'In a Violent Nature' - A Fantastically Fun FAILURE of Messaging [ENDING EXPLAINED] 

You’re forgetting a huge piece of dialogue that fixes a portion of your criticism. When the two teens meet up with the ranger and the killer is walking towards them final girl asked “well why don’t we just give him the necklace and he’ll stop”. Then the ranger says “giving him the necklace won’t make him stop”. The ranger then goes to say how the necklace wasn’t the only thing that bound him to staying dead and alluded to something else needing to be done that required him to be tied up. So just because he has the necklace now doesn’t mean he’s not out there still roaming and senselessly killing anyone he comes into contact with.

Dude!! Finally someone else mentions this, the bear does not = the killer in terms of motivations

Maybe it was a cocain bear, dishing out revenge on the rangers that stole his stash?

I don't think the message of the film is the necklace. I believe that the name of the film clearly says the message, that place is surrounded by violence, for Johnny this is something natural like drinking water and breathing air. That's why handing over the necklace wouldn't stop him. That's what the bear's story is about, some things have no logical explanation or reason, just like Johnny's motivation for killing. In a Violent Nature is not a masterpiece (and why does it always have to be?), I see this film as something more conceptual, the film could be easier for an audience accustomed to receiving answers to everything rather than stopping to understand something deeper than the most superficial layer of a film.

In a mundane nature.

I think that its easy to find excuses like the necklace and the bullying , were always looking for a motive . While your correct does his actions excuse what hes doing absolutely not. Its like why do these things when in reality the motivations do not matter its killing for killing sake. I think its messaging comes off perfectly because we Consume media Like Dahmer and we look back on serial killers and the questions always Why did they do these things. You give a killer a motivation or a backstory like the senseless bullying and murder and you want to sympathize with his plight but the excuses are a moot point . Instead its as the title says In a violent Nature , Evil doesn't need a motivation to be Evil its just easier to digest when they do .

I’ve been really looking forward to hearing your take on this. I enjoyed the originality shown in some of the kills, especially the girl who had been doing yoga 😬 but i did have a hard time disengaging from how poor the script was. I agree that it provided a really effective visualization of the effects PTSD has on a person, with how that traumatizing event is always going to feel like it’s about to happen again. I don’t think I’d watch it a second time, but I’m glad I ended up catching it in the theater.

I didn't take the bear story literally. I figured it was Johnny and she was just coping.

I've enjoyed it - thanks! And you have a great day too!

I personally loved it and the ending to me was good.

man these last handful of videos have been fantastic,

Gollum and Jason Virhees had a mutant child.

Well I think it’s trying to tell us he’s the exception he actually has a reason to go crazy and stab and it’s weird to believe but in this case the crazy Jason copy cat is the only one with a reason and he’s kinda in the right compared to everyone else

We know nothing about the final girl to care.

so the premise is Friday the 13th??? got it.

Nature is violent?

Im so early

Algorithm comment!!!

*subscribed*

FIRST!