Is Evolution Compatible with Christianity? 

@@ImperativeApologetics of course I also Don't think that the universe was made in billions of years. But rather we have a very young world. This goes against most people's view but the reason it does is because of carbon dating. That makes things seem like they're really, really old when carbon dating is very inaccurate. I believe it took a rock from Mount St. Helens that was freshly formed and sent it in to be carbon dated and apparently it was 40,000 years old which makes zero sense

​@@techauro8346 Yes, I believe that was a Potassium-Argon dating method for the Mount St. Helens rock, but both of the dating methods are inaccurate. The carbon-14 dating method for instance is based upon the assumption that the carbon-14 in the atmosphere has reached equilibrium, which it has not! We have lots of evidence of many of these dating methods, which you pointed out, giving absurd and contradictory dates!

Yes, I agree that microevolution (or simply variations) do in fact happen everyday, and I was not arguing about whether or not variations occur in nature (which they do). Microevolution seems to me to be the term in which evolutionary advocates 'bait and switch,' while attempting to prove evolution. They oftentimes point to a variation within a species, and then use that to argue for macroevolution, which is way more extreme than microevolution! Kent Hovind described the six types of evolution: 1. Cosmic Evolution (i.e. Big Bang) 2. Chemical Evolution 3. Stellar & Planetary Evolution 4. The Origin of Life 5. Macroevolution 6. Microevolution The first five types of evolution are the ones which I was showing were incompatible with the Bible. I wholeheartedly agree with you that microevolution does in fact occur everyday, and it is the only scientific form of evolution!

Macro Evolution requires that God created a universe where to get to his perfect design, there had to be constant death and suffering. Completely contrary to the Bible which says death was introduced to the world through sin and man. Micro evolution has all the building blocks inside the DNA themselves..we can observe this today, but should rather be credited to the adaptability of organisms and not large scale evolution

@@MrSneakSneak While microevolution is certainly real, macroevolution is completely imaginary! Macroevolution within a Biblical viewpoint would result in heresy, as it would mean that death came before sin, while the Bible clearly declares that death came into the world because of man's sin.

@@ImperativeApologetics amen to that!

@@techauro8346 why would a mutation need to happen in both parents to be passed on? What mechanism would the newly created combined cell use to determine which of the two chromosomes is the "original" and which is just a mutation?

Could you provide any verses in Genesis to back up these claims? Could you also provide the evidence that atheists would use to debunk the claims made by Ken Ham?

There are six types of evolution. There is: 1. Cosmic Evolution (i.e. Big Bang) 2. Chemical Evolution 3. Stellar & Planetary Evolution 4. The Origin of Life 5. Macroevolution 6. Microevolution The changing beak shape of the bird that you are referring to is microevolution (or simply called variations). That is science, but the other forms of evolution are complete speculation. There are limits to the genetic variation that an animal, plant, or human is able to go through. There will never be a pig as big as Texas for example. There is simply a limit. There is no evidence of macroevolution ever occurring (or at least I haven't seen any). The animal suffering is simply a result that we live in a fallen Creation. Man's original sin brought death and suffering into the world. God had originally Created a perfect world, but sin ruined it, which is consequently why we see this animal suffering and so on. But thankfully God is going to Create a new heaven, and a new earth! (Those are my thoughts on those points!)

Thank you so much!