Stored as an image file it would be massive. But it can be compressed into a function or functions that take up less space. Just more processing to display it.
I thought they just rendered and saved an area and repeated that smaller and smaller and then placed the images down smaller and smaller Or at least that’s one method
I zoomed in specifically that way. One has to choose precisely where to zoom in to make it sync with any music. Took me several tries. My laptop is crying.
Nah put it in the water far from the island and make sure the island is full of snakes and for the sea to have sharks and make sure the water has so much salt your enemy can't even swim down and if your enemy tries to they can't even open their eyes cause that will just cause their eyes to be blind as there is too much salt
For the people that have no clue what they're looking at, it's a Mandelbrot fractal, it's basically just a shape that no matter how much you zoom in it'll eventually just repeat infinitely At around the beginning when he starts zooming in you can see some duplicates of the main shape, and at the very end it's a duplicate of the main shape
@@bacn_you are correct in that it doesn’t exist in natural form but it’s long story short a math equation or something like that, that goes on forever… kinda like pi… only you can zoom infinitely into a Mandelbrot set unlike you can with pi… (within the computers computation and hardware limits)
that wasnt 8 hours of redering per frame cuz if you take then number of frames shown in th title then you get 1000000 frames and if each frame takes 8 hours to render then this video was renderd in 913 YEARS so yeah not true
I don’t get fractals. I understand that it’s supposed to be infinite, but fractals in my opinion is just the same shape connected to each other the more you zoom in. I can accomplish the same goal by infinitely adding triangles upon triangles to each other that are connected at the points and becomes increasingly apparent the more you zoom in You can accomplish the same goal with any shape to do this. And for this reason I do not consider fractals as a shape. The “Mandelbrot set” in my opinion is not a shape. it’s just a mathematical equation that once executed in a real life practical example exhibits an infinite result,… which in this case is the attempt to create an infinite shape. But that’s the thing. It requires infinite attention in order to complete it. And a shape that is not completed is not a shape at all. And not only that but the moment you stop is the moment it becomes finite. Which means that you can’t make your boast that the shape is infinite.
@NicholasHeitman Damn you really proved you dont get fractals. So by your logic, as you said, and I quote:- "The moment you stop is the moment it is finite. So you can't boast that your shape is infinite." Really now 😂? Brother then by your logic we cannot make our boast that there are infinite natural numbers since we cannot count them all. Or maybe that's such an obviously intuitive point that it is excluded from your 'law' here. Sure. Then that also means no more infinite sets, rational or irrational numbers as we know them, any type of inifinity in Geometry is mathematically impossible according sir omniscient over here 💀. My brother a shape doesn't HAVE to be comprehendable OR finite OR bound to the rules of real life physics or logic to exist mathematically. Way more concepts than just fractals use infinity in geometry, and hell, some even in real life physics. Just because your opinion clashes with their model of existence doesn't mean that they themselves are just made wrongly. You simply do not understand their infinite scale just like everyone else, but you are the only one not able to accept it. You ain't slick, and you ain't special. So stop spreading negativity unnecessarily in the replies.
I’m not trying to stomp on anyones pride and joy here. I don’t get fractals. I understand that it’s supposed to be infinite, but fractals in my opinion is just the same shape connected to each other the more you zoom in. I can accomplish the same goal by infinitely adding triangles upon triangles to each other that are connected at the points and becomes increasingly apparent the more you zoom in You can accomplish the same goal with any shape to do this. And for this reason I do not consider fractals as a shape. The “Mandelbrot set” in my opinion is not a shape. it’s just a mathematical equation that once executed in a real life practical example exhibits an infinite result,… which in this case is the attempt to create an infinite shape. But that’s the thing. It requires infinite attention in order to complete it. And a shape that is not completed is not a shape at all. And not only that but the moment you stop is the moment it becomes finite. Which means that you can’t make your boast that the shape is infinite.
@@DiamondStumpy first off, yes, the entire point of fractals is an infinitely repeating shape/pattern. For instance, the triangles apon triangles thing, yes, that would actually be a fractal. Secondly, by your logic, i can count to ten and say there is no number after ten, because i stoped counting at ten, just because we dont have an infinite amount of time, doesn't mean we cannot prove something is infinite. Otherwise we could just arbitrarily say something isnt real or possible because you stopped before you got there, so it doesn't exist.
Easy enough. All N+1-dimensional fractal surfaces should have a finite surface area and perimeter. N+2 fractals and above have both infinite surface area and infinite perimeters