Is OpenAI still open?

Подписаться 10 тыс.

Просмотров 10 тыс.

50% 1

OpenAI, now mostly known from GPT-3 / GPT-2 is in a very unique position as a company. I tried to cover this topic as objective and neutral as possible, still, everything said here is my opinion. I am a big fan of many things produced by OpenAI, like GPT-3, GPT-2, PPO. Their algorithm (PPO) is something I use all the time, so it's not like I don't have a bias. Please, let me know what you think!
Support me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=25285137
Keep in touch: / sebastianschuc7
AI/ML/ML-Agents Discord Channel: / discord
Want to read more about the topic? Here are some of the things I read:
- openai.com/charter/
- www.technologyreview.com/2020...
- bdtechtalks.com/2020/09/24/mi...
- news.ycombinator.com/item?id=...
- www.nytimes.com/2019/07/22/te...
- openai.com/blog/openai-api/
- openai.com/blog/openai-licens...
- news.microsoft.com/2019/07/22...
- • Connor Leahy, AI Fire ...
- www.eleuther.ai/
- analyticsdrift.com/a-glimpse-...
- www.theverge.com/2020/9/22/21...
- www.technologyreview.com/2020...
- www.wired.com/story/openai-te...

Наука

Опубликовано:

6 окт 2020

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 47

@NextFuckingLevel 3 года назад

Dont worry, they will release gpt-3 source code for free after GPT-6 developed

@StagnantMizu 3 года назад

I have acces to the gpt-3 API and I am pretty sure it is capable enough to evolve itself lol.

@ricardoraulino-guitar 3 года назад

@@StagnantMizu could you please talk more about it, Sir?

@imagineexistance4538 3 года назад

@@StagnantMizu I have access to the api and its not THAT good. It is a really good language transformer if not the best currently.

@StagnantMizu 3 года назад

@@imagineexistance4538 well imo the prompt is key, I think if you were able to use an extremely complex prompt you could get incredible results.

@codewebsduh2667 3 года назад

Steps for AI companies: 1.Create an AI Lab with a lot of hype and some big names. Raise hundreds of millions of funding. Differentiate yourself from other labs with some philosophical ideas to start. Greedily pick up as many data scientists as you can in the area you operate. 2.Train them so that they can successfully deliver AI research projects. Wait to get bought out by a large enterprise because they couldn't build their own AI team.

@__-xy9gx 3 года назад

Answer: No

@meh1672 3 года назад

I agree. In my opinion their move to create a paid api was still inline with their vision as everyone had equal access. And there are undoubtedly large costs associated for running gpt3. The pricing here however is another issue as it could be argued that only large companies could pay for it. But a breakdown of where the money goes would go a long way to resolve this. The deal with Microsoft however is completely against their vision in my opinion. It makes it hard for me to thrust OpenAI in the future.

@hotpushupguy4203 3 года назад

100% agree. Microsoft has such a sinister history - we've forgotten too fast how hated Gates/Microsoft was in the 90s/00s. this completely shattered my faith in Open AI.

@greggolden4871 3 года назад

No, no it isn't. Open Source means you share the source. If I can't see the source code, then its not open, it's closed.

@jellohunter7981 3 года назад

@Orr Burgel yes but they can remove API access at any moment. That’s not really open.

@jellohunter7981 3 года назад

@Orr Burgel Google is **free** not **open**. Open AI said they would democratize AI. Locking it behind a API is not democratic.

@jellohunter7981 3 года назад

@Orr Burgel Are you saying Google and Facebook are open? They or closed systems. "Free software” means software that respects users' freedom and community. Roughly, it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. Thus, “free software” is a matter of liberty, not price." - GNU

@jellohunter7981 3 года назад

@Orr Burgel I was voicing a concern over Open AI, and you accused me of crying over the internet. If someone disagrees with you, is that crying over the internet?

@vallesisrinivas 3 года назад

I have no idea why this appeared in my feed, but I did subscribe. Nice channel.

@KeinNiemand 3 года назад

they should change there name to closed AI

@crassflam8830 3 года назад

Very interesting video! Regarding the question at the end, we can only assume that Microsoft has profit as its true priority, and so we should only expect to see whatever security is necessary to avoid intrusion and liability. Really love your channel, Keep it up!

@jambexuk 3 года назад

Safety was the original argument made to make the source code public, so that 'no single company or government controls general AI'. Now it's the new argument to keep it's source code closed. And small companies or individual researchers wouldn't be able to profit from the code without an API? Why not offer both, an API and the source code?

@rdi67 3 года назад

Too soon...to soon! Now I realy understand Elon Musk saying..."It's too late...It's too late..."

@ayushwardhan7663 3 года назад

We all should've seen this coming :( hopefully they'll be able to stay true to their mission statement

@radcow 3 года назад

Unlikely

@alexharvey9721 3 года назад

Not nearly enough people seem to be asking this question. Thanks for the video. I couldn't believe that they granted rights to MS... that seemed to completely go against their mission.. but after watching your video I can see this was a slow migration away from the purity of their mission over a few years. I think there is also an argument to the danger of this system being freely available... but yea I'm not really sure how you deal with that one.

@theendarkenedilluminatus4342 3 года назад

I am absolutely livid about this development, but I can't say I didn't see it coming.

@crazyhq270 3 года назад

When will we get access to this api. We have just seen video demo. No even other people have live demo with their API access.

@JohnSmith-uu5ov 3 года назад

Closed Ai

@jhauty 3 года назад

When OpenAi turns to CloseAi

@Foxtrotopia 3 года назад

I'm a bit late to the party here but this is a very interesting topic. I wonder if at some point they got so focused on AI behavior that they forgot human behavior. If you have exclusive control over something that is a massive advantage, how many people actually give up that advantage completely and utterly? Exceptionally few people in all of human history. There is also the very fundamental market behavior that being the first to create a technology does not guarantee success. For example, email, AOL, was the first email program available to the public but now it has been completely replaced by Gmail and others. They took what AOL did and expanded on it so much that AOL could not compete, and now AOL is completely irrelevant. I think they know this, and it does play a part in their decisions. I guess only time will tell what happens next.

@MrNimbus420 3 года назад

As if there was a bigger power than AI, nowbody can tame that beast.

@ConnoisseurOfExistence 3 года назад

OpenAI might be one of the companies on the forefront of AI research, but it's definitely not alone there. Deepmind, Google brain project and others are right there too. So we need to trust the moral of not just 1 company, but any of these. Because any of them has very real chance to win the AGI race. Not to mention the Chinese ones... In my opinion, SingularityNET seems like the most trustworthy one. But there is no way to make AGI safe for humans, except via brain-machine interfaces, as the ones developed at Neuralink.

@usertogo 3 года назад

another important question is on what hardware does GPT-3 even run? I assume they use the chips developed for Tesla cars?

@warsin8641 Год назад

AGI is just AI trained on adaptation

@user-kw9cu Год назад

Take the guns

@erikals 3 года назад

Would OpenAi in the wrong hands be a good thing ? Once you've answered that, should it be Open ?

@erikals 3 года назад

@Christian Belchior True, but if the opposite is worse...

@dihydromonoxide1032 2 года назад

See I get this argument, but the hand we are trying to keep it out of are large companies like amazon or face book. By closing the AI Behind a api and only letting other large companies in, it is the exact opposite of what we want. Also telling everyone how to do it allows bigger companies to profit and keeping it out of the hands of the small companies or indivduals.

@ThatControlUser 2 года назад

That can be said about many things, that are in the wrong hands right now, the world adapts. That's what we do.

@legiongaming99 Год назад

I hope more people notice OpenAI isn't Open at all it's like calling a prison a resort.

@cleo1488 3 года назад

OpenAi need money for research.

@rakeshmanathana 3 года назад

Doubtful

@countofst.germain6417 Год назад

Yeah they sold out, they aren't transparent at all. A really shady company.

@straightshooter6615 3 года назад

Can never trust BigTech like Micro$oft

@hughmungus4398 3 года назад

I am okay with this because countries like China exist who would very likely abuse GPT-3..

@dihydromonoxide1032 2 года назад

If china wanted to make their own, they could easily. OpenAI Already released how to make it, by locking it behind a api it only hurts the individual and small companies.

@user-kw9cu Год назад

I bet China has similar stuff internally they just don't reveal it. And making API only available to "white" people (US and Europe) is a racist move from OpenAI.