Man fuck this shoe only because i didn’t get it but great video as always tony . But 13,000 pairs and no luck not paying 600 dollars for this if i strike out on all of the Travis I’ll go back but until then 0/1
Just because a shoe is a collab or low in quantity, doesn't make it "sneaker of the year". This looks like a regular ass shoe or even the Nike Attack with a strap and backwards swoosh. I'm tired of every sneaker youtuber asking the same question "Is this sneaker of year??" for every hyped up shoe
I mean I asked the same question for the military blue 4. And just because a shoe is a collab or low in quality doesn't meant it CAN'T be sneaker of the year. You can't sit and say that the Red October was not the SOTY when it dropped or the Off White Bred 1 from the Jordan 1. This is a brand new sneaker something DIFFERENt like people always complain they want. Its funny because the same way u hate sneaker youtubers saying SOTY because its hype. I get tired of people hating on a shoe just because its hyped lol
That sneaker is not worth $200. Maybe $130 or 140. There's no tech in the sneaker ( no zoom air or air in the midsole). There's nikes that cost $110 - $130 with Zoom air or air, and this $200 sneaker can't get any of that. Nike could've at least an insole with Zoom air. This sneaker is all hype.
@JMillz512 I get that. At the same time, I'm not paying an inflated price because Travis Scott is attached to the sneaker. Doesn't make logical sense to me. I can get sneakers with better tech and look better for less money from the same company. Also, I don't care about sneaker boxes, I throw them away. If one of the reasons for a higher price is the box, put them b*****s in a regular box. Hell, give me the sneakers in a brown paper bag, and I'm good.
