Тёмный

Is This Killer Sudoku Really Impossible? 

Cracking The Cryptic
Подписаться 610 тыс.
Просмотров 30 тыс.
50% 1

You can try today's Killer Sudoku puzzle here:
cracking-the-c...
▶TRY OUR SANDWICH SUDOKU APP◀
AppStore: apps.apple.com...
Steam: store.steampow...
Android: play.google.co...
▶SUPPORT US + ACCESS EXCLUSIVE "CRACKING THE CRYPTIC" PUZZLES/VIDEOS◀
Patreon: / crackingthecryptic
▶SEND US PUZZLES TO SOLVE/CONTACT US◀
crackingthecryptic@gmail.com
▶FOLLOW US◀
Twitter: #crypticcracking
@crypticcracking
▶SOFTWARE◀
We sometimes use Duncan's Sudoku Solver, which is available at www.littlegogs....
Or our own software, which you can access by clicking on the links under the video.
▶ABOUT US◀
Hi! We're Simon Anthony and Mark Goodliffe, two of the UK's most enthusiastic puzzle solvers. We have both represented the UK at the World Sudoku Championships and the World Puzzle Championships. We're also "cryptic crossword" aficionados. Mark is the eleven-time winner of The Times championship and Simon is the former record holder for most consecutive correct solutions to The Listener crossword. We hope we can help your puzzle solving while also introducing you to some of the world's best puzzles.
Thank you for watching!
Simon and Mark

Опубликовано:

 

18 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 109   
@billiardsprofessor
@billiardsprofessor 5 лет назад
Thank you for sharing the puzzle! For clarity, the puzzle was included in an iPhone app called SudokuKiller, and "Impossible" is their most difficult category. I got to about the same as you at around 11:37. Just before you "spotted a nice trick." That was very elegant! I am so glad I found your channel. I very much enjoy sudoku, as well as cryptic crosswords (although I haven't done one in a while), and your videos have actually helped me solve harder sudokus. I especially like your techniques of pencil marking corners vs centers. As for my moniker: I am a pool player and an instructor, and one of my friends calls me "professor" all the time. So, of course, I decided my pool instruction business should be called Billiards Professor :) I truly love puzzles and games that make you think. Thanks again!
@tylerlarsen1842
@tylerlarsen1842 5 лет назад
I could only get three numbers into the grid before I got stuck. This variant of Sudoku is brutal, especially the harder ones.
@thorndeux
@thorndeux 5 лет назад
That's so funny: I tried this puzzle, got pretty far, but took a wrong turn somewhere towards the end. Now that I check the video and comments it turns out I have the same app and already solved the very same puzzle on there (although it took me more than an hour).
@hotonis
@hotonis 5 лет назад
I am a huge fan of the SudokuKiller app. So many really good puzzles on that app. Though I mostly stick to the hard puzzles...
@TheArizztokrat
@TheArizztokrat 5 лет назад
I find it very nice that you always show your train of thought so we can comprehend and learn.
@Pianoblook
@Pianoblook 5 лет назад
This has quickly become my favorite channel to watch daily. Very wholesome and satisfying :)
@12tone
@12tone 5 лет назад
Didn't catch those chaining 2s so I got stuck for a long time trying to work out the bottom box, eventually realized that the 239 in r8 meant that one of the numbers in the 33 cage was _either_ 3 or 9, which meant that wasn't the 12 total that was missing, and coupled with some other reasoning I'd already done that forced a 9 somewhere into the 23 cage, that was enough to collapse it. Took ages, to get there, though. Great puzzle!
@gposchman
@gposchman 5 лет назад
I still do not have all the number sequences memorized for numbers that fall with a single group size. It took me quite a while, and I only missed how the 9 in the 45 group affected the middle box. Working out the possibles for the other two larger 7 groups took a bit of time. I would pause my game and watch the video until you caught with me, of course, you were paused while I played. It took me 2 hours. But when I figured out the 5&8 in the lower middle box, it all fell into place. A really great puzzle and I am ever grateful that I support you on Patreon, well worth the $3 and I love your Sandwich Sudoku game. I recommend both to all who play Sudoku.
@Pyromonkey83
@Pyromonkey83 5 лет назад
That was over an hour of struggle for me. You found the 2-7 in the 9 cage so much faster than I did, and frankly, I gave up and bifurcated on the 5 in box 5, which I got lucky with on it being correct the first go around. It solved the puzzle in the end, but I was unable to spot the logic that you did. Perhaps with more killer sudoku experience I'll be able to in the end!
@XoIoRouge
@XoIoRouge 5 лет назад
I boiled so many of this down to various pairs. Just so many pairs that couldn't unwind. And the 5-8 pair at the bottom row 13 cage would control everything. I spent 2 hours on the webpage which timed me (2hr18m) but (1) I didn't know combinations by heart so I had to google search many of them and (2) I wasn't really working on it all 2hr and 18min, as I took a few breaks. I suspect it actually took me somewhere between 1h30m to 2hr to solve. I never got the center row as you did, and I ultimately solved it by guessing 8,5 on the 13 cage and then another guess later. The 8,5 guess was correct, but my later 3,6 guess in the middle column was reversed, -- led to an impossible row 4; swapped the two values I guessed with and solved the problem from there. Now to watch the video and actually learn.
@willconyers3811
@willconyers3811 5 лет назад
That was some quite impressive logic at 17:30, would have taken me forever to spot that myself
@CzerniawskiMateusz
@CzerniawskiMateusz 5 лет назад
13:45 after puting the 1 there was little reason to go this far with the kinda crazy logics because you could have put 1 in the upper central box with normal sedoku.
@johnsonli6589
@johnsonli6589 5 лет назад
lol you are right, much easier this way.
@oNtuobAwoH
@oNtuobAwoH 5 лет назад
I was completely and utterly stuck until your deduction in the lower right box and the 33 cage. Would have never, and I mean never, realized all of that. Awesome video.
@marcohofmann7322
@marcohofmann7322 5 лет назад
I rarely comment on any YT Vids but this was just a beautiful solve! You can see Simon enjoying this so much at 21:04. I love seeing this. Great job!
@macchubbin
@macchubbin 5 лет назад
I solved this one a while ago -- it took me almost 3 hours... :-) The funny thing about this app is that some of its "easy" puzzles are harder than its "very hard" puzzles...
@darkguardian011
@darkguardian011 4 года назад
This was my first Killer Sudoku, came in just over 2 hours (give or take for brain breaks). Enjoyed watching your solve after to see how we differed on approach.
@draconicdusk5911
@draconicdusk5911 5 лет назад
This took me 54:35 holy crap what a hard puzzle. I had to resort to the calculator on dailykillersudokus.
@bfish89ryuhayabusa
@bfish89ryuhayabusa 5 лет назад
I got the 1-5 pair in the left middle block by adding the complete cages in the first two columns to get 84, and since the 21 cage had a 4, the only possibility was 5 and 1. Once you get the 4, 2, and 9 in the 45 cage and also that key 5-8 pair, the 5 cells of the cage that are in the center block have to contain 1, 3, 6, and 7. More importantly, this means those numbers cannot be in the right three cells of that block. The 1-6 pair in the bottom center block then restricts the 1 and 6 of the center block to the middle column. This resolves the 11 and 9 cages in the top middle block, and the resulting 5 means that the only remaining place in the center row that can take a 5 is the 11 cage, which is therefore a 5-6 pair. I know I got the 2 and 7 in that middle-right 9 cage somehow, but I can't figure out what I did, though I quite like how you managed that. The real killer here is resolving the 5 in the 35 cage. It's the only number that has to be in that cage from the start, and I narrow it down to the two cells, but that resolution is quite hard to see. I bifurcated at that point, as much as I hate doing that.
@chipsounder4633
@chipsounder4633 2 года назад
With Simon, nothing is impossible, you are definitely one of the best channels 👏👏👏
@BlueCyann
@BlueCyann 4 года назад
1:39:08 I don't think I could have completed it at all a few weeks ago when the video first went up, and even a week ago think I would have resorted to filling in a lot more little numbers than I finally did, trying to figure out that 27, or the location of the 4 in column 7 (which was my replacement for what the video did with 5s around 16 minutes). 20 minutes blows my mind. I'm glad I'm finally learning what to look for. It just takes so, so much longer. (Some of it is backtracking mistakes, but not that much. At least this time I could find them.) Oh also: the challenge about the 18 pair: there is in fact also a problem with the 1 and 8. Putting a 5 in the 23 cage forces r9c7 to be an 8. Having an 8 there means the only spot to put an 8 in the 33 cage (which needs an 8) is r6c6. Which the 18 pair is pointing right at.
@glennmelven3414
@glennmelven3414 5 лет назад
When I saw that 33 cage I wondered how you could have a 2 in that cage. To many Sandwiches I guess.
@bfish89ryuhayabusa
@bfish89ryuhayabusa 5 лет назад
In fact, 2 is one of the numbers that have to be in a 33 cage, along with 1 and 6.
@christiananderson8686
@christiananderson8686 5 лет назад
Doesn't that depend on how many cells the 33 cage encompasses?
@glennmelven3414
@glennmelven3414 5 лет назад
@@bfish89ryuhayabusa I think you missed the point. "To many Sandwiches I guess". In Sandwich Sudoku, a 2 is the one number that cannot be between the 1&9.
@bfish89ryuhayabusa
@bfish89ryuhayabusa 5 лет назад
@@glennmelven3414 No, I was quite aware of that. I just thought it was funny how that played with what I mentioned.
@bfish89ryuhayabusa
@bfish89ryuhayabusa 5 лет назад
@@christiananderson8686 true
@masterofthepinkside
@masterofthepinkside 4 года назад
I would never have eliminated the 5 on the right of row 7. Well done, Sir.
@thetacog
@thetacog 5 лет назад
Took me 20 minutes to place 3 digits. Your logic is just incredible. Then again, this was my second ever Killer Sudoku. The first I tried took you 40 minutes so maybe I should just try easier puzzles...
@DukeTVGaming
@DukeTVGaming 5 лет назад
done ... i mean opening the puzzle.
@billiardsprofessor
@billiardsprofessor 5 лет назад
LMAO
@jdyerjdyer
@jdyerjdyer 5 лет назад
I found it rather easy. I still took around 3 times your pace as usual. I played the 35 and 33 cage off of each other with the focus on the 35 cage more, eliminating 2 possibilities forcing the 35 cage contents for 4 of the 7 cells and likewise for the 33 cage. That play quickly resolved the 58 combos for the 13 cage at the bottom and the upper left cell of the middle bottom 3x3. Unfortunately this method took a bit of mental tracking (and for the first elimination I had to mark a few and then undo those marks) so it was a bit slower than your elegant solution. Like you said, a rather nice puzzle.
@tallrapp
@tallrapp 5 лет назад
I tried it and got stuck also. It was your trick identifying where the five went in the lower right box that broke the puzzle open. Wish I could spot those things like you can!
@andrewtaylor3167
@andrewtaylor3167 5 лет назад
I'm kinda surprised. When I was going at the puzzle, I ended up using the 7th column with the 33 and 35 cages a ton to finish up. Once you find 9,7 and 5, everything that remains in the column is in one of the two cages. For example, since the bottom right preoccupies a 4 outside the column, it forces a 4 (and thus a 6) into the 35 cage. However, there's only one spot for a 6.
@RandomBurfness
@RandomBurfness 5 лет назад
Lovely puzzle! Thanks for sharing this gem. I especially liked the 33-cage in in the lower-right part of the grid.
@Jouzou87
@Jouzou87 5 лет назад
Couple of things I deduced differently: In row 5, 5 can't go to the middle because the total would be too big. It can't go in the 9-cage because 4 is used up. Therefore, it has to be in the 11-cage (and the other digit of course has to be 6). Another one was what would happen if I put a 5 in r6c6. If the 33-cage contained a 5, it would have to contain a 7 as well, but there is no place to put it.
@barneya1965
@barneya1965 5 лет назад
New to killer sudokus, had to laugh at how you breezed through this 5 times faster than me.
@JaggerG
@JaggerG 4 года назад
I didn’t see the 249 triple. I instead summed the 4 right columns and found 4 of the cells subtracted to 17, meaning their corresponding pairs subtracted to 19. Having pencil marked a 2 in them already, it greatly reduced the possibilities in the remaining 3 cells, and fed back into the aforementioned pairs. I missed the later trick, instead reasoning that if r8c9 had been a 3, it places a 9 in r8c9. Clearly a problem, so the 33 cage couldn’t leave out a 3 and 9. Also that cages 1 positions fixed the 18 pair in the 9 cage above it. Took me over an hour.
@dggdgg3903
@dggdgg3903 5 лет назад
i didn't get the 2 trick in the middle of the video but used a whole different logic. with a couple kids break it took me almost 2.5 hrs (minus 45 min), still cracked my head a bit on it. i paired the board until it croumbulled
@ThePainTroller
@ThePainTroller 5 лет назад
The puzzle is one of the free ones on the Android app called Sudoku Killer.
@billiardsprofessor
@billiardsprofessor 5 лет назад
Yes... it's also on iPhone. That's where I found it.
@DaveGeelen88
@DaveGeelen88 5 лет назад
I downloaded this some days ago :D Could finish the Easy and Medium :D Hard an Impossible only partly xD haha And now I see this here, I recognized it :D Omg I didn't even see the 9 in the beginning ! Would have helped me solving all of the left side, but never even got there :o One day I will also be able to solve some Impossible one in 22 mins :D
@ThePainTroller
@ThePainTroller 5 лет назад
@@DaveGeelen88 At first I though I was tripping as the puzzle looked so familiar and then I realized where I had seen it. I think it took me 2 hours to solve. The other "Impossible" sudoku on the app took me closer to 3 hours to solve.
@msliz746
@msliz746 5 лет назад
Went straight to your website and solved it in 53 minutes 8 seconds. Felt real good until I realized you solved it in 22 minutes
@emphyriohazzl1510
@emphyriohazzl1510 3 года назад
This puzzle was really excellent! I proceeded differently for the bottom middle block (much more complex reasoning, lost lots of time there) and for the right side (quite simpler reasoning, on the other hand). I find you go a bit too slowly pn some very obvious stuff and a bit too fast on complex reasonings (had to relisten at times for some parts of your right side solving).
@paulorobertorodrigues2642
@paulorobertorodrigues2642 4 года назад
Thanks for this video. I saved it as a "tutorial" to explain how to solve a sudoku killer puzzle.
@bristolrovers27
@bristolrovers27 5 лет назад
A good puzzle and you were in form today so a very nice solve.
@killroy42
@killroy42 4 года назад
My first complete solve before starting the video :) Took a longer path though...
@honigschlecker1
@honigschlecker1 5 лет назад
He needs minutes to spot the obvious (4-7 in box 8). And then he comes up with two mindblowing deducations within seconds. Especially the second one starting around 15:50. How can you spot such things?!
@florianzellmer8735
@florianzellmer8735 5 лет назад
Phenomenal puzzle! I had to give up because I didn't find the trick involving 2's
@1kololo1
@1kololo1 5 лет назад
That is so funny - it took me like 1 second to realise that this exact variant was the very first killer sudoku I came across) And the one which got me interested in solving puzzles in general. I solved it in about 2 hours, spending most time just staring at the grid and occasionally "inventing" new techniques and putting in another number. Knew nothing about sudoku back then.
@billiardsprofessor
@billiardsprofessor 5 лет назад
I was too impatient LOL... I wonder if I would have discovered the "nice trick" Simon found at 12:08. Curious... did you spot that as well, or did you find another route to the solution?
@keljackson4002
@keljackson4002 5 лет назад
Thank you !!! I was also stuck on this one
@niklp6116
@niklp6116 5 лет назад
i am too lazy to calculate these types of sudoku, i like thermometer ones much more
@charleyweinhardt
@charleyweinhardt 3 года назад
That was cool, makes me know I can solve the one I'm on somehow
@PickledWhispers
@PickledWhispers 5 лет назад
This was very pleasing to solve. I enjoyed it very much.
@PiperWyattP4
@PiperWyattP4 5 лет назад
I need to memorise the combinations to spot this 😂
@msclrhd
@msclrhd 5 лет назад
You could write them out on a piece of paper and use that as a reference.
@KiczzciK
@KiczzciK 5 лет назад
@@msclrhd Why make life easy when it could be hard?
@2070user
@2070user 4 года назад
@@KiczzciK Why make life hard when it could be easy?
@amoitouseule
@amoitouseule 5 лет назад
At 17:43 I understood all your logic to not put 5 into these 2 cells into the box but then how do you know the 5 isn't in r7c7 but in r9c7 ?? i don't see it
@jimmyh2137
@jimmyh2137 4 года назад
That's for the big 33 box, you can't have a 5 in the big box or it can't add up to 33 in 7 different digits (with clues already filled)
@sofiagiaccone8141
@sofiagiaccone8141 3 года назад
I'm late to the party but I do have a question...when I play sudoku I do so with the assumption that the numbers in a numbered cell CAN in fact be repeated (provided they're correctly not placed in the same square, line or column), and it is so in many sudokus I played even on paper. I was stuck on this one because of that, and I was surprised by the fact that it seems normal to you to assume that none of the numbers repeat.
@Loptr__
@Loptr__ 5 лет назад
Got stuck at the part with the logic about the 5 in the bottom right. First I also thought about putting the 5-7 pair in the 23 cage but didn't see the logic with the 1-8 pair. Def a good but difficult puzzle
@patmosis4258
@patmosis4258 5 лет назад
The 7s were clear to me, but not the 5s. How were they excluded from the entire 33 shape. Row 7 column 7 in particular? Thanks
@xll666
@xll666 Год назад
Why are 2 and 7 at 13:10, I think it may be 8 and 1, please advise.😊
@ix2dareyou
@ix2dareyou 5 лет назад
At 11:45 you noticed that there must be a 4 in either of the r9c8 and r9c9. You then drew two conclusions that I can't follow along with (1) that there must also be an 8 in the cage (2) that there also needs to be either 3 and 9 or 5 and 7 in the cage. Any help would be appreciated!
@joelbaker210
@joelbaker210 5 лет назад
Since it was a 33 cage with 7 squares, the two missing digits had to add to 12 because of the 45 rule. There are three possible 2-digit 12's. One of them is 4-8. So when he locked in the 4 he knew that the cage had to have an 8, meaning the missing 2 digits were now either 5-7 or 3-9. Hope that helped!
@ix2dareyou
@ix2dareyou 5 лет назад
Joel Baker thanks! This was my first killer sudoku so I hadn't come across that logic yet. It makes sense now!
@mikrosom
@mikrosom 4 года назад
The 5 on 14:15 is a mean mean mean trick... I had to see it for myself... I've summed all 36 of 7 out of 9 combinations, and only 3 of them sum up to 33 in 7 digits, two of them both have 7 & 5, the third one doesn't. You either know this, our you're bust :S
@jasonmetcalfe4695
@jasonmetcalfe4695 5 лет назад
i need to work on how to make numbers, and then working out how to fit them in the grid the correct way around
@Dankman9
@Dankman9 3 года назад
Wow, took me about an hour but I managed surprisingly.
@Leonideez
@Leonideez 4 года назад
Didn't find that elimination of 5s in the bottom right box. Got stuck there.
@UnGeekCommeUnAutre
@UnGeekCommeUnAutre 5 лет назад
it is funny to see how you mind works!! you come up with such high tier thought processes but you often completely miss the obvious resolutions.. this 11 cage in the center bottom you had it as soon as you put the 2 and 9 on the central square, meaning so much less to think about that you actually did.. same goes for the 5 cage and you let those 4 and 7 pending for almost 10 min not resolving the 4-8 in the 12 cage on the left bottom square... that is always surprising as seeing those obvious resolutions would ease your thought process so much! I think you jump into new calculus too fast and lack taking the time to actually look at all the solving you get from putting a new number, making you life so much harder ahaha!
@remigregoire2219
@remigregoire2219 5 лет назад
Now I know what to get you guys for Christmas :-P
@StephenTreiber
@StephenTreiber 5 лет назад
At 7:20 when you say you couldn't figure out how to resolve it, can't you use the 11 cage in the bottom middle 3x3 box to rule out a 2, as it would place a 9 in r8c6, which conflicts with the 9 pair in r6?
@StephenTreiber
@StephenTreiber 5 лет назад
Wow, I paused at 10:00 ish to write this comment, really should have watched for a few more seconds...
@nr9409
@nr9409 5 лет назад
I suggest looking at the other boxes once you’ve resolved one. Throughout a lot of puzzles I’ve watched you complete, I have noticed you frequently don’t check other squares once you figure where a number goes.
@splaterpus23
@splaterpus23 5 лет назад
I dont know if i just happened to stumble upon and see things on accident and got lucky. But i feel the puzzle wasn't that impossible. Anyways, love the videos as per usual, keep it up
@mikewatson4729
@mikewatson4729 5 лет назад
Took me over an hour to get this one
@hepenypacker
@hepenypacker 4 года назад
11 hours 55 minutes 18 seconds. Not a good time, but I did it, lol. Would have been good to know that numbers could not be used twice in a cage before I started........damn
@johnsonli6589
@johnsonli6589 5 лет назад
@17:02, how did you rule out it cannot be 5?
@CallumLerigo
@CallumLerigo 5 лет назад
Longest one yet for me! Hour and 3 minutes :D
@edensaquaponics1941
@edensaquaponics1941 4 года назад
It appears that I completed this in the original iPad app in 92 minutes. I have no idea how much of that time was spent with the puzzle open while I was distracted.
@brianray8484
@brianray8484 4 года назад
4:52:28 with some breaks
@hanbanaroda
@hanbanaroda 4 года назад
Little bit over 3 hours but Ive made it!!! Hurray!!! :-D
@chernobylcitybus7208
@chernobylcitybus7208 5 лет назад
Could someone please explain the logic at 17:20 to me, i cant see how the 9 is ruled out from the rightmost 239 pair
@mozartdminor
@mozartdminor 5 лет назад
It's explained back at 16:00 he just doesn't loop back to it again at the end of the logic chain. That stumped me for a bit too. If you can't go back and watch, the logic chain starts out assuming that there is the 5/7 pair in the 23 cage (which is 5 squares large), so if the 5/7 is correct, that means the other 3 squares must add up to 11. What that means for the square you're struggling with is that if it was a 9 it'd force the last two squares in the cage to add up to 2 (meaning 1 and 1) - breaking the cage.
@Sypher32
@Sypher32 5 лет назад
Assuming there's a 5-7 pair as stated, then the other three options in the box would have to add up to 23-(5+7)=11. You can't add up to 11 with 3 numbers while also including a 9, so it's no longer a possible value.
@arturoluque4601
@arturoluque4601 5 лет назад
i did this like 4 days ago, took me 1:30, so tricky
@rigdigwus
@rigdigwus 5 лет назад
i really don’t get how you ruled out the 5 to not be in the 33cage when placing that 7 in col7
@IconicGamers
@IconicGamers 5 лет назад
took me a minute as well. The only way to get 33 when you don't have a 7 in a block of size 7, is 9,8,6,4,3,2,1. Only way to add 7 numbers and get 33 if there is no 7.
@rigdigwus
@rigdigwus 5 лет назад
@@IconicGamers i see, thanks. he did it so fast that i assumed he used some other technique.
@xykontyrox4945
@xykontyrox4945 4 года назад
Took me an hour and five minutes, but I managed to solve it. :D
@iosifoulis
@iosifoulis 4 года назад
Resolved 20.47
@abcdefghijlkmn1794
@abcdefghijlkmn1794 5 лет назад
Is "killer" giving you problems with the youtube algorithm?
@OsefKincaid
@OsefKincaid 5 лет назад
1:28:44
@200644600
@200644600 5 лет назад
This one is far from impossible. Even I finished it before.
@thesolarfutureenthusiast1102
@thesolarfutureenthusiast1102 4 года назад
2:33 winner :-) Sadly not minutes but still, I got there.
@EelcoWind
@EelcoWind 5 лет назад
Ouch, I paused it at 1st second and went to solve it. Took me 3,5hrs give or take, but I managed. Then I checked the video and I found out about the rule that there are only unique numbers in the regions >.< Solved again with the new knowledge, cut me down to little over 1hr. Nowhere near your time, unfortunately.
@cojofoplays1837
@cojofoplays1837 5 лет назад
You could give me a year n I wouldnt be able to finish that
@Kurgosh1
@Kurgosh1 5 лет назад
No it is not. It took 2 tries and something like 3 hours on and off, but it is possible.
@RoderickEtheria
@RoderickEtheria 5 лет назад
No, is not impossible. I took an hour and about 8 minutes, but it can definitely be solved by a human solver, not just a computer one. I ended up resorting to calculating how a few squares could add up to 30 given the numbers I could use.
@boskayer
@boskayer 5 лет назад
First!
@zombiedino184
@zombiedino184 5 лет назад
original comment
@EyeDewDie
@EyeDewDie 5 лет назад
@@zombiedino184 Original reply
@zombiedino184
@zombiedino184 5 лет назад
@@EyeDewDie i'm not trying to be witty. I'm justs saying that saying first on every video is not funny and never was funny and is lightyears from being an original joke
@EyeDewDie
@EyeDewDie 5 лет назад
@@zombiedino184 I was just making the same joke as you...
@glennmelven3414
@glennmelven3414 5 лет назад
@@EyeDewDie lol lol lol
Далее
New Sudoku:  A Killer Skyscraper
29:35
Просмотров 11 тыс.
[Hard] World-Class Killer Sudoku
29:31
Просмотров 43 тыс.
A "Mad But Brilliant" Sudoku
41:31
Просмотров 37 тыс.
Too Hard For The World Sudoku Championship?
25:33
Просмотров 754 тыс.
Very Tough Killer Sudoku:  By Request!
25:26
Просмотров 14 тыс.
The "Empty Grid" Sudoku
53:12
Просмотров 1,2 млн
Can You Find The Paths Through The Sudoku Fog?
55:26
Просмотров 12 тыс.
Expert Sudoku:  Overlapping Wings - What Are They?!
24:29
I've Never Seen That In ANY Sudoku!
37:09
Просмотров 38 тыс.
Only ONE Person Has Solved This Puzzle...
2:13:13
Просмотров 455 тыс.