Is KALKI 2898 movie distorting Hinduism? | Kalki Movie Review 

Kalki movie adaptation of Hinduism ❌ Kalki movie inspired by Hinduism ✅

Its not bollywood movie ❌️ its tollywood movie ✅️ ofcourse indian cinema

Other movies 🤡 kalki 2898 movie 🗿

This Not A Bollywood Movie It's From Tollywood Don't Take Credit For Everything And Just Tell Bollywood

Deepika With Vishu inside her crossing the fire scene ❤❤❤ . I cried😢😢

The movie is amazing! So many scenes that will give you goosebumps 🥶👌🏻

Telugu films are highly reliable when it comes to representing and promoting Hindu culture.

Kalki is not Bollywood it's Tollywood.

Kalki movie Bollywood ❌️ Tollywood✅️

why why and why always comparing ourselves with Hollywood and feeling inferior complex ... plz don't compare this movie with Hollywood films they are fiction and comical.

South Indian movie industry is way way way ahead than bollywood, they are at the level of International Cinema.

Kalki is the only Indian movie which done justice to the epic Mahabharat 🔥🔥🔥

Adbhut....the mention of Puranic facts is commendable....love your narration....Har har Mahadev 😇😇😇

first off its telugu film industry not bollywood correct your thumbnail.

The script you mentioned as ancient is called Ranjana lipi. It is a script used by the Newar community in Nepal since ancient time till now, and is the national script of Nepal.

Please please dont misguide audience kalki is not a Bollywood movie adipurush is a Bollywood movie Bollywood can't make this type of good movie

Tollywood is the face of Indian movie not bollywood 😤

Sir you should make a video on how the British implanted Cast system in Hinduism and in Hindu scriptures there isn't mentioning of the word Cast at the first place only!,I would highly recommend that you must make a discussion video with Neeraj Atri sir on this topic for more informations,that video is needed!🚩🕉️

Change your thumbnail...first go and search which industry from kalki 2898 AD is ?..🙄

Great review bhai The reference to Srimad Bhagavatham was indeed commendable. Wish to see more content from your end😇 Jai Shri Ram 🙏🙏🙏

I seriously doubt the intent of the makers of this movie Towards the end they have portrayed the main villain as a reincarnation of Arjuna, and saviour of the day being Karna! This is some serious twisting of scriptures to suit the agenda!

next level review bhai, i never seen something like this.

Those who read Mahabharata knows, (karn) was a very bad person, and he instigated (duryodhan) to insult droupadi.😑

I don't know why people are thinking the Movie is Very cool but without 3-4 other scenes it doesn't match either with Kalki Puran Bhagavad Mahapuranam Or Bhavishya Puran

Brilliant description and analysis my dear the present scenario of universe which is sure to happen in the days to come due to severe callousness of human being for rapid industrialisation.

One thing is inaccurate in this movie, that is when supreme god takes an avatar, he is never born by a womb like us humans he appears and descends to earth. Like, when lord krishna was born ,he was never in her mother womb ,instead lord vishnu appeared in his 4 armed form in front of his parents and toom the form of a child. When narsimha avatar, was there he appeared out of a pillar or stambh. When matsya avatar was there the lord in form of fish appeared in front of manuh the first human. This is true for all other avatars of shri vishnu as well.

Still I can't believe that KALKI is an Indian film🔥🔥.. Hollywood range vfx movie that too director (Nag Ashwin ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥) with 2 movie experience in past ✌️

I hv stopped wasting time and money in bollywood 😂😂 i use that to plant trees 😊🙏🏻

Sir you must make a video on how contrary to mainstream narrative(Specially by Leftists and Neo Buddheists)Sati pratha never existed in Bharat at the first place only,it's a huge lie told in our school history books that sadly 99%of Hindus still belive and feel guilty about that!,even Jaipur dialogues Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda made a discussion video debunking that,that video is needed!🙏🕉️

Why every youtubers say that Kalki avatar will be last avatar, bhagwan Vishnu is always there so his avatars neither have beginning not ending.

par mahabharat ki strory distorted hain kyunki isme dikhaya gaha hain ki karn arjun se jyada strong hain par asal me Arjun >>>>>>>>. karn Arjun vs Karna all encounters: 1. Virat war: Arjuna singlehandedly defeated all kaurava warriors including Karna (thrice), Bhishma and Drona and destroyed the entire kuru army alone to save the Matsya kingdom (refer Virata Parvam in Authentic Mahabharat eg: BORI CE) 2. Fight with Gandharvas: Karna was defeated by Gandharva king Chithrasena, captured Duryodhana and Karna fled away. But Arjuna alone defeated Chithrasena and released Duryodhana 3. Panchal war: Karna was defeated along with other Kauravas by Drupada; Arjun defeated and captured Drupada 4. At Draupadi Swayamvar: Karna fought with Arjun but was defeated by Arjun and Karna retreated. 5. Mahabharat war day 14: Arjuna slaughtered the Kaurava army and defeated Karna and Drona while hunting for Jayadratha. Nobody could stand against him on that day. He destroyed 7 akshauhinis that day (refer wikipedia Drona parva) Who is better: 1. Abhimanyu's death: Abhimanyu defeated Karna many times during the war and he was invincible for anyone so he along with 7 other warriors through betrayal jointly attacked him like a coward. But on 17th day Arjun challenged the entire army to protect Karna's son Vrishsena and killed him in front of Karna in one-to-one battle. 2. Arjuna was ambidextrous: He was the only warrior who could use both right and left hand for using weapon 3. Arjuna could aim and shoot upto many kilometers even during night 4. Arjuna was the only warrior to wield the mighty Pashupatastra in dwapara yuga, which could destroy the entire cosmos; the only warrior to fight Lord Shiva and impress him. If you read Kirata parva, Lord Shiva said, that no one except him and lord Vishnu from all the three worlds could defeat Arjuna 5. Arjuna was the only warrior who knew all the five tatvas of Archery( fifth one is the ability to give back life) 6. Dhanur Veda, the holy scripture of archery starts by praising lord Shiva, lord Rama and Arjuna 7. Arjuna singlehandedly killed 30 million Nivatakavachas and Kalakeyas whom even Ravan couldn't defeat 8. Arjuna was Nara, the partial incarnation of lord Vishnu himself. Now coming to the last mentioned arguments: 1. Indra could have given and equally powerful armor(kavach) to Arjuna as he is also a demigod like Surya. He knew the power of his son but wanted to ensure a fair battle as Karna has a divine protection(which ofcourse, is obtained not because of his skill but as a boon). This would make the battle completely based on skills and weapons and not on boons. Just think, many demons got boons by which they could not be killed easily, eg: Hiranyakashipu, Madhu and Kaitab etc. But does that make them more powerful than lord Vishnu, never... just loopholes to escape death. Also he exchanged it for an even more powerful weapon that puts Arjun in more danger. Exchanging one for another is not dana, it is a trade 2. Nagastra has many counter weapons like Garudastra and Arjun had around 130 celestial weapons in his arsenal. According to BORI CE Mahabharat, KMG and Mridananda interpretation of Mahabharat, it was Ashwasena, a snake who lived in Khandava forest in order to take revenge on Arjuna got into Karna's arrow without Karna's knowledge. It was in this situation Krishna saved Arjuna. But when Ashwasena came face to face with Arjuna on the same day, Arjun killed him. 3. Krishna told Arjuna to fire at the time Karna's chariot sunk in soil in order to give respect to curses and make Karna realize his mistake and to remind him of the situation Abhimanyu was in. Krishna used to praise Karna in front of Arjun to make Arjun more aggressive and vengeful and also for not having any head weight so that he can continue sharping his skills even more. Also, it is clearly mentioned in Mahabharat that Drona taught Karna along with Kauravas and Pandavas. Yes, Karna was a student of Drona(just google for yourself). But he was always jealous of Arjuna's skills so he decided to study alone under Parashurama. Also Arjun never got anything with ease, he struggled a lot, he never wanted to be better than Karna, but better than himself. Also Arjun was an epitome of humbleness, kindness and wisdom. He was morally far far greater than anyone else. Remember, it was Karna who ordered the disrobing of Draupadi. For saving the cattle of Brahmins from Thakshak, he entered Draupadi's room to take his bow eventhough he knew that he would have to go for exile, this shows that he was a selfless hero. Also, Karna surrendered himself to Duryodhana the personification of adharma and took part in various evil activities but Arjun surrendered himseelf to Krishna, the supreme lord who gave him the purest of purest the highest knowledge- Bhadavad Gita. Please don't misunderstand me. I am not being biased. I was also a Karna fan, but after studying authentic Mahabharat like BORI CE(most accurate one till known), KMG and Swami Mrudananda interpretation and Srimad Bhagavatham, I got to know the real essence of Mahabharat. Please don't believe in TV serials, they create fake stories to increase their rating. Karna was a good warrior no doubt, but he ended up being a good mango gone bad. Pandavas suffered worst but the had complete faith in dharma and Krishna and followed the right path. But, when society started teasing Karna, he had two ways but he chose the wrong path and got a tragic ending all his skills and valor gone without any use to the society or nation, just he surrendered everything to Duryodhana...and that is the difference. And finally, for those who says Arjuna is nothing without Krishna, we all are nothing without Krishna. He is giving us the power to speak, walk, work and live and without him we are nothing. Krishna was there for everyone including Karna but only Arjun saw the true light of wisdom of Krishna. It is so sad that we live in a society which considers the presence of the supreme lord as a demerit. If we understand Krishna we understand everything including Arjuna...

Movie dekh liya meine .wah kya movie hai yar🔥⚡️ specially war scenes mahabarat aur poora vfx aur characters etc wow bht amazing .kadak🔥⚡️🇮🇳🤯

I can't remember when was the last time I went to see a movie in cinema hall. But I watched Kalki on 30th June. Its a movie worth watching in cinemas. A true masterpiece by Nag Ashwin. Kudos to Him for bringing a revolution in Indian film industry

What an amazing presentation anant great going loved your work 🎉🎉🎉

*Boycott of Peacefuls should be permanent. Only temporary as a reaction will achieve nothing. We should calculate 1 years impact of economic boycott and from this consider the effect of it in next 10-20-50-100 years which will be tremendous.* *Just like any other habit it will require deliberate conscious efforts for first few months/years until you get used to it. Your few months/years efforts to make this habit part of your life will have enormous contribution to ensure their complete economic destruction and unsustainability. This habit should be made as a part of our culture and maintained generation after generation.* *Every aware hindu in their life needs to convince atleast 10 hindu houses to boycott them permanently.* **C0py And Share This Message To Atleast 100 Hindus*

Today watched the movie...wow indian cinema is developing rapidly ❤ specially vfx was amazing ...mahabarat scenes were epic ⚡️🔥

Now, a days, even hollywood movies are not up to the mark.

According to puran vishnuyash would be the father of kalki. But here it was shown as a test object of kali.

Kalki father is not mentioned cause that was artificially made on deepika. Womb. In puran as this bro said,kalki father is VishnuYash😮 and everyone who watched movie realized that the kamal hasan character name is also Yashkin have yash name attached.🤔 And yashkin was the guy that do pregnant in their lab for power. So,in future kalki cinematic universe Yashkin will be kalki father.👀 Reply anyone

You are doing a great job with such videos. Keep up the good work.

I watched the movie today. Nag Ashwin has used creative liberty and made a few changes in his version of Mahabharata .

Jo real Shambhala hai woh toh ek kingdom hai jiske ek village me Kalki ji paida honge air Shambhala aaj ke world se kati hui hai I mean yaha sikh jain buddhist culture nahi balki og Sanatan culture hai I mean aaj bhi yaha je log pehle ke yugo ke logo ki lifestyle ko follow karte hai unki tarah jeete hai and they have superpowers

I think this is the start to a vision of a complete Mahabharat on the big screens by Tollywood. Only it can make something such grandeur, epic and visuals very close to our ancient Bharat by doing justification of charaters.

In this movie they're glorifying Karan but in actual reality ARJUN is far beyond powerful than Karna , not even once KARAN defeated ARJUN in his life, and ARJUN single handed destroyed all kuru sena in VIRAT YUDH

We south indians represent our culture in a different level take adipurush who is directed by om raut a north indian

Jai shree krishna Jai shree ram ❤❤❤

Arjun vs Karna all encounters: 1. Virat war: Arjuna singlehandedly defeated all kaurava warriors including Karna (thrice), Bhishma and Drona and destroyed the entire kuru army alone to save the Matsya kingdom (refer Virata Parvam in Authentic Mahabharat eg: BORI CE) 2. Fight with Gandharvas: Karna was defeated by Gandharva king Chithrasena, captured Duryodhana and Karna fled away. But Arjuna alone defeated Chithrasena and released Duryodhana 3. Panchal war: Karna was defeated along with other Kauravas by Drupada; Arjun defeated and captured Drupada 4. At Draupadi Swayamvar: Karna fought with Arjun but was defeated by Arjun and Karna retreated. 5. Mahabharat war day 14: Arjuna slaughtered the Kaurava army and defeated Karna and Drona while hunting for Jayadratha. Nobody could stand against him on that day. He destroyed 7 akshauhinis that day (refer wikipedia Drona parva) Who is better: 1. Abhimanyu's death: Abhimanyu defeated Karna many times during the war and he was invincible for anyone so he along with 7 other warriors through betrayal jointly attacked him like a coward. But on 17th day Arjun challenged the entire army to protect Karna's son Vrishsena and killed him in front of Karna in one-to-one battle. 2. Arjuna was ambidextrous: He was the only warrior who could use both right and left hand for using weapon 3. Arjuna could aim and shoot upto many kilometers even during night 4. Arjuna was the only warrior to wield the mighty Pashupatastra in dwapara yuga, which could destroy the entire cosmos; the only warrior to fight Lord Shiva and impress him. If you read Kirata parva, Lord Shiva said, that no one except him and lord Vishnu from all the three worlds could defeat Arjuna 5. Arjuna was the only warrior who knew all the five tatvas of Archery( fifth one is the ability to give back life) 6. Dhanur Veda, the holy scripture of archery starts by praising lord Shiva, lord Rama and Arjuna 7. Arjuna singlehandedly killed 30 million Nivatakavachas and Kalakeyas whom even Ravan couldn't defeat 8. Arjuna was Nara, the partial incarnation of lord Vishnu himself. Now coming to the last mentioned arguments: 1. Indra could have given and equally powerful armor(kavach) to Arjuna as he is also a demigod like Surya. He knew the power of his son but wanted to ensure a fair battle as Karna has a divine protection(which ofcourse, is obtained not because of his skill but as a boon). This would make the battle completely based on skills and weapons and not on boons. Just think, many demons got boons by which they could not be killed easily, eg: Hiranyakashipu, Madhu and Kaitab etc. But does that make them more powerful than lord Vishnu, never... just loopholes to escape death. Also he exchanged it for an even more powerful weapon that puts Arjun in more danger. Exchanging one for another is not dana, it is a trade 2. Nagastra has many counter weapons like Garudastra and Arjun had around 130 celestial weapons in his arsenal. According to BORI CE Mahabharat, KMG and Mridananda interpretation of Mahabharat, it was Ashwasena, a snake who lived in Khandava forest in order to take revenge on Arjuna got into Karna's arrow without Karna's knowledge. It was in this situation Krishna saved Arjuna. But when Ashwasena came face to face with Arjuna on the same day, Arjun killed him. 3. Krishna told Arjuna to fire at the time Karna's chariot sunk in soil in order to give respect to curses and make Karna realize his mistake and to remind him of the situation Abhimanyu was in. Krishna used to praise Karna in front of Arjun to make Arjun more aggressive and vengeful and also for not having any head weight so that he can continue sharping his skills even more. Also, it is clearly mentioned in Mahabharat that Drona taught Karna along with Kauravas and Pandavas. Yes, Karna was a student of Drona(just google for yourself). But he was always jealous of Arjuna's skills so he decided to study alone under Parashurama. Also Arjun never got anything with ease, he struggled a lot, he never wanted to be better than Karna, but better than himself. Also Arjun was an epitome of humbleness, kindness and wisdom. He was morally far far greater than anyone else. Remember, it was Karna who ordered the disrobing of Draupadi. For saving the cattle of Brahmins from Thakshak, he entered Draupadi's room to take his bow eventhough he knew that he would have to go for exile, this shows that he was a selfless hero. Also, Karna surrendered himself to Duryodhana the personification of adharma and took part in various evil activities but Arjun surrendered himseelf to Krishna, the supreme lord who gave him the purest of purest the highest knowledge- Bhadavad Gita. Please don't misunderstand me. I am not being biased. I was also a Karna fan, but after studying authentic Mahabharat like BORI CE(most accurate one till known), KMG and Swami Mrudananda interpretation and Srimad Bhagavatham, I got to know the real essence of Mahabharat. Please don't believe in TV serials, they create fake stories to increase their rating. Karna was a good warrior no doubt, but he ended up being a good mango gone bad. Pandavas suffered worst but the had complete faith in dharma and Krishna and followed the right path. But, when society started teasing Karna, he had two ways but he chose the wrong path and got a tragic ending all his skills and valor gone without any use to the society or nation, just he surrendered everything to Duryodhana...and that is the difference. And finally, for those who says Arjuna is nothing without Krishna, we all are nothing without Krishna. He is giving us the power to speak, walk, work and live and without him we are nothing. Krishna was there for everyone including Karna but only Arjun saw the true light of wisdom of Krishna. It is so sad that we live in a society which considers the presence of the supreme lord as a demerit. If we understand Krishna we understand everything including Arjuna...

Kalki Mahabharat scene = whole adhipurush movie

na bro hollywood also distorts their mythology. It's just that their audiences take it as an entertainment purpose

Who said it's a bollywood film??

karna ko acha dikhaya or arjun ko bura q dikhaya isme

Bhai kya baat kar rhe Karn ko hero bataya hai Karn kbse arjun se bada ho gya ?? 🙏🏻Jai shree Ram bhai Yahi to.kaliyug hai Log ravan aur karn ko.mahan kahenge.

The lipi is from Nepal. You can find that on any stupas wall.

People are ao much unaware of their own scriptures that they accept any story or scene which is made in the name of god and historical characters but which are not mentioned in any scripture.

we want this type of videos bro jai sree raam subscribed and liked bro

Bro, Kalki is Tollywood movie and Adipurush was Bollywood movie.

Bhai karna ko hero dikhaye gaya hai movie mei aur arjun ko ghamandi banadiya Jabki arjun karn se jada strong hai

Yes. It sets very High Benchmark(At par or better than Some Hollywood Suoerhero Movies) and at the same time remain truly tied to Hindu Epic without doing very significant Intervention so as to lose its essence.

Bhai, bada achha video banaya hai, maine bhagwat puran padha hai or 12 we skandh me kaliyug ka perfect warnan kiya hai, sirf picture me itni kamtarta hai ki, kaliyug ka ant 6000 years ke bad dikhaya hai, par bhagwat puran ke nusar kaliyug 4,32,000 years ka hai, jisme se abhi sirf 5224 years ho chuke hai, to abhi kalki avtar hone me 4,27,775 years baki hai

8 feet nahi 12 feet aur agar woh kaliyug me janme hote toh 6 feet ke hote

Main pahle yah clear karna chahta hun. A movie Tollywood ka hai Bollywood ka Nahin Hai. Tollywood : Telugu film industry not a Bollywood

It's not a bollywood movie It's tollywood movie

Almost every movie which was made previously inspired by Mahabharata had made joke but this is true ; it is showing that every warrior who fought Mahabharata war was great equally.

Bhai kalki wale us mahabharat sceen ko dekh ke lagta hai ki pura mahabharat banna chahiye yar 😊

Kalki movie mahabharat scenes ko pura justify diya hats off, love from assam ❤

0:59 Bhai aapke knowledge ke liye, Kali ka janm samudra manthan ke time hua tha.

ये तो साउथ इण्डियनका देन है जो कल्की जैसा मुभि बनानेका हिम्मत राखा । अनुसन्धन किया और फिल्ममे दर्शया । अब साउथका तेलुगु, तामिल और मलायम इण्डष्ट्रि हि भारतिय सिनेमाका इतिहास लेखेगा । अब तो पुष्पा २, कङ्गुवा, Kantara A Legend Chapter-1, KGF 3 जैसा मुभि ने भि बलिउडको धुल चटाने वाला है

Waching kalki movie for fun ✅ Waching kalki movie for concept ✅✅🗿

I understood your stupidity Kalki is fictional film Suppose in hollywood films protagonist kills antagonist then in Indian films do the same is that a copy? And kalki is Tollywood , actually adipurush did it not kalki

Bollywood ❌ Tollywood ✔️

Kalki is not a Bollywood movie, it's Tollywood and Indian cinema, The movie made well and respected our gods and culture very well 😊

Come on don't call Kalki bollywood, Indian Cinema rather or better Tollywood

Well explained ❤❤❤

Waiting for the 2nd part ❤

Galat hai bhai karn Arjun ki jo fight dikhai hai vo puri tarah fake hai ek average worrier karn ko Arjun yani nar se compare kar rahe aap Mahabharat padh sakte hai aapko Arjun ki power Virat yudh aur kirat parv main pata chal jayega bhagwan shiv ne bhi Arjun ko hi powerful kaha hai

Sir see pratik borade review of this movie

Really what the hell have you researched or read ?? Movie is trying to glorify karna which is one of nonsensical points which you didnt mentioned also in real Arjun was more powerful than karna also arjun defeated karna in one to one battle too, but what in movie mentioned is totally opposite of historic facts but you're promoting movie how you will mention this, don't you ? Movie was juat below avg and you're just trying to promote this movie just based on visuals ? And what about story and manipulation of historic facts or truth ? And first one and half hour was just cringe and boring!! Prabhas acting was just as usual cringe with same as disha... Only interesting character was kali and somewhat ashwathhamas scenes were giving good feel but no movie was below avg only trying to glorify negative characters and also shown shree krishna pushing or kicking ashwathhama back and taking is also not in original Mahabharat, in real there was no gem or mani on ashwathhamas forehead yeah but its ok in here to take creative liberty to show mani on his forehead but all other historic facts are just false and manipulated...

Kalki distorted the history as well. Arjuna was put under the bus while karna and ashwathama were held high. Ashwathama had to repent the most for his sins. Karna was a benevolent. In terms of valor none can come close to Aruna and his devotion to Krishna was second to none. I guess it is still better than bollywood movies. AB - was wonderful, Prabhas was awesome, kamal was ok. Direction was good. I could not stomach the distortion and reversal of roles of Mahabharata heroes…

glorification of karna was needless he was no competition for arjuna...Arjuna was the greatest amongst the warriors.. it would be bad precedent and narrative

It is not bollywood, it is TFI : Telugu film industry. And directors have the right to change historical facts regarding anything, its called artistic freedom. Try to respect that.

It's not bollywood first. Change it immediately it's tollywood film.

The best depiction was Shri Krishna. No matter who the hero is his presence was truly epic. and his mentions were also unbelievable.

Honestly, Mahabharata scene gave me goosebumps.

Me

❤❤❤❤

Bohat hi badhiya video dali aapne. Mere khayal se hum jitne v advance level pe jaye phir jo purano mai kaha gaya tha woh sach shabit ho raha hai. Sab kuch unhone likhke rakha hai. Bas unki avatar se paawan hona baki hai Dharti.

Brother , You are the second person who gave very pleasant review ...God bless you 🙏

I have read the Mrityunjaya, the death conqueror Book by Shivaji Sawant in collage time. And its almost Mahabharat from eyes of Maharathi Karna. The way Ashwadhama show was perfect as in book. And it was really an emotional scene for me when in movie when we got to know real identity of Bhairava. Thats why i really impress by the movie, like maker of this movie really know what they are doing. Hope next movie will more of treat

Karna is greater than Arjun by this narrative they are not targeting Arjuna, ( samajhlo ) they are actually targeting Shri Krishna and by targeting shri Krishna they will target Sanatana. Simple. Yehi kaliyug hai. Sab ka time ayega. Ruko

#correct representation of our civilizational heritage , our ancient history I loved that bro , bhaisaab salute 🫡

Kalki is name of NEXT AVATAR. So nobody should be allowed to use it.

Kalki is distorting Hinduism. "AD" in title alone is the proof

Raja Parikshit was right - 🕉️🚩 Kalki really resides in (pro$titution, alcohol,gambling, violence ).We can see it in daily instances.😢

The last scene or the mid credit scene of supreme yashkin referring to Lord Jaganath that was epic Jay Jaganath Jai Odisha Bande Utkala Janani Bharat mata ki Jai

In Hollywood they don't show accurately of their culture Do your research Your mahabharat good But any movie has their own creativity and imagination Kalki is already big and has a length of 3 hours If they want to show it will length more so they shorted it

Wow! Awesome review 👌

Hari om hare Krishna 🙏🚩😊

Kalki has done a fabulous job in integrating the ithisa with the futuristic sci fi dystopia world. This gives me hope that we can have multiple cinematic universes based on our Puranas. At least this makes it mainstream and will motivate the younger generation to know our cool myths and legends. Super Job.

Well explained brother. Movie is top notch. Perfect representation of our culture relating it to the Mahabharath and future. As you said this movie going to set high standards of Indian Cinema to global level. ❤