Тёмный

Improper Integral of type 1 

Prime Newtons
Подписаться 219 тыс.
Просмотров 7 тыс.
50% 1

In this video, I showed how to rewrite an improper integral of type1 to make iteasier to compute

Опубликовано:

 

12 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 27   
@acerovalderas
@acerovalderas 5 месяцев назад
You are great. I am lucky to have found you.
@punditgi
@punditgi 5 месяцев назад
The proper way to learn about improper integrals is to watch Prime Newtons! 🎉😊
@ZolileZicwele-lb6bq
@ZolileZicwele-lb6bq 5 месяцев назад
Yeah, thats proper
@AzmiTabish
@AzmiTabish 5 месяцев назад
'Definite'ly 🙂
@amiahooman
@amiahooman 5 месяцев назад
Nice like begging
@learning-iz-fun
@learning-iz-fun 5 месяцев назад
Limit can be solved by observation as well. In the product of linear and exponential term, the exponential will always grow or shrink faster than linear
@iithomepatnamanojsir
@iithomepatnamanojsir 5 месяцев назад
Very nice sir
@savannahkim6679
@savannahkim6679 3 месяца назад
Love the flow. You are doing great. Keep on!!!!
@semanurgulhan9520
@semanurgulhan9520 4 месяца назад
You're amazing thank you♥️
@josegerardodias5591
@josegerardodias5591 2 месяца назад
Very nice! You are great!
@RanBlakePiano
@RanBlakePiano 3 месяца назад
This is terrific !
@arbenkellici3808
@arbenkellici3808 5 месяцев назад
Hello professor! I need your help to solving: lim x approaches 9- (9-x) 1/4=0 by delta epsilon proof Thank you!
@henrikljungstrand2036
@henrikljungstrand2036 5 месяцев назад
It seems you would need to change the x on the lhs of your expression into x+delta, change the 0 on the rhs into y+epsilon (y being an implicit function of x), and then assume you get such an arbitrary epsilon as an input, and trying to find/make up a suitable implicit function to compute delta as an expression of epsilon; then you would need to compute two different limits, one where epsilon is assumed positive and one where epsilon is assumed negative (where you may compute delta out of epsilon in different ways if you like); and in both cases showing that the expression in x and delta is behaving in such a way that computing it and then taking the limit as epsilon converges to 0 makes your delta also converge to 0, and then forces y to be 0 in both cases. Note that y is not allowed to be dependent on epsilon (or on delta, since delta is dependent on epsilon), only on x, while delta is allowed to depend on both x and epsilon. I have given you the outline for the general theoretical reasoning, now go and do the practical work yourself!
@holyshit922
@holyshit922 5 месяцев назад
Gamma function ? By very simple substitutoion we will get Gamma function
@Phantom_Reaper_
@Phantom_Reaper_ 5 месяцев назад
That's a cool approach, but i feel like it's using a higher level concept that most people won't be aware of at the level of class this question would be given
@holyshit922
@holyshit922 5 месяцев назад
@@Phantom_Reaper_I have used Gamma function for expressing product lately which I have got from ODE so I thought about it but I agree that it is better to use integration by parts and limits unless it is some strange introduction to the Gamma function
@Phantom_Reaper_
@Phantom_Reaper_ 5 месяцев назад
@@holyshit922 Ive only seen a little bit about the gamma function off of RU-vid, but does this integral just become - Γ(0) when you substitute t = -x? That's quite an elegant solution even though it may be unnecessary at this level
@holyshit922
@holyshit922 5 месяцев назад
@@Phantom_Reaper_ After substitution you will get -Γ(2) -te^{-t} = - t^{2-1}e^{-t} and Γ(2) = 1 Γ(z) has singularity at zero I tried to calculate coefficients of Chebyshev polynomial via power series solution of ode I derived equation in following way I know that T_{n}(x) = cos(n*arccos(x)) Let t = arccos(x) y(t) = cos(nt) Let's differentiate y(t) twice y''(t) = -n^2cos(nt) y''(t) = -n^2y(t) y''(t) + n^2y(t) = 0 Now I changed independent variable t = arccos(x) in this equation and I got (1-x^2)y''(x) -xy'(x) + n^2y(x) = 0 Now I tried to solve it using power series y(x) = \sum\limits_{m=0}^{\infty}c_{m}x^{m} While solving this equation I have got following recursion (m+2)(m+1)c_{m+2} - (m-n)(m+n)c_{m} = 0 and solved it for c_{m+2} (Because we expecting polynomial it is possible to solve also for c_{m}) c_{m+2}= \frac{(m-n)(m+n)}{(m+2)(m+1)}c_{m} c_{m} can be expressed in terms of product \frac{1}{m!}\cdot\prod\limits_{k=1}^{\lfloor\frac{m}{2} floor} (m - 2k - n)(m-2k + n) And I have got Γ(0) after expressing this product \prod\limits_{k=1}^{\lfloor\frac{m}{2} floor} (m - 2k - n)(m-2k + n) in terms of Gamma function but only for n=m=0
@kevinmadden1645
@kevinmadden1645 5 месяцев назад
​@@Phantom_Reaper_Using an A-Bomb to swat a fly .
@Ivan-fc9tp4fh4d
@Ivan-fc9tp4fh4d 5 месяцев назад
I think the last sentence was not correct. Limit does not converge to "-1". Limit IS equal to "-1".
@PrimeNewtons
@PrimeNewtons 5 месяцев назад
I actually meant to say the Integral converges to -1.
@bastianmora4780
@bastianmora4780 5 месяцев назад
1
@JSSTyger
@JSSTyger 5 месяцев назад
I'll say -1.
@arbenkellici3808
@arbenkellici3808 5 месяцев назад
Sorry (9-x)^1/4
@henrikljungstrand2036
@henrikljungstrand2036 5 месяцев назад
It would be better to redact your original comment.
Далее
improper  integrals Types 1 and 2
16:28
Просмотров 11 тыс.
How to use the error function for some tough integral
16:20
how Laplace solved the Gaussian integral
15:01
Просмотров 741 тыс.
Epsilon -delta proof for sqrt function
16:49
Просмотров 13 тыс.
Is x^x=0 solvable?
9:55
Просмотров 98 тыс.
Strategies for integrating  x^n e^(x^m)
12:17
Просмотров 8 тыс.
Evaluating Improper Integrals
12:24
Просмотров 193 тыс.
Austrian  Olympiad System of Equations
27:12
Просмотров 25 тыс.