Positively, negatively, and infinitely curved space explained. Covers Ricci scalar (scalar curvature) and Gaussian curvature. Useful for Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. My Patreon page is at / eugenek
To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available). --To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable. --To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video. --If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky Werner Music is right, for someone who tried to wrap their head around curvatures and parallel transports to get an intuitive understanding of general relativity, this video is invaluable. Thanks for making this.
I'll have to take your word for it. I'm totally Homer Simpson watching this. My doofus brain is so out of its depths that it can only think about pizza, donuts, and party hats. So my question is this: If black hole singularities are party hats, what are they celebrating?
Thanks for the compliment. More videos are on their way. I make all the animations for my videos myself. In many cases, it takes me several months of work to create the animations for a single video, so please be patient.
I make the 3D animations with "Poser." Also, I sometimes create some of the 3D models in "Wings3D", and then import them into Poser as ".obj" files. Also, although Poser has a built in physics simulator called "Bullet Physics", I also have an add-on to Poser called "Poser Physics" which works better for certain types of simulations.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky I much prefer quality over quantity. Unfortunately the RU-vid algorithms currently do not properly reward your style of work, but I hope and expect that your material will have a "long tail", providing value long into the future. In other words, take all the time you need, and please keep a copy of the original models and code. I suspect that they will be used in the future to extend your videos into interactive and/or AI-assisted learning environments. This work will last.
Finally the curvature of the cone visualized. Reminds me of the Leonard Susskind lecture where he showed the geodesics and curvature vector rotation on the cone using a paper model.
V L indeed, I had the same thought, re parallel transport. Or as Professor Susskind says in his videos in his endearing accent, “parallelly transport” :-)
Wondering what you were referring to, I found 1:02:15 of the YT vid 'Einstein's General Theory of Relativity | Lecture 6' by Leonard Susskind & Stanford
10:04 pretty much the only place for a 2D Being living on the cone to go when it enters the tip is the “other side” of the surface. This results in a parity inversion and a gravity well protruding into the “other side”.
Due to this video I was able to solve what happens to something after it falls into a Black Hole. The video explaining it is on my channel. Thank you, Eugene. You’re the Best.
@@Reach3DPrinters Theoretical things like gravity and it's relation to time (which is just a transient-blip construct and not a fabric) can make all kinds of sense in our minds or on paper and even have some natural characteristics as well but doesn't necessarily mean they are reality. Take for instance these vector laws; do you think if you traveled a 1000 km square over the surface of earth, you would not return to your original location? I asked my original question because E.K. should be amply intelligent to apply all the things that limit vision and how they contribute to the theoretical "horizon" we see, instead of the common mistake of seeing it as a literal drop off point of a curved earth. So indeed, the earth is the biggest object and somehow contains the stars and sun and moon in it's sky, and not the other way around. At the very least, we now know for a fact that earth is not spherical, and great minds should be working out some theories that support these yet-to-be-understood realities instead of the fantasies that are getting old.
In reality, radii does not apply. but in theoretical mind ^#$%ery a straight line has INFINITE radius! (i will re-watch to see if there was practicality to giving a straight line infinite radii)
IMHO, Eugene is a genius as his name suggests. The way how his videos explain the laws of physics is the most innovative way of teaching physics as of now. I am very much hoping that Universities can adopt his approach or at least start using his videos in class. Thank you for making the world really (!) a better place.
Something just clicked for me while watching this. Light bulb went on. I have understood these concepts, at least enough to feel comfortable with them but my level of understanding just became a little bit deeper! Thanks Eugene Khutoryansky!
It's also time consuming. I watched it, and then with a drooling mouth I started thinking and Google'd some things, watched more videos, and went on a Wikipedia adventure and there we are, just wasted the whole day.
I teach electrical courses to adult apprentices in the evenings. Your electrical and math animations have given a whole new level of understanding to my students. (My 12 year old daughter has also gotten into the physics of general relativity and loves the videos). Thank you for these!
Again, another one of your visual explanations blows my mind. I understand the math behind this, but in an abstract way. Seeing it visualized makes it orders of magnitude more intuitive.
I travel a lot for work. I have spent many hours watching your videos, the perfect combination of entertaining and educational. Please keep making them, and I will look forward to more physics, math, Hungarian Rhapsody, and Kira! Thank you for the effort you put into these!
More videos are on their way. I make all the animations for my videos myself. In many cases, it takes me several months of work to create the animations for a single video, so please be patient.
I will give you a interesting case, the magnetic torroid. Perfect field confinement in a circle, theoretically, but since it is a thermal radiator, the inside of the doughnut gets heated more then the exterior because it is facing itself. I know its not relevant but I always found this interesting for some reason.
Views may be low, but you prudence high quality content! Don't stop making videos, this is literally my favorite channel on RU-vid. You ara about to hit 500k congratulations on that!
@@EugeneKhutoryansky In fact, not just this one. All of your videos I have watched are wonderful! :D It is always nice to visualize the abstract mathematical concepts. Particularly when these have to do with geometry!!
You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link: ru-vid.com_video?v=Dl6-5qDifrs&ref=share You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit buttons for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately. Details about adding translations is available at support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en Thanks.
Kawser, I make my 3D animations with the software "Poser." Poser is expensive, but there are also free 3D animation programs available such as "Blender" and "Daz Studio."
You're propably one of the best channel on RU-vid i really like your videos and your hard work put in it.could you please do video about quantum chromodynamics i still don't understands it well.
Thanks for the compliment. I already have a video about Quantum Chromodynamics at the following link. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FoR3hq5b5yE.html
Very informative video on intrinsic curvature 👌 One question: how is the tip of the cone singularity different from the tip of the cusp? I'm thinking of the origin on the surface that we get by rotating the graph of square-root of x around the y-axis.
If someone could help me imagine how this translates to a 3D being going around a black hole singularity in 4D spacetime. Or in other words, how does this work in our universe? Great video as always! Thanks for creating such awesome content :)
Instead of a regular sphere, you have a 4 dimensional hypersphere with time as the 4th dimension. Time gets stretched to infinity as well as the curvature of space the closer you get to a singularity. It's hard to visualize, but lookup Penrose diagrams and watch PBS spacetime for more examples.
In the 3-dimensional case of gravity, imagine a large lattice of dots representing points in 3D space. Now place a spherical object in the middle and imagine each point around it being pulled in from all sides. I think a black hole would just be a place where those points are really densely packed together so that all geodesics lead toward the center.
Hello Sir. All of your presentations/visualizations are the best out there. Can you make a video about solid state relay and how it works? Thank you Eugene
thank you for your great videos. i love your videos. i want to suggest which make some videos about nanomaterials, like nano particles, nanotubes, nanolayers and ets. the physics of nanomaterials with there usage in nanotechnology like nano electronic are very important.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky NFTs are a way of packaging and selling digital art. It's an easy and fast growing new industry... it may be worth your time to look into it... Best wishes!
I love your videos. I do have a question. When approaching the speed of light, it take more energy to accelerate, such that it takes infinite energy to reach the speed of light. So the energy of acceleration in the direction of velocity takes exponentially more the faster you go. But what about slowing down? Say you are going 99.99999%c and you want to slow down. Would it take the inverse of the energy needed to accelerate in the direction of velocity? Or would it take the same energy to apply negative acceleration (opposite velocity) as it would to apply positive acceleration(in the direction of velocity)?
@Leo Yohansen thank you for taking the time to answer. I am confused by your answer. In the first part you say you need equal energy to slow down as you do to speed up. But in the second part you say there is a resistance one way and not the other, implying that there would be unequal amounts of energy.
@Leo Yohansen thank you for a wonderful explanation. It fits exactly how I envisioned the universe working and confirmed some suspicions I had about other aspects.
@Leo Yohansen not to mention they have experimentally proven that the acceleration of a rotating body has been shown to drag spacetime with it. This tells me that spacetime has almost what could be described as a viscosity against acceleration and velocity.
Some may find the narration a bit soporific, but this is loaded with key information, and really clear animations of parallel transport of vectors. Thumbs up!
Many thanks! I hadn't thought of adding a sector to a 2-d euclidean disk, to force it into a 'Pringle chip' (saddle-shaped) form. Very clear explanation and animation.