It could be possible the object may have some form of electro magnetic field around it, maybe it is made up of naturally magnetic materials that can fritz out the probes sensors when it gets to close, kinda like how radiation causes cameras to glitch out once it reaches a certain threshold. The spin could be caused from collisions with other objects way back when. Speed and movement is relative in space, unless an outside force acts on the object, it will keep it's momentum, so if you threw a football into space, it would keep going forever, at least until it hits something. Considering this is the kuiper belt, it is very likely that asteroid collision are the reason for the spin. I'm not against the thought of alien life, i personally believe aliens life forms exist. But there is always a mundane answer to any question.
The thing is spacecraft is especially designed to be radiation-resistance in order to advoid data loss (since space is really radioactive). That thing must know the exact way to interrupt signals to make the system dead for so long.
Yup, that's what I feel like. It's probably just a mundane answer. But OHMYGOD the amount of conspiracy theorists in this comment section is eating up my brain piece by piece, I have to x out of this tab before I become as brain dead as them. "THe ELiTes aRe CoVEriNg ThIS uP, NAsA Can'T Be TRustEd".
Well there probably is, but how far away it is may be depressingly far. Hell technically us being intelligent is basically a fluke as evolution isn't designed to make things apex predators, just make them carry their genes on to the next generation. Remember that the T Rex is an evolutionary dead end and went extinct. Meanwhile, the dinosaurs that survived became birds we see today. That's not really what most people have in mind when they think "survival of the fittest". But as I said, evolution is about carrying your genes on and since large animals take more food to live, when a mass extinction occurs they're screwed. Meanwhile something like rabbits or chickens are really fit to carry on as they have many children and rely on constantly available resources. Now us existing at all shows evolution can lead to intelligence but it's not a flawless system and it is clear that life can't be any more intelligent than us. Studies have shown having too big a brain leads to us being incapable of learning due to the shear amount of information our brains try to process. So we are basically near the pinnacle of intelligent life possible. But it took us 4 billion years to go from any life existing to intelligent life. In that time our planet almost died off over 6 times and as we can see with Venus and Mars, it only has to fail once for us to not exist. If we didn't form on such a lucky planet we wouldn't be here today. The question then is, how many ultra lucky planets exist in the universe like Earth that can sustain life? That's a very hard question to answer especially with rarities like our moon to really throw a wrench in things. I imagine that the universe is full of life but intelligence is likely excruciatingly rare. I don't know if our species will ever detect alien life. For all we know this whole galaxy may be bare of any others.
The spinning spaceship concept starting about 03:09 reminded me very strongly of Larry Niven's Ringworld novels. The science is sound but to make it liveable he had a radius of 93 million miles - the same distance as the Earth is from the sun. That certainly solves the rotational issues discussed later in the video, but who could build it and why? Definitely not us! In any case Arawn could not be a ringworld - it is much too small. Interesting speculation though - I'll definitely be looking at more of these videos.
When you say us i hope you're referring to the white race because there's still much you need to learn people today have no clue what's going on in space
After extensive mental calculations, it seems that the probability of an extraterrestrial spacecraft hiding in the Kuiper Belt turns out to be indistinguishable from the probability that such a spacecraft is orbiting Uranus.
5:05 A spinning spacecraft would most likely be spinning on a vertical axis, and the spacecraft would be HUGE. With the craft being very large, these effects that she speaks of would be greatly diminished. Just as they are diminished here on Earth. You don't feel the planet spinning because of it's size. If the planet was much, much, smaller, though, you would feel it.
Says who? Our moron scientists who are being proven WRONG on a regular basis. Maybe the culture inside that thing is tiny. Microscopic in size. Relativity is everything & humans arent relative to most of the things in this universe. FOOLS thing the everything revolves around us. HARDLY! Were just a speck of sand with delusions of grandure.
indeed! I had to laugh at the demo, because she is basing her theory on a primitive demonstration....does she really think that maybe if they can travel to another solar system they probably figured out how to iron out the problems of gravity? Not to mention maybe their body is designed to handle space travel unlike the human body.
@@Hundar10TheGreat There's 2 types of gravity that we understand; one generated by mass and artificial gravity through rotation. The rotation based gravity cannot be even tested on Earth, and in space it would NOT be a "halo" or some sort of donut with land inside as this depicts. Halo the game uses "magical" gravity by some generators to pull things towards its ground. The rotation based requires a very specific shape where the force pushes the structure against your feet, and thus you start moving with it. It's hard to describe the required shape because simply having a wide box would not provide uniform gravity on its surface... it probably curves a bit like some turbine wings? You would have many of those wavy floors perhaps inside a cylinder for example.
But...the "Coriolis effect" demonstrated by the tennis ball was actually Earth's gravity. After all, the spinning demonstration room IS on Earth. In space, all those maladies they discussed would almost disappear. The only force to deal with aside from the artificial spinning gravity would be inertia
@@carlospar3727 (Btw, I’m only discussing so no tone intended.) Zero G doesn’t exist. It should never exist in any sentence. For example: Being in the space station is not zero g those astronauts are in orbit because of gravity and the speed it took to get there.
@@thedude1744 Agreed and no worries. Enjoying the conversation. I was specifically referring to the minute perception of gravity where our space stations hang out. Otherwise, they would expend much more fuel keeping the orbit from decaying, much more often. Clearly, they have to actively manage the orbit. Otherwise, they would have no need for thrusters to maneuver and adjust same. However, for the human in the suit on an EVA, inertia seems to have a much greater impact (from what I've seen and read - not an astronaut) on their operations than gravity. Yes, I know it's there, if not they would float away into space at even slower speeds. Kind of a loosely related proprioceptive system's version of the optical phenomenon: parallax. 😎
25 people liked this nonsense. If it were Earth's gravity, you would not need the spinning thing, duh. And either way, it is not gravity, it is the Coriolis effect. Earth has it's own on the large scale, while this is obviously a very dramatic one, given the small radius and fast spin. This thing spins once every few seconds, while Earth spins once every 24 hours.
The spinning motion sickness when testing the artificial gravity models that spin, is due to, there being two gravitational pulls on the human body of the test subject, the earths gravity and the centrifugal gravity from the model is what causes the effects. it's the same reason it happens in other various scenarios of moving objects a person is in/on such as a boat or car.
@@alecisla no its so much bigger than that, even at just this angle; think about how our solar system (our earth) is the new kid on the block in every direction around us. Is it so hard to believe that they would have an observation station simply just watching earth and watching our progression? The rest of just our galaxy alone and the suns and planets contained inside of it are billions of years older than our planet. I for one actually think that (though off subject) the "ancient alien theory" is by no means far fetched. Every religion says they came from the sky (our atmosphere), the heavens (outer space) that's all that is above the sky. Heaven as in space. And they did come.
@@tylerjennings1558 Your "new kid on the block" is 4.5 billion years old, give it or take it. You don't seem to have a notion of how big space is for a coincidence like that to happen, "so we were passing this rock on our way to the infinite and we bump into this spaceship"... (has never said a NASA emploee). I don't discredit the theory of ancient aliens, it's a very interesting subject. But then again, it's a theory. There's no real and concrete proof that is real, many things claimed by the theory have been debunked already, leaving not much behind for our imagination and speculation to work on. The whole problem here is the assumptions that people make, without real evidence to support their claims. Nothing is "true" until the contrary is proven.
Radiation interferes with computer functions so a body emitting large amounts of radiation would effectively jam any electronics on the spacecraft depending on the tolerances it was designed with. Since our sun is the largest body emitting radiation and the spacecraft is heading away from the sun, then I think they didn't design it to resist any significant amount of radiation. If this theory is true, then the big question would be is why is this meteoric body so radioactive and why is it's composition so different from other Kuiper Belt objects?
Correlation is not necessarily causation. You're making some huge assumptions, including the assumption that it wasn't just bad timing that the sensors experienced issues. You're also making the assumption that it was radiation that caused the issue. Of course, you're relying on conspiracy theorist narratives who are leading you down this path by narrowly guiding your thought process to "it's aliens!" If you read the NASA press release, the on-board computer detected a problem and switched over to the backup computer and put the craft in safe mode so that it could re-establish communication and flight engineers could diagnose the problem. Communications were only down for about 1 hour and 20 minutes. That's hardly a window in which they would lose any possibility of getting data on this asteroid and honestly, they are playing it up.
That expirement she was doing is incorrect. She is creating artificial gravity on gravity. She would need to weigh as light as a feather to walk in a straight line.
If you think 🤔 💭 this video is crazy… You should see some real sightings from around the world.. We have posted over 300+ uploads submitted from people around the world.. this is nothing !
@@injunsun Scott Manley has talked about this.Even small budget hollywood cannot afford huge setup to simulate big star ships on streaming channels. I don't thing we will be able to make huge size star ship in coming centuries because of huge investment requirement. In short,our all attempts at creating artificial gravity in space will be in small size only.
This cuts out the parts about how the Coriolis effect is drastically reduced when your spinning body is large. The sickness is caused by the % difference of rotate between your head and feet, if you're standing inside a 30ft rotating body, and your 6 feet tall, the velocity difference between your head & feet is a lot more than if you're in something the size of delaware...
exactly, most of the new idea of out of earth life by bilioners like Bezos are based on big shells, rotating on itself, simulating gravity, and obviously a small simulation like that NASA lab, is more comparable to a jetta-costa then to a big object like that pseudo-asteroid. Yes, that object could indeed simulate gravity as well for us too.
So the old, take a bucket full of water and swing it around on a string, the water stays in the bucket once it's up to speed. You need a good length of string to do it well, if you have a 1 foot length of string, the water won't stay in the bucket well. Now instead of water in a bucket, think of blood in a human, if the radius (string) is too small, there's chaos in the bucket, which causes motion sickness & dizziness
@@mrseanpride6449 we don't feel the curve of earth, bcs the arth is enough big to seem flat... and that's the same reason (inverse) why if you build an enough rotating machine u will not feel the difference from a flat surface (only a little bit). The example of NASA scientist (with all respect...) is not correct IMHO
The spin could be because of impact but the main thing was that, it was spinning while maintaining it's place. If it were to spin naturally at that speed, the tangent would carry it forward, very fast. That's mind blowing on whole other level.
Wait, they are testing gravitation pull from a very small room, the effects of gravity are related to the size of the internal AND exterior force, meaning, if there was a very large space spinning, like the ones in the early pics in this video, they would react totally different than what the female doctor experienced in her VERY small space...it's like comparing apples to oranges, as they say.
Plus the object was spinning in space, a weightless environment not on a planet that has gravity. Dumbass "scientists" their results are automatically invalid.
@@j.rjunior5584 no, their tests were done on a planet (this one) and not in zero G environment (in space) which invalidates their "scientific" test results. I apologise if my point of view was not clear enough.
2 aliens are talking in outer space, looking down on Earth. "It seems the inhabitants of planet Earth have created nuclear technology and missiles" says one alien "are they showing signs of intelligence?" asks the other I dont think so. They seem to be aiming at themselves"
Question , I would want to ask since she's having trouble with a small room, bigger the object, would it be easier to do things?that we take for granted so what I'm asking, the bigger the spherical object, would the spin have lesser of effect of motion sickness, and disorientation?
So a piece of rock spinning in the middle of nowhere in space, that when observed by one of NASA's probe randomly malfunction, supposedly because of the spinning rock, now is being analyzed by a bunch of people that don't even work at NASA and were not involved directly with the New Horizons mission, and is being claimed to be an alien spaceship.... wow! Incredible!
Rock, stone, asteroid, comet, chunk of ice, blob of solid material... who cares? That's not the point. Because if NASA thinks that this could possibly be an alien spaceship, you wouldn't even know that this malfunction happened! Most likely the rock has an iron core, maybe some magnetism involved, that interfered with the probe's sensors. Then a bunch of "experts" that don't even work at NASA decided that it was an alien spaceship and started talking nonsense... pffff come on, give me a break.
I like how we found one, out of millions, asteroid that was spinning in a different way than most of the other ateroids in the kyper belt, and people were immediatly like "artificial gravity which means aliens!"
I love how Dr Kaplan explains gravity simulation on earth & the effect of coriolis force, well of course numb nut you have to counter Earth gravity force pulling downwards. It's like spinning two balls on each other & expecting them to sync lol. In space it's different & as long you have enough distance from Earth gravitational effects the coriolis effect is irrelevant or very minimal, as long you have rotational speed correct & the precis length of the spokes from the center it will work, correction does work they already tested small prototypes in space, don't know why they don't want to make that general knowledge? That object in the Kuiper Belt could be a base or station of some sort, think about it rather than constructing a huge space station then spinning it up to speed creating artificial gravity it would make sense to find a large asteroid then mine the inside out build your base then attach temporary thrusters on it, bring it up to the correct rotational speed required bingo. Now you have a space station base with artificial gravity & the bonus of it being stealth, nothing to look here just a wired asteroid spinning a bit fast. The difficult part is finding the perfect asteroid with enough mass & the correct material composites, probably with very high iron & nickel content you don't want the ones with high silicate or clay content as they tend to brake apart too easily.
The triple ring theory is the best I see, the outer ring and the inside ring spin together slightly off pace, and the middle ring of the three spins the opposite way at near or slightly faster then the other 2, it is assumed it can create Artificial gravity and give the feeling that you in the very center of the craft would feel as if you are on earth and all is normal. Maybe.
Not saying it’s true but there are many youtube videos reporting navy personnel witnessing ufos going into and coming out of our oceans. I think the history channel also had series about searching for underwater ufo locations.
If you think 🤔 💭 this video is crazy… You should see some real sightings from around the world.. We have posted over 300+ uploads submitted from people around the world.. this is nothing !
The signals going out exactly as it was approaching could be someone or something jamming the signals intentionally and then the fact that it conveniently came back online once it was away from the craft/rock makes this discovery that much more interesting I wouldn’t be shocked tho if the signal wasn’t lost and they actually saw something but are just saying that the signal jammed to keep the masses from knowing what they actually saw You’re telling me that they ACTUALLY may have discovered a alien craft and we can’t schedule a follow up mission? Notice the guy at the end of the vid just quickly dismissing this and ending with “ah, well we won’t know about this any time soon” That’s either the elites covering this up or if this is their genuine attitude and this story happened exactly as it is reported, then this is EXACTLY why humans (supposedly) haven’t discovered alien life yet. The second we would find something we immediately turn away and make up excuses not to investigate. We are “looking” without actually looking for extra terrestrials
what they don't tell you is that it wasn't signal jammed, it went offline due to a timing error in the programming. It "conveniently came back online" because NASA just... turned it back on after it was safe, but unfortunately 15810 Arawn was already passed by that point. They just wanted to hype it up for views.
@@tanuki9691 Yeah....No Possibly a dense, metallic object which creates a small magnetic field. At that distance wouldn't take much to interfere with the signal home.
A "chance" encounter becomes exponentially more likely if you consider an advanced species sending out drone swarms. We send crap satellites already. Much easier to travel space when you are not required to have life-support and shielding.
Why would there be a highly magnetised piece of iron in the Kuiper belt? Type M metallic asteroids are the fragments of proto planetary cores as it takes the differentiation of planet formation to separate the heavier elements from the lighter elements, undifferentiated material would only be 8% iron much like the Earth's crust is only 5% iron. We expect objects in the Kuiper belt to be more comet like, more frozen water ammonia ice, dry ice, and some undifferentiated rocks and hydrocarbons which is why this observation is so unusual...
Could also be a giant metallic asteroid that caused the signal to drop, the odd reflection, and the odd rotation due to a mass difference between "typical" asteroids and this one.
Mass of object does not correlate to metallic asteroid. It is too light. As stated in video, rotation speed would rip ice and rocky asteroids apart. Based on rotational energy, this asteroid should have mass shadow larger than Earth's Moon. Only 2 possibilities for this. Asteroid is unknown exotic metallic or crystalline material, extremely dense yet low mass; or hollow artificial construct - O'Neill cylinder
They need to send two probes ahead of the main satellite, the second one to report the distance that the first probe lost connection, and then stay well outside that. If all three are disabled at different distances, they are definitely being actively jammed.
The spin may be producing some sort of electromagnetic field that knocked out the probe's sensors temporarily Also, no advanced civilization would use centrifugal force instead of artificial gravity because of the detrimental effect on the maneuverability of the craft
Exactly what I thought especially the fact that it could easily contain metal like asteroids do and a electric motor operates in the same manner. They are stretching hard on this.
Scientists only thought about the inner spin... They forgot the thought that a spaceship could have two layers and only the outward layer spins which could be the key to how Aliens control their craft's motion
or maybe it spins order of magnitudes faster but they can't see because of the max framerate of the measuring instrument, just like the effect when we stare at running car wheels.
Absolute but multi layered opposition is not overkill in practically nor expense when budget engineering is cognizant to the advantage and potentials. We humans seem to fear and hence smear any multi dimensional thought processing to which all multi dimensional realities fear them. I never read a once popular trilogy of books entitled "CONVERSATIONS WITH GOD" But in essence the climaxing end of the last book goes like this on last page ,last paragraph 《 so God can I ask you one last question, "why did you choose to talk to me?" God replied I did not choose to talk to you, you finally chose to listen to me!!!⁶] this is the future not present in reality as to humans.they believe to know it all yet have not exhibited any interest in active demonstration of any of their knowledge. Hmmmm. Beam me up scotty their are no intelligent life forms on Earth! Meanwhile, singular dimensions humans claim similar of any multi dimensional thought process. We even observe pet owners frustratingly trying to make their pets understand their linguistic which is harder than the pet owners learning the much improved animal behaviors and vocal communicating. final be the so called animal whisperers who lean toward listening and speaking as a multi instead of human tendency to act superior and not do or say anything of value.now called word salad and mental masturbation Perhaps viagra for the brain might serve humans better than Olympics of sex.? Not in single dimensional primates such as values prominence is instant gratification but I can assure you not all earthling resemblance is one dimensional(referred to as three dimensional in graphics).And it is not a recent addition. So sad to see the backwards direction of the dummed up society implemented by single dimensional humans grappling over all to get into control before the masses realized their deficiencies and self inflicted ignorant status. One day perhaps return to the intended goals of unity ,will allow moving from reverse to 1st gear again.then humanity may be considered for enlightenment in this experiment of life,but then again why bother. Admitting the failure and instigating anew life experiment is more important...
Exactly. I always wondered why passenger planes don't have an inner pod that eject at a certain height and has massive parachutes in it if the plane is going to crash . Also remember the star wars toys Transporter ship were you could twist it but the middle stayed levelled. Like a compass effect
Wouldn’t that machine they’re using to simulate gravity be impossible to achieve on earth because our planet is already spinning? It would be the equivalent of a eye glass prescription, in how you have to have bad vision in order for eye glasses to correct your vision. If you already have good vision, eye glasses would just over correct them and it would be blurry. Artificial gravity can only exist in a place where there is no gravity, yes? I’m not a scientist so I don’t understand this, but automatically that’s what I assume.
Please excuse my ignorance. But if you try to create a separate gravitational pull while another one still exists. Wouldn't that cause 2 separate pulls which confuses the brain? While in space the pulling force would be different if you had an artificial gravitational force.
we've tried spinning to simulate artificial gravity within Earths gravity field which would cause two conflicting gravity forces, if we tried it in space, away from Earths gravity ,would we get different results?
That's the best question on here jon well said I think it would be different scientists will tell you no but we as humans only ever learn by trial and error so I think definitely worth a try the to gravitational pulls would affect each other but I also think about crafts that already come and visit planet I think they create gravity from magnetic fields which creates gravity for them were there's a way there's a will
Thats what I thought to because I'm actually in the middle of reading that book right now. Page 134 chapter 26 the voice of Rama. Got the other 3 books as well.
Verrrrrry Interessssssting.... And if this is all true, and not hype-or-speculation, then this is one of the few vids, if not the only one, amongst the endless 'no point' vids in this category, that was worth the watch. Not disappointed at all that's for sure. I'm sub'd in, you bet !!!
lemme guess. it can see close up of earth from that distance but the image of the rock is as blurry as a big foot photo? thats why they "needed to get closer"
I met bigfoot once for tea. The pictures of bigfoot are not blurry. Bigfoot actually is blurry. Oh, and he likes his Earl Grey hot with no sugar. He is on Keto...
I've always had one question about using the coriolis "force"; the early video clip showed a person jumping...and slowly coming down. But that was with external gravity. if in a space vehicle or station if one jumped up from the rotating surface, wouldn't you be suddenly weightless? (I hadn't thought about walking and your lifted leg having different forces acting on it than the planted leg. Makes running questionable...although SkyLab DID have astronauts running to a degree.)
No. If you think about the reason for centripetal motion. The thing keeping you stuck to the floor of the station is the floor itself, it's accelerating you so that you don't fly off in a straight line into space. If you jump, all that happens is that you alter your trajectory slightly "upwards" in relation to the floor... But you are still traveling in a straight line in space but that floor is part of a ring (the part of the floor under your feet has now rotated around the curve and caught you), in half a second or your feet will be touching it again... It wouldn't feel any different to normal gravity and a normal jump. Try drawing your path on some paper and drawing the path of the floor that would be rotating and see what happens when you give yourself a small kick towards the middle of the ring.
Wondering if the artificial gravity can be obtained by creating a double sphere structure, one sphere in another, whereby the outer one spins and the inner is stationary ( for the space crew)
There are 12 densities, they don't adhere to "gravity". You are closer to the reality than the creators of this video though. They are all guessing except the deep underground base in Dulce NM. That place is the REAL House of Horrors. Out of sight, out of scrutiny.
The inner sphere would have to be spinning as well. A common design for a spinning habitat is twin cylinders which are contra-rotating at the same speed. They can accerate and decelerate off each other so no juice is required to start or stop the spin.
ham radio It's basically higher frequencies set aside for technician and emergency purposes. when a weather warning comes over the radio that is a form of ham radio that is a high frequency therefore it takes over your radio station it can also send alerts to everybody's phone. If they were sending out frequencies or a radar to guide them through space chances are it was a higher frequency than we can create a therefor it would disrupt anything we have. Just a thought🤷♂️
5:14 Surely the problems the people in the gravity generator are experiencing is in large part due to having two gavitational forces at play? Once off Earth it should be a very different experience shouldn't it?
@@alecisla he's referring to the US Navy tictac videos and the accompanying disclosures, including the Pentagon disclosure coming in a few days, as part of a funding pre-requisite passed by the Trump administration.
@@IndianArma I don't think so, he's talking about this video here. Otherwise, he would've posted that comment on the tictac video, isn't it? And either way, where is the "subliminar" part of the equation, if that was the case, when videos, reports from Navy pilots and the government itself are explicitly talking and showing everything to the public? There's not much to hide there so I don't know where the "sublimiar" came from...? lol
@@vojavucinic you mean the staged video of an F18 in infrared from miles away and from another moving aircraft giving the illusion of tremendous speed and maneuvers? The signature in infrared is identical to F18s filmed in infrared by other branches of the service Dont be a stooge to govt misinformation....they have a sinister purpose
It is what it is, a chunk of chunks of planet that broke apart from spinning too fast. All of them are charged with energy. They are like a communication switch board for the planets in our solar system.
Actually, the Stanford Torus has 95% of it's mass as micro meteorite and radiation shielding made of packed regolith. This serves as an outer tire within which the habitat module would spin quickly for artificial gravity. What would be visible from the outside would be a slowly counter rotating shielding material as the shielding material would be a lot more mass than the habitat ring so it takes a slower spin to counter the angular momentum. Basically, you're right, just as with Arthur C. Clarke's 2001 Discovery One spaceship, it would be an inner section that spins, whatever is spinning on the outside would have a much slower spin if at all..
Kristie andJeff ,right on and other info such as this is their .never underestimate the potential of unity of like minded toward breaking into multi dimensional al wisdom.perhaps Elon .musk is wrestling with similar circumstances as to barriers in intelle tual and physics of space travel theoretical and the event horizon excuse in quantum thought reasoning .
Wrong! The Coriolis effect is present on earth even it is the only gravity source. The coriolis effect is what is, among other things, causing rotating weather systems. It simply means that a point on equator is moving faster than a point near the poles, when the earth spins.
Problem is, only the habitat vessel must spin for artificial gravity, what you see from the outside is just the micrometeorite and radiation shield and would not spin or would counter spin very slowly to neutralize the angular momentum of the spinning habitat unit within. An actual spacecraft with an artificial gravity habitat would not show anything spinning from the outside or would be counter spinning very slowly as the radiation shields would be at least 95% of the mass. An example of this is Discovery 1 on Arthur C. Clarke's 2001 A Space Odyssey has an internal spinning section but nothing on the outside spins. Whatever spins is subjected to the artificial gravity and hence must have more tensile strength than the rest of the spaceship so the spinning section would be kept to a minimum. You would not spin the entire space craft if you can avoid doing so.
@@jacobshandymantreeservicel2522 You do realize that no one is building a large space habitat with centrifugal gravity as artificial gravity at the moment, there is no one to "work for" in making posts about the idea as they are just theoretical concepts based on known science. Does people talking about science distress you so much that you must infer ulterior motives and conspiracies? Do you have an inferiority complex? Do you wear a red hat?
It could spin if it was a space station. If it is a spacecraft, it is better to have the inside ONeill cylinder spin counter to the outside. Ideally, 3 layers would be necessary. Outside would be stationary relative to XYZ axis, inner shell would rotate one way, inner habitable zone would rotate the opposite to the inner. This is assuming it is in perfect working order, and not damaged or derelict
@@brianwhedon8442 It's more a matter of 95% of the material would be radiation and micro-meteorite shielding and simple aggregate from moons and asteroids would suffice instead of refined machined materials launched from Earth or from established space based infrastructure but loose aggregate however contained by binders (plastics or cement) or by bags (adobe construction) would not withstand the tensile forces of spinning fast enough for artificial gravity hence it would be best if the micro-meteorite and radiation shielding did not spin or spun slowly. This would be true of space stations, space habitats, but with spaceships where mass must be minimized, the shielding is more likely to be refined materials such as kevlar and Z polymer shielding instead of just relying on mass. Note that generation ships and external nuclear pulse propulsion ships would not have the same minimum mass requirement.
Could it be that the outer part spins opposite to an inner core using 2 forces or something to spread out the spinning? I mean probably not I haven't put much thought into it but just saying that's not the ONLY answer.
You need to have 3 parts, the centre/core is stationary, followed by another sphere spinning clockwise and last sphere counter clockwise (As with a gyroscope) That is my calculated guess........... Thank you for sharing
Absolute and logically sensical my friends! Multi oppositional gyrations is kiss simple for space phenomenon to which applying Einsteins theory on gravity's push Not pull doing like hydrostatic oceans movement pushing static pressure upon objects (ie.displacement physics and tide effects of moon and fluid dynamics primarily) Einstein loved sitting at oceans edge and studying the physical aspects exhibited .thusly imagine that displacement values of the vectors produced by the many bodies of stars, planets etc. Is the space dynamic to which the world really spins,orbits and maintains and we thus far only understand the oceans force reflected from the seawall after the wave hits.minor in vector force as OPPOSED to the crashing wave hitting the wall and only tantamount to current surface tension... vectors like a Riptide.! Anyway Very interesting maybe to a few maybe to which viewed this site as have I maybe.
The wet not set typo apology in of supra previous reply. Hate word spell trickery in changing meanings by a single word.computir and secretary vacations is my excuse for typo failure!
So the issue I see with the simulation of artificial gravity is the fact we are testing it and creating it on a planet with gravity. Don’t you think that affects how the artificial gravity is created? Wouldn’t it be better to build a zero gravity room and then put the artificial gravity room in it to more effectively test and experience it? Idk just my thoughts.
I would agree with you on that. Earth does have gravity already so maybe that's why she was experiencing motion sickness. I think that it's going to be possible for humans to create artificial gravity if there's no gravity existing.
artificial gravity is merely a function of the inverted spectrum of the space-time continuum put through a molecular disintegration fulcrum for the use of protoplasmic ions
When I was a kid I was at a county fair there was a ride that I went on called the gravitron it created more gravity we were stuck to the walls upside down our heads not even touching the floor
Spinning around on the planet surface in a container you are already in a gravity environment. Outside of planet gravity spinning in a container would be a different effect I would imagine.
The object was obviously at the point at in the horizon which does three things distorts time distance and size it was probably right at the part where the object was just starting to fall indefinitely as it’s reflecting those lights coming off the stars making a soup or plasma spinning faster at the end pushing slow on the other end where it’s pulling and it probably would make it look synchronized
Maybe we're thinking about this way too much. Maybe it could be spinning from a recent impact maybe? Plus i wouldnt expect the city lights to be like yellow probably. They could be green, blue ect.
If you think 🤔 💭 this video is crazy… You should see some real sightings from around the world.. We have posted over 300+ uploads submitted from people around the world.. this is nothing !
The spinning problems would lessen the larger the spin radius is and so the rotations per second would reduce and so the pull would reduce. Also, in space the effect she had problems with might not exist at all because there is only momentum, not actual gravity interfering. At least at Lagrange points.
