Keep an eye out for your videos, as enjoy them, nice video, I picked up the RX 6750 XT a year ago, and paired with a Ryzen 5600X, game at 1440P on a 144 Hz monitor with FreeSync Premium, under-volt the GPU and use MSI After-burner, and play games at 100 FPS +, and to date have had no coil whine or driver issues ( Use DDU with each new driver release, with a 750 watt PSU) , the card gives me all I need to have fun with the games I play, more than a decent set-up, doubt if there's much of a performance difference with the RX 6700 XT vs. the RX 6750 XT, so for price at present the RX 6700 XT is still a great value budget GPU!
I got the 6750xt, would have preferred the 6800xt tbh but they would not go down in price and they always seemed like they were in limited supply. I play mostly single player games that take GPU horsepower so this card is already starting to age. Perfect card at 1440p pre 2023 games.
"Starting to age".....lol. Meet my little friend, the lowly rx 580. Chained to a Ryzen 5700x. ;) The 5700 non XT is about what I can afford, but i'd sure love to have this 6700 XT.
@@davefroman4700 Hey I was you not that long ago with a GTX 1050ti 4 gig. This was suppose to be my "last 5 years build" but it is aging like milk so far.
@@Playingwith3D Im an old man. Trust me. They always age like milk. Ive been in this game a long time. As in my first graphics card was an ATI with 256mb of ram.
Didn't have much an option here in Ukraine, got 6700xt this summer and happy with it, especially after using laptop with i3 7100u + 940mx for 4 years) Sadly prices are crazy in here, the cheapest 6700xt (new) i got for 460 usd, only 3060 or 3060ti were cheaper (it was few months before nvidia 40 series release or amd 7000)
AMD cards are always overpriced in many countries outside of North America unfortunately, I think it's a matter of quantity of imports, whereas for Nvidia cards they're always on high demand so they're plenty of them on the market. Kinda same with AMD cpus too. The 5600xt is around 185 where I live and you can buy 12600K maybe cheaper than that which is hilarious lol
@@MMillerPCs yeah it is, some of us can never taste the performance/$ of AMD and have to go with Intel and Nvidia by default😅 great contents btw brother keep it up👍
Bought a used but only about 6months of use on it Gigabyte 6700XT Eagle for $250 in the beginning of 2023 and at the end a XFX Quik 6750XT for $200. Also six 6600XT's Powercolor Reds for $128 each in late 2022. Last a 6900XT Asus TUF for $483. AMD is just where the best bang for the buck is. All 3 Media PC's and 5 office PC's basically have similar hardware x570/32gb/RDNA2. I would like to try a modern Nvidia card out and see if it handles some of the older games I run better. For some reason AMD sucks on even games like Minecraft. The GPU stays almost in a sleep state not ramping up and getting rather low FPS around 80-140 which is crazy low for how modest of a game minecraft is. The GPU instead of running around 2400mhz it's down near 500mhz and getting crappy inconsistent frames.
My cpu is an i5 11400f, paired on a msi tomahawk z590 board with 16gb trident.z 3600mhz ram, and gpu is 6700 XT. Its awesome at 1440p for the price@@itsmimic007
I bought my sapphire nitro 6700xt for $200. And it’s a solid card. But kind of disappointing at 1440p because I have to rely on upscaling even at all low settings. I’m upgrading to a 13600k from an 11500. So hopefully that mitigates SOME of my issues until I get a 7800xt later this year
And I don’t know if it’s something to do with my monitor or build. But even if I set my resolution to 1080p for more fps. I would get absolutely no performance increase at all. Same frames as 1440p. And the only game that actually benefited from 1080p was cyberpunk
@@kodiee9936maybe try using hdmi or display port. Or check if you plugged it in your motherboard, which you should not do. Make sure to plug the Monitor on the Gpu. Hopefully you get it solved
I don't understand how people can stand seeing tearing on the screen. The visual quality is more than just that line, the entire look and feel is off when you aren't synced up with the monitor. Freesync with the synced FPS / HZ is one of the best additions to PC gaming in a long time. Unlike the olden days of PC gaming where I would just enable Vsync and simply lower my settings enough to always stay above the 60hz to maintain a tear free experience. Now you don't need to overshoot your FPS like you had to do with Vsync. Just adjust in game settings to keep the FPS around your max refresh rate and then cap the frames a couple lower than the refresh rate of the monitor. Butter smooth feel with increased graphic settings that fluctuate the monitors refresh rate to whatever your card is pumping out.
My capture card cannot record at that refresh rate so that is where a lot of the screen tearing comes from. People want to see the high FPS numbers so that is what I give them. Hopefully they are playing on the appropriate monitor when they play the game themselves.
You lucky bastard, I’m gonna try to build a pc this summer and I’m planning to get this card cause I’m trying to do some light vr stuff, I’ve pretty much cheaped out on everything but the gpu and the cpu so hopefully it goes well, hope your goes well as well
In Poland cheapest RX 6700XT costs about 375$, cheapest RX 7700XT costs about 550$, cheapest RX7800XT costs about 628$ and cheapest RTX 4070 costs 680$
I have an 12th gen i7 and 16GB of single channel DDR4 RAM. Trying to find the best bang for the buck GPU so I can get the best possible price to performance while also getting the best possible performance.
This year i just bought an RX 6700 XT Power Color Red Devil only 210$ before I'm thinking to buy an RTX 4060 but the price was too expensive.. so I pick RX 6700XT to my gaming rig
I use it with my alienware 34 ultrawide 1440p and it's phenomenal. I have the 7800x3d paired with it and the asus rog strix mini itx mobo 670e-i. Love it.
I'm planning on upgrading my PC and buying this graphics card, I mainly play at 1080p as I prefer high fps and was wondering if it would pair well with my CPU which is a Ryzen 7 5700G
Man, I just got this card from Best Buy for $360 ($390 after taxes) everyone said it’s about $300 but I couldn’t find it for that much. Even used was about $310
I get around 340-380 fps 1080p and it looks good on fortnite with the card on performance mode and over clocked and everything low looks clean I love this card
Why is this card still going for $300+? Even used! They've lost their minds if I had that much I think I can get something better. At the moment my rig is a bit old; asus z270g, i7 7700k, 32gb ram. I just wanted to get a 6700 cause sooner or later I'm building a better rig. Should I wait? Any suggestions would be helpful, I love gaming it's just that my budget is pretty much bottom of the barrel. Maybe the next best thing if i can't get it? Thanks everyone. P.S. Forgot to mention I've been playing with a 1060-6gb for the past few years. Shocked it's pretty much run everything I've thrown at it, doesn't wanna die.
I’m not sure where you are located but I find the 6700XT on eBay a lot on the $250ish range. Your whole is going to need upgraded at some point being on 7th gen, if you play mainly triple A title though upgrading the GPU first is a good option. The 6700 isn’t bad but from what I’ve seen on eBay the pricing is not saving you much money.
My CPU is Intel core i7 4790k Will be fine for now just to play the games on 1080p? Because whenever i installed the game it always brings a bullshit error saying Your GPU doesn't support dx 12 My current GPU is (R9 290x)
FYI some of your info is outdated.... AMD has not been faster than NVIDIA in Directx 12 since Turing when they finally added hardware async compute.They've been pretty much on par with each other in Directx 12 games since then.Any major differences between the two in games has more to do with game sponsorships and the optimization that usually comes with that.(this is coming from a 7800 XT owner 😉)
@@MMillerPCs OK ty and can u recommend a good mobo for ddr5 which is compatible with i513th gen and also which has wifi n Bluetooth both under 200 bucks
Im upgrading from a gaming laptop which was gtx 1650 and i5 9300h but I decided to build a pc and im considering 6700xt with 12400f but I dont know if the 12400f will bottleneck the gpu so im looking for a good cpu that would give me high fps.
The only GPU that is fairly priced right now is the 4070 super and 4080 super IMO. But if you aren’t spending $600-$1000 then you have to go used just about
@@MMillerPCs After a month of considering various options of this gen i got myself used 6700xt and very happy with it. Swapped my 2060 6gb. If only cards that have "deal value" are 600-700e in my country....then I don't want them. Even US prices are insane and those prices are still much better then Europe or rest of the World.
I only play at 1080p thats clear enough for me in gaming im not spending all that money for a high end video card that i can buy a 75inch Tv for that orice of a video card just to play a game
Edit- Ignore this folks, 75% is correct lol. ~3.7 million pixels (QHD) x 0.75 (Render Resolution Scale) = ~2.8 million pixels. 1080p/FullHD = ~2.1 million pixels. The render resolution scale needs to be at 56% for you to render in FullHD.
No sir… you cannot do math like that. 2.8 million “square pixels” QHD is 2560x1440p you have to take the 75% of each dimension. 2560x75% and 1440x75% is 1920x1080
This is something I can’t find a definitive answer to but I’ve always been led to believe that the render scale adjusts the H and V resolution. I.e. 1440 x 0.75 = 1080. But as you say it could also relate to the pixel count?!? I might try running a benchmark to compare performance between 1080p and 1440p at 0.75 scale to see if the FPS matches.
@@thebdg4200 it’s how math works lol the 2560x1440p are the dimensions. If you multiply them you’re getting the area. So you have to multiply each dimension by .75
@@MMillerPCsMight be a bit picky here but you’re getting the total pixel count not the area if you multiply the H and V sides. In this case 1440 and 1080 are number of pixels not a measurement of length. Not all pixels are the same size.
If you have this card and don't tune its clock to 6750XT factory OC speed you are cheating yourself, its the same exact chip. The memory is locked to 2150Mhz max OC but its near enough to the 6750XT to get 98-99% the same fps. With AMD driver based FG available in all DX11/12 games its a hell of a deal used for $230-$250, beating many much more expensive next gen cards and destroying the no FG Nvidia 3000 series.
There is so much you can do to squeeze out extra performance in PC parts it can get overwhelming for some, so that’s why I just do everything at stock (and except for ram I at least enable XMP in bios) But I agree with you!
@@MMillerPCs I did not mean your test here. Naturally, for testing, it needs to be clean stock. The only exception for me in test is re-bar/SAM. Great job on the vid +1.
The rx6700 xt is even capable for playing at 4k 30 fps and also don't forget the power usage is much lower then advertised (about 50-75 watt less) during gaming.
6700XT can do far more then 4k 30fps. I have two Media PC's almost identical spec'd hooked up to 4k TV's. Silverstone GD09 cases, Noctua CPU coolers, X570S Tomahawk, 5700X/5800X, 48gb/32gb, NVME boot/storage both with 6700XT Gigabyte cards. Now a big part of this 4k 30fps only or 4k 60fps + is which games are we talking here and are we talking ULTRA preset? I don't play the latest 2023 triple A games, I usually will play yesterdays games like BF1 , TitanFall2 , SOTR etc out in the living room 4k setups. One of my 4k TV's is a Hisense U75K which does 144hz at 4k. I never ever on new demanding games do I just set it to ULTRA everything. You can get FAR more FPS from your GPU if you just find which settings you can hardly tell the difference from. Sometimes stuff like Shadows dropping from ULTRA to Medium makes a huge impact and to be VERY little difference. With a custom balance of which settings net you the best performance balance you can easily run a 6700XT around 100-144fps at 4k. TitanFall2 is a game I just picked up when all the hype started up a few months back and wow but a great looking game that runs really well. Same with Doom Eternal / Doom. Very good graphics and high FPS on 4k.
@@45eno I was referring to native 4K which normally results in 30 FPS unless resolution scaling is active. You probably have been playing with upscaling without realizing it. (thats how good FSR can be ;) ). But yeah, this card is a beast overall and the best in it's class.
@@45eno Then it's not possible what you say. Not a single (gaming) GPU can render 4k natively, there is always upscaling active. In this case it's scaled up from 1440p to 4K. Try Furmark at 4K and you see you won't even get 10 fps. Besides that, even a rtx4090 only delivers 60-80 FPS at 4K when native settings are applied. (still there is upscaling need !!!) Do not forget that upscaling is not only FSR, DLSS and such but also part of the standard resolution scaling build in into monitor themselves and other software.
so i wont be building after all as Amazon says i got my parts when in fact i did not and they wont refund me my money that is OK i live just 4 hours away from there headquarters 440 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109 that's a day trip for me
@@MMillerPCs yep i am pretty disgusted as i lost my trucking carrier do to a massive heart surgery back in Jan went from $3000 a week to $1200 a month i was excited for this build so i will keep after Amazon and save back up another year and use Newegg i suppose well like always love the videos
@@MMillerPCs well my brother help me out with a build as we wait for amazon but i have a Q for ya can you pair the arc 750 with the Ryzen 4600G not the build i wanted but it is the one i have coming from Newegg and the only reason i ask about the 750 it is the only to date card i can find in my price rang being i am on borrowed funds
