Badly written judges in EastEnders do. The judge against Sharon was wholly inappropriate commenting the way he did. There would be grounds for a serious complaint IRL I have no doubt. The judge against Kim who held her in contempt for having a panic attack surely cannot be realistic. If it is, any judge that does that should not only be removed from their position but spend at least as much time in prison as the person they unjustly held in contempt.
Another crap compilation of mostly recent scenes. Where is the Steve and Matthew trial from 1999, by far the biggest trial storyline EastEnders have ever done?
