Is going FULL FRAME an « upgrade »? 

This is a RU-vidr who has earned and deserves the 500k subscribers he now has.

There's also something to be said about "The best camera is the one you have with you". I shoot Fujifilm, the AF performance is sub-par, its an APSC sensor, the menus are outdated, the app is wonky. But I just LOVE holding this camera, and using it, and bringing it out, and the lenses are so nice. The camera ENCOURAGES me to want to go out and use it and play with it. I think that's super important too, even if you are a professional! You can achieve anything if you ENJOY your equipment and it makes you happy :)

Most photography sites focus on generalizing everything: camera choices, lens choices, camera settings, camera reviews and what camera is “best for you”. Very few of them even acknowledge that we’re all inspired for different reasons and shoot different subjects. I appreciate that you acknowledge this simple truth.

Simon, thanks for the best explanation of the differences in sensor sizes I’ve ever heard. A couple of years ago I switched from Canon full frame down to Olympus micro 4/3. The change made sense for me because as an older photographer, I am 67, the weight and bulk of a full frame system was getting in my way of the joy photography. I wanted to upgrade to a mirrorless system and I didn’t have a fortune to spend on the new system. I got two bodies and a good selection of lenses for half the price of full frame. And I’m a happier photographer. I’m pulling my camera out and shooting a lot more than I did before. Different strokes for different folks. And I’m not saying that sometime in the future, I might not get back into full frame for some reason. After all cameras are just tools, and we get the tools we need for the jobs at hand. Again, thanks so much.

I am so glad that you publish this video at this time, because I have been struggling with the idea of getting a full frame camera. I shoot with a Nikon D7500. I think I would rather go to a mirrorless so I can relieve myself with some of the weight of my Nikon. I knew that a full frame would just be more weight, but I didn't realize the difference of how the photos look. I was looking at a full frame because of having more light and I often should an old abandoned houses. I think I would just rather go mirrorless or just get some really good lenses for lowlight situations. Thanks again for all the great info you share which other photographers are not willing to do! 😊

I switched from APSC to Mirrorless Full Frame, and for my case, landscape photography in some difficult light conditions, the performance of full frame to capturing high dynamic range is much better. It helps to preserve dark tones and high lights.

I Live in Mauritania ( a country mainly speaking french and arabic) and I am always eagerly waiting for your videos. What amazes me is that there are RU-vidrs with millions of followers who don't have a third of your knowledge in photography. I have learned more from your videos than from anyone else on RU-vid, it covers everything and are easy to understand for me as a French speaker. Because of you i ended up investing more than 4000 dollars in canons (R8 + RF 24+105 F4 + 50 mm f1.8 + canon m50 mark ii + viltrox adapter and speed booster + several lenses). Thank you for your work and knowledge your sharing with us , keep up the good work . Sorry if i made mistakes in my comment , English is not my mothertongue language .

Simon is the one that keeps convincing me that my gear is better than I thought it was (:

As a new photographer your channel is very helpful. It has helped me not to go down rabit hole of equipment specs and rather helped me focus on my art. Congratulations on reaching 500k

I recently upgraded to a canon R8. It’s great for what I do which is mostly landscape photography. I love these videos as an amateur who is always looking to learn you are very instructive and a great teacher.

You're like some kind camera Guru God, I was so confused as I just bought my first camera the R50 just 2 weeks ago and I was so lost as to why I only get subpar photos compared to my phone. I quickly went down the rabbit hole of watching videos about expenses lenses and lighting gear and I was like Wth the hell am I getting into, I'm broke I'll never afford these things. My head was spinning until I found this channel. The clean straight to the point presentations and clear wording has been my Saviour. Can't thank you enough for clearing things up so much for me. Your video about the Histogram was especially eye opening for me.

I went from a Z-50 (Very Nice Camera) to a D850. Zero regrets. The Z-50 was just too small for me to work intuitively and quickly. The 850 is a bit of a tank but it fits my grip much better. A true bonus has been the influx of great used lenses available. Love the channel Simon and congrats on 500,000 plus subscribers!

Very nicely and clearly explained.

Hello Simon I am so glad u have over 500 thousand followers. As I love watching your RU-vid’s videos and I learnt so much form you. I wish you had a book out.

This is great. I am considering a full frame and this is helpful

I'm so glad that you explain in a calm and methodical manner all the differences in sensor sizes. The main myth being that FF cameras give blurrier background just because of being FF, and not because you take the shots differently. I have met quite some people who'd swear that FF gives you blurrier background, without really explaining the Why. Anyway, thank you for the best videos on photography on RU-vid. You're a gem. And the 500k are well deserved.

After using Nikon Z50 (crop-sensor) more than 2 years, I switched to full-frame Canon R8. I have been using R8 for more than 6 months now. What genre of photography I do? Travelling, landscape, portraits of my family and friends. I use R8 with 2 main lenses: basic RF 24-105 f4-7.1, EF 70-200 f4. Yes, this combo is bigger than my old Nikon Z50 + 2 kit lenses. But, in my case, it was totally worth the switch (I also often use the RF 50mm F1.8). I explain a little bit: - for travel: the R8 is small enough to get it everywhere. I love how this camera manages a lot of situations: indoors photography (and I love to take indoor shots of palaces, churches, cathedrals etc). Even with the 'cheap' 24-105mm the image quality is much better overall: colors, noise etc. Also, for outdoor, the images are superior: much detailed, the highlights are recovered much better, also the details in the shadows are better. Now, I feel that I worry less about the dynamic range, I know I can recover highlights/shadows information in post-processing. And when you travel and walk the streets of old Italians, Greeks, Spanish towns, it is very comfortable to shots knowing the details will all be there. - landscape: as nature lover, I did also quite a lot of landscape photography. Not for selling, but also for landscape R8 is better (and not having the cutting-edge lenses). The details and the dynamic range make a lot the difference. - for portraits: oooo, yes, here it is absolutely no doubt the change was well worth it. The focus of R8 is amazing, the multiple way you can setup up how the camera will focus on subject is a big advantage. The subject tracking, again the high ISO management (when fast shutter speed needed), all is so good, worth every penny. With R8 I started to love portrait photography. - I didn't do wildlife. Except few tries on zoo, but this is not wildlife, with 70-200mm. And yes, you feel the need to have more reach, much longer focal length. But so far, so good, it is not my main interest. ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Conclusion: using this R8 is a joy, having a camera I can rely on for a lot of scenarios: indoors, outdoors, low light, portraits, speed ... Everything is better, is higher quality, is close to professional work I could do one day with this camera. For me for me it was worth.

Congratulations on passing half a million 🎉 you deserve it!! Thanks for all the educational info and advice for all types of photographers.

I shoot full frame at work and bought mysef a m4/3 for my personal use. Definitely pros and cons for each. I really love the reach I get out of my Gh6 and my 100-400 lens. Ive gotten amazing shots on my work cameras and my personal cameras. So definitely bigger is not always better, just different.

Just bought a sony a7 iii im new to all this but im having so much fun just capturing moments in time!

Wow! I like this camera 📸

Hello from the Philippines, Simon! Your videos are a great help to novice photographers, especially those like me who's about to buy their first camera.

Superb as usual Superb as always

Best photography channel on RU-vid!

That "I know you can do it ! ;) " always leaves me with a smile :D Love your videos Simon - wether you need the tips in the video or not, its always fun to watch them 💪

Excellent summary, very helpful.

As a crop sensor Canon user I appreciate your giving time to the topic. Not surprisingly you’ve hit 500k so quickly. Best from Texas!

I liked how you presented the advantages and disadvantages of both sensors. It’s a matter of what you photograph in my opinion. I bought a Fujifilm X-T5 crop sensor and I’m very happy with it. I used a Canon EOS RP for many years with some EF and RF lenses. The cost of a newer full frame body and RF lenses made me reconsider. At the end the Fujifilm system I owe now it’s more than enough for what I do as a hobbyist. The smaller size and lower price was very attracting without to mention its 40MP size. Thank you for the video.

More good advice and congratulation on 500K subscribers.

Congrats on half a million subs!!! Very well deserved! I'm one of those who did not switch to full frame due to the advantage of crop sensors for wildlife.

Another highly concentrated walk-through of some of the technical and equipment-related camera fundamentals with the top online photography teacher. Merci Beaucoup!

Superb content and presentation as ever, saved me a fortune going forward!

Thank you so much. Great info. I have a Canon R10 and works great for me. Full frame isn't necessary for me at this time. Thanks again. Love your channel .

You have such a good educational channel, Simon. And you make it all a little easier to understand than some photography channels.

The most knowledgeable and easy to understand content on yt , Great work Simon !

Congrats on your 513K! I still have my Canon 60D, I use it for Macro with a 35mm Macro lens, no need for a full frame for this type of photos; sometimes I take it for wild life and paintball, depending on "the mood". I bought a Canon 5D IV, more expensive, but great dynamic range compared to my 60D.

this guy deserves an oscar or something, so easy to understand!!

It's no surprise your channel is growing since your tutorials are so easy to understand and so well-illustrated. You are my "aha" moment guru! this was timely because I just bought a used full-frame from a friend who has way too much gear. Haven't compared many images yet, though I do think I am getting better detail. The one negative I have run in to is one you mentioned - the weight and size. A little weight does make a big difference and since I have small hands with arthritic thumbs and wrists, I immediately noticed a problem when trying to do things like back button focus. QUESTION - how do you know if a LENS is full frame or crop sensor?

Nice summary! And I shoot both fullframe and APS-C :)

Hey Simon! Just wanted to say: I’m an audio engineer, and I can literally hear you getting better at your audio finishing processes! 👍 I remember you mentioning before in one of your advertisements that you were going to pursue that course of study. It’s paying off! ✌️👌👌👌👌 I have learned probably 1/2 of how to function in photography world competently from your videos. Thank you for never compromising 🙏 📷 Your content helps the entire community 🤘

Thank you, this is the first time I heard an explanation that make sense regarding background blur between FF and crop. All the RU-vidrs would just say about the sensor, it didn't really made sense to me since the difference would not create that effect if it's just the sensor.

Recently went from a Canon M50 to Canon R6 for Automotive and Motorsports Photography. Full frame allows me to catch more of a scene, not just a car filling the frame. Absolutely love it.

Full frame is the way to go👍🏼 I love when he says his name!😊

Every video from you always contains so much knowledge to learn. The only issue is we all tend to forget!

Congratulations on the number of subscribers. This doesn’t surprise me as I was following you back when you had 10,000 or less. Another great video which makes understanding cameras, Photography, and other subjects related easy to understand.

Excellent video ... congrats on reaching 500K subscribers. Well earned!

As always, your presentation was pleasant and informative! I purchased an APSC with a Sigma 18-35 1.8 as a backup with the benefit of the crop factor on longer full-frame lenses!

Congratulations! I used Canon APS-C cameras for 10 years for landscape and some wildlife. I bought the original EOS R when it came out because of the mirrorless features and improved noise characteristics and dynamic range. Most of my images are long exposures of Bald Cypress trees/knees in lakes. In this type of photography the scene dictates the field of view needed so full frame provides more options. But getting closer also reduces the depth of field. As a result I sometimes need to either use a smaller aperture, focus stack or let the background go out of focus. It just makes me have to think more about depth of field. There are tradeoffs when moving to full frame. I still use APS-C for birds and wildlife but now have the R7 for the eye tracking.

Congrats on the 500k. Well deserved! My favorite photography channel by far!

Congratulations on the 500K subscribers, Simon! We are the subscribers, of course, but we are here because of the quality of the content on this channel which is second to none. You deserve all the credit!... Thanks for another great video! A year ago, I bought a new camera after hesitating between the similarly priced Canon R7 (APSC) and R8 (full frame). I chose the R7 mainly for its build quality, its bigger battery, dual card slots, etc. I am mostly interested in landscape photography, so "close quarter" is not an issue. I like having more reach, when using my zoom lens, for the occasional wildlife photos. I thought the narrower field of view of the cropped sensor would be a limitation for landscape photo, but in reality, the wider the field of view, the more difficult it is to avoid obstructions and to find a composition (so many trees in Canada!). However, to compensate somewhat, I found a 7.5 mm f2.0 fisheye lens (12 mm full frame equivalent on an APSC) which I intend to use for indoor/architecture photos from time to time. I still think I do not really need a full frame camera, but I may change my mind someday, who knows...

I went from 7d to a 6d plus now the Canon 70-200 is usm f4, best choice i could ever make! This combination gives me so much more benefits using it in low light and still get crisp result!

I am so used to using my Canon 1.6 crop M6 mark II that I don't worry about Full Frame cameras. Good video.

thanks for the education on the advancement of cameras, I had a Brownie, graduated to an 127 and then to 35mm, I have 62 years of photography taking, you teach me lots Simon, thank you, do your viewers even know what a Brownie is ?

A very good and honest presentation . I shoot with both full frame and micro four-thirds. Both have their benefits. When used in the right situations, they both produce great images.

Congratulations Simon on your well deserved milestone! I feel some folk get too hung up on camera gear rather than the pure creative joy photography can bring to us 😎

Clear explanation as always. I actually use both full and crop frame sensors. Each has a unique advantage over the other. For longer reach, I prefer APSC cameras, but for better bokeh on portraits, Full Frame is my choice. If I go for a hike, APSC and their lenses are lighter to carry.

Thank you. Super super information.. Your generosity and commitment to your work is a blessing.. Thank you

Love your videos, Simon. I watch Them even though I already know the material because your explanations are so good. You are one of the best teachers on youtube.

Outstanding video! Thank you. Clapping from Norfolk, Va.🎉

I use both systems. The Sony FF for my concert photography because of the low light advantage and the Fujifilm system for my travel photography because of the weight. They both producing great photos and I'm not interested in blurry photos. Great video Simon. Thank you!

Hey Simon. Absolutely love your content and this video was great as well. I was wondering, could you do a best camera for every budget, show a full frame and crop sensor and maybe what each one is best for? I think that would be very interesting. As always, great work here!

Another quality, informative video. As always, I learnt heaps from this. You have an excellent channel, and deserve double the number of subscribers.

You always explain things soooo well ... Simply and straight to the point ... Thank You 🎉

Well made content. Good script reading.

Nobody does it better Simon. Congrats on breaking the 500k threshold. It comes as no surprise. I'll stick with APS-C, Canon and Fujifilm, because of my photo interests, the smaller form factor and lower cost; it also allows for purchasing more glass. Kudos to you Simon.

Simon, excellent video with clear narration, helpful graphics, nice example photos, and perfect delivery of the info. I like how you produce your videos, explain the tech stuff, and show examples and options and tips. Keep up the good work (subscribed).

Well explained video again from Simon. The benefits of each sensor size is why I have both an APSC and a Full Frame in my gear stash. As much as people recommend just dropping my APS-C and buy a second full frame, I couldn't let go of the smaller format because of its small overall form factor esp. when you couple it with apsc lenses. This really gets very handy when on travel.

Love your channel and the way you explain stuff Simon always appreciated, I shoot Micro Four Thirds and love the system, always gets me great images

Hi Simon, I really love your videos. I've just recently bought an old near-mint Sony A7II to upgrade from my Nikon D5000 which was APSC. I mainly shoot street photography and sometimes live performances, which I felt the D5000 was particularly poor at. When I set the ISO beyond 1000 or so I could see the noise and the loss of details. I was under a budget, but I had a lot of old manual lenses, and owning an A7II really made me felt like shooting "digital film". I felt the upgrade was worth it for me, but I also do feel the extra weight and complexity of the new camera.

I have three crop senor canon cameras. I have used all of them and just have no need to buy a full frame camera. I use full frame lenses on them and get results that fills my needs. Since I sell my images I only get asked what I use from fellow photographers. The people buying the images don't care what camera or what editing software I use. They just want the image that fills their heart. I have always been a believer that the most important factor is the lenses and not the camera. I shoot wildlife and enjoy the reach I get with them. I also shoot other kinds of things and use lenses that fit the occasion. Even more important is the person behind the lens can make it work with what they own. The only time I would consider a new camera is when I have a need for one and can make enough to warrant the perchance price. Thanks for the info and keep it coming.

Great reminder for those of us craving full frame and for beginners who are confused by hype. I'm using my full frame Nikon for the backyard birds. With a 150-50mm it has helped me get shots that adapt to lighting better. However, I have been in search of a M43 or light weight option for travel. On the other hand, M43 lenses are getting HUGE. Then the smaller size issue is a moot one. You are to me, one of the top educators on RU-vid, Simon!

Another great educational video Simon, I've learned so much from your channel and am already making money with photography!

I’m happy I found this page. Thank you for the great detail work and examples you give

Best explanation of sensor size choices and what works best in particular scenarios. I’m sure that will help a lot of people whom might be thinking bigger is always better. Well done (again)!

Your videos are so good on many levels, bravo

Great video Simon - you speak a lot of sense and say it exactly how it is. After getting back into photography recently via a Fuji X-H2 APS-C, I then got intrigued by M43 so also tried out an OM-1. Down the rabbit hole I went. M43 is poor, no good in low light, poor image quality etc etc. But, for what I shoot (which is essentially everything), and how I shoot it (generally with a young family in tow), I'm really valuing the small form factor of the M43 system. I went to an airshow yesterday with my OM-1.2 and 40-150 f2.8 (so 80-300 FF equiv.) and didn't even realise I had it with me. Seeing the guys and girls with FF and massive lenses on the front really made me realise that I just couldn't lug that around all day with everything else I need to do (and I wouldn't want to either). That doesn't mean anyone is wrong, it's just a case of to each their own. I can see the benefits of FF in some of my shooting situations, and I may well now offload the APS-C and get a FF for certain scenarios - in effect having the benefits of each system at both ends of the scale and ignoring the one in the middle. Either way the most important thing is the size of your sensor doesn't make you a better photographer - you do. Pick up the camera you have, go and, shoot it, and most importantly LEARN IT. That'll make you a far better photographer than continually buying 'better' gear (and it's significantly cheaper too!).

Thank you Simon. This is the clearest explanation of the differences and benefits of crop and full-frame sensors that I have ever heard. Thank you so much. Dave from down-under 🇦🇺👍

i actually needed this video. I have a used A7C on sale near me for $1200 and i was gonna get an a6700 for $1300 but i couldn’t decide. Especially with better sharper video on the crop video because i do slot of photos of planes and boats

You deserve way more followers Simon !

This videos are really good to explain why you need full frame and why you MIGHT not need it. The thing is if you're starting with photography buying a cheap second hand camera has millions of possibilities and it's better than anything any great photographer of the 90s and before have available

Good morning Simon, well done on getting 500k subscribers, it's no surprise really you are extremely knowledgeable giving great advice and never coming across as patronising, other RU-vid photographers should take note. Steve H from across the pond in the UK ❤

I upgraded from my d3100 go a d7100. Most of the knowledge that i put into practice was stuff i learned from your videos! I thought i would drop photography like i drop other hobbies but its beem consistently fun

Thank you! Such a helpful video.

Excellent explanation and breakdown. I will I would have that a few years ago. I went to full frame and did like you indicated and went back to a Fuji crop sensor and am loving it. While there are compromises if you understand the good and bad you can enjoy it. Great video. Thank you

I shoot with an R5, but my wife shoots with an R10. Every time I use her camera, I think “man these smaller form factors are so much easier to handle and travel with!”

Congrats on 500K!!! I recently traded my Canon 90D for a 5D Mark 4. I also have an EOS R which brings my APS-C days to a close. While I will miss the 1.6 crop factor shooting birds, I wont miss the camera vibration when shooting bursts. Nor will I miss the noise in most shots when the auto ISO goes to 6400, which frequently happened with the 90D. It's still a great camera body, with plenty of high end features, but full frame with Canon's "L" lenses...let's just say they were made for each other. Simon, keep up the magnificent work!

I own both APSC and Full Frame Canon DSLRs. Both give excellent results, and I am happy with them. I do use the APSC more for sports and wildlife, and the Full Frame for portraits and landscapes. Congratulations on 500k!

An excellent summary of the differences. 'It depends' is so true. Simon has proved it and others have said it. Re bodies & lenses Body weights and sizes are decreasing. So too for lenses. Eg Canon's R series (mirrorless) 24-240 and 100-400 are lightweight FF lenses but price competitive with APS-C lenses! If you are thinking APS-C, you could still choose them and keep the FF option open for later on! Quality is fine. Far better than typical kit lenses. Lots of reviews around say so. My move I had a ten year old Canon 600D (18MP APS-C) with Tamron 18-270. Loved it. I do travel grab shots. So an APS-C upgrade would probably have done me. Instead I got a Canon RP (26MP FF) and Canon 24-240. Why? I did NOT lose 'reach' over my old gear. Crop of new gear better IQ than full image of old gear. Regardless, most of my pics are in the 24-200 range on FF. So reach not critical. The difference in price for FF bodies and lenses in mirrorless is narrowing fast. Mid range APS-C options can be dearer than entry level FF options! Got some discounts on the RP + 24-240 too good to refuse! That FF v APS-C price gap is shrinking regardless. I gained IQ over my old gear. Over new APS-C? I added an R50 for super-reaching. Not a body I'd recommend for regular use. So far FF better IQ. I LOST a few hundred grams in weight! Though the separate flash added it back. So I'm weight equivalent with a better flash and FF advantages. With mirrorless I get a better image in the viewfinder of what to expect. Got back what I liked about my Fuji 6MP mirrorless from 15 years ago! I didn't need most of the features found in mid-range bodies. eg 15fps+, better video, etc. The RP has more than what I had before. So how did that all happen? More MP? 18MP went to 26MP So probably. Maybe later technology pixels too. FF pixels (larger) v APS-C pixels (smaller)? In low light, yes. Otherwise maybe. Even the belief that larger pixels are always better is being challenged! New lens? Probably. My old one was 10 years old and collected a little inside dust. Manufacturing technology is always improving. The lens served me well. Moving from Tamron to a budget Canon lens? Unknown. My old Tamron v a new Tamron may have been similar. At the time Canon did not allow third party R series lenses. Change from mirror to mirrorless? Yes. Mirrorless allows for smaller and lighter bodies and lenses v mirror bodies. That means cheaper v mirrored bodies! (Reverse for second hand!) New firmware / software. Yes. Lens correction now happens in the Canon's body. Which is exactly why Simon started with 'it depends', introduced the factors at play (when just one factor changes) and then leaves it up to you. Perfect. As others have said too. And what have I now done? Added an R50 (APS-C 24MP) and a Canon 100-400! Got them on discount. The R50 is too small for everyday use for me. But it's good enough for the odd super reach shots I might take! 400 x 1.6 = 600+! I'll leave Simon to do the super IQ, super reach shots! Maybe I should have just bought his African Safari shots instead? Now if I wanted / needed an L lens with F1.8, then my budget would have said APS-C!

Excellent explanation. I use M4/3 as my camera body and a couple of lenses are easily transported on my bicycle or motorcycle. I have thought about switching to a slightly larger APC camera but that's a new set of lenses to buy so I'm sticking with my M4/3 set up. By the way, I also own a tiny Sony RX100 and it produces beautiful images. Thanks for the upload 👍

Now, how did you ever manage to get that many subscribers? Could it have something to do with your depth of experience, interesting subject content, and clear and lucid presentation style? Nah, probably just lucky. Congratulations, Simon! And thanks for another excellent video!

I just bought a 7D mark II to complement my 6D mark II for wildlife photography and muah… best decision ever!

Well Done. I am currently struggling with an annual visitation from the little voice in my head about moving to full frame. apsc is still winning for all of the reasons you note. Personally, the limitations, and benefits, of the apsc format are a good challenge on an ongoing basis. It makes you really reflect on technique and proper positioning...almost like in the olden golden days.

I started my digital photography journey with an apsc. I bought full frame for the greater angle of view and better low light performance. I have kept my crop sensor where I need greater reach. Have recently bought a 150 to 600mm zoom so on the crop sensor will now be virtually redundant as I wish to try my hand at wildlife photography and the better low light performance from full frame will give me faster shutter speeds with lower iso and hence less noise. Back in the film days we called this a grainy image. Can look okay in certain situations especially monochrome rather than colour.

Congratulations on reaching 500k. Switched to medium format. Love the dynamic range recovery for landscape photography but sure miss the large lens options that were available with my Nikon full frame.

I went from a canon 80d to an RP to an R6. Going to full frame instantly felt so much better. I like the look, color depth, and contrast. I’m sure there are some great crop sensor cameras but I won’t go back.

Along with impeccable photography, It is great to watch a well planned scripted and edited RU-vid video!

Congrats on 500k subscribers! Always a lot of detailed and useful info that keeps me clicking on your links.

My main camera right now is a Fuji X-T5. I love the small size of the camera and most of Fuji’s lenses. I can fit the camera plus six Fuji lenses of widely varying focal lengths into a small backpack. Even Fuji’s XF 70-300mm lens is relatively small. I shoot a wide range of genres including travel, street, events, sports, and aviation, but only usually as an unpaid amateur for friends and family. I’m sure I’d like the low light capabilities of FF plus Fuji’s autofocus isn’t the best. But I prioritize small size and weight, and I know the camera well and can work around its less than perfect autofocus capabilities. So for now, this Fuji system works great for me.

Congratulations on 500k. Well earned and deserved.🎉

After shooting with my gf's Rebel T7 crop sensor for a year, I decided to get my own. After months of picking through details, I settled on the EOS RP full frame. I've taken it in the woods, to the beach, to the city. Wonderful camera for my area of Nova Scotia in the south. I picked up a 2nd hand 70-300 and have even gotten some good shots of wildlife.