Is There A Difference?! Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 GM I VS. II Comparison, Sample Footage

Подписаться 11 тыс.

Просмотров 32 тыс.

50% 1

How do the specifications and features of the new Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II lens stack up to the original 24-70mm GM? And more importantly, is there any difference in image quality that's noticeable to the human eye? I recently picked up the 24-70mm GM II, and in advance of doing larger in-depth reviews on both of these lenses separately, I decided to make a video comparing Sony's two premium standard zooms.
Specifically, in this comparison video, I'll cover the main specifications and differences between the two lenses - from weight/height, to all of the key physical and tactile features. Furthermore, I include several test shots and sample footage from my Sony a7 IV of both lenses in the real world, testing its overall image quality, sharpness and color rendering, autofocus, and focus breathing.
Do you notice any differences in IQ between the two lenses? Are there any features you're happy to see on the version II that's missing from the original GM? Let me know in the comments below, and feel free to subscribe as more in-depth reviews regarding both of these lenses will be coming soon to the channel!
Sony 24-70 f/2.8 GM II: amzn.to/3OWeb6k
Sony 24-70 f/2.8 GM: amzn.to/3HfLIoy
0:00 - Intro, brief unboxing
0:33 - Specs and features comparison
6:31 - IQ, Sharpness, Color Samples
8:36 - Autofocus Samples
9:16 - Focus Breathing Samples
9:27 - Conclusion
============
My Current Kit:
============
Cameras & Lenses:
Sony a7S III: amzn.to/3Gd87kK
Sony a7 IV: amzn.to/3g3Ipoq
Sony a7 III: amzn.to/3GcEX5x
Sony 20mm f/1.8 G: amzn.to/3AE7pMt
Sony 50mm f/1.2 GM: amzn.to/3m2GbIT
Sony 16-35 f/2.8 GM: amzn.to/3AryrbN
Sony 24-70 f/2.8 GM II: amzn.to/3OWeb6k
Sony 70-200 f/2.8 GM II: amzn.to/3IPSge6
Audio:
Rode VideoMic NTG: amzn.to/3AJwTrW
Tascam DR-10L: amzn.to/3AIRA7l
Zoom H6: amzn.to/32HCgep
Lighting:
Aputure LS 60x: amzn.to/3Gc04og
Aputure Amaran P60c: amzn.to/3ob7qm6
Aputure Amaran AL-F7: amzn.to/3g3IzMy
Aputure MC: amzn.to/34l8DzS
Tripod/Monopod:
Manfrotto 290 Xtra 128RC: amzn.to/3o8bPpV
iFootage Cobra C180-II: amzn.to/3r8kfPY
Affiliate Disclaimer: The above links to products may contain affiliate links, which may earn me a small commission as an Amazon Associate. Amazon and all related Marks are Trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.

Наука

Опубликовано:

23 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 53

@dwightlooi Год назад

Here's the thing... the GM II has sunk the GM's resale value through the floor. You can pick one use USED in excellent condition for somewhere between $800 and $900. That's cheaper than any of the Sony F4 zooms. If you don't mind a little extra bulk it's a great deal.

@andrewsaraceni Год назад

Completely agree; at that price, it's a steal for the IQ, what it offers, etc.

@sidvicious3129 Год назад

Andrew, you did a fantastic job here for those that are going to make purchases this year. No one is doing a comparison like yours with photos and video. I was expecting the GM2 to simply blow the GM1 out of the water, but that's not what we got here. The GM1 held its own against the GM2. I think the size, weight, aperture ring, and extra features, might make some go with the GM2, especially if you were going to buy the GM1 new. I came across a deal that I would have been stupid not to go with and that is a used GM1 for $923 with shipping from a camera store in very good condition. I also came across a used Aputure X300 (V-mount) with a Aputure Light Dome II, total package $545.00 in fantastic condition with everything included some items in the bag were not opened, but I missed out on the Aputure 300 color. Most used prices for the GM1 are about 1198-1298. I have purchased from this store before and got a 55mm 1.8 Zeiss for $225, which was in great condition, and I didn't think that the GM2 was $1276 better than the GM1 and your test are proof of that to me. Have you ever compared either the GM1 or GM2 with the equivalent Tamron 28-75 G1 or G2 or even the Sigma 24-70?

@andrewsaraceni Год назад

Thanks, I appreciate that! I've seen the Tamron in action with a couple of friends' setups, but haven't gotten to do a deep dive test myself. As you said, I think the 24-70 GM I (new or used now) is one of the best deals out there, given being so much closer in price to the Sigma and Tamron compared to the GM II and what it used to be.

@williamshakespeare9815 9 дней назад

I agree. Im going to get the GM1 because there doesnt seem to be much noticeable difference in picture quality, certainly not enough to justify the jump in price. I don't see the aperture ring as an advantage, I can change the aperture easily on my camera.

@jamescastleton2191 2 месяца назад

Really helpful. Thank you!

@andrewsaraceni 2 месяца назад

No problem, James!

@FERNANDEZ4K Год назад

Good night. Excuse me, the sony 24 70mm gmii lens would be a good option for my FS7 II camera. Or the best thing would be to buy a sony lens 28-135mm F 4 G.?... Your videos are excellent, well detailed.

@andrewsaraceni Год назад

Thanks Jaime! I think the 24-70mm GM II would be great for the FS7 II. 28-135mm f/4 is also good for the additional focal length, but I'd still have a 24-70 f/2.8 just to get more shallow depth of field and go a bit wider.

@FERNANDEZ4K Год назад

@@andrewsaraceni muchas gracias.

@yushi213 Год назад

Thanks for the review. This two lenses are so close quality wise

@andrewsaraceni Год назад

No problem! I completely agree - they're both stellar options.

@Daniel_Ilyich 11 месяцев назад

It's a bit difficult to tell the differences via RU-vid. Some unedited sample images would be really helpful.

@andrewsaraceni 11 месяцев назад

RU-vid compression always make it tough. I'll probably do a photo comparison as well for future videos.

@COCOPAWS544 Год назад

Ty for review

@andrewsaraceni Год назад

No problem!

@satheeshv7640 Год назад

Hi which one is best for videography (shortfilm) Gm i or Gm ii

@andrewsaraceni Год назад

I've used both for video extensively, and I can honestly they're both great optically. Really just depends on if you need the features (aperture ring, smaller size/weight, smooth/tight zoom) and don't mind paying more for the GM II vs. the GM I.

@satheeshv7640 Год назад

@@andrewsaraceni thank you sir

@donnas8408 2 месяца назад

Eye tracking is better with the original Sony 24-70 GM - NOT worth the upgrade - next

@Flexin010 Год назад

I’m thinking of getting the gm1 for stills.

@andrewsaraceni Год назад

Great choice, hard to go wrong with that - I just put out a full review on the GM I.

@JamesJones10 2 года назад

Thank you!

@andrewsaraceni 2 года назад

No problem, James!

@trevor759 3 месяца назад

i decided to pick up a GM I for 1500$ on B&H i was told to get the sigma 24-70 but from my research i seem to like the GM I because the AF is a bit faster. Idk if it was worth a 500$ extra but i dont mind sticking to the sony ecosystem. Came back here to make sure i made the right choice in not splurging for the GM II as i do not shoot professionally just for a hobby.

@andrewsaraceni 3 месяца назад

You made a great choice - the GM I is a fantastic lens. Always loved the look I got out of it.

@taylaluva Месяц назад

I purchased the Sigma but returned it because dust got in it so fast. Went with the GM I instead.

@andrewsaraceni Месяц назад

@@taylaluva Interesting to hear the Sigma is still suffering from this. I had heard they corrected it on newer versions, but haven't gotten to see/test myself.

@CesaRomeroPHOTOGRAPHY 10 месяцев назад

I have a Sony A7R V and Sony 24-70mm GM1 lens ! Should I upgrade to GM2? Is it sharper?

@andrewsaraceni 10 месяцев назад

I love my 24-70 GM II, but the GM I is a great lens as well, so it all depends on if you're happy with the results now. I would say it's sharper, but not a dramatic difference unless you really pixel peep.

@CesaRomeroPHOTOGRAPHY 10 месяцев назад

@@andrewsaraceni awesome Thank u 👏🏻

@RobbyHuang Год назад

Man, the original is so much more affordable now, but damn it’s just so heavy and big. If only that wasn’t a big issue for me.

@andrewsaraceni Год назад

Yeah, it's a preference thing; I never found the weight of the original 24-70 GM to be too bad, but the original 70-200 GM is another story...

@cadenprosise2609 5 месяцев назад

Thats what I thought owing a 24-105 and wanting to get the 24-70 gm1. I can say with confidence that im glad I got the gm1 the weight and size make it easier to keep steady. I forget sometimes how the gm1 doesnt have OSS like my 24-105 f4.

@vvenkat3358 Год назад

Hi Andrew Saraceni , which one you Suggest Better one Either Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II OR 24-70mm GM?

@andrewsaraceni Год назад

Both are excellent, I'm still forming my opinions on the 24-70mm GM II (full review will be coming later). But if you can afford the GM II, I'd go for it, otherwise the original GM is still great.

@AaronOverEverything Месяц назад

I will not be upgrading. this was a great video. they almost got me lol.

@andrewsaraceni Месяц назад

Thanks! Yeah, no need to upgrade if the GM I works for you now.

@azzazz4549 Год назад

Is the mark 1 worth the 1400 dollars?

@andrewsaraceni Год назад

I think so...it was my go-to lens before the mk II, and still would be today otherwise. I have a full review coming on the mark 1 in a couple weeks that talks about that.

@azzazz4549 Год назад

@@andrewsaraceni Ok thanks. I'm going to buy the mk1 tomorrow so wanted to make sure

@avisexable Год назад

expensive lens but excellent

@andrewsaraceni Год назад

Agreed - it's pricey for sure, but great IQ.

@thegorn 2 месяца назад

The image quality improvement is very minimal. The real benefit I feel is in the greatly reduced size and weight, and smaller close focussing distance.

@andrewsaraceni 2 месяца назад

Agreed, those are the main reasons to upgrade (or, stick with the GM I if IQ is your main concern).