The Moudge-class frigate Sahand of the Iranian Navy capsizes and sinks in Bandar Abbas port. This si the third ship of the class to sink. NAFO Link www.help99.co/patches/suchomi...
Sinking and rolling over might have the same result, but they are caused by vastly different events. One is a buoyancy issue the other is a stability issue. The stability issue may have sod all to do with water ingress.
@@csjrogerson2377 There is a good chance they engaged some water egress, triggering the aforementioned stability issues, then once she flopped,...the water ingress was a done deal.
We probably shouldn't giggle too loudly; we managed to burn up a multi-billion dollar amphib while tied up in San Diego. Incompetence is the fruit of bad leadership and politically appointed clowns.
It can happen. A dutch ship once sank in port when a waterpipe broke in the weekend with only minimal crew... it is fun to laigh about, but it happens the best.
There once was an Iranian boat Of which their navy would gloat While the boat was still tied and despite the high tide The boat of the gloats won't float
You say the Russians haven't been daft enough to sink a ship in port, but they did manage to sink a floating dry dock and nearly take an aircraft carrier with it.
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LejeMvKHxh4.htmlsi=63tqXiHkh_X72pMh they HAVE sunk their own ships by incompetence, just not this century lol
No icebergs to be found. Only bad iron or steel. Some how it rusted a whole in those pipes and or tanks. Wrong stainles version. 314 and not 316 stainles steel?
The Titanic was pretty well-engineered for the time, she was just unlucky. Had she hit anything less big and solid than an iceberg, she might well have survived, and even with the iceberg, she stayed up far longer than her designer expected. If you want to see what Titanic's safety systems looked like when they worked, her sister Olympic hit a lot of things including a cruiser and a submarine (still the only merchant vessel to sink a submarine, although she was a troop transport at the time) while staying afloat.
I have no idea what that means, but then again I'm not the one designing war/ships for any country. So my inability to wrap my head around anything beyond Algebra 1 doesn't affect anyone aside from myself. I'll defer to those who _do_ understand that terminology, and derive a good chuckle from your remarks nonetheless.
More likely a failure of basic watch standing and proper water tight settings for hatches, valves and billage pumps. That flooding took hours to happen. Even purposely filling all tanks one on side might not do it. Most ships can take a lot of flooding if the main spaces are held water tight.
As an Iranian i didn't even know anything about any of the incidents you mentioned here. It's good that I've started following you recently so I'm going to be a little bit more informed now. Thank you and keep up the good work👍
If I was you, I would consider getting a VPN. Unfortunately the secret police is an entity not to mess with in your country. All the best and regards from Italy (EU).
@lorenzcassidy3960 i have one my guy. How do you think i can come here and it's not just me even the regime officials have them. Hell some of them even sell it to people. Thanks for the kind words 🙏.
"I was wiping the floor and stumbled over the water bucket, which tipped over. So I pulled the plug in bottom of the bilge to get the water out again."
If you look at the discoloration where the ship was sitting in the water, it is clearly top heavy. The hull would need to be much lower in the water to stably support the superstructure. I graduated with a bunch of Iranian engineers. They cheated their way through school. I remember a professor saying, "I hope none of those guys ever design a bridge."
From what I've read, the vast majority of Iranian people are beautiful, tolerant, and loving people. Israeli citizens used to get along with them, and Iran was a popular vacation destination. I would love to visit the country for these very reasons if it wasn't for the fact it was controlled by Orcs from Mordor.
@@jacko4483 USSR invaded Iran during WWII (along with Britain). Unlike the British, they never left when they were supposed to, and they also exploited their "annexation" in the North and starved hundreds of thousands of people and further exploited the locals. Today, they're probably being told that Russia is "great friends" and that the British are imperialists. (GB ended colonialism, which had existed for thousands of years, speaking of...) But I digress (I'm a Norwegian)
Oh my initial point of commenting was to mention some nice areas around the southern end of the Caspian Sea (Mazandaran). Persia _WAS_ a gateway to the far East, but it's lost its role in that way. Zoroastrianism originated in the approximate area too, and it had (has) strong Hellenic cultural influence in many parts - it really was a nation of many cultures and histories. Today, radical Islamism (I'm of no religion at all personally, not atheism either) (and moderate Islamism probably would not have had this effect:) ruined much or all of this. Zoroastrians was also purged under radical Islamists. The former quite univocally being a more peaceful and synergetic religion, but again I digress
@@SebHaarfagre Not "islamists" . . . . simply islamics . . . ! Not “islamism” . . . . simply islam . . . ! “There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that's it.” Recep Erdogan, Turkish Prime Minister, Milliyet, Turkey, Aug. 21 2007
@@EllieMaes-Grandad i agree that's definitely how their leadership wants people to think it is, and perhaps the people as well. An Iranian gov poll of religious diversity show that 99% ascribe to the government's religious view, but a poll by nongov, based in Netherlands, show the population is extremely diverse in their personal views. (On a tangent, this mirror my own visit when it comes to the consumption of alcohol, back in Tehran in 06'. Smuggling, making and drinking was ok as long as you did so behind closed walls and windows.) The government knew they could do nothing about it. To me, it seems like the idea of not losing face is of such importance in Asia as a whole, that to admit the truth must be trampled under all reason. This is further echoed when you ask any of their text books to describe the darker parts of their own history. If you want me to dig up the name of the poll, I'll get right to it. (Also Norwegian)
One of these sank in the Black Sea within a year of joining service. It sank after running aground. The incompetence of the Irainian navy is never ending.
There once was a frigate named Sahand, In Bandar Abbas it made its last stand, The Moudge-class pride, Now lies on its side, The third of its class to be canned.
Nice saying but bad tools do actually exist. Have you never bought literally anything from Amazon? Of course. It could be a bad ship and the crews could be total air heads. Those aren’t mutually exclusive.
This is a special project, frigate/submarine vessel. They are also intended to save us an anti ship missile, we just have to yell boo! at it and down it will go.
I read the title and was like "Wait a second, didn't we sink the Sahand in the 80s?" They built another one, and it sank too.. Fucking good work, boys.
This was all I pictured in my head when you were talking about all the issues they have had When I first came here, this was all swamp. Everyone said I was daft to build a castle on a swamp, but I built in all the same, just to show them. It sank into the swamp. So I built a second one. That sank into the swamp. So I built a third. That burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp. But the fourth one stayed up. And that's what you're going to get, Lad, the strongest castle in all of England.
Habitual Linecrosser, in regards to new Iranian warships, said yesterday that Iran will become the greatest exporter of coral reefs, should they do something stupid. I didn't expect it to become true to soon.
