Inquiry intro the Nature of Time with Hameed Ali (A. H. Almaas) 

Very fascinating stuff! Thank you

Beautiful choice of music

Thank you, Hameed- makes perfect sense to me and corresponds to my experiences!

_anyone who has read Kant's Critique of Pure Reason is aware that time exists apriori to sense perception. Stretching this farther, one must account for that simple fact that time is 3 dimensional (see Dewey Larson). I'm new the speaker's thoughts, but I surmise, in light of above, it'ss possible his timeless state is actually the full immersing in of time. You couldn't perceive without time -- even via the classical Greek conception of time as an abiding present. The future never arrives; the past IS gone. Nothing stays. But regardless of how mainstream science conceptualizes time as being a mathematical point on a continuum, and regardless of the ancient view of the abiding present, time must exist apriori in order to have inner perception. Perhaps the vertical dimension -- imagine traveling up the vibrational spectrum of light and simultaneously of time travel -- only is made available and opens up and exists when the flat base has been formed. By the way, matter is not empty space. It's time, frozen as 1d. Only consciousness reaches the third sector. Yes, mainstream science and popular opinion is dead wrong about something so fundamental as the reference system in which phenomena are properly placed._

Thank-You, Thank-You....

I like how he explains it.......

I'd like to know Almaas thoughts about Aurobindo's "Towards the Supramental Time Vision": "All being, consciousness, knowledge moves, secretly for our present surface awareness, opnely when we rise beyond it to the spiritual and supramental ranges, between two states and powers of existence, that of the timeless Infinite and that of the Infinite deploying in itself and organising all things in time. These two states are opposed to an dincompatible with eahc other only for our mental logic with its constant embarrased stumbling around a false conception of contradictions and a confronting of eternal opposites. In reality, as we find when we see things with a knowledge founded on the supramental indentity and vision and think with the great, profound and flexible logic proper to that knowledge, the two are only coexistent and concurrent status and movement of the same truth of the Infinite. The timeless Infinite holds in itself, in its eternal truth of being, beyond this manifestation, all that it manifests in Time. Its time consciousness too is itself infinite and maintains in itself at once in a vision of totalities and of particularities, of mobile succesion or moment sight and of total stabilising vision or abiding whole sight what appears to us as the past of things, their present and their future. ..." Aurobindo, "The Synthesis of Yoga"

In some sense, it might be more accurate to just say that Time is irrelevant. The present moment is all we have. In reality, at some level, this concept is somewhat useful just to communicate and to get some of our currents needs be met. The Universe is unfolding as it should be, always, regardless of time and space concepts being used or not.

Yeah, very playful... This all arises out of the mystical thinking of our collective. Which we are not separate from and is "humanity" All this talk arises from the experiencing structure... So in a way, it all amounts to caca. If the experiencing structure goes even for a moment, this kind tremendous philosophical structure reveals itself as truly, eternally useless. Crafty words based on mystical experience