I am currently studying LLB Law in the UK and have had the unfortunate experience of working on a task where we were advised to use the IRAC method after our group had already submitted the work. You can only imagine how many "mistakes " were made since we did not follow any set format. Thanks for your detailed explanation it is very helpful.
I have watched lots of videos, but none is as detailed and well explained as this. This is really helpful. Thank you very much. Please keep the videos coming.
Perform legal reasoning: General overview: Be exposed to facts that a client brings , determine what legal issues arise from those facts. What constitutes a single issue? Apply the facts and the fact pattern to the rule. Analysis/application section is where: you make analogies (similarities) & distinctions (differences) State only the rules that pertain to the issue. The cases you have read corroborating Conclusion, what would a court likely conclude on the issue, tend to do/conclude Conclusion in line/parallel to analysis , which will show that what you wrote is strong, so conclude on what a court will likely hold for each issue
