The statement "a set of vectors is linearly dependent if none of the vectors in the set can be expressed as a linear combination of the other vectors in the set" is incorrect because it is describing linear independence, not linear dependence.
Are there errors on orthogonal projections ? Instead of (Sqrt(17))**2 --> Sqrt(17)*Sqrt(4) ?. Why would proj v->u is equal to proj u->v even slope would differ.
@@1970mza Discord didn't work out so I am in the process of creating a website to allow for the downloading of my PDF slides and software files :) I am sorry for the wait and thank you for your patience :)
The way of your teaching is excellent. At the start of your lecture you said that this lecture is going to be boring but I didn't find the boring part in the whole lecture and that's all because of the way u teach.
Fabulous lecture professor and massive thanks for uploading such videos on RU-vid. However, there was one typo in the 52:08 where alpha2 value was supposed to be -2 to sum those vectors u and v to be 0.
Been looking for this my whole adult life, so excited to go through all the lessons, thank you Doc. But why would you make all this available for free? I am not complaining though, love it.
In the review of Linearly Dependent/Independent, is the definition correct? I think it should be "A set of vectors is linearly independent if ...", not " A set of vectors is linearly dependent if ...". Can someone help me check my understanding, please? Thanks in advance.
Unfortunately, @ALEXANDERLUYA, I don't have it as well. But I think that Dr. Pettit is a professor in Canada... We could ask him by his e-mail. Regards.