Realty Income is just such a powerhouse, again over dilution is a slight worry with O, they have been doing so many acquisitions and aggressively! You honestly couldn't go wrong with either one, they are both super great monthly paying reits.
I might start DCA'ing into ADC instead of O. I don't think rates will come down as fast or as far as most analysts think. I'm not going to back out of O but maybe its time I slow down on investing in it.
Realty Income will probably do share buy backs at some point when things improve and rates fall. It’s actually genius what they are doing and probably a huge opportunity for investors.
Building a good investment portfolio is more complex so I would recommend you seek expert like Donna Patricia Hester’s support with her top notch experience, insights and strategies to secure and minimize the possibilities of losses
how do these companies do in the event of a conflict with China? That's been my number 1 concern the past few months. Roughly 1/3 of all maritime trade goes through the South China Sea. Imagine if Dollar General couldn't sell goods made in China tomorrow. Same for Walmart etc. It'd be nuts.
Not certain why Realty Income entered the Data Center property sector. I understand the tech sector is a booming market, but I also remember the tech bubble bursting. Data centers aren't company specific and a company can and will shop around and move from one data center to the next. Just seems a little more risk and hopefully it will be a small percentage.
Am not too fond of Real estate, but for diversification sake i hold O in my dividend portfolio. At the moment am not planning on aquireing more real estate stocks. I rather focus on the sector i know better wich is financial and recource companys.
Ye, i always like taking opportunitys, if they present themselves. Since every investment has an opportunity cost. Uranium is pretty interesting but at the Moment am looking more into strategic and precious metals. A huge spike in price is inevitable. Due to the enormous consumption of our society
Is it realy dilution, when the company takes the money from new shares to buy new property? When a company has a net value of 10b and offers new shares for 10b and then use the money to buy property for 10b, the shares outstanding are doubled, but so is the value of the companys property... so property value per share stays the same. Not realy dilution?
The problem is that they are issuing new shares at a low price (compared to past years): to raise 10b you need to issue way more shares at $50 than at $70. Also you always pay a premium for your acquisitions, so you are diluting the shareholders at a low price to get say 10b, when the book value of what you get is 8b at a tag price of 10b for example. REITs also tend to issue new shares for stock compensation and bonuses, which sucks at any time, but sucks most when the stock is trading at a lower value.
@@Gastyz I understand the thrust of your point, but I disagree with your example. Which do you think has a larger opportunity to be undervalued, a property acquisition in a market with few buyers or a publicly traded REIT? Even if the REIT is slashed and burned, if what they acquire is slashed and burned even more, it's likely worth the equity issuance.
@@schonsense Yes, there can be scenarios where you are acquiring assets at a discount, maybe this one is, maybe not. But in general, lets just look at the book price, do you end up with a higher or lower P/B ratio after the acquisition compared to before, if you end with a higher P/B it means you paid a premium, if the ratio is lower then you got them at a discount and its a good move. Back to the original post, is it really dilution or not, I would say it depends.
@@Gastyz All things being equal I'm with you here. But right now the CRE market is in shambles, and everyone with an upcoming debt maturity that they can't finance is dumping their properties, dragging down values across the market even for those not under water. If these properties are not getting picked up at a significant discount, then management needs to go. The whole point of being in a good position during a market pullback/correction is to take advantage. Hopefully that is happening.
Size matters during bad times. O is almost 7x bigger than ADC (O market cap $40B ADC $6B) . It generates $880 millions net income / yr compared to ADC $165 million /yr. You want a company with larger cash flow and more assets / properties to weather the incoming recession. HOwever O has more debts (debt/equity 0.8 ADC 0.6) but the debts are still manageable
I am truly impressed by the video you shared and I want to express my gratitude for breaking it down into digestible pieces. Even though the current economic climate is facing a downturn, I am ecstatic to share that I have been experiencing significant financial gains. To be more specific, my initial investment of $9,000 has resulted in returns of $60,000 every 21 days. This news brings me immense joy and I am grateful for the opportunity to share it with you.
Each Quarter is 1/4 [1/4 of 12 is 3] of the year, or 3 months. So, if something pays quarterly, it pays every 3 months [equating to 3 months worth of income/dividend payments], & to get a monthly equivalent, you divide that quarterly payment by 3. So, if something pays $0.30/qtr, it pays the equivalent of $0.10/mo. Put another way, if you multiply that quarterly payment by 4, you get $1.20 for the entire year, or the annual a dividend amount when adding all 4 quarters' payments together. And guess what, If you divide $1.20 by 12 [months in a year], it also comes out to $0.10/mo equivalent. ;)
@@wewhoareabouttodiesaluteyo9303 As @SuperWotman said , don’t look at EPS. Look at AFFO. Earnings has depreciation in it. But unlike other assets real estate appreciates.
@wewhoareabouttodiesaluteyo9303 EPS isn't a proper way to evaluate REITs. You want to use AFFO. Because REITs are required to pay out 90% of earnings by law, most have a distorted EPS. Also, by selling off the office assets and lowering the dividend, they improved their finances substantially. They have a positive AFFO.
