraud is Petty Larceny, 1st degree scheme to defraud, & 2nd degree ID theft. $25K for defraud scheme, 12m jail & $2.5K fine for Petty Larceny, 6m jail max for 2d ID Theft. Trespassing is waived as FGM caught them and they left peacefully. Assault charge, Yep. No complaints on that one. Same for False Imprisonment even though he's not tied up or locked up in the closet. Burglary, plain and simple. No complaints. Reckless Endangerment - No. No one was fatally wounded or hurt in any way. Pushed due to flood of a magic potion, definitely. But everyone escapes safely. Property Destruction - No complaints. Illegal Squatting. Maybe. It can be argued (and those watching would confirm) it's just storm shelter. With pleasantries and offers to repay for the stay, it would then seem to be temporary tenants, same as a hotel / motel. They would be a 'customer' and therefore legally on the land- even if they entered illegally at first. Robbery - Blatant, no complaints. Dine & Dash is iffy, as it's not seen if they paid or not. Without more evidence we cannot pin that crime on them. Resisting Arrest, yep I give that one. No complaints, it's plain as day. Felony jail escape / escaping lawful custody, middle road for punishment, no complaints. We don't know if it's Shrek's idea to create the giant gingerbread man or Gingy's, so without knowing we can't blame Shrek for Terrorism here. He may be in command, but that does not mean ownership. He was asking a question- rather rudely and with anger, but a question nonetheless. Not intimidation. The entire play section is self defense. Agreed, no charges. ~Shrek Forever After I wouldn't call this Terrorism. Heavy on destruction of the entire town, yes. But not terrorism. Rumple may be the ruler but Shrek was not in custody. No charge. Property Destruction - Blatant. No complaints. Donkey was kidnapped in Rumple's leadership, Shrek rescued him. Charge revoked. No complaints on Sexual Assault here. It's a plot to free the wrongfully imprisoned. It's justice, not a riot. ~Extra Legal Assistance Double Jeopardy, one cannot be tried twice for the same crime. This would mean that any consecutive charges that Shrek is acquitted or found Not Guilty of, he cannot be charged of those again. Shrek 1: Cannot be tried twice for Resisting Arrest as the first he was found Not Guilty. 2nd charge revoked.

0:33 now hold on the piligers were trespassing his property so he's in the right 1:22 also there was no one to pay after that guy passed out and shrek did nothing to harm him.

Awesome video!!! Honestly Shrek did a lot of good, for example in the first Movie he did free the Fairy Tale Creatures from his swamp, he also saved everyone from the rath of Multiple Villians like The Fairy Godmother and Prince Charming, so in my Opinion Shrek should be given a Pardon :) also for the Lord Farquad kill, in my opinion that was a self defencive kill, so I would also pardon Shrek for that

Please do if lightning McQueen and mater was charged for their crimes

In the castle fight scene, i dont know if it would count as assault, as shrek was going to be killed by the guards due to order of lord farquad

one more thing : The events of the third movie technically never happned and only Shrek (and Rumple) remember it

0:20 1:46 and 3:51 is self Defense

Thank you for the video pls make more

If Shrek is in jail Lunch is served His choice would be cheesecake!

Will If Sinbad was charged for his crimes (Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas) be next?

20th Anniversary Shrek 2 Since 2004

3:25 Maybe I don't remember the context, but he was rescueing Fiona, so the whole action is self-defense and this one thing was an accident.

Pepper spray was invented in 1962 People before 1962: 7:55 and 8:05

Shrek Being A Memes

3:26 How is that sexual assault? He didn’t do anything.

Boutta take some finals, thx :)

Animated Courtroom, I understand that Shrek has performed all these bad crimes, but how can you charge him for his crimes if he’s innocent!? The 4 Shrek movies are my favorite movies, Shrek is my favorite character, and he’s the main character! Also, how can you charge an ogre of all people!?

Shrek is love, Shrek is life, and Shrek is…going to be charged as a crook?!

If alex the lion (all Madagascar movies) was charged for his crimes

Can you do The Shawshank Redemption Villains charged for their crimes next please

2:37 😂 I’m sorry thats What??

8:39 It's actually *not* illegal to escape prison in Germany.

to be fair, he was in a world made my the villian in the fourth movie so i doubt those charges would carry over

Most of these charges are set against him by the villains who he is trying to stop.

I mean for the first one, aren’t the crowd that Shrek scared away were trespassing on his swamp in the first place? And I mean come on, do you really think Shrek intentionally fell on the dragon’s tail where she accidentally kissed his butt?

How is it trespassing if the dragon slammed him through the roof, plus it was abandoned and only inhabited by Fiona and the Dragon

The sentence of shrek crimes gets me every time.

Ok I got a few for you 1. Intimidation should be removed he was just getting people off his land. 2. Assault just self defense in a gladiator arena fight 3. Crop destruction he is clearly walking between the rows of plants. 4. Trespassing he’s going to farquaad’s castle for official business to discuss his swamp after he dumped fairy tale creatures on his land. 5. Second trespassing charge he went in to save her from the dragon. 6. Sexual assault it’s a dragon. 7. False imprisonment Its a dragon Should’ve been charged with property destruction for the two kegs of Ale he destroyed in the arena and two charges of theft one for the ale he drank in the arena and second for the crops Shrek is eating.

The first charge can be labelled as defence of property, as they were trespassing onto his property. The case where he assaulted 15 knights can be self defence, as thier intent was to "kill" him as ordered. Rumplestiltskin was an usurper and not the rightful ruler, so those charges hold no credit at the end.

It's shrekover

3:57 (rubbs bringe of nose) Objection. This is clearly self defence. And even if it wasn't, the Dragon could easily get out of that. You'd might as well declare "faulse imprisonment" every time someone slams a door in someone else's face!

7:39 Thank you mother. MOTHER?!?!

Shrek got 3 death sentences and 122 years and 1 live sentence and2.0009.250 dollar's

For one of your next videos, how about “If Gru was charged for his crimes”?

Police, What are you doing in my swamp?????

Do “If BoBoiBoy Villains Were Charged For Their Crimes” pls

2:57 Three-way objection, your honor! First, he was thrown through the ceiling by the dragon. That was not his intent. Second, she was waiting to be rescued. I'm guessing anyone would be welcomed? Third, Lord Farquad sent him on the quest.

I move to pardon shrek of all crimes. He was just built different.

If Paw Patrol villains being charged for their crimes 1. Mayor Humdinger 2. Harold Humdinger 3. Lady Bird 4. Codi Gizomodi 5. Victoria Vance

4:52 Here I would agree he would be resisting Rightful arrest due to the crash he did previously.

Cool Video Bro!

hey for that first crime, he was just scaring them of his property, which is legal for him to protect what's his

1st part is more self defense to me. Shrek has shown to be harmless to the humans unless he's being threatend. He didnt touch any of the angry villagers and the villagers had the intent to ittimidate or possible hurt shrek or destroy his property

Look judge Shrek didn’t mean to terrorize the city

Shrek crimes that should be taken back: Shrek 1) Those villagers are intruding on his land and most likely trying to kill him. 2) Those knights were ordered to kill him first. 3) I’m not sure how that’s trespassing when he accidentally gets knocked into the tower. 4) The Dragon was trying to kiss Donkey against his will and accidentally kissed Shrek’s butt, so I’d call it sexual assault on the Dragon’s part. 5) The whole point was to defeat the Dragon. 6) He’s bringing Fiona to Farguaad anyways, so I wouldn’t call it kidnapping. The whole point is for her to be rescued. 7) I can understand him killing Farquaad would be illegal. But, if anything, Farquaad should be charged for his crimes because of his enslavement and removal of fairy tale creatures from their homes and placing them on Shrek’s land, as well as trying to have Shrek brutally killed and have Fiona go back to the tower where she herself was enslaved. Shrek Forever After 1) I’m not sure how that’s terrorism because he’s only just scaring people. He’s not hurting or killing anyone. 2) Rumple Stiltskin is the ILLEGAL ruler of Far Far Away, as he made the real King Harold and Queen Lillian sign a contract they weren’t aware would make them disappear and die. I feel like any crimes committed against Rumple should be taken back, as he effectively committed regicide and illegally became the ruler of an entire kingdom. Not only that, but he ensalved the ogres, so Rumple should get a slavery charge added to whatever charges he has beforehand. Even he incites a riot of people to find and illegally arrest Shrek at one point.

Has there been one where you charge chopper of his war crimes

4:36 Objection! Donkey is not the one on trial, here!

Can you do if revenant from apex was charged for his crimes

Good video but "Letting a Dragon roam free is terrorism" *a few moments earlier* "Shrek encaged the dragon, which is false imprisonment"

AWESOME ! 😃

It was self defense when farquad told the knights to attack shrek

Day 10 of asking for marvel thanos

Can you please make the if terminator 2 judgment day 1000 model terminator were charged for his crimes

9:39 I could have sworn that he was pardond by the royal family afterwards

Uh, Shrek getting his ass kissed was completely on accident

Do If Po Was Charged For His Crimes next please. Sources: Kung Fu Panda 1 - 4 I would appreciate it if I requested for Dreamworks Heroes.

That's Weird that Shrek Committed Crimes.

It will be cool that, when Shrek, donkey and puss escape the Potion Center, will the doom music apear 😌

Animal abuse you forgot about that he throws donkey

3:28 #MeToo 😂😂😂

3:30 what 💀 I would have sooner blamed it on the dragoness, but it was all a coincidence.

So glad you stopped using decimals for the years

He’s a ogre

One phrase that represents the purpose of the movie Shrek: Satire over fairytales.

One of my favorite things to do while watching new videos, is to try to guess the crimes while the clip plays and then see if I am correct.