Inside Justice Jackson's separate opinion in Idaho abortion ruling

Подписаться 6 млн

Просмотров 6 тыс.

50% 1

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a separate opinion in the Supreme Court's ruling to allow emergency abortions in Idaho, for now. Attorney and CBS News campaign reporter Katrina Kaufman and Stephen Wermiel, professor of practice at American University Washington College of Law, shed some details on why Justice Jackson concurred with the majority opinion, but still had misgivings.
CBS News 24/7 is the premier anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations that is available free to everyone with access to the internet and is the destination for breaking news, live events, original reporting and storytelling, and programs from CBS News and Stations' top anchors and correspondents working locally, nationally and around the globe. It is available on more than 30 platforms across mobile, desktop and connected TVs for free, as well as CBSNews.com and Paramount+ and live in 91 countries.
Subscribe to the CBS News RU-vid channel: / cbsnews
Watch CBS News 24/7: cbsnews.com/live/
Download the CBS News app: cbsnews.com/mo...
Follow CBS News on Instagram: / cbsnews
Like CBS News on Facebook: / cbsnews
Follow CBS News on X: / cbsnews
Subscribe to our newsletters: cbsnews.com/ne...
Try Paramount+ free: paramountplus....
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com

Опубликовано:

29 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 66

@moonlightpixie9976 3 месяца назад

The war on women must stop abortion is healthcare plain and simple lawmakers have no business butting into medical decisions. Vote 💙

@aaronbrewer1742 3 месяца назад

We the people are truly doomed...

@nealdraper3751 3 месяца назад

If the far right Republicans plan with Project 2025 succeed then you are right we are doomed. Total fascism coming to America.

@EternalEyeofRa 3 месяца назад

Justice Jackson's dissent was on point in this ruling, but her dissent in yesterday's Snyder opinion is one for ages.

@flankman9385 3 месяца назад

She only has a job because of her race and everyone knows it 😘

@rafram4132 3 месяца назад

There should be a caveat to the statement we always hear ' Your honor ' they have no honor and have lost all our respect for that statement to be used in today's court.

@johndoherty2003 3 месяца назад

Isn’t she the justice who can’t define what a woman is?

@johnbrowneyes7534 3 месяца назад

Jackson is the only active Supreme Court justice to have attended an Ivy League law school, clerked for a Supreme Court justice, served as a public defender, served on the sentencing commission, served as a U.S. District Court judge, and served as a U.S. Court of Appeals judge. She seems to be qualified. You want to judge people based on their anatomy?

@bobby-ov9qn 3 месяца назад

⁠@@johnbrowneyes7534. Yet still can’t define what a woman is. 😂

@kronos7110 3 месяца назад

GOP thinks embrios are people:/ Don't talk smack, when y are so fooll of it.

@kronos7110 3 месяца назад

@@bobby-ov9qn Not a frozen embro:/ But gop disagrees.

@kronos7110 3 месяца назад

GOP can't even define what people are:/

@phoenixr6811 3 месяца назад

It seems overturning Roe vs Wade was not simplified as some as thought it would be. 🤔😒

@GreggWalken-xd3qv 3 месяца назад

It's very simple, righting a wrong. It was returned to the states per 10th amendment.

@johnbrowneyes7534 3 месяца назад

@@GreggWalken-xd3qv SCOTUS was majority conservative in 1973.

@IcerinAlaska49 3 месяца назад

@@GreggWalken-xd3qvthat's why people need to vote people out again

@DaleHartley 3 месяца назад

@@GreggWalken-xd3qv It was not wrong, When they had to reach back to a witchfinder to get the justification it was not wrong. This was a private medical decision between a woman and her doctor. Tell you what Let's make ANY male sexual decisions/medication Public. I mean a guy that cant get it up is as nature intended right? AND lets get rid of gerrymandering and see if the STATE governments still agree with it.

@LearnToCode003 3 месяца назад

Someone please explain to me the answer to this question: WHY ARE MEN ALLOWED TO VOTE ON WOMEN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE? It's not their business - NOT AT ALL!

@harrylippidardo 3 месяца назад

Where in the constitution is abortion mentioned??? It isn't so it is reserved for the states.

@ooh_Boi 3 месяца назад

what is a "WOMEN"?

@nealdraper3751 3 месяца назад

@@ooh_Boilol something you never get to touch apparently.

@nealdraper3751 3 месяца назад

@@harrylippidardo No it's the person and the person choice only.

@DaleHartley 3 месяца назад

@@harrylippidardo Really? where are planes in the constitution bud? Would you rather have 50 different air agencies all TRYING to cooperate? It is an idiots point, one using logic fallacies.

@alooga555 3 месяца назад

How can someone who cannot even define what a woman is opine on an important case like this??

@proudatheist2042 3 месяца назад

My thoughts exactly as soon as I heard her say her infamous quote.

@johnbrowneyes7534 3 месяца назад

@alooga555 3 месяца назад

@@johnbrowneyes7534 Admit it. She is an DEI hire.

@truthwarrior2727 3 месяца назад

She lets off child predators anything she’s saying is invalid to me

@Wolfcamp555 3 месяца назад

@@johnbrowneyes7534she's an affirmative action judge. She's not qualified at all.

@chadweirick 3 месяца назад

lol there won’t be a new administration in 2925. It’ll just be more Joe.

@matthewst537 3 месяца назад

She’s just a terrible human for helping let them off

@michaelobrien8661 3 месяца назад

More and more, Justice Jackson is a shining star attempting to save the democracy.

@harrylippidardo 3 месяца назад

This has to be satire.

@FrankS111 3 месяца назад

Hahahahahahahahaha!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@GreggWalken-xd3qv 3 месяца назад

You bet. A shining star who can't describe a woman but making decisions on a woman. smh

@StalinTheMan0fSteel 3 месяца назад

Like when she voted with all the conservative judges that the Democrats removing Trump's name from election ballots around the country was unconstitutional and an attack on Democracy! 😂😂😂

@johnbrowneyes7534 3 месяца назад

@gardy4390 3 месяца назад

Idaho the state of obedient wives and children. I have Nieces on my husband's side who all have 4 to 6 kids but as soon that is accomplished the all have Hysterectomy .Is that the way to do it instead of an Abortion? I am just wondering.

@4dogs999 3 месяца назад

So I have a family member that lost three babies before they had a final fourth pregnancy that carried to terms. Two years ago when our state is zero abortion, we had a fight like hell to get the medicine she needed to prevent her from going to the hospital as her body rejected the pregnancy, we finally got the medication at the 11th hour. It was devastating doing all that while she was losing a baby. A hysterectomy is a operation that is never necessary unless you have an issue. So do you think like a 14-year-old girl she have a hysterectomy so she doesn’t get pregnant. This is insanity. It’s nobody’s business it’s healthcare choices for women.