Тёмный
No video :(

IMLEC 2018 - International Model Locomotive Efficiency Competition 4K HDR - Live Steam - Birmingham 

LMS4767
Подписаться 16 тыс.
Просмотров 20 тыс.
50% 1

The history of the International Model Locomotive Efficiency Competition - or IMLEC, as most model engineers have come to know it - dates back to 1959 when a meeting was called at the�Model Engineer �magazine offices to discuss the possibility organising an annual event to test the efficiency of miniature steam locomotives. However, its true origins can be traced back to around 1903; long before it was to become recognised as a competition in the true sense of the word: More of this later.
However, to first return to the origins of the competition, proper: In 1959 LBSC was consulted and later - in typical LBSC fashion - remarked that although he had been consulted, his views had been ignored. The�then Editor of Model Engineer replied by saying that his response to the proposal had been negative. It is fair to say that LBSC was clearly against efficiency trials when he quoted a storey about two fictitious friends who took part in a club trial and then fell out afterwards over the result. Of course, most model engineers would say that he was possibly missing the point. However, he was heard to say that; �Aim for efficiency, by all means; but do it for your pleasure and don�t parade it at the other fellow�s expense! I would rather see all so-called �efficiency trials� abolished and the time better spent in giving joy-rides to children!�. The following years have shown that both can co-exist for both the benefit of those interested in competition and those that derive pleasure in using their locomotives to give pleasure to children � plus adults too!
Despite this, soon a formula was agreed that was seen at the time as being an accurate way of measuring the efficiency of both 3�� and 5� gauges � the more common gauges of the time. This method was then drawn-up into a set of formulas and recommended for general acceptance by the various societies up and down the country. At this time, though, these rules did not take into account the calorific value of the fuel.
Printed alongside these published formulas was an indication that Model Engineer magazine was also considering the establishment of an annual national efficiency competition for passenger hauling steam locomotives of 3�� and 5� gauges based around these formulas; where It was expected that societies would hold their own individual trials early in the season and submit their two most efficient locomotives with drivers as entries in this national competition completion. Model Engineer magazine were to sponsor the completion as well as provide prizes for the winning entry � a tradition that continues to this day.
When this idea was published several societies indicated their interest in adopting the proposed efficiency formula; whilst some others went further by expressing their interest in Model Engineer magazines� proposal for a national competition. The proposal went even further by suggesting elimination contests to be held on society tracks, with the winners going forward to represent their respective societies at regional or national finals, with a trophy and a cash prize of �25 being awarded to the winning society.
Despite all this talk it is interesting to note that it was a further ten years before anything further happened and on March 7th 1969, Martin Evans, the then Editor of Model Engineer, announced that a locomotive efficiency competition to be known as�The Model Engineer International Model Locomotive Efficiency Competition�was to be held.
The first IMLEC was hosted by the Birmingham SME in July that same year. With a fine silver cup together with second and third prizes being donated by Model Engineer magazine, it was hoped that most of the major model engineering societies would enter. Some individual entries would also be welcome. A further announcement on 21st March that year confirmed that twenty locomotives of 3�� and 5� gauges would compete for the Martin Evans� Locomotive Challenge Cup and �25, a second prize of �10 and a third prize of two years� subscription to Model Engineer. For the time, quite generous prizes!

Опубликовано:

 

28 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 30   
@rbdaviesTB3
@rbdaviesTB3 2 года назад
That 'Standard Mikado' was a beast! Blitzed the competition!
@themidlandcompoundarchive9430
@themidlandcompoundarchive9430 6 лет назад
Went down on Friday, nice to see the rest of the contestants!
@abuubaydullah1
@abuubaydullah1 6 лет назад
This was such a pleasure to watch when i was a kid(in the 60s) one of my mates grandfather use to built engine by hand every little nut and bolt cast even his wheels and he use to take us to springfield park (Rochdale)and we had free rides,for my mate grandfather and some of his friends are one of the reasons i be came an engineer.
@Bruno.Trains
@Bruno.Trains 6 лет назад
Super footage Great scenery !!
@staffy109
@staffy109 6 лет назад
What an effort for that 0-8-0 to haul 24 adults wow that is a good engine cheers Dennis ps great clip as usual
@ukmodelengineering
@ukmodelengineering 6 лет назад
staffy109 thanks.
@ryannosaurusrex424
@ryannosaurusrex424 2 года назад
no offense but im pretty sure its 25
@haroldpearson6025
@haroldpearson6025 2 года назад
I was hooked into the hobby in 1953 and built my first tiny 3.5g 0-4-0 in 3 years. Now 80 I have built 6 engines of various gauges. Still a member of Bham SME. Its time a major TV channel made a full length programme covering the hobby. The vast majority of people think these engines a all factory made.
@dorians4148
@dorians4148 Год назад
Los felicito son trenecitis de vapor muy bien hechos y yo estoy haciendo una de vapor con mis recursos a mano el triunfo claro esta es hacerla funcionar todo haciéndolo casi a mano hasta las ruedas los pistones y claro tiene imperfecciones pro verla funcionar será todo un júbilo para mi
@peterpullen958
@peterpullen958 6 лет назад
Another excellent production ......well done.
@ukmodelengineering
@ukmodelengineering 6 лет назад
Peter Pullen thanks for the kind comment.
@charlesfitton9677
@charlesfitton9677 3 года назад
It would be nice to know how the competition actually works..
@stephensmith799
@stephensmith799 2 года назад
A pity BR didn’t build the 2-8-2. It would have done both almost as much the 9F 2-10-0 as built and a little bit more than the Brit 4-6-2 🤔 If only I had been BR CME! (I wish😉)
@GreatCenteralGlory
@GreatCenteralGlory Год назад
Seeing Apollo after the 2021 IMLEC makes me really sad.
@mattseymour8637
@mattseymour8637 5 лет назад
Great shots and locos. What loco won the competition?
@StaxRail
@StaxRail 6 лет назад
Am I right saying that I saw a Britannia outline 2-8-2?
@ukmodelengineering
@ukmodelengineering 6 лет назад
clanline35028 the engine you refer to is a proposed BR 2-8-2 Heavy Goods which shared similarities to the Britannia class as so did the 9F. A number of departures from the designs constructed were suggested, but not acted upon in terms of fabrication. A 2-8-2 was originally proposed instead of the 9F 2-10-0 and S.F. Harrison drew up a Pacific design owed which owed much to Gresley practice. These are outlined in several works by E.S. Cox, especially his British Railways standard steam locomotives.
@StaxRail
@StaxRail 6 лет назад
LMS4767 ah, makes more sense. Thanks for informing me, it looked pretty cool!
@terrier_productions
@terrier_productions Год назад
Would love to own either a 3.5" gauge or 5" gauge steam locomotive.. I currently own a 7.25" gauge electric locomotive. I'm never owned a proper miniature steam engine, so I'm guessing that buying a 3 1/2" or 5" steamer would be a good starting point?
@madguernseyboy
@madguernseyboy Год назад
Can you please direct me as to where i can find the published formulas for IMLEC. thanks
@gregoryvanderdonckt6028
@gregoryvanderdonckt6028 4 года назад
New title of this video, wheel slippage compilation xD
@megamanx5760
@megamanx5760 2 года назад
3:10 that's a lot a people for such a small engine
@htral
@htral 6 лет назад
Noticed the bigger the engine - the more likely it will slip -- is this bad driver wheels, bad rail or operator error?
@MatecaCorp
@MatecaCorp 6 лет назад
It is entirely dependent on the pull of the loco, the weight of the train and the skill of the driver. (drive wheels are not exactly "good" or "bad") In the above video the larger engines are struggling because their trains are longer. Generally smaller engines are underestimated and larger engines overestimated. (in the hobbyist field anyway)
@leedorrington8755
@leedorrington8755 5 лет назад
The smaller the engine the more important the adhesive weight becomes. The scale weight of a Britannia for instance in 5"G as in the video would be about 69Kg without the tender. The model would likely be many times that probably over 200Kg. The other thing to consider is scale speeds, if a model is doing 1mph it's really doing 11.3mph(scale), if its doing 6mph that's 78mph(scale) and the majority of steam locomotives didn't generally work much over 60mph....
@thestarlightalchemist7333
@thestarlightalchemist7333 6 лет назад
BLUE PETER EVERYWHERE
@joshhere___9477
@joshhere___9477 5 лет назад
I am a meme at the BSME, I have a 4-4-2 Atlantic
@joshhere___9477
@joshhere___9477 5 лет назад
Not trying to boast
@davidbyrne5623
@davidbyrne5623 6 лет назад
Great video bloody awful intro music!
Далее
STEAM LOCOS IN PROFILE: IMLEC 2021 Special
1:23:42
Просмотров 248 тыс.
Whoa
01:00
Просмотров 45 млн
2023 Midland Model Engineering Exhibition
20:39
Просмотров 34 тыс.
Heavy Goods Trains - 7 1/4 Narrow Gauge
21:52
Просмотров 8 тыс.
Driving A Steam Traction Engine Down The Road
33:13
7 1/4” gauge Duke of Gloucester Steam Test
14:10
Просмотров 317 тыс.
I.M.L.E.C. 2005 - Northampton  - Day One
1:07:47
Просмотров 3,3 тыс.
Whoa
01:00
Просмотров 45 млн