For the next Måneskin video you can try this opening: "ben tornati amici!" Means 'welcome back friends!' :) < Ben - thor-nah-tee - A-mee-cee > (hard c like the ones in "click") Anyway a cool thing to say in Italian could be "Alla prossima" It means " 'till next time" (as in 'see yall next time') < Allah pro-SSee-mah > Lol keep up the good work, i enjoy watching your reactions! Alla prossima! ;)
@@charlotte9157 I'm not a fan of heavy production or any autotune either and I don't particularly enjoy FF but I have to play devil's advocate here as I don't think you can say that bands who go down the slick production route killed rock music as a genre! Rock never died, it's always had many subgenres, some of which do rely heavily on production, it just fell out of fashion for a few years. I agree that technology has had a hand in this but I think it's because young people find it a lot easier to make music by themselves on a laptop rather than the hard work of putting together a real band and practicing in each other garages every day until they're good. I would never use brit rock as an example of overly produced rock either, 00s brit rock was very much about live performance and energy. Brit rock bands are used to playing in small venues and pubs and most of them made their names off the back of these strong live performances. 00s Brit rock incorporated elements of dance music with the driving bass lines and fast melodic guitar riffs so I suppose it sounded like they had a lot of production but it was usually just well rehearsed playing with precision timing. Måneskin have explicitly stated that Arctic Monkeys and Franz Ferdinand are some of the band's they take inspiration from so to say these bands will be forgotten isn't true because they have helped to inspire the next generation of rock bands like Måneskin. Both Franz Ferdinand and Arctic Monkeys and other bands like Bloc Party started off as a true live bands with all that energy in the room but the music has been refined more with production over time so it seems to have been a conscious decision on their part, they wanted a more 'epic' sound and they used technology to help them achieve that goal. I don't think there's anything wrong with that, it's not to my taste but I think there is a danger of thinking like an elitist if you look down on bands who do utilise the technology available to them to achieve something specific. It doesn't necessarily mean that it's being used as a crutch and they cannot play their instruments well or that they cannot sing well, sometimes it's done just for the impact. Even Jack White, uses heavy distortion on his guitar and voice to achieve an effect and he's considered the king of honest dirty garage rock. I suppose the key is striking a balance and knowing how and when to use technology to enhance your sound and when to back off. I get what you're saying though as overdoing the production definitely sucks the life out of music and kills that initial spark of spontaneity. It is so awesome to hear a real voice with gravel in it and real instruments, played live with in the same room, you really can't beat that.
I do agree with you, their live performances are disruptive! Unfortunately their EP studio version is much less raw and energetic, because the producer cleaned up the sound too much.
Stellar performance. If I had been in the audience here, I would have gone mad......I fully agree, better than the original (but of course great song writing here !)
