Improve your Hunting Property by Removing Non-native Invasive Species  

Yes sure will when fully leafed out. 3% solution of Garlon 3a with surfactant will do the trick on bush honeysuckle.

Watch WHS you will get 1000 % better information than this shit channel

@@aaroncornelison5477 lol he wants you to keep your invasives Tad. Move along “aaron”

@@Landandlegacytube probably be better than removing the invasives without recommendation of what to replace it with that is cover and food.

This area has an extremely established honey suckle problem. I've yanked hundreds of not thousands. I've cut hundreds and killed with tordon. The issue I have is the small returning honey suckle in the areas I've hinge cut or dropped trees. Instead of pulling thousands of small shoots I'd prefer to just come through in the spring and spray the small stuff so the browse can have a chance.

If you’re spraying many different varieties of invasives such as brambles, vines, and shrubs all at once, 3% solution of Glypuosate, mixed with 3% Garlon 3a and surfactant will work just fine.

@@Landandlegacytube thank you very much

What is good deer habitat? Please explain

@@Landandlegacytube I'm not the dumbass with a channel telling people to get rid of good cover , wether it's native or non native. Multi flora is great cover and deer eat the crap out of it. You are telling people to get rid of great cover and food without having something to replace it.

@@aaroncornelison5477 you’re view of quality cover and food is likely created from being in an area of too many deer for too long, If deer are “eating the crap” out of MFR it’s because they’re very hungry and quality forage is limited, not because it’s preferred. Dr Harper says it best, if a homeless man is eating garbage is it because it’s quality food or because it’s the only food. Relying on non natives to provide forage and cover is a poor excuse for true habitat management and only a few “deer guys” will stand on that hill to claim it

@@Landandlegacytube I live in southwest MO. Cattle country. You are making way too much of a broad stroke on your painting. Stop it.

@@Landandlegacytube I will meet you any time to discuss good deer habitat any time you want.

That’s not a great mindset to have. Deer are very adaptable species and in many cases are over populated. Many native species are struggling (turkeys, quail, pollinators, etc etc) but deer aren’t. Ultimately deer are causing many problems just from the fact obsession people have for them.

@@Landandlegacytube oh so you want to reduce the number of deer? Really say that to your subscribers let them know you want to reduce the number of the species that they target. You are the Joe Biden of deer hunting.

@@aaroncornelison5477 absolutely - less deer on the landscape creates more resources for the remaining deer on the land, therefore those deer have healthier lives, healthier deer have bigger bodies and bigger antlers. Less deer also means better hunting success since you. An avoid bumping deer constantly going to and from stands. It’s a very straight forward concept similar to having a water impoundment. You can many for lots of fish and high catch rates or lower catch rates and bigger fish, can’t have both.

@@Landandlegacytube lmao 🤣😂 do you really think that if I got rid of all my chickens but still fed the same that I'd end up with more eggs? Us poor folks want deer meat and still want some antlers on the wall. We ain't rich pansy like you. Deer numbers matter more than a 200inch deer. We are happy with a 120 than your mom is with you.