IS THE T-90M STILL GOOD? 

Well everyone here breach sniped. Only Germans have a small a breach as Russians. The reverse is shit though

Although recently a lot of new players decided to pick Russia pulling down the winrate because their tanks arent noob-proof. The bias is absolutely true, i dont think i have to mention the Pantsir with it's missiles having almost double the range of any competitor, or the new uncounterable 20km range AGMs that only Russia has. Also the R-27ER has basically double the thrust it should, not even gonna get into the 2S38 or Ka-50. For the over 1k hours I've played i see in matches that any team with russia has a way higher chance of winning, and I noticed it's reverse for Germany.

@@ZigzagEnd don't worry, you'll grow out of this, you need 3k more hours to understand what I'm saying I recommend you to grind Russia and play it by yourself, you'll notice why you're wrong

@@gasparferrandisromero1075 any time i play russia i notice i bounce off more shells than in any other nation, although i know that russia is notorious for having terrible depression and poor reverse speeds, still the things i mentioned are true

@@ZigzagEnd every nation has its strengths and weaknesses, armor is a key point for Russia, but no fancy thing allowed, you can't turn back, you can't retreat, you don't have those fancy reticles of the westerns, your armor often has major weak points. A nation that has good traits is not biased

@@gasparferrandisromero1075 yea, tho i keep seeing this scenario that is the most common: russia rushes and dominates with barely any loses while the enemy team crumbles, just like this game i had a minute ago in 4.0 russia, and just like hundreds of previous matches in diffrent BRs

Gay

I would say the T-90M is way better in rural environments.

@@OhhhLucien I mean, sure. It's fine. But T-80BVM is still just better. Almost anything T-90M does, BVM does the same or better. Mainly cause it's more mobile and has a functional reverse gear

@@Registered_Simp I'm agree, the BVM is still just better. But I really prefer the T-90M on rare open maps like Fire Arc, Sinaï, Tunisia... The commander sight is a plus, the laser warning too.

@@OhhhLucien I like CITV and LWS, sure. But the lack of reverse has proven too much of a loss for me. Can't get out before getting my breach shot out or my ammo rack detonated. With BVM, I can still spot targets about as easily and have the mobility to avoid more hits. That's assuming I'm not already doing that job better in Abrams or Leopard 2...

dude how is it a tiny bit rough, they have a missle that can kill from 40km away, overpowered armour and amazing anti air

@@InFamoose-WT with top tier strvs and leopards, and just CAS in general some games i find russia to have its face caved in but other times it does fine or well, its hit and miss, hence why i said little but rough, not as powerful as it used to be imo but still really good

​@@InFamoose-WTMe when shit doesn't render from more then 20km so the range doesn't matter:

@@InFamoose-WT The missile doesn't actually lock and track until it's within 10km, so it's not as overpowered as people make it out to be

Im still curious about the timer in the T-90 & T-72B3 or T-80BVM when you turn your engine off, each of them got an APU installed which ensures the vehicle can still operate for many hours without the engine running.

unironically

since people expected a more updated version of 2018-2024, with reverse gear and completely different protection (active protection). and now this is a old version

@@playeramin8862 T90M visually to this day has no APS, upgrade plan is scheduled in 2025. Reverse speed is still the same as confirmed from footage in Ukraine. The only upgrades is better roof coverage.

It’s not even that the spall liner doesn’t work. The weakspots are all still the same and your ammo still explodes when it’s tickled. I only have up to the M1A1HC, and I’ve never had an issue fighting this thing

2 different type of gameplay t80bvm is more universal while t90m is more long range anti tank gameplay

So true they nerf T-90m so much, spals doesn't work. People always say bias, I mean compare the new Su-25 to F-16. New Su-25 can kill 2 tanks in long range but F-16 can kill 5-7 in higher ft above ground. Besides Russian tanks doesn't have depression like what Leopards have, and they can also be killed easily.

@@christopherjohnferrer3771 exactly. Gaijin are falling to the crowd. if you watched real stuff about T90M you'll see you cannot pen it with DP even without era!.

I agree with the Fuji one, that thing is pure bs

Holy shit. As someone with nearly every top tier Russian air and ground vehicle, ya’ll are the reason this community sucks. Imagine bitching about one of the best and most well rounded nations not being OP enough. Lmao. Go grind France and see what real nerfing looks like.

I don't know what you were up to but the t90m never had a -16 reverse or a 1500 engine.

That's just incorrect, the T-90M has the best T-72B3 engine 1,130hp. That being said it always had 4km/h reverse speed. Vacuum 1 was developed for the T-14 Armata platform. The T-90M and the other Russian Low profile tanks cannot fit Vacuum 1 inside their autoloaders due to Size limitations. one of the Strengths the T-14 Armata has is bigger size with more internal space. Vaccum 1 was developed to maximize its length according to the T-14 Armatas internal space All other Modern Russian Tanks (T-72B3 T-80BVM T-90M) uses 3BM59 - 3BM60 - 3BM44M These rounds are similar in performance from each other due to the fact that the internal space of said tanks are limited by vehicles length / width / height. You really gotta research more into this, I main Russia as well and I even know the differences and reasons.

@@dankaloww1067 footage in ukraine shows T90M going backwards at 16km/h in every video if youd go and look the T72B3 gs 1130hp but the T90M has a 1500hp engine as for vacuum 1 that i was wrong so thank you for that

Хватит писать, что задний ход у 90 - 15 км/ч... Видел видео, как 90м едет назад - не больше тех же 5 км/ч, так что да, проблема с трансмиссией у него все еще присутствует

@@dankaloww1067 you're mistaken in something. look at the sides era! relict provide 250mm protection from apfsds but in warthunder it provides 20mm which is a joke if you know the old era called contact5 you'll see this is a nerf. while the same plates of era which ia relict provide a 250mm of protection in the front hall. isn't that a nerf?

Wait what,what's the nerf

​@@adhitypratamairwanto5450top speed and reverse to 70/40 respectively

Bro yall crying it's a little slower 😂 come on

@@damir9819 man -40KM/H reverse is still pretty damn good

@@adhitypratamairwanto5450how are they crying over 40km/h when the most russian vehicles got 4-12.