In A World of Systems 

(2)

(3)

(4)

HAHAHAHAHA

(5) (we're literally watching this in class rn)

lezzgo!

hi eunice HAHAHHA

This comment will encourage future Sci 11 students for many years to come!

Thank you po sa encouragement! Sana okay ka lang po ngayon :> I wish the best for you!

hala mao ni ako subject rn late ko 1 hour pass hehe skl

same reason 😆 the struggle is shared swhesfshdhdh

Same lol. UP?

Ed Monte Yep, in the middle of Module 3 na kami

HAHAHAHAHAHA

@@rymercado7696 omg same sis

hello guys hahaha

samedt jai HAHAHAHAHA

@@rodlynjanemendoza2942 omg AHAHAA

+Steve Byers Did you know Antioch University in Seattle once had a master's program in Whole Systems Design? My adviser was Rodney Donaldson, protegee and archivist of all of Gregory Bateson's work. I felt fortunate to get that degree but I also felt way ahead of the curve having graduated in WSD 24 years ago!!! So glad to see Systems is getting out into the mainstream.

this is a great lesson .. but 90% of the world's population does not live with such privileges and leisure to do things. Close to 80% dont even have a garden to pick fresh vegetables from. I love it how the west creates these models of perfection, or shall we say near perfection. Systems!

Glad you enjoyed it!

Hi UP fren

Eyo iska

same here :)

oooof hahaha

Lmao

hi lace

@@jemalorarche2069 daeee wahahag

hi po

Pasaron ang Sci 11 💪

hi Claireeeeeeee

hello group palayok 👁️👅👁️

its probs more for the appreciation on things and recognizing the kind of impact u may have as an individual who is part of these systems,,, but uwu i digress

Can you give us an example of a system without a purpose? Thanks.

Do you mean natural systems like hydrological cycles? A farmer may have a goal of getting the right amount of water at the right time to crops, and that farmer is in a small way part of the hydrological cycle (whether they divert water sources, or develop soil with better water retention, or do nothing (their choice to do nothing makes them an active part of the system)), but other people have conflicting goals, and the system as a whole has no goal, whether or not we include the humans' goals. Is that what you mean?

Just saw these questions--gosh, there are infinite examples! Like two balls on strings knocking against each other. Or gas particles swirling on Jupiter. The first probably has a cyclic attractor, the latter a chaotic attractor.

like you?

@@marksman314 You are wildly wrong too, smartass. If they are repeating cycles, their goal is to maintain equilibrium. Not a human definition of a goal, but still a valid goal.