Тёмный

Implicit Differentiation 

Eddie Woo
Подписаться 1,9 млн
Просмотров 72 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

2 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 69   
@krispy4452
@krispy4452 Год назад
9 years later and still being insanely helpful, what a treasure.
@sdparsons
@sdparsons 4 года назад
I was conceptually stuck differentiating y^2 with respect to x and this was the perfect explanation that I needed! Fabulous, thank you!
@humanature440
@humanature440 3 года назад
Love this video so much! I was craving to find the video that show me derivative using transposition of terms, it makes me know why and when I should use the implicit differentiation clearly.
@izzyh4658
@izzyh4658 5 лет назад
Great way of comparing the two ways of solving for dy/dx. Thanks.
@qualquan
@qualquan 5 месяцев назад
In Implicit functions (IF) the "Dependent variable (DV) is NOT JUST a function of the Independent vaiable (IV)". So if IV is X then DV might be Y or G or a mixture of X and Y but not JUST a function of the IV or X. Some use explicit = numerical quantities and implicit for non numerical quantities but when dealing with (IF) it is more comprehensively defined as "When the DV is not just a function of IV" Differentiation of that DV which is not a function of IV requires the chain rule.
@D3Jia
@D3Jia 2 года назад
TRULY A GOD TIER EDUCATOR
@imperialrecker7111
@imperialrecker7111 4 года назад
thx for the explanation for why we multiply dy/dx when ever we differentiate y.
@noacavassi8131
@noacavassi8131 2 года назад
This helped me so much. Thank you Eddie, you don’t know how grateful I am for your work!
@gretawilliams8799
@gretawilliams8799 7 лет назад
I feel like i'm in class...
@TheRAVI147
@TheRAVI147 7 лет назад
Sir can you please make video on partial differentiation from basics.... Because it is creating problem for me in fluid mechanics
@adamshebani1451
@adamshebani1451 2 года назад
Eddie Wooooooo 💫 💫💫
@Lilatom-ps6cv
@Lilatom-ps6cv 3 года назад
An incredible explanation; it helped me understand very easily. Thank you so so so much!!!
@omargrisha6019
@omargrisha6019 3 года назад
thank you man may Allah bless you
@ayandas8299
@ayandas8299 4 года назад
You explain things so well! Thank you!!
@drmichaelsunsschoolformath
@drmichaelsunsschoolformath Год назад
For explanation of why its called implicit differentiation and not just normal differentiation go here : ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-wcn9r64X5bQ.html
@provezano
@provezano 3 года назад
This is the thing, you focused on what is the most confusing part of solving implicit differentiation problems and made me understand. thank you :)
@enzuber
@enzuber 10 лет назад
I like to teach chain rule outside first, then inside(s). In this order, the implicit is even easier - because you keep differentiating until you hit the bare 'y' term - and write dy/dx. Downside of reversing the order is you need to clean up the expression in most cases, but I think that's a benefit.
@williamhogrider4136
@williamhogrider4136 2 года назад
Great 🍺🍺🍻.
@lanewaygarden1338
@lanewaygarden1338 4 года назад
Excellent explanation
@qualquan
@qualquan 5 месяцев назад
He made 2 errors. First the sq. root is +/- and not just + making the first method more tedious. Second one should show all the steps of the chain rule making the second method look easier and the preferable method since one CANNOT always make Y explicit. So when trying to find dY^2/dX by chain rule he should show all the steps. So initially we should write d Y^2/dY and not dY^2/dX. Then one can easily see that dY^2/dY = 2Y and dY^2 = 2Y*dY. Then dividing both sides with dX we get dY^2/dX = 2Y*dY/dX.
@user-mv4ix7jd8o
@user-mv4ix7jd8o Год назад
Why do we have to use the chain rule when differentiating y²? Does the Power Rule not work? I'm thinking it might work, but we don't use it because that way we wouldn't have that dy/dx term, correct?
@dawoool
@dawoool Год назад
If you use the power rule on y², which is y*y, you would get y*y' + y'*y, which equals 2y*y', the same thing you get with implicit differentiation.
@arieltabbach4946
@arieltabbach4946 2 месяца назад
no because y is a function of x so you have to multiply by the derivative of y with respect to x
@Mathsiseasy
@Mathsiseasy 5 лет назад
Interesting
@Jason-o5s
@Jason-o5s Месяц назад
Cheer~~~implied though not plainly expressed.😊
@mountaindog3870
@mountaindog3870 5 лет назад
5:27 Woo hoo...
@MaverickCF
@MaverickCF 6 лет назад
Thank you very much now i understand differentiation watching ur series of videos about it instead of just memorizing the rules of differentiation and applying it !
@avichalthakur1482
@avichalthakur1482 Год назад
Aren't there videos for partial differentiation?
@dawoool
@dawoool Год назад
A circle can be expressed as 2 functions: y = sqrt(r^2-x^2) (top half) and y = - sqrt(r^2-x^2)(bottom half). when I do the derivitave of the top half I get -x/y, just like with implicit differentiation. But when I do the bottom half, I get positive x/y. What am I doing wrong?
@samibchiri1442
@samibchiri1442 Год назад
You are doing nothing wrong: in the bottemleft quadrant x/y is negative. In the equation x (negative) is divided by y (positive because sqrt( r^2-x^2) stays positive). Example at (-3, -4) the equation gives (-3)/(sqrt(25-(-3)^2)= (-3)/(4). This is true since at the bottomleft quadrant the slope is negative.
@theterribleturnip
@theterribleturnip 6 лет назад
does anyone else answer his questions? xD like in the video when he asked if we were happy with how he got to the solution, i was like "wait *pauses* *scans the board* okay yea i got it". xD
@kyaruh
@kyaruh 3 года назад
you explain things so well, thank you!
@domesticd3signer339
@domesticd3signer339 8 месяцев назад
Edie woo makes me me go edie wow
@psych0-shorts
@psych0-shorts Год назад
THIS MAN IS THE GOATTTTTTTTT
@juliannafotheringham7101
@juliannafotheringham7101 10 месяцев назад
amazing thank you
@hakaneskici2771
@hakaneskici2771 Год назад
Thank you teacher
@thatomofolo452
@thatomofolo452 Месяц назад
👋👋
@nahomwg5116
@nahomwg5116 Год назад
Thank's a lot.
@JT-wk9sf
@JT-wk9sf 4 года назад
I would have liked one more example with a y impossible to extract...
@Nathaneal51
@Nathaneal51 4 года назад
at 10:19 why did you change (d/dx)y to dy/dx, because aren't you essentially going from the derivative of y wrt x to the rate of change of y to x which are two different things?
@chi3750
@chi3750 2 года назад
Thank you so much! You are the only one explained why y² became 2y·y' after differentiation
@zenyatta5064
@zenyatta5064 3 года назад
Thanks eddie
@reubenmanzo2054
@reubenmanzo2054 3 года назад
Just one question: how would you go about graphing this implicit gradient?
@onurrrrr77
@onurrrrr77 3 года назад
man, I really felt bad when he had to pass the best part which he differentiates y. He thought that sudents couldnt understand him and I feel him.
@mihlalidikwana1188
@mihlalidikwana1188 3 года назад
Wtf i was i tuned this with headset on almost busted my eardrum
@ksrajavel
@ksrajavel 4 года назад
Why at 11:03 Prof. Eddie Woo mentions dy/dx as gradient rather than derivative ( He seems to self correct).?
@kallewirsch2263
@kallewirsch2263 4 года назад
In this context,"gradient" means the actual numerical value at some specific point on the curve. The derivative is the formula to calculate the gradient. He already has the derivative. It is -x / y. Now he plugs in the values and gets the actual gradient at the point in question. Remember: "gradient" is just a fancy word for "slope of the tangent". But this is a numerical value. The derivative is a formula to calculate this slope at any point on the curve. The derivative describes in which way this slope changes when walking along the curve.
@elishagunasekara4038
@elishagunasekara4038 3 года назад
Thanks amazing video! why is the gradient negative though?
@arlieferguson3990
@arlieferguson3990 3 года назад
The only vid I've found that really explained the extra dy/dx part.
@Food_through_my_lens.
@Food_through_my_lens. 2 года назад
Thanks a lot for such easy explanation!
@briansullivan2664
@briansullivan2664 3 года назад
very good broseph!
@ochithyafernando1050
@ochithyafernando1050 3 года назад
I really don't know how I would pass calculus without you
@joseryanlatosa4698
@joseryanlatosa4698 5 лет назад
sir i am not a mathematician and i just want to understand dx/x integral could you make a video about it? thank you... im just so curious
@Nathaneal51
@Nathaneal51 4 года назад
he has made videos on it
@mobr.
@mobr. 4 года назад
Great video on implicit differentiation. Thank you!
@valadier3348
@valadier3348 2 года назад
Brilliant explanation
@loveyouself5389
@loveyouself5389 3 года назад
Great ❤️❤️❤️💕
@skoolscribe3918
@skoolscribe3918 4 года назад
The passion is just pouring 7:30. Just a constant 😭😷🚀
@ahmedelsabagh6990
@ahmedelsabagh6990 4 года назад
best math teacher ever
@danielhanson5560
@danielhanson5560 2 года назад
This explanation is fantastic!
@yizhenghe600
@yizhenghe600 Год назад
Very helpful
@game_changer08-y5p
@game_changer08-y5p 3 месяца назад
as helpful as your profile pic is when i feel horny to jerk off.
@charlottebruce8198
@charlottebruce8198 4 года назад
THANK YOU SIR!
@anshumansharma3555
@anshumansharma3555 4 года назад
great
@harrisonbennett7122
@harrisonbennett7122 6 лет назад
Thank you, you are amazing
@meltdown6856
@meltdown6856 5 лет назад
He sounds pained at the start of the vid
@vaiebhavpatil2340
@vaiebhavpatil2340 4 года назад
There's no second part,right?
Далее
Implicit Differentiation - example question
6:21
Просмотров 25 тыс.
Calculus 1 Lecture 2.7:  Implicit Differentiation
1:08:11
Просмотров 481 тыс.
МАЛОЙ ГАИШНИК
00:35
Просмотров 460 тыс.
БАГ ЕЩЕ РАБОТАЕТ?
00:26
Просмотров 111 тыс.
42 - The implicit function theorem
35:49
Просмотров 136 тыс.
What is the number "e" and where does it come from?
7:58
Leibniz's Derivative Notation (1 of 3: Overview)
13:10
Implicit Differentiation
11:45
Просмотров 1,1 млн
The essence of calculus
17:05
Просмотров 9 млн
Introduction to Calculus (Derivatives)
5:05
Просмотров 14 тыс.
Overview of Differentiation Rules
15:08
Просмотров 21 тыс.
МАЛОЙ ГАИШНИК
00:35
Просмотров 460 тыс.