Incredible Biggest Wind Turbine Farm Installation Technology. Amazing Giant Factory Machines Working 

Smh…JFC you can’t be this dumb

Wind turbine would produce that energy within 6 months of operation. Also that concrete foundation would last up to 50-60 years.

Бедные черви как они будут теперь жить (

😂

Ну в России на такой проект бабки распилят в карман, растянут на 10+ раз дольше, качеством хуже, рабочей силой по объявлению. Ещё больше бабок получится

Russia is shit without oil and gas.

@@zurgmuckerberg ваш уровень образования говорит о том, что вы не очень умны. Саудовская Аравия на 90 процентов живёт на продаже нефти. В России продажа энергии это 30 процентов от ВВП. Вы из какой страны? Чем сильна твоя страна?

@@zurgmuckerberg I'll translate yours for you, so I don't think you can read it with a dictionary. your level of education indicates that you are not very smart. Saudi Arabia lives on oil sales for 90 percent. In Russia, energy sales account for 30 percent of GDP. What country are you from? What is your country's strength?

No the wind turbine produce that energy within 6 months.

Yeap! Thats so energy efficient .. 😂

I would be curious to know how long it must operate for in order to break even in terms of the energy expended for the materials, manufacturing and construction.

@@davidemmet7343 Just posted a very similar question.

@@fifthof1795 It is unfortunate that those kind of questions don't get asked more! I am all for sustainable, green energy but I don't want to see expensive virtue signaling.

They are terrible... we ar goin on 3 years and still dealing with terrible roads etc.. They have to operate atleast 15 years... if they make it that long... The destruction and waste of fuel and precious resources is an abomination....

And tons of concrete and plastic. Crazy !

❤

On what basis are you comparing this project to' is it worse than building a coal plant? im just curious what your thoughts are.

"East of San Francisco, one of the country’s oldest wind farms has produced power for more than 30 years. There, almost 1,500 old turbines were taken down in recent years. Only 82 new ones were installed in their place, but they produce about the same amount of electricity." Meaning, the new turbines are 18x more powerful than the ones they are replacing. Incredible! And now we have ones that are 50x more powerful than that on the way. The GE Haliade-X 14 MW turbine produced a new record of 312 MWh in a single 24hr period.

@@pianodarr you are referring to the ones on the Altamont Pass those are the ones I worked on as a Young Man.

@@davemartinez4143 Cool. If I was starting out today instead of being 55, I'd go into building or designing renewables. U.S. Renewable Energy Jobs Employ 800,000+ People and Rising: in Charts "Twice as many Americans now work in the wind industry as in coal mining, and solar employs many more… "Nationally the U.S. solar industry work force is bigger than that of oil and gas construction, and nearly three times the size of the entire coal mining work force.”

@@pianodarr to be completely honest with you I was just helping at the construction part. I really have no idea how they work. ? I was 18 years old at the time

I did know about the amazing amount of steel, but here I learned about the crazy amount of concrete.

@Leon Wilcox how are you traveling? On a drone? Oh yes a Tesla... clean energy in your place but polution in the production of batteries, electronics and other equipment. Not to talk about the end of life disposal of those....you are so smarter than everybody👍

@@DS-ll5fn Don't forget about the coal burned in the power plant that supplies your electricity to power your tesla.

Why would it catch fire

👍

@@Danieldoomerta

For not to catch fire there will be the engineers magic

you are so right about that

Solar doesn't provide as much energy. Also the panels are highly toxic after their lifespan.

@@arun2404 Really? Don't wind turbine generators require 'wind'? Not every place has wind 24/7. Despite my criticism of wind turbines, they are part of the solution. Together with solar generation and batteries, we can greatly reduce our fossil fuel dependence.

@@Anthony-qq2xm Good point! I wonder if there's anything toxic involved in manufacturing fiberglass turbine blades? And I wonder if fiberglass is recyclable?

Complete waste of taxpayer funded money for no quantifiable change in the climate in any way,there is no climate emergency,total bullshit,part of the great reset where you will own nothing and be totally pissed off!

Forgot a few. How efficient are they? (less than 40%) where do they put the blades when they are disposed of? Made of fiber glass and will never decompose! How long before they generate profit? 15 years, How long do they last? Average life span? 11! Not so green

,,,WEATHER WARFARE is here see MIKE MORALES show WIND FARMS put ELECTRICITY INTO THE ATMOSPHERE and destroy the normal climate and

They ruin the view of what exactly, fields?

@@Termini_Man Yes, the whole countryside. Unless you live in the city and never leave it

@@swany001 I don't see what is so beautiful about the vast fields that have been scarred from the earth. and even if, very few people will see the wind turbines. a handful of farmers and the occasional person passing through. Anyway, how it looks Isn't really an issue. The benefits of them are immense, and the obtaining of resources, manufacturing, maintenance, and operation have very little negative environmental impact, especially compared to the negative environmental impact of generating equivalent amounts of power by burning hydrocarbons. If I could have a massive wind turbine in my backyard, I gladly would.

@@Termini_Man Well looks like you don't get out much. Take a drive down to Taralgan or Crookwell down the Hume highway .where there are about 50 of these things over the rolling hills even on windy days only about half a dozen are rotating. Plus they have a life span of about 10 to 15 years.

@@swany001 The lifespan tends to be about 20 to 25 years, but yeah I admit that that is not super long. They brake and turn their blades parallel to the wind at high speeds as to decrease wear (the power lines might also bottleneck the power transfer in heavy winds too, but I am not sure with that one). I think they look cool, a testament to the massive engineering feats humans can create that aren't super awful to the environment. It is crazy just how tall they are, and for them to be moving too.

Don't forget the wind powered foundries making the rebar and structure framing, concrete plants, and the facilities where there built.

Your point being . Once the wind turbine is put up it generates electric while the wind is blowing for the rest of it's life without generating emissions. Sure there are problems with them. But hardly the diesel fuel used by the trucks to put them up. After all I am guessing you don't really give a crap about the diesel fuel being burned up by everyone else.

@Leon Wilcox don't forget 100s of gallons of fossil fuels filling gear boxes. 100s of lbs of fossil fuels packed in bearings. 1000s of miles of fossil fuels insulating wires. Yep saves when working. Go ask Texas how reliable wind was. Wind power is not gonna eliminate fossil fuel it needs it to exist.

@Leon Wilcox so does your house and car. I bet your not eliminating anything in your life involving fossil fuels. Actually it was our current governments incompetence that caused the problems in Texas by not allowing steps to be taken to ease the situation. Like you said colder places have wind power and it works. I'm in the NE snowbelt and our power plants never froze. Clearly it was bad decisions at the higher levels that was at fault, other areas have the knowledge to avoid the problems. Fossil fuels won't be going away.

@Leon Wilcox how much fossil fuels went into mining the batteries for your ev?

Not clean

Onde à toneladas de betão e toneladas de aço só um burro é que diz que é ecológico há gente mais parva neste mundo

@Leon Wilcox the cost and work put into this energy product doesn't equally the energy it provides. And it takes the burning of fossil fuels to make every piece of the piece of crap.

@Leon Wilcox interesting how you pour out your judgement on those you don't know. I have no connection with either industry but I do know the facts. And outrage? Lol. Maybe you but not me.

@Leon Wilcox I can say the same about you. Only I have no reason to "regurgitate" lies. Turbines are 100% made from iron ore, aluminum, copper, plastic, rubber etc which is all created by fossil fuels. That's a fact. They have a 25 year life span and where I'm from we have tons of them everywhere...but...they account for less than 2% of our entire electrical grids capacity at any given time. I'm in Ontario Canada and we have superior electrical knowledge as we supply 1/2 of the electricity our American neighbors enjoy and I can tell you that nuclear power and hydro electric power is what you use to supply power. Not shitty wind turbines that poison aquafers, create noise pollution as well as waste tax payers money on get rich quick skeems like "green energy". It's ok. The juice will wear off in about 20 years when all these turbines die out and nuclear/hydro is still going strong.

@@paulsmith5469 Well said.

Any idea on how to stop a company from building them? They are trying to put a bunch where I live in the Ozark Mountains. @@paulsmith5469

Exactly- making green backs off of green guilt is stupid easy

Most are now producing electricity without subsidies unlike fossil fuels or nuclear!

@@brendancooney9401 If it wasnt a grift, why do they leave entire wind farms to decay. The entire energy sector is a subsidy. Thats why the politicians invest in it.

@Leon Wilcox Wow! Get triggered much?

I don't care where they work, Our news had tons of footage of many turbines covered in ice, not moving, frozen solid. And solar panels iced over. The generators are still powered with fossil fuel. And the Honda generator that ran my house for 5 days, and kept my Family alive, was burning some good dead dinosaur's.

@@SPROCK3TMONST3R triggered you too. Oil is the way to go. It always has been and always will be. Global warming is a lie. The climate is in perpetual change. Scientist said the Arizona desert used the be a lush grassland less than 1500 years ago. In the 90s scientists were saying the Mt. Pinatubo eruption put out more CO2 than mankind throughout history. That was the consensus. One thing I learned, there is always an agenda, and rich companies wield much power.

Nuclear fan here. Sorry boys

Its really terrible.. Ive lived here 20 years and now Im smack in one..... They are even worse than most ppl can imagine....

Birds aren't big fans either.

Get it?.. Birds... Big fans? These fans are for the birds... Actually they are against the birds. Lol I crack myself up.

@Jhon Christover What t f does that even mean?

I know...just thank God they are not in your backyard!!

одичальій катсап вернись наxyй запарєбрік собирать валежник пока Вексельберг разрешил

The location, wind speed and duration of wind spped matters much apart from consistent progressive govt policy on import duty, local tax and subsidiary of State. For example, souther tip of India enjoy both East, west wind with oceans on 3 direction s. Is Suzlon failure because of energy orientation rather than wind orientation? There should be consistent progressive. Govt , policy for sustaining with correct feasibility reports. 👍 For sharing. from India.

power depends of the wind, if you have internet connection you can find these informations.

It takes 50+ years to pay itself off. Wind energy is a scam. Imagine your government taxing you for their "wind"

@@higherlifts420 Where is your evidence? Total nonsense. Bigger turbines are much more efficient than smaller ones and the technology has improved. In the meantime gas and oil are very expensive.

Far more than it will ever return. They average 20% efficiency, barely produce enough electricity to run a household, cost $300,000, last about 20 years, made from all non-renewable materials.

They pay for themselves in about 8 months of operation

Not me

I would think (hope) the cost effectiveness has been studied

I have read different numbers, that the carbon footprint reaches equilibrium in 1.5 years. But this is an exceptionally large one, numbers will likely vary for different types. Once up, the bigger ones are substantially more efficient. I did think "that's an awful lot of concrete".

just go on field n do work what labor is doing than u will realize what labor work is.

@MOHAMMAD MOIZUDDIN I have nothing against labor. There are a lot of people who are very hard working and doing things very well. But everything is given to them, the tools, the machines. But there is a genius man behind them that we don't even know about. We don't know who is the man, that came up and created things 1st. And don't believe it is a team of work it is not that way. There is a one man in team, who came up with things and doesn't get any credit for it.

Yea landfill . .. not so green is it.

Yeah, it's all a big steaming pile. But it's a slightly less steaming pile than if nobody bothered. I think the key is to acknowledge that there isn't just one option available. You're 'allowed' to use shitty technology to produce slightly less shitty technology. And why not? It doesn't have to be all or nothing. Once the turbines are working they're running on a free resource and reducing the need for coal, gas, oil, nuclear, whatever. It's better than nothing. Not perfect, but that's no reason not to try stuff.

@@EleanorPeterson yea and only 20 years. Then the blades end up in the landfill. You can't break down fiberglass. Oh and electric cars.... you know how much earth you need to dig to get the stuff that goes into making the battery. Not so green is it. Look it up.

But I am 🐼

المسيح يسوع رسول الله دين اللة الإسلامي مافي شعي مسحي دين اللة واحد الاسلامي

The word that should be used is, ELOHIM not god, as it is Satan's title.

@@davidcloutier5145 well its up to you to say what you will , you cant tell me what to say i know him as GOD he give the life that you have there now doing other things

Haha..... ya right. Good one! Far from environmentally friendly.

Лет через стоооооооооооооо

Да это их не волнует :)) Они потом на нём в космос полетят. Идиоты.

Окупится гораздо бистрее, чем Фокусима и Чернобиль

@@ВладСікорський-в4ф эти аварии - результат диверсии.

Деньги некуда девать

المسيح يسوع رسول الله دين اللة الإسلامي مافي شعي مسحي دين اللة واحد الاسلامي

@Leon Wilcox You probably own stocks on companies that produce these. You might catalogue us as fools, but you are a greedy and irresponsible bastard.

Le CO2 dans l'atmosphère est plus grave, à moins de vouloir revenir au temps des cavernes..

Where are the mass grave yards located and how many blades are buried?

They don’t rot they are fiberglass they are just there. Bad for the environment

@@raybin6873 Look it up .. You'll find the blades are cut up and put in the ground as there is no way to recycle them

@@fasteddie7997 Exactly

How do you want to produce electricity?

Neither one is a good idea. Where do dispose of the spent fuel rods??

@@thomasritter3159 TerraPower can use ‘spent’ from current power station and tailings from uranium mining (which cannot be enriched). Basically it uses it all up. According to them there is enough above ground material to provide all our energy needs for centuries to come.

@@DanVicary well put 😰

Yep. The music's actually offensive! A pity, really. I understand that not everybody wants to provide a spoken commentary, but an engineering video like this would really benefit from some captions - a few facts, figures, dimensions, criticisms, the pros and cons of the technology, and so on. I hope you noticed that my reply to your Comment was written without a musical accompaniment. I was totally naked when I typed it, though. ;-)

I looked in the description for where the wind farm is, the make and model of the turbines installed and total generating capacity but just saw details of the music. The people likely to watch this sort of video care about such details.

The video may very much be a computerized animation video like what's in the movie. So don't be fooled!

Behind the expert work, quite admirable, the contrast with this low-end music highlights the useless and purely green marketing character of this whole operation

Big rip off

Ei creio em nome de JESUS CRISTO

Allah de de ise yarasın manyak.

@@vatansever6861 - JESUS CRISTO DE NAZARÉ AMA VOCÊ INCONDICIONALMENTE MUITO ❤️🇧🇷🙏

Нет, в процессе его создания, обеспечивается занятость недовольных тарифами на электроэнергию)))

Если все люди так думали мы бы до сих пор жили в каменном веке Это альтернативные Технологии На перспективу , на будущее

Если хотя бы лет пятьдесят отработает то окупит себя 100 раз

@@ВладСкиданов-т3к постройка, ремонт и утилизация никогда к сожалению не окупится. Это альтернативная энергия. Там где нет других вариантов. Всегда будет рваная генерация, то избыток, то нехватка. Пока не смогут создать дешёвые аккумуляторы большой ёмкости, солнечная и ветряная энергетика останется пафосной картинкой

@@ВладСкиданов-т3к Хотели сказать: окупится при условии если за 50 лет будет 100 ветряных дней? -- нет, не окупится, это слишком мало.

Вот тоже интересно как они эту энергию перерабатывают, не напрямую же потребителю

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-zJ2lM6n9PIE.html

@Leon Wilcox it is what it is.

@Leon Wilcox you believe what you want

@Leon Wilcox but burn fuel to set up these wind turbines and mining for precious metals for solar panels and turbines don't count, you liberals are all the same.

@@barryvarga3538 It's not about the environment. It never was

@Leon Wilcox Leon, learn to do a little reading before making up stuff to support you “Feelings over facts” way of life. energycentral.com/news/retiring-worn-out-wind-turbines-could-cost-billions-nobody-has

And I bet you believe it was all done without producing ANY CO2. What a load of rubbish. They build them for one reason only, to get the huge subsidies from governments, your money, if you’re a tax payer. Just sayin!!!

@@richardtemby4358 Nobody actually believes that there is no CO2 emitted in the construction of these turbines, it's the fact that they can generate electricity without the use of fossil fuels that will mean less CO2 is emitted into the atmosphere.

@@dsrnotverycashmoney1796 So does the generator on my bicycle but it doesn’t produce base load power, just like wind and solar. Also all this hype was supposed to reduce electricity costs, give me one country where costs have reduced, without government subsidies. Look at Germany, starting to move away from these woke efforts. The only benefits they have produced is to increase the wealth of the investors in these wind and solar farms. Maybe in another fifty years after everyone has finally moved to nuclear there will be lots of jobs created to dispose of all the leftover junk. Just sayin!!!

@@richardtemby4358 oh dear, another coal rep seeing his job go up in flames.

@@null643 Here’s a fact that few people are aware of. Land owners in the Welland area of Ontario who signed up to having wind generators on their land are required to do the removal and regeneration of the areas when the units reach their use by date, all at the land owners cost. How’s that for a sweet deal? Money from the government to put them up, zero cost to take them down and we all pay higher energy bills to the investors.

@Leon Wilcox it's all cool be when the wind blows. I've seen acres of windmills just hanging out.Nothing happens. Explore that while we live with what we've got NOW!!!

Iu

typically pays for it's carbon birth~ death in about 5 to 8 months. It's the scale.

@@philrabe910 it’s true- there’s a sucker born every minute

если честно..0..они производят очень мало энергии..один ветряк на 50 семей...на 5 миллионый город полей не хватит.

@@eckuruf147 ИНТЕРЕСНО какой доход должен быть у этих пяти семей, чтобы сначала построить, а потом обслуживать эти ветряные мельницы?

Ich habe mir

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-zJ2lM6n9PIE.html

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-zJ2lM6n9PIE.html

😘😘

Сьезди в зону отчуждения или на реку теча на экскурсию, потом сравнивай экологичность.

@@ЮрийЯкупов-и5р забей в ГУГЛе запрос на ТТХ АЭС БРЕСТ и глупые вопросы отпадут сами а заодно поГУГЛи про утилизацию лопастей этих ветряков

@@LomakinSergei а тыэ посмотри про утилизацию ядерных отходов. Ну для тебя Россия, Урал, Снежинск, Маяк если знакомы? А дуракам немцам может неведомо про АЭС!?

@@ЮрийЯкупов-и5рвот если б ты про БРЕСТ ТТХ прочитал бы то про утилизацию ядерных отходов глупых вопросов не возникло бы.

@@LomakinSergei дак РБМК-1000 тоже охренеть какой. Правда около него 1000 лет жить нельзя теперь.