"wanna try something new" is probably what delevigne got asked before she signed a contract for a greenwashing campaign for a company that's responsible for emissions that will make millions of people be in areas that won't be livable - in one generation..
Classic example of greenwashing... Hydrogen is not an energy source. It can be used to transport energy, but it also needs energy (from fossiel fuels) to be made. So you end up spending more energy to create this 'green' energy.
One can install huge arrays of solar panels at the right latitudes and use electricity from them to produce hydrogen... which, in practice, needs pipelines to be transported where it is needed. And is somewhat difficult to store safely and efficiently. There are, of course, more practical fuel cycles.
@@laurisuoranta5512Sure, one *can* install solar arrays, although wind turbines are way more efficient. Especially when you're a Northern European country. But Vattenfall only had 10% production from wind and basically non from solar. In 2020 more than half still came from non-renewables. So to me the question is "What is Cara Delevigne's face supposed to distract us from?"
Who says it´s an energy source in the video? ? It´s essentially giving us the potential to exclude fossil fuels like oil from the value chain completely and instead use water, and yes, you still need energy for this process. Which there are plenty of solutions that´s currently being worked on and available now. What you are doing is the opposite of greenwashing. I would say you are a classic example of being brainwashed, judging purely on what you wrote and what you started your statement with..
Well it is a real commercial. the question is weather it is supposed to be taken seriously or not. On any account i have been laughing at the prospect of industrial emissions face mist for the flast half hour.😀i mean how did we get here as a civilisation?
@@arnoldsander4600 we got here because we let giant corporations take over our everything and are now living with the consequences of companies like Vattenfall doing shit that's destroying our planet despite fucking knowing better for at least half a century.
It’s pretty straightforward they get water and extract the hydrogen gas out of it so they now have an abundance of hydrogen gas which is highly combustible they do this by charging electricity through the water in pressurised containers with a vent which leads to another container which stores the hydrogen.
Yea, galvanic cell recuires energy cuz this redox-reaction is not spontaneous. That energy could have something to do with it that isn't exactly "clean enough to put on your face"
Ik heb nog nooit zon hekel aan een bedrijf gehad als aan vattenfall voor het hersenspoelen van Nederland door middel van deze reclame. Ik zal het gebruik maken van hun diensten voor mij zo lang mogelijk uitstellen
Is there away if contacting you guys for employment. You recently visited Lowestoft in England for a careers even you had given me a QR code to scan which only brings me to a website but has nothing about careers… which is a shame because you have aspired me in this career for clean energy.
and then you have these morons saying that transwomen do not really look as women. Well just look at Cara, she looks more feminine than most biological women, i bet that even the most hardcore straight men are attracted to Cara.
Renhet och Vattenfall i samma film? Den här reklamen kommer folk att titta om 30 år med samma nyfikenhet som vi har idag när vi tittar på filmen Sjövett 1964 med frågan i huvudet "Hur tänkte de?"
This is a very nice initiative to attract attention over sustainable energy technologies, rather than gluing oneself on the asphalt and crying "Save the planet". The benefits of Hydrogen are obvious. I am still curious how this energy source can be adapted at a large scale industrial and commercial use. Hydrogen is very tricky to handle, hence the skepticism of many. However, every great technology started off surrounded with skepticism. I believe very much in hydrogen and therefore I applaud this marketing strategy!!! Well done!
It's not something you need to believe in. Why is it not happening although announced 40 years ago for tomorrow? Efficiency. Despite all the research billions. Vattenfall is telling fairy tales here instead of simply doing what's necessary: Energy transition! Build massive wind and solar power, take care of the grids and only then produce green gases for the gas power plants to jump in at the Dunkelflaute when no wind nor sunlight are available.
@@Legominder the energy transition as you call it is currently at capacity. Companies like Siemens and Vestas are fighting to build bigger and bigger wind mills in order to cover the demand. I don't understand this strawman you are depicting, there is plenty of money being invested in wind and solar be sure of that, while the companies are fighting to increase production. Vestas is soon to open an assembly station in New York for instance. There is so much one can do at a given time. The biggest problem with wind and solar is the question of storing that energy. How do you exactly store electricity? This is the problem companies like Vattenfall are trying to solve. Yes, sometimes technologies take a lot of time to be matured: after Karl Benz invented the car, it took almost 40 years before Ford came with the solution for mass production of cars. Great things take time. Hydrogen, by nature is a gas difficult to handle, not impossible. The transition you are talking about is already at capacity, baaically one cannot absorb more money, unless maybe you have a constructive idea about how to increase the production rate if wind mills... 'Cuz after all, the companies involved in this industry are investing millions of dollars exactly to answer the questions: how can we produce more wind mills/solar pannels and how can we store the energy they produce?
Classic example of greenwashing... Hydrogen is not an energy source. It can be used to transport energy, but it also needs energy (from fossiel fuels) to be made. So you end up spending more energy to create this 'green' energy.
@@RogierVJ Hydrogen can be applied for power to x use cases. In Scandinavia we experience that we product more energy than we consume from wind and tidal. That energy is wasted if not consumed. How do you harvest it? Through hydrogen. You power the process needed to produce hydrogen and then you burn the hydrogen to produce e.g. steel.
