India's ancient caste system misinterpreted by modern historians? 

Why are u still following such a caste system.Leave ,be free and enjoy the free world.God loves everyone .

Bhai karlo exchange. Mujhe mil jyega reservation, Brahmin hone ka aise to koi fayada nhi ghata hi hai

@@shashwatanand5397 wahi toh baat h bhai reservation k liye caste exchange kroge lekin jo real casteism usk liye exchange karoge ?

@@datsrohan Bhai sab paise se hota hai. I have Dalit friends who are from rich families having government jobs. Unke saath koi oppression nhi hota, why? Money and power, jiske bhi pas hai he becomes a social elite and no one gives a damn about caste samjhe. Sirf reservation ki wajah se differences hain. Everything else is just propaganda.

brother dont call yourself lower caste....call it a different caste ...and equal to them

Proof is in your statement that caste system is modern. Your ancestor was a professor in a college setup by the British. Why would he allow other castes (ethnicities) to be eligible for his job? This is no different to people wanting less immigration to keep their wages higher. So do Donald Trump anti-immigration parochialists follow ancient Indian caste system? Both caste and modern versions of hinduism are positive orientalism. Neither existed in pre-modern India in a consistent way across India.

​@@betadevb ​ What you are saying is completely out of context and incomprehensible, make more sense while writing any answer. She has made perfect sense that caste system is inherent part of hinduism and has been going on since thousands of years, and has been a discriminatory tool against Dalits and shudras. Watch the video completely as the panellists has given several points that proves caste system existed in hinduism

@@silentuniverse2401 no my understanding is the modern academic understanding. Check out works of Nicholas dirks who is the leading expert on this or Gnana aloysius who is a Dalit activist. Both moder Hinduism and Islam in South Asia was institutionalized by the British in 18th century. There is no "thousands of years" here. British needed caste system to find unpaid labour for their plantations. You can say Brahmins benefitted but the "intricate feature of Hinduism for 1000s of years" is fake history.

@@betadevb keep your points based on facts and research. It's a sensitive issue so your own perception isn't sufficient. रविदास जन्म के कारनै, होत न कोउ नीच नकर कूं नीच करि डारी है, ओछे करम की कीच [ कोई भी व्यक्ति किसी जाति में जन्म के कारण नीचा या छोटा नहीं होता है, आदमी अपने कर्मों के कारण नीचा होता है. ] This was said by Saint Ravidas in 900CE and Britishers came in 1700CE and there are many proofs that caste was in hinduism since ages.

​@@silentuniverse2401 that's written in devanagri and modern sanskrit - developed in 17th and 18th century by the British - Fort William College is one of the major places where this happened. Likely transcribed during British period. Original text would be dated to 900CE - but that doesn't mean the text was in widespread use In 900CE most of modern day India did not speak or understand devanagari sanskrit. Were translations floating around for people in Kanyakumari and Bengal to understand this? Who was travelling across the subcontinent, risking confrontations with tigers, leopards and hostile tribes, to translate and spread this word? The history is the same with Islam - Urdu scholarship, much like modern Sanskrit scholarship, was institutionalized under the British. I am not saying caste based discrimination does not exist in India - it obviously does. But it is not an ancient monolothic practice. It was institutionalized in 17th century onwards. And this is not my stand - google who Nicholas Dirks is. It's his research. He is chancellor of UC Berkeley. Possibly world's most renowned expert on South Asian history.

Haa jis se jisko fayda vo Good system aur reservation se koi fayda nhi isliye wrong system

actuly he knows the truth,but being a rrs member he can not say it openly.

It is because he is an immoral hypocrite. He is one of those ancient nationalist people who refuse to accept ANY criticism of India's culture or history. To people like him India is a perfect country whose modern problems are ONLY cause by someone from outside of India. Obviously there are some rooted cultural practices of India's people which perpetuate racism, discrimination, and mistreatment.

Caste and jaati are different. Jaati is based on the profession. Jaati is a characteristics, skills of a person. Cast system exist in america too because normal man in USA cant expect the respect of president.

Ms. Reddy caste is the English word for जात in Marathi or जाती in Hindi. I think you got confused between caste and religion. Religion means धर्म

Upa time me Bana tha

Caste System is a Violation Of Human Rights

@@teeluckdharrysailesh8834 how

Mountstuart Elphinstone in a written reply to the House of Commons in August 5, 1832 on mobility in India despite the caste system : "Notwithstanding the institution of castes, there is no country where men rise with more ease from the lowest rank to the highest. The first nabob (now king) of Oude, was a petty merchant; the first peishwa, a village accountant; the ancestors of Holcar were goatherds; and those of Scindia, slaves. All these, and many other instances, took place within the last century. Promotions from among the common people to all the ranks of civil and military employment, short of sovereignty, are of daily occurrence under native states, and this keeps up the spirit of the people, and in that respect partially supplies the place of popular institutions. The free intercourse of the different ranks also keeps up a sort of circulation and diffusion of such knowledge and such sentiments as exist in the society. Under us [i.e. in Britain], on the contrary, the community is divided into two perfectly distinct and dissimilar bodies, of which the one is torpid and inactive, while all the sense and power seems concentrated in the other… " Source: Dow, Alexander, The History of Hindostan, vol. I, Today & Tomorrow’s Printers & Publishers, 1973, first published 1770., page 32.

In Hinduism, birth based caste is a superstitious system, however Varna was the original system, in Varna there was no upper or lower, people chose the work of which they are qualified for and according to Bhagavad Gita, anyone can be a Brahmin (Teacher, Scholar profession), Shatriya (Warrior, Army profession), Vaishya (Trader, Business profession), Shudra (Other social workers) based on as per their skills, knowledge, and capabilities: 🔹In Bhagavad Gita 4:13, Krishna says that he created different Varnas (Profession) on the basis of one's Karma (Activity) and Guna (Quality). 🔹Bhagavad Gita 5:18 "The truly learned, with the eyes of divine knowledge, see with equal vision a Brahmin, a cow, an elephant, a dog, and a dog-eater" 🔹Bhagavad Gita 9:29 "I am equally disposed to all living entities: there is neither friend nor foe to Me: but those who with living sentiments render divotional service unto Me, such persons are in Me and I am in them." 🔹Bhagavad Gita 18:41 "The duties of the Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras are distributed in accordance with their guṇas (quality) and not by birth. Caste is a Spanish and Portuguese word 'casta' which stands for 'Breed' or 'lineage'. During earlier times Caste use to be Varna (Profession) and based on merit and not merely by birth, I can give instances from the ancient times, where a so-called modern day "lower caste" moved to "upper caste", e.g. Guru Valmiki, Kabir Das was from a shudra family but became a brahmin based on merit, etc and btw Ravana, his younger brother Kumbhakarna all were Brahmins knowledgeable person from Northern India but because of their notorious activities all were punished by Rama (believed to be an OBC if we abide by today's caste categorization). Lastly, you have to understand the British motive behind imposing caste: The Caucasians (Europeans) created Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda, Africa, to divide and control the native population, and for this reason, the Rwanda Genocide occurred. The same attempts and inequalities Europeans also tried to create amongst Indians by separating Northern India and Southern India into "Aryans" VS "Dravidians" and further dividing Hinduism into 3,000 castes and 25,000 sub-castes. And also read about Herbert Hope Risley who created casteism, racism in Indian society by one's facial features and skin color, and Bishop Robert Caldwell who propagated the "Aryan Invasion" in Southern India to convert "Dravidians" into Christianity. Read the book 'Castes of Mind' by Nicholas Dirks

They are other form of supremists like white racism in West.

Because caste word comes from the roots of Portugese word Casta first used in 1569 and when Portugese came to India in 1628 they employed this word to divide people and spread hatred among us for political gains and facilated mass conversion. when the Iberians came to Asia and the Americas, they began classifying people by descent. The Indian society used to run on the basis of 'Gotram' and and their are ample examples around you to check that a Brahman and a person belonging to Sc/St category have the same gotram which makes them a family. So this caste system decided by birth and all that is a sham that has taken over to divide the people. One can also check the Bhagvad Geeta chapter 18 verse 41 where it is written that the duties of Brahman kshatriya vaishya shudra are distributed according to their qualities and not by birth. And in no scriptures Vedas Purana Upanishads it is written that varnas are based on birth. And also in chapter 18 verse 43 it is written that one's varna is decided by their own actions and capabilities and karma(also written in manusmriti adhyay 10). Caste system (based on birth) was never born in India and isn't mentioned in any of the scriptures

@@technext6272 caste is segregation based on genes. Brahmin is most intelligent No wonder ceo of google and Microsoft happen to be a Brahmin

Exact

Actually I think Hindi is not his mother tongue therefore he is kinda slow

No dude it still happen in india.

nikku reservation is the cause of existing cast system now

@@raushanpathak4015 no dude actually reservation based upon caste discrimination.if we kill caste discrimination in our society then reservation will die naturally.

@@nikkukumari5132 you are obviously a lower caste person

@@MohitSharma-cy4rv sadar charanaspars apko🙇‍♀️🙇‍♀️🙇‍♀️

The same system is still going on in every country. Soldiers have the responsibility to protect the country.

@@DipakBose-bq1vv abe dhakkan but everyone can become a soldier. It's not based on birth. Infact army sometimes forces citizens. Khajput chutiyo ne because of pride probably didn't let shudras and dalits prepare for war. Muslims and Christians dont face this problem. Ur denial and answer back shows how sick upper caste is

@@noname-oo7rd Abe idiot kshatriyas had the responsibility to protect society not Rajputs, Rajputs and kshatriyas are two different things, Rajputs was a caste group which originated from different castes like jats,gujjars,Ahirs, and other similar castes during 11th century then after 15th century system got corrupted and it got based on lineage, so actually Rajputs are not even original kshatriyas because some Rajputs even came from lower caste such as kacchawahas, but you are an idiot you are confusing kshatriyas with Rajputs.

@@noname-oo7rd lol I know caste system is bad and needs to be removed but I still think Varna system is good option, it was based on karma not birth, otherwise I endorse and agree and what you said above.

The Upanishads are the highest authority on what Hinduism is. It doesn't mention the caste system we follow. Upanishads proclaim one God that is Brahman and all other life forms originated from Brahman and each life form has a part of Brahman in them called Atman. But due to ignorance the individuals are not able to realise this truth that they are part of Brahman. Once the darkness or ignorance is removed, the individuals can realise they are derivatives of Brahman itself. This is what the rishis realized in their deep meditation- i.e Aham Brahmasmi meaning I am Brahman. If each individual is derived from Brahman, obviously the whole world is one family- Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam! It's not very difficult to understand. But the so called priests/ Brahmins distorted this truth and devised caste system to for selfish reason. They degenerated the beautiful Sanathana Dharma for selfish reason and this resulted in the decline and conquer of India . It's high time we bring the truths of Sanathana Dharma, where the only merit is goodness.

Remove your caste with your name. If your want all this.

You have not understood it fully. The word "caste" itself is a foreign word.

@@jimmatrix7244 who cares Aslong it affects people.

Caste system is in every country but it is not groped like it is grouped in India and the peoples of different castes were discriminated. This is the only difference between India and other countries but unfortunately it is represented in such a way that it has created a huge problem

@@ravi-gx2qc2qz4r can you show me the caste system examples in other countries... go to any crime or jobs or politics or any social structure it is still based on manu...

Remove caste ... without caste there is no caste system .

You want to remove caste system and you're yourself presenting with caste. First remove your caste with your name then give lecture to others.

@@dr.harishkumarkhatri2149 Is that supposed to be a valid response to Arpan Patel? Do you realize how what you wrote is self contradictory and immoral? You are suggesting HE must change his name. WHY? Because you suggest that other people hear his name and treat him because of the caste the name is associated with. BUT WHY should HE be changing his name? Other people are obligated to not associate people's names with any caste and they must treat everyone equally as India's constitution requires. Are you also going to say the the people in the lowest untouchable case also simply have to "change their name?" How is a victim supposed to be responsible to change their name? It is the people who love the caste system who are obligated to stop discriminating.

Why would I suggest you to change your name. You are against Caste System and you are yourself mention caste with your name. That's why I wrote that. No where I wrote that I'm against caste system and for your kind information this is my mail id. Otherwise my name is Harish Kumar on every record. Hope you would satisfy now.

If Ram was purshotam and also Holy Spirit then he is not believed Sitamai but by listening of other how He doubted her and how killed Sambuka by following caste system

Correct

Tu v gandu hai ravish ki tarah

@@babasolar7100toder moto sheyana howar theke bhai amra gandu e bhalo. shudhu proshno kori, karor khoti korina.

Brahmin pareshan is only reason of support for cast system.

@@mohammadrafique5610 very true

yes, we always need a ravis kumar. a anna...... and we r dump. yes . u r right

sahi kaha

Bbot hi sahi bola

GURU TOH HAI HI LEKEEN UNHE KIDNAP KAR EK KHAS TABKA KAR LIYA THAPPA LAGA LIYA

Kamtaprasad Raj आप ने गलत बात की है मेवाड़ की महारानी मीराबाई ने भगवान श्री कृष्ण जी की प्रिय भक्त थीं पर उन्हें सच्चे गुरु की खोज थी तब उन्हें पता चला कि सन्त रविदास जी बड़े सन्त थे तब मीराबाई ने अपना गुरु बनाया इसी तरह मारवाड़ मतलब राजस्थान के जोधपुर के पास बालोतरा उसके पास मालानी के राजा मल्लीनाथ जी उनकी पत्नी ने अपना गुरु सन्त धारू जी मेघवाल थे इसी तरह एक उदाहरण भिष्मपिताह ने प्रतिज्ञा ली थी उसके पीछे कारण था अपने पिता की शादी करवानी थी वो लड़की मच्छ कन्या थी केवट की पुत्री और शुद्र वर्ण को पढ़ाई का अधिकार नहीं था तो ऋषि वाल्मीकि जी ने संस्कृत में रामायण कैसे लिखी और ऋषि एतराये जी ने 16सस्कार कैसे लिखें उनको पढ़ने का अधिकार नहीं था तो ऐसे हजारों उदाहरण प्राचीन समय का है पर 3000हजार साल में कम उदाहरण मिलेंगे उस समय में उस समय भारत देश में भेदभाव बढ़ा हुआ था अत्यचार अधिक था उसके बाद भगवान बुद्ध ने जन्म लिया नेपाल में लुंबिनी राज्य में शाक्य वंश में राजा के घर में उसके बाद का इतिहास सभी जानते है

@@arpitchauhan8225 ji... But ambedkar ne esa kabhi nhi kahan ki iss reservation ko 200-300 salon tk chalana h... Ye hmari sari govts. Ki nakamyabi & votebank ki rajniti ki vjh se ab tk h....

Does he have written on history would love to read it. Or Any online class of him.

Kha likha he?

@@yatharthagrawal1416 लिखने का क्या ......उन्हीने सबसे पहले हिंदू धर्म के वर्ण व्यवस्था को खुली चुनौती देकर ज्ञान का दरवाजा अछूत, वैश्या , खुनी , डकैत, हर जाती के इन्सान को खुला किया ,समानता का संदेश दिया जो हिंदू धर्म मे नही था क्यूकी हिंदू धर्म का बेस असामानता थी ....तो उन्होने जातिगत भेदभाव को खुली चुनौती दि तो थी

@@rajeevkamra9120 jhuth fail rahe he aap

@@yatharthagrawal1416 आप बुद्ध धर्म के बारे मे ज्यादा जानते होंगे. कितने 'किताब पढे हमे भी बाताओ

@@yatharthagrawal1416 br Ambedkar ke books pado

And those are thousands of year deprived from everything..... You will not uplift for their development and dignified life?

"भारतीय" राष्ट्रीयता Nationality

han bhai aisa hi br ambedkar ne socha tha aur lo ooper se chamatkar ho gya . roj bhagwan ki pooja karte raho aur chamatkar ho jayega

सुदर्शन जी को सुनकर बहुत अच्छा लगा लगा एक महान इतिहासकार को सुन रहा हू।

Baat Keval column bharne tak hi nahi hai sir.

There are no such thing like shudras , untouchables in India. It's in the mind of people . How can person be proud or pity on himself just because of caste.

This is the problem with you people, you guys are so deep into victimhood that it stunts your ability to grow and overcome this oppression and become stronger. Unless this happens you are bound to stay the same.

@@aloksen626 Why don't you change names and show how it's done?

@@virtualmaza513 Yes, it's in minds of people that's why there are still such thing as shudra and untouchables.

Its all created by British education. Why would you expect others to touch you first of all? Respect yourself man. Why do you want others to acknowledge. Do your karma and be happy

Surendra Nagesh sahi kaha jhuth ke pair nhi hote

India needs to end the caste system. Make it illegal.

@@tubester4567 i want to end it too.. Standing in 2024 elections from MP..nirdaliye Motto - end a casteism in India. Replace surname with last 3 digits of aadhar card. If u support me plz vote or if u want to make a party contact me.

@@thevloglife5899 caste system is important

@@nishantnimish7825 so are reservation based on caste system

Even Dr. Ambedkar is not an historian.

Exact

He was only mentally week because of he did feel untouchable castee himself, he did not proud of him that he is untouchable castee but not agyani so he felt mentally week and by the way of christianity he decided to make indian new const

Yes you are absolutely right!

Chanderbhan parshad aap keya dusare parmatma ne banaye the Jo tumhe padne ka adikaar hai Jo dalit ko nhi tha jawaab dijiye

@@raviard649 are Bhai Tu Ramayana Dekh usme tujhe pata lagega dalit padhta v tha or Brahmin, Rajput ke sath gurukul me padhte bhi the..or raja bhi the..

@@DeepakJha-lt9ud that's a TV show

@@DeepakJha-lt9ud Asli ramayan me nahi hain, Ramanand sagar wala ramayan mat dekho. South indians bandar aur bhalu hain ramayana me.

Jaati matlab janm Varna matlab pratibha, kushalta It is clearly return in Indica by megasthenes was that their were non-discriminationat all in rig vedic era and and discrimination started when cast is imposed on the people by Britishers and Jawaharlal Nehru. Megasthenes also said that anyone change change his varna according to his choice.

Sahi kaha ekdum

तथ्यहीन बातें no, four varan not man made.

सुदर्शन जी को सुनकर बहुत अच्छा लगा लगा एक महान इतिहासकार को सुन रहा हू।

jab koi sudra ye bate bolta to kuch relevant hota

songs for refreshment of mind b

@@ayushmandhanrajpurohit8998 phir toh koi history nahi aapko Nancy drew ki novels padhni chahye. Wahi kalpanik batein achi lagengi !!

It means they were created by GOD .. so a person is made shudra or Brahmin by god meaning born .. what was the ceremony which decided who was shudra or Brahmin after a certain age of karmas

Brahmins created Buddhism

@@shashwatanand5397 Brahmins created buddhism 🤣🤣🤣 joke of the year

@@ex009adityarajsingh2 75% Buddhas disciples were brahmins.

*Much of the Buddhism is so much exaggerated.But most of the Buddhas critic of brahmins instead he redefined who should be brahmin? Brahmin by talent not by birth. Beside he never was against anyone he reformed very much. At time of Buddha Caste heirarchy was not so much at its lowest level. It became worst later on. Read history fact base.*

I love to have this drug... Drug which clears my mind.. which makes the whole world view clear.... No Fakeness , only truth

Bro caste in Hindi called jati, Nirlamba upnishad had critisized caste system. Bro because society was divided into jati, portugese used the words caste

@@rashidrazakhan9153 jaati is not used in any scriptures. Jaati means breed which is used for type of animal , plants , etc. Scriptures, Upanishads had Varna system which was based on gunas. Iberians , britishers are the ones who was creating casta around the world for rasism and proving their superiority.

Even second and third generation Americans born Indian do follow caste system rigidly. So no hope.

in ancient time it was not caste system it was varna system

@@sameeryadav4333 doesn't matter anything which depends on birth must be removed

Sukhchain Singh Vishwamohan jha's Sir best History Professor in India.

well said brother

+mahesh sam IF YOU HAVE MONEY THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT CAST AFTER THAT>>>>lol

we r low caste that's why still middle class condition...

@Suraya Khan But Islam has failed in India! Even muslims here practice caste. If the message of Islam is all humans are equal in the eyes of god then why muslims here practice caste? Why there are 'dalit' muslims? A religion is known by its followers and in this case Indian islamic followers are doing the exact opposite of what your phrophet said. Your prophet proved weak, your god's message proved weak. Islam couldn't stand the test of social evil that is caste system. The caste system infected Islam like cancer. Same goes for christianity and sikhism.

Read about Brahmins how occupied India? Learn who are they

Molvi

Jnu ke jihadi jo ho tum 😂 chutiye saale ibarians ne birth based casta system banaya gunas based varna system se aur aaye chale missionary

November 2023

भाई जब तक भूतकाल को पकडे रखोगे तो आप वर्तमान और भविष्य का कुछ भी सोच नहीं सकते और न ही आप समझ सकते हो

चींटी दो तरह की होती हैं एक लाल और दूसरी काली ऐसे ही हमारे भारत के नेता हैं? एक आप का अनाज खाती है और एक आपका जिसम ........?अब आपको समझना है के आप् को किसे चुनना है .....?

Agree with everything except land re distribution

Brave statement....ofc it's mythological

No he is real

+Ram Nangunoori whom are you teaching this things. Irrelevant and ignorant people.

+Ram Nangunoori "By birth everybody is sudra" Bhagwat Gita or Rig Veda which describes the Varnas never said that. Varna system is not caste.

Bhagvad geeta was written after Buddha periods hence it talks about equality, (Buddhism was a dominant religion) Manusmriti was a civil code, how society should function , hence they are discussing manusmriti The origination of Varna system is in Hindu religion where your religion states everyone is born unequal ..now you get the logic? Don't bring Bhagvad geeta every time, that wasn't civil code, or eternal laws, Everyone knows Bhagvad geeta has a influence of Buddhism

Seemana Mahale It is stated in the Skanda Purana, 'kalau sudra sambhavah' - in Kali-yuga everyone is basically a sudra. It is only by brahminical qualifications and acceptance of panca-samskara diksa from Sri Guru that one can actually attain the status of a brahmana in the age of Kali. Therefore, the Mahabharata states: na yonir napi samskaro na srutam na ca santatih karanani dvijatvasya vrttam eva tu karanam "Neither birth, nor samskaras, nor learning, nor progeny are the qualifications to be a brahmana. Only brahminical conduct is the basis for brahminical status." (Anusasana-parva 143.50)

Just shut up. Who the hell are you to judge the people? B.Gita teaches that these are "innate" qualities (read it as when born) and that it comes from previous birth. This is the cruelty. People had simply no fighting chance at all. Whatever you wrote is from a casteist's manual and Krishna (and you) are the casteists apologists.

Galat iske basis pucho kya hai janamana kaise hai

No body liked competition , meritocracy and quality that comes with it. Thats why.

Hiii....

For sure

You are the only one i have found here who is not talking bullshit.

True

Why because he is saying their is no castism In ancient time .

He was a director of ihrc.which is top most position for historical research

Pachhim Bharat se jhara khara bad bhab youtube main prasaron itna kio?

Bhakkk...... he was a "SUT-PUTRA" lower caste.. so he was denied... STOP misleading people. 😤😤😤

@Cheems Doge True....

If Hinduism was confined within India then how come we find old Hindu temples in whole south east Asian countries!!

@@HoneyBadgerz Hindu temples or buddhist temples labelled as Hindu temples

Haan. Muslims me jo casteism hpta hai ashraf aur ajlaf wala uski bhi debate ho

Then who wrote valmiki Ramayana? You fool

@@sameeryadav4333 there are 200 versions of ramayan not only 1 or2 second valmiki ramayan as historian say was written around 1st or 2 nd century and sanskrit itself is new because in ivc the sanskrit have not been found and the lipi is devanagri lipi which is around 9th century sanskrit granth cannot be written in anyother lipi dhamma lipi or kharosthi the oldest manuscript of veda itself is 1464 ad and is of devnagari lipi

@@ex009adityarajsingh2 Sabke apne apne views hote hain

@@sameeryadav4333 ye views ka baat hi nai hai ye fact hai क्ष त्र ज्ञ ऋषि etc likhe hi nai jaa sakte hai try kar lijiye

Because India is full of dickheads😂😂

Kareemullah Khan right sir

bhai...dalit nahi the chandrgupt ...kaha jata hai ki unki mother dalit the ...dalit shabd use karna thik nahi hoga ....kitabo me aisa kaha jata hai ki ...unki mother shudra thi ... but not sure ..

+Praveen Gahlot ChandraGupta was called Shudra by Brahamns and was rejected but after debate with Chanakya , Chanakya Made them understand about his capability.

Bhai ye sab ko pata hai ...magar kon se brahmin literature me padh liya ki chandrgupt shuxra tha ,,,budha literature usko kuch aurkahtahai.... jain wale kuch aur ,,,, roman use kuch aur kahte hai... tumne kaha ye baat padh liya ki 100% sure ho ? ... sach to ye hai... unke caste ke bare me kahna possible nahi hai ...anuman hi laga sakte hain .

History holds enough examples which proves Chandragupta Maurya was a dalit. Read books of Acharya Vishnugupta(Chanakya) you will understand.

Bhai kis book ki baat kar rahe ho....naam to batao...tum ne koun si book padh li chanakua ki.... naam batao...publication ka naam batao... faltu ka knowledge na pelo idhar aa ke.

kindly stop this non sence. read mahabharath and ramayan carefully to understand the birth base caste insidents.

Then how come Brahmin kids can put Trivedi in front of their name .

@@chandrareddy4392 Hello brother, Mahabharat has geeta. Please read/listen that, you will be answered well. Best Regards.

@@ashokvijay1144 Hello brother, Being a tyagi doesn't mean that he is a brahmin, its just a identity like some people write father's or village's name before their name. Being pround over it is just arrogance. Best regards.

@@royalranit2 I said Trivedi and it is not a village identity . Have you ever seen a ceremony where based on karma and Gunas some people are made from Brahmin to shudra and asked to drop their surname .. caste and verna is birth based

reservation is the AIDS for India

@@raushanpathak4015 nope reservation is for social upliftment of lower caste people the day caste system dies is the day reservations will die too.

@@raushanpathak4015 Anti reservation sentiment is AIDS/COVID or whatever you want to coin it.