No video :(

Installation and Use | Ops-Core’s RAILINK Powered & Data-Enabled ARC Rails System

Подписаться 11 тыс.

Просмотров 24 тыс.

50% 1

The future of headborne systems technology is here. Introducing RAILINK®, the first-of-its-kind, integrated, in-rail solution that simplifies the life of the user by running multiple head-mounted accessories from a single, centralized power source. Feeding power to and sharing data between an array of Smart Nodes and a VAS/NVG interface that allows the user to operate a wide variety of night vision systems, RAILINK improves protection and lethality by increasing the effectiveness of the user and reducing their burden.
In this video, we will be demonstrating the proper installation techniques for the Ops-Core® RAILINK system, as well as showing you how to attach several accessories to this exciting new platform. You'll learn how to adjust RAILINK to your helmet and mount the battery pack, SureFire HL2-A Light, Princton Tec Switch MPLS and Core Survival® HEL-STAR Rail Strobe.
Learn more about RAILINK and Ops-Core:
shop.gentexcor...
shop.gentexcor...
shop.gentexcor...
www.gentexcorp...

Опубликовано:

5 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 58

@HeadPats-vi7jm 2 месяца назад

Streamlight Sidewinder Stalk about to destroy this whole man's career

@OEightHours 2 месяца назад

Ok I understand the incentive to make a product pricier as it will be an "exclusive" GOV item, BUT nearly 2.5k for a glorified torch and battery pack, you can get night vision for that money!

@alexshakk 2 месяца назад

That doesn’t include the battery pack or accessories. The total system costs 5k+. Oh and AN ADDITIONAL 23 DOLLARS FOR SCREWS.

@ivaniuk123 2 месяца назад

The whole point of this system is to be future proof which is why it has really fast processing capability, and nodes with the ability to put in additional nodes into the rail later. I heard that ops core will have a powered version of the AMPs later. But yes, overall this system isn't designed for us poors. It's not even designed for the vast majority of the military. I think there will be more stuff coming for the rail link for those civies that can afford it.

@aquila3958 2 месяца назад

ok wait, you dont get a helmet shell but you have to buy the rails, the battery pack attachment bracket for the rear for 2.5 k and THEN you have to buy the battery pack for 1.1k and every other light, torch and strobe seperately for 200 + ???

@alexshakk 2 месяца назад

@@aquila3958yes

@alexshakk 2 месяца назад

@@ivaniuk123DATASHARING

@GearAndGuns 2 месяца назад

2,500$ - 4,700$ is crazy.

@ivaniuk123 2 месяца назад

I wish the Princeton tech light had blue instead of red. You can't see blood when you use red light. It would be helpful for us medics.

@calbrock7342 2 месяца назад

Agreed. Green works, sort of. Looks black under green light

@ivaniuk123 2 месяца назад

Maybe they will do a version 2 and include a blue option.

@timring3684 Месяц назад

I did 12 years in the Army as a medic. If you can't tell if an injured soldier's bleeding, be real with yourself and do your best to stay away from the field and operational Army. You belong in a clinic counting medical supplies. Red light is tactical, and is enough for you to figure your shit out.

@Raymond23rdOBC 2 месяца назад

good luck on selling it

@ivaniuk123 2 месяца назад

They don't care about us. When a pair of the new NVGs cost over 40k this is a drop in the bucket.

@ErrorOptik 2 месяца назад

I love how we are starting to finally transition into powered armor systems, I can’t wait to see the 5k Plate carrier that will eventually be made to connect with this. That being said, this helmet is a nightmare, you’re going to have to damn near take off your helmet just to turn your strobe on, or turn your flashlights on. The wiring tape seems very fragile and is damn near unsupported inside the rail, it’s one drop/blast away from shorting out. I really like the idea but there are definitely some improvements I would suggest to make this system more operator friendly, and fail safe.

@Laminar-Flow 2 месяца назад

I’m an engineer, flexible PCB’s are a lot tougher than you think. A lot tougher. Doesn’t need to be supported and in fact you don’t want to screw flexible PCB’s down between two surfaces, etc. I personally can’t think of a single better design than what is shown for a powered rail. Wiring may instinctually seem better but trust me, this solution is far more stable. Big thing is there aren’t huge wire solder joints that are susceptible to g-forces.

@ErrorOptik 2 месяца назад

@@Laminar-Flow I guess we will see, but during the installation I saw a lot of vibration in the wiring due to it being unsupported, and I think over time that will take its toll.

@Laminar-Flow 2 месяца назад

@@ErrorOptik That’s not how FPCB’s work; it’s intentional.

@brandonwardlow4246 2 месяца назад

How would one mount a helmet cover with the RAILINK?

@ivaniuk123 2 месяца назад

I looked at a picture of one on tnvc's website and it looks like they installed the rail link without the helmet cover on. Then they put the helmet cover over it and most likely did some cutting in the proper places to get the battery pack to connect.

@montyanderson7853 2 месяца назад

I mounted mine over top of cover on both of my helmet rigs. Keeps the cover from being removable but it works

@ivaniuk123 2 месяца назад

I mounted mine to the bare helmet as per the ops core instructions and then I put the helmet cover on over top of it. I cut the back portion to be able to mount the battery pack. With the battery pack on it stays nice and secure and it just appears like I have a regular helmet with a battery pack that isn't connected to anything. I thought about installing it over the helmet cover but went against it because if it rains and the helmet cover soaks and wicks water and traps water into the rail link... at least that's my reasoning. Like I said, putting a battery cover over worked just fine and it hides the system to the point where people might question as to why you've got a random battery pack on your helmet.

@montyanderson7853 2 месяца назад

@@ivaniuk123 great point about the moisture. If that happens I’ll put it in my dehumidifier lol

@tjboylan20 2 месяца назад

Just a bunch of dude’s who will never own it watching the video, one day I might

@JinKee 2 месяца назад

How do you keep mud out of the electrical contacts?

@ivaniuk123 2 месяца назад

Mud doesn't matter. The nodes only work if they detect a device and that device needs a charge.

@the-sj3vq 2 месяца назад

Cool but overpriced

@metalmarine8259 Месяц назад

MY HEAD IS A COMPUTER! :beep boop beep:

@v_r_adventures 2 месяца назад

What about mud and sea water and the conectors?

@ivaniuk123 2 месяца назад

Gold doesn't rust and the nodes only work I'd their is power that needs to be drawn.

@benjaminkonikoff2026 2 месяца назад

Ignoring the price point. Will work on helmets like the HHV High cuts and the Crye-tech Airframe?

@ivaniuk123 2 месяца назад

From messing with this system it looks like if your helmet can accept the standard ops core rails then it can also accept the raillink. The system seems adaptable to all helmet sizes. The only thing you might need extra are mounting screws. The raillink is thicket than the standard rail system and screws come in based on your helmet type. That being said if you mount a 4600 dollar system on a cheap Chinese helmet that uses the US people as free beta tester then that's something to laugh at.

@pyeitme508 2 месяца назад

YES!

@ironsights1809 2 месяца назад

With the high pricing and all the screws needed, you have a screw loose for what you think this helmet is worth.

@GIdle.s_lenaissance 2 месяца назад

좀 씨발 싸게좀 팔아라 존나게 비싸서 한국산 사야하잖아!

@rippinlipsfishing68 2 месяца назад

for the price no thank you can think of alot better things

@Pariatric 2 месяца назад

you arent the customer

@ComfortsSpecter 2 месяца назад

Bad Advertisement Horrible Branding A Fairly Cool Product Questionably Meh Ability Improvement per the usual OpsCore Cost Could it perhaps accept Drone Goggles? Would Be Nice if more Corporations worked together like that How super Proprietary Are the plugins? Bad Strobes; maybe Okay for LEO, Airborne and very Specific Operator Use Mohawks Are Better Good Quality I Assume It better Be sealed Great Work advancing the Tech Culture Really Need’s Better Memetics

@FDCNC 2 месяца назад

It was designed for a Tier 1 army unit running the latest Fused-Panoramic NVGs (F-PANO). You will not see the benefits or use case with normal NVGs. Fused NVGs are restricted to MIL/LE only so this is not for you and you don't understand the system enough to know what its benefits are.

@ComfortsSpecter 2 месяца назад

@@FDCNC “…” “As if any of That Is Foreign Culture.”

@ivaniuk123 2 месяца назад

A regular person can still get the benefit from this system... for a heavy price that won't really make it cost effective.

@FDCNC 2 месяца назад

@@ivaniuk123 how so? The benefits are truly seen with fused nvgs so how will this benefit the average nvgs user other than reduce weight and snag hazards for an extreme price