Islam vs Atheism | Oxford Debate (*OPEN COMMENTS SECTION*) 

@@Mahmood.23 Great argument right there, well done buddy

jesus is our savior and the one and only truth

@@zizekinburnu7713 ideology*

From a scientific perspective, what exactly is "nothing?" Even in deep, empty space we have dark matter, light etc so the question of how something can come from nothing is based on a false premise.

@@Mahmood.23 And it was a pointless one. You even liked your own comment after posting it. Seems to me that you're insecure, no?

Ye he’s an absolute tosspot

😂😂

Yes im sure you were seriously considering it 😉

He is scary 😂 Feels violent

@Drawfhe’s a clown, he purposely maliciously misquotes Alex in a desperate attempt to dismiss his valid criticism. He again ignored Alex’s point on Morality because he knows it’s indefensible

Durka Durka Mohammed Jihad

HOLD ON HOLD ON!

Hi my name is Jesus CrossNecklace

Finally found someone else who's been thinking this 😂😂😂 I can't unhear it

Too much energy, so much falsifiable arguments. Totally energy draining :(

Cry lol

@@ademjrad9994low iq copetard

😂😂

@@ademjrad9994No.

Definitely.

You just made his point. His answer to this question is yes, his free will led him to rethink his faith and choose Islam, so what’s the problem?

@@laythqadi7081 subtle assertion, it was his circumstance that led him to believe, not his free will

@@laythqadi7081 lol maybe he would be hardcore christian is he born somewhereelse

Duat Chol That's just your unknowledgeable point of view, truth is clear and anyone anywhere who would want to know it would be led to islam, that's why it is the fastest growing religion in a world that is heading towards atheism

Meshari yea, you just don’t use it.

@Meshari you believe torturing animals before killing them is good? Lmfao that goes to show how delusional you and your nasty cult of hate are.

@Meshari that clearly is torture. This is why no one takes you clowns seriously. You constantly lie about your nasty cult.

@@07GhostHD I was obviously poking a bit of fun with my comment, but let's not get nasty with each other. Dialogue and even a bit of banter can be good, but we should always remember that there is a human being on the other side of the screen.

@@dawsongooch4194 I suppose you are right. We should not really be acting like Hijab and his followers.

I agree its easier to be an atheist than follow an obvious false prophet

You God was brutislised on cross and died for adultry and sins what bullshit paganism

i mean... if you belive in God, you shouldnt think lesser of other (even if they seem less developed or modern to you.) interpretations of a creator.

@@ege8240 im not into new age and you shouldnt be either

@@ege8240 I don't think that's true at all. Shouldn't I think lesser of Stephen Law's "Evil God Hypothesis"? It's also an interpretation of a creator. As a matter of fact, the islamic god concept is much closer to the Stephen Law's concept than to the christian one. So it has nothing to do with being modern. The Christian concept of God is much older than the islamic version anyway. An evil god (islamic) is objectively inferior to an all loving god, purely based on philosophy, regardless of culture. But to give you another example: we both agree with chinese extremists that Mao Zedong existed, but they think he was a good guy. Should I respect their concept of Mao Zedung because we both believe he existed? I don't think so.

😂

i think he tried to slide in some misconceptions but alex defended very well

He basically only brought the infinite regress fallacy in different sauces. The incompleteness of scientific knowledge doesn't make God real...

It was a really interesting thing to hear these intellectuals speaking, and Hijab.

Yet that means.. that incomplete scientific knowledge could mean that there's a god. We know absolutely nothing about the universe as of now. No matter how you claim it, we barely know .000001% about the universe. Partial knowledge is worse when compared to no knowledge. ​@@winstonhood6371

can you list some of these misconceptions?@@liamzhao4613

This username and profile picture are an 11/10

Good. Hijab deserves it not only because he is editing and deleting comments but because of his reprehensible views. Views that have been debunked over and over again all the while claiming them with a pedantic attitude and an air of extreme arrogance.

I kind of feel like this should be a thing... "doing a cheeky Alex".

Naah he is just being a cry baby

@@TS-uj4qf lol

Good who?

@@richardk5246 Allah

@@ranbirvaid449 They can stay, as long as they are respectful

It's as if proponents of dillusion don't want people saying whatever they want

@@ranbirvaid449 What's an abdool? Lmao

Debte becoming Aggression if you lose it. Ok pal

​@@adnan202508You do realise that Hijab got owned in this debate? Don't you

@@adnan202508 Maybe go back to Hijab's version where he deletes 99% of the comments cause they dont agree with him...what a loser piece of shit he is and you support him

@@viridescent8941 The self-evident nature of Alex's comments and evidence is revealing enough in and of itself.

@@viridescent8941 And I responded to your question the first time.

@@viridescent8941 True. I might be subconsciously biased, but I don't think my bias is affecting me in a significant way in my satisfaction from Alex's backing for his remarks. If you remain unsatisfied though, then by all means knock yourself out on each response to a response video.

@@viridescent8941 I'm sure he provides some sort of response that satisfies his base of Muslims' unease with the possibility their hero could be at fault. I do not doubt that watching Alex you did not feel content, but watching Hijab you did. However, it turns out that I simply feel content hearing Alex's points as I find them to be revealing of the objective truth that Hijab "debunks." You can say I'm being stubborn, and I can say you're being close-minded to Alex's clear portrayal of the facts. But clearly, this will go nowhere. Have a nice day.

@@viridescent8941 See, now that you've stopped insisting that I must watch Hijab's video, I'm thinking that I just might. Personally, Hijab's angle on things gives me a headache, but I'll bare it for this video, and I'll let you know what I think of it. No promises though as I have a very impulsive personality.

Sophistry and rhetoric

Just mocking the man's rhetorical style. He acts like a frightened child.

At the centre of Hijab's head is a tiny mouse homunculus controlling a bloated body. (Hijab always has to speak big - a little man in a big body).

Especially before you blow up.

I think it actually has the opposite effect id more likely take in what the calm person was saying

Davtian Vahan Alex made a video about it. The debate video on MH’s channel had over a million views and under 1000 comments. Many people noticed that their comments had been deleted

He's a man who re-edited his answers...you really surprised he manufactures his comment section to praise himself.

@@tanjavankessel9842 MH?

Yeah, he deleted my comment, I just checked

Not to mention editing video he misquoted the koran the idiot embarrassing enough to edit apparently

Congrats

How many raka'ah in instinjah

@@fudgecake8565 How many female sex slaves Mohammad had? lemme test your knowledge first

@@fudgecake8565 There are 9 raka'ah in instinjah. Just like the age of aisha when she was raped by muhammad and also like the average iq of muslims when they say shit like you said thinking it's an epic bait and switch own.

Former Christian here. Accepting atheism liberates and be just a good person for all.

So u don't have any argument against hIjab the only thing u noticed is his way of talking ?

@@sdhqiohfq3152 No, I just wanted to point that out. Alex repeteadly debunks his arguments during the talk, on several points, while Hijab just repeats one argument: "How can something come out of nothing?" Nobody knows. Neither does he.

"HOLD ON" "HOLD ON" "HOLD ON"

@@sasos13 You just summed up the Quran "How can something come out of nothing"

And Hijab talks like a magician without any magic.

And let me guess, the ability to upvote and downvote was turned off? Usually people who want to censor criticism does that

Johannes Gerrild his comments are washed down and sanitised for the targeted audience.

... It seems better to be 'the rat's head' than 'the lion's ass hole' ...

M.Hijab : hold on hold on hold on hold on hold on xDDDDD

@Syed mehdi Kazim as far as I watched it, It was just "Your dude" misrepresenting "The Atheist" and repeating rehearsed arguments non related to The Atheist Arguments and Questions .... Obviously, indoctrinated parrots perceive the repetition of their doctrine as a corroboration of their doctrine Confirmation Bias been Confirmed, Again and "Again" & "Again and Again". I don't know if "Your dude" is intrinsically dishonest or just So Dumb to never get Critical Thinking skills. I hope the latter is better for him.

@@Gorilla_brown786 Atheists don’t believe that. The majority of atheists are agnostic atheists meaning we lack knowledge about the universe and its origins therefore we don’t believe. Hijab was misquoting him in his opening statement. You can actually see Alex smirking and rolling his eyes in the bg.

@@Gorilla_brown786 Lmao that proves you haven't watched shit, comprehend a thing, or have ever looked up philosophy or debates about this. Holy shit, you people never learn.

Yes, alex did a great job here. I loved his every word even though I did not understand it completely

@@saivardhanannam1086 I you could under stand what was being said you'd see he was clearly losing and hijab was pointing out all his flaws in detail. Wish he could get to his last point tho. About the profits wife and all that.

​@The-Black-Serpent-Syndicate - Universe exists - I currently have no way of testing/confirming how it came into existence, therefore I can't make a claim as to how it came into existence. OR - Medieval warlord wrote/spoke what he believed happened and I'll believe that. This is the whole debate. That's it. Nothing else. It's two completely separate epistemological paradigms debating from their own framework: One, scientific, enlightenment principles. The other spiritual. Learn what you believe to be an unquestionable doctrine and never honestly scrutinise.

Y’all have no objective morality so how can u cry and complain on aiysha lol

@@aasikage5311 Not believing in a ‘universal, objective morality’ doesn’t equal ‘no morality’. It’s that simple-minded thinking that makes a lot of religious people look stupid. It’s strange people attempt to justify a 30+ year old man’s marriage to a 6 y/o because she was ‘smart’, had ‘a good memory’ and ‘was mature for her age’ as morally correct and in-line with this so called ‘objective, Devine morality’. It makes your morality seem immoral.

@@blackcatus4762 ignore him, he is heavily indoctrinated terrorist + a dishonest liar for his prophet These Muslims always lose debates everywhere These pdfile worshipper's have no shame lmfao

Fun fact: only 120 years ago people knew about Aysha but never asked about Aysha Why ????

@@aasikage5311 idk why most abdools get triggered when they hear about "Aisha" lmao

Ever Greatest Wtf dude

Ever Greatest You’ve been spamming that message throughout the comment section although it isn’t related to what’s being talked about.

Yes you have to choose between several options Is this your only life or is there another life after this life. After answering this question if your answer was yes there’s another life, then the next question would be which life is more important? If you answer no then enjoy this life to the fullest without restrictions because it’s your only life. If you think the answer to the second question was one life was more important than the other then 100% there will be lots of sacrifices. If you’re answer was both lives are equal in vakue and importance that doesn’t make any sense you should take a nap and think it over

I agree with your quote and "liked" it. Also, I love your hijab in your profile pic. ♥ Are Muslim woman modern day ninjas.....? ♥

@@noneya8100 they're ninja assassin wannabees 🤣🤣🤣

😂😂💔💔

I thought my telephone crashed

I believe he likes to say things three times or by groups of three. Every time he unattentively says something twice, which happens regularly to everyone, he forces himself to say it a third time. He mimiques Muhammad who was much into this kind of numerological applications, especially with the number 3 (prayers, swearing, divorce...)

"Sorry I know this is quite a you know... performance"

Also when he argues/debates in person on the street and someone provides a sound logical argument to rebut his positions he says: “I see what you’re saying but...” then proceeds to say some random stuff to throw them off.

Because The arabic traslation of the word "he" refers to both males and anything that's neutral, so in english, there's no other way to refer to allah, since "she" and "it" would be even more inaccurate. Don't be so quick to jump to conclusions.

@@ghofranahmed7252 simone de beauvoir 'the other' theory

don't make me laugh. u guys use illogical statements. science is limited to what u can observe . sorry but u guys say there isn't a necessary existence but if there isnt then we dont exist bc it would lead to infinite regression

@@farazdaqhanoon7328 I think you should learn to observ before talking about its limits or talking at all

@@farazdaqhanoon7328 illogical statements? yes of course we are limited to what we observe because that is what we can explain through evidence while you make up some god that sent his message exclusively through a man that willingly married a 6 year old. also wasn't there a hadith that described the sunset as the sun going to god's throne and then ordered to rise again? years later we find out through science that the sun doesn't go anywhere so if your religion makes such an absurd claim shouldn't the observable prove it it's true?

@@mjgraphics5565 lol whats wrong with marrying a 6 years old? the hadith you state is a metaphysical matter

@@gintokisakata6080 wow do i seriously have to explain what is wrong with marrying a literal CHILD? In what world is a child able to consent for a long term commitment with a 50 year old man??? If your religion can normalize something like that then holy shit you are screwed. and hell you can argue that it's a metaphysical matter but it is clear that this is just how they understood the world at the time. This isn't the only non-scientific statement by islam anyways.

Because they don't want Muslims to know the truth about their religion. Recently he posted a video where Yasser Khadi admitted 'there are holes in the narrative', that the Quran isn't perfectly preserved. Once he realized that, he removed the video. They don't want you to know Aisha was 9, or that Muhammad had sex with the wife of his adopted son, or that he would go around all of his 9 wives in one night and only take one bath. They don't want you to know any of that.

Fettem23 how is it ignorance if you only asked a question as to why you don’t get to see everything in full without any editing and make a judgement for yourself?

Benjamin Park now I am more eager to watch the whole video.

@Fettem23 you seem to think that this person shouldn't be considered a Muslim because he didn't already watch some other video. A: that's stupid. being uninformed doesn't make you non-Muslim, it makes you a regular human. B: I, like you, wish he wasn't a Muslim. I love to see people like you allying with us atheists to try and push more people away from their faith! thank you, comrade!

@@angeldust235 don't listen to that moron. you seem like a decent person, and I wish you the best of luck in exploring the rest of the information surrounding this debate.

There are people on MH's side that stand to gain from at least being exposed to a decent, honest argument every once in awhile. It plants seeds that bloom into cogent thoughts later when an idiot isn't yelling at them to stop doubting or they'll burn in hell or at least be beaten by a nearby man.

Both sides make active claims. Atheists argue universe came from nothing or created itself like M.C. Escher's Drawing Hands. The theists argue God created the universe. Universe coming from nothing is impossible, creating itself can be done with Eric Weinstein's geometric unity, but this presupposes the existence of the X4 manifold. One would need to prove the X4 manifold is necessary which the atheists do not. The theists have a stronger case because the existence of God is proven by contingency argument given in the Quran.

@@shoopinc *Both sides make active claims. Atheists argue universe came from nothing or created itself like M.C. Escher's Drawing Hands.* Nope, atheism doesn't make any such claims. Want to try again?

@Meme Thief Alex is getting his own gumball analogy wrong. The question is why is there a jar of gumballs rather than none at all. We aren't making claims about properties of the universe. We ask a deeper question as part of the metaphysical why are we here?

@@TheRealCatof atheism rejects belief in God. In doing so you make a science of the gaps fallacy as to how we came to be.

Yeah i sad it on hijabs chanell first and i ewasnt even sure if this malfunction was intentional or not. Then i found the same vid on another chanel and it has subtitles. This is how quality looks like and theists are afraid of it

if u ask me the alpha move would be to answer the debate hijab's main argument without needing to be all passive aggressive and petty about something as irrelevant as a comment section. pettiness is the beta move if anything.

@@SimpleReally if you call this beta what you gonna call that guy who litrally cencored his coments because people called him out for bigotry

@@SimpleReally i think main points were discussion here but if you watch Alex's video on dishonesty to hijab then you will get some ideas about the intentional works on hijab on this debate

@@SimpleReally The comment section is *not* "irrelevant." It is quite possible to edit and restrict comments to create the appearance that everyone agrees with one position or the other.

Honestly, as a Muslim, Hijab's behaviour is embarassing. He's muslim David wood 😂😂😂

😂David woods sarcasm is funny Mojab is just outright rude

Sharwama funny doesn’t mean it’s not rude😅

@@AzamatBagatov413 Well finally I saw someone like you!

@@AzamatBagatov413Hijab is ironically one of the biggest advocates for muslims leaving their faith

Physically threatening?

Nah y’all are just soft tbh

​@@aasikage5311he did threaten him mate, if you keep doing this kind of act Islamophobia will rise more So i recommend being honest and stop lying

@@Suiseisleeps1he agrees with you hes just saying that "its not that bad" and that atheists are soft for not accepting threats laying down

You should not have a mould in your mind that you have created consciously or subconsciously by influences that you have been exposed to and then fit Islam into that mold, and when it doesn't fit and it never will, because Allah says in Quran, completely enter into Islam and make it all for Allah Swt (i am paraphrasing some of it) and as a result of this,you leave Islam, honestly that's not a honest thought process and an honest way of being a muslim. Let me give you an analogy. Islam is like a tree, and you are trying to grow this tree on a branch of another tree , and when this doesn't grow because you think its a branch, it is disingenuous of you to say that the branch is spoiled or dead. Sister,I hope you understand what I mean. I had made the same mistake as you. I hope Allah forgives me.

You know that no comment sections are truly fully open? RU-vid deletes comments all the time.

@@advenco344 yes

@@advenco344 We could just say it's as open as Alex can get it, and that he doesn't intend any overzealous restriction of speech. Sometimes individuals have better principles than their environment. Being that RU-vid is the dominant outlet for these sorts of things, and they have power we don't have then we have to play by their rules to participate in the game. Of course we would choose that RU-vid would leave RU-vid more open if we could choose for this sort of content.

spacedoohicky of course, I don’t disagree with you, I was just explaining why the OP was incorrect with his last sentence.

Except for that part where that fresh air becomes toxic air due to the unintellectual, hateful, and unnecessary comments of many people.

It's like the word "atheism". Everyone it applies to wishes that it wasn't necessary at all, because for some reason it's not the default position.

He's just making a distinction with the video offered on his opponent's channel.

coffeefrog yes

It is sad that pretty much all atheist videos have open comment sections and nearly all theist videos have closed comment sections... That really says a lot...

Hijab's channel is censored by the way.

First learn the islam then critisize may allah give guard ma bro

@@milderwritings1539 you guys provide nothing to the world. We Europeans hate you with a passion. Mohammed was just an asshole like Hitler.

@@poofpoof7740 you hate us today but when you find the truth you will love us that is it if you read more i am sure you will love us i love my bro with all my heart

@@milderwritings1539 you don't know anything about truth and science. Why are you people not educated at all? Israel is the most modern society and then there are you losers believing in rape and slavery. Go away and ride a 🐫

@@poofpoof7740 you look so angry and i dont know why but read more about islam instead of listeninig and i am gonna ride camel which i love and you gonna ride your BMW

Good one 😀

I think that's agnosticism

Quoth the raven agnosticism would be more like “I don’t know if we could ever know”

@@antonkottorp3148 No, it is we dont know. Athiesm is disbelieve in God. Agnostics neither believe nor disbelieve.

Mohamad Moustafa you Done know what you’re talking about, pls just google the definitions of the words. Agnosticism is only a claim about the KNOWLEDGE about a god and atheism if wether or not you believe in it. You can technically be a agnostic theist (even tough it’s prob quite rare). Atheism is not the disbelieve in a god it’s just not believing, very important distinction

@@antonkottorp3148 Ah, it is not disbelief it is not believing. Silly me, I thought that those meant the exact same thing. /s

Damn, spiritualism is a very interesting thing, I'm glad you have at least a comments section to say shit like this in :D. Stay cool dude.

@Safeel K hot take

@Safeel K But yet in Islam the punishment for apostasy is death. I was born Muslim, so according to your religion I'm supposed to die. Even though I never ever believed in a single bit of Quran or hadith, never even believed in God himself, but I was born Muslim so that settles it. Forgive me, but the problem is not the Islamic countries, it is Islam itself.

@Safeel K وفي صحيح البخاري عن ابن عباس رضي الله عنهما عن النبي ﷺ أنه قال: من بدل دينه فاقتلوه وفي الصحيحين عن معاذ أنه قال لمرتد رآه عند أبي موسى الأشعري في اليمن: لا أنزل - يعني من دابته - حتى يقتل قضاء الله ورسوله والأدلة في هذا كثيرة، وقد أوضحها أهل العلم في باب حكم المرتد في جميع المذاهب الأربعة وقول الرسول أيضاً: (لا يَحِلُّ دَمُ امْرِئٍ مُسْلِمٍ إِلاَّ بإِحْدَى ثَلاثٍ: الثَّيِّبُ الزَّانِي، والنَّفْسُ بالنَّفْسِ، والتَّارِكُ لدِينِهِ المُفَارِقُ للجَمَاعَةِ). These are two clear talks of the prophet stating that those who were muslims and then left Islam must be killed. And yes I know, there's a small portion of muslims that don't believe this hadith to have been really said by the prophet, but these muslims make a very small percentage of muslims. So please don't say I don't know islam, I probably know about it more than you do. P.S: I added a third talk of the prophet.

@Safeel K just a question out of curiosity, please don't feel like I'm pushing you or anything, if you think hadith was changed and corrupted, how do you know Quran itself wasn't? I mean aside from the verse in Quran stating that it wasn't (which is no proof to a none muslim because they don't believe in Quran) so how do you know Quran is 100% unchanged?

That's my biggest problem with his causation argument. So many aspects of their God could be changed and are therefore dependent by Hijabs own logic. So how could they're God be the brute fact or unmoved mover?

"Look, you lived a pious, good life, you helped the sick, fed the poor, and was kind to everyone, but you didnt wear a bedsheet around your head when you went in public, soooooo have fun in hell"

@@jacksonraidal9917 I feel like it's rather the stretch to assign this timeless, formless, genderless powerful being triple duties because human beings have 3 fundamental questions they couldn't answer....and the being thus had to answer ALL of them at once. Where are we from? Well, there is a powerful entity that is outside of time himself (because let's not pretend Hijab thinks his god is anything but a dude) and that didn't need to be created. This entity started all the stars and got all of the Universe going. Why are we here? Well, after a couple billion years, the universe he'd created settled down, countless planets formed, one of them ours and he decided to plop us on there. Then the being that set off the very beginning of the universe itself and wrote its laws and constants....he was in charge of making sure we cut off our foreskin and kept those women out of sight because they'll distract us. Oh and after all those billions of years by himself he now also needs us to bow towards some rock somewhere about...make it five times a day at regular intervals. In eeerm thanks or worship or something What happens after we die? Ah Well, the timeless, formless, genderless powerful being is now also in charge of plopping us somewhere else...if you the individual that has existed in less than the smallest of fractions of a nano second of the existence of the universe so far managed to impress him enough (and wasn't tempted away by any other all powerful dudes that some other guys were claiming also did all this stuff) you get to go to a magical place filled with virgins and this pork thing you've not been allowed to eat all along. The other guys go somewhere very hot. Well, what about after that? Oh, this time it's permanent. Forever. So eeeerm.....quit asking questions

@@kenbee1957 well said

Quran "word of god" didn't mention anything about hijab, the quran instructs both Muslim men and women to dress in a modest way.

This confusion. From Arabic language There's no it in Arabic Everything is female and male not us gender only but according to striction of the word it's self So allah is male word elah is female That's mean the God is male word and god is female word both reference to him Quran said god not a female or male nothing like it or like him or her Only youse he she according to gender and also according to the word another example Moon is male. Word sun is female word

Tell me you don't know anything about Islam and Arabic, without telling me you don't, that comment is simply proving Alex followers knowledge about Islam.

@@professorparadox795 I simply repeated what the Muslim dude said….never claimed to be knowledgeable. You’re not a professor…you’re stupid…go away.

@@fantasticg73 Dumb, in Arabic The words that exist for Gender is much different than English, We have He She and It in English While in Arabic there is only for female and male , there are no other word for something else , and that's why in the quran God is stated to be he, what do you expect to say, she? Quran is written in Arabic, Arabic is very different than English, no atheist Arab talk about this because they know why Allah is referred as he and nothing is wrong with that, it's Arabic Grammer . the first speaker said "he" because he translated it directly from Quran

@@professorparadox795 in Arabic god said "we" even though he was supposed to be Tawheed. Who's we?

@@lucas9030 I think you missed the point of the comment. I don't actually belive that. That's why is enclosed in quotation marks.

@@lucas9030 lmaooo right

RAYfighter or Lucas did cus he accidentally attacked a comment (your comment might be sarcasm but no one uses emojis in the comment section so idk)

@@sujin9185 I both love and hate sarcasm.

@RAYfighter Nice.

Yeah.. smh😒 thats not the way to have a debate.

The nice thing about Hijab is he is honest and straight forward in your face kind of guy. Whether he shouts (not saying that he does) or not, guy cuts to the point like a hot knife cuts through butter and on the seldom occasions where he is wrong, he will just say he is wrong and continue with the debate.

@@redart3005 I think you watched a different debate...

@@Kobi_89 TBH I didnt watch this 46mins but isnt it the same debate that Hijab posted from 1 year ago which is about 2hrs long? I am assuming it is, and if it were then I stand by my opinion. But Cosmic was not that bad, I think he did a good job compared to the old man although he lost the debate eventually.

@dimmy dunk I ll be honest with you xD I didnt watch this video but I am assuming its a snippet from the big debate from 1 year ago which is a 2hr video? You can correct me if I am wrong

Because this book carries divine guidance in it. Authored by God, the creator of the universe, there is no way a human seeking for truth could reject it. Only someone who does not want God to be real, will not believe in it. And its not because of the lack of evidence, but them not wanting the accept a God, to submit to God. I've heard multiple atheists state that they would not believe nor obey God, even if God himself would undeniablely prove Himself to them. Atheist dont want to accept the rules set by God, even if God was factually proven to you, so the only option is to disbelieve. They simply dont want to comply to the rules and can't accept that the creator of the universe, the designer of us humans, would set certain "policies" for us that we should not transgress. And that He would judge us upon how well we obey His word. They simply don't want it to be true, because they would have to give up so many wordly pleasures, accept that they are "bad" humans infront God, for sinning and wanting to sin. God says in the Quran: "If We had sent down to them the angels, and the dead had spoken to them, and (even if) We had gathered everything before them face to face, still, they were not to believe, unless Allah would have so willed. But, most of them adopt the way of ignorance." "Surely, the ones who have disbelieved, it is equal to them whether you have warned them or have not warned them, they do not believe." God already knows the nature of disbelievers, He knows the source reason for their disbelieve, thats why He tells us how true disbelievers will not care whether they are being warned about their wrong believe/disbelief or not. But there are also disbelievers/atheists who are on the seek of the truth, unaware of the truth yet, for example because they had negative experience with other religions and therefore gave up on religion without looking into Islam before. The Quran says: "And have not the ones who disbelieved seen that the heavens and the earth were an integrated (mass), then We unseamed them, and of water We have made every living thing? Would they then not believe?" Truly fascinating wisdom in a book of the 6th century to be able to dscribe the Big Bang and the base of every living being.

I know the answer: skill issue

I think its mainly , because we humans have a inate nature to part of a community, and people dont want to start truely anaysling their religion at risk of being rejected by their community. Hence they live a life of ignorant bliss and igonre parts of their religion which deep down they disagree with or try and find loopholes to somehow make the bad parts of their religion seem accaptble.

Low IQ's

Yes and good lot it's done for our world hasn't it? How much death, how much hate has come as a result of your book of divine guidance (among others) @@QuinnTheTailor

Just work on it

@@asherroodcreel640 Alex is incredibly intgelligent and smart. He graduated from oxford university. 95% can't speak like him becasue his brain processes and understands abstract concepts at higher level and way quicker than the average person.

@@EphemeralOnlooker and with that additude no one ever will again, greatness isn't something you plan but stuble into

@@asherroodcreel640 It's not an attitude thing. If you know anything about IQ you would know that it's immutable and that you're born into different capacity for abstract thought. Not everyone can become Albert Einstein. Infact, 99% of the population wouldn't be able to go near his complexity of thought even if they dedicated their lives to studying. How do you explain kids graduating university at the age of 12? Can you chalk that down to 'simple dedication'? I think not.

@@EphemeralOnlooker if you knew anything about iq then it wouldn't have been brought up due to being highly envormental and generally shit, sense you seem to suggle with this stuff I'll lay it flat, my point was that socity is traded and enforced by mediocre people meaning the smart especially have to fight for their education no matter what, now that we've established by my system your bad at logic or by your simply less intelligent listen; right now education is about one kind of intelligence: doing a lot of work on your own and then going trough a test, what is intelligence covers the breath of the human mind, natural grace, cleverness, color matching, you name it it's a thing, and a lot of its lop sided like how Alex can't debait for shit

He challenged him with his wit, something what bullies do not like. Then bully's inner squeaking girl wakes up. The result you can see in the video.

As he said already he took this aggressive stance purposely, he's not like this normally if you see his other public debates you can see the difference.

THE BULLIES ARE BEING BULLIED

mehdie Hasan is good though

Shajalal Atik sufi lol he makes very good arguments actually unless ur just ignorant

So if someone dosent believe in the same free speech as you they are shook? What kind of deluded logic is this. So when your parents told you not to curse in the house they were shook of you?

@@mahadism7455 "doesn't believe in the same free speech as you"??? Free means without constraints/restrictions. One cannot have a 'subjective' definition of free speech. Different definitions would mean 'regulating' speech according to the corresponding definition of free speech one believes in. Something that is being 'regulated' is not free. All the delusions here are in your court, not mine. It is your logic and reasoning that is fallacious; contradictory and nonsensical.

Jahnvi yes, speech is restricted all over the world. For example freedom of speech is something that’s protected in the west but we both know the speech isn’t completely unregulated, even in the RU-vid comment section if you threaten someone your comment will be removed. So no this isn’t “without constraints/restrictions” youtube has its set of rules, and if you’re comfortable referring TO THIS RU-vid comment section as “freedom of speech” then yes i feel comfortable saying you don’t believe in the same freedom of speech as me. Now if you said this RU-vid comment section isn’t free speech but in fact restricted speech and that THE TRUE freedom of speech lies only within a context WHERE NO RULES or restrictions apply then I wouldn’t even have argued against you. If you think a RU-vid comment section is completely unregulated all the delusions you have are in YOUR COURT. So now you have two choices either you admit this RU-vid comment section isn’t completely unregulated thus isn’t free speech or you admit that you have your own subjective definition of freedom speech that involves some regulations as we see with RU-vid. Whichever way you slice it its a checkmate against u.

@@mahadism7455 I'm completely fine with admitting that RU-vid sections are regulated, solely because that is a fact. However, the difference between Alex's comment section and Hijab's comment section is that one of them makes it their private business to regulate speech in accordance with 'their personal definition of free speech'. Having said that, it is 'fairer' for youtube to be the entity that regulates both the comment sections, as that allows for a standard that is indiscriminate, and by extension, gives equal treatment/consideration to all people who comment. Something that can't be disputed is that, in this situation, RU-vid is clearly the only entity which has no dog in the fight and therefore has the ability to be unbiased. Whereas, either of Alex or Hijab regulating their comment section proves bias on their part. Alex's comment section might not be free in the truest sense (as it is regulated by YT), but it is undisputably more free and unbiased than Hijab's comment section.

Jahnvi this is what we call moving the goalpost lmao. You went from claiming this comment section as a free speech outlet and chastising me saying theirs no such thing as a subjective definition to freedom of speech to moving your point away from freedom of speech and trying to point out the Alex’s comment section is more fair because it has youtube as a moderation tool and not whatever third party company Hijab employs. First of all i want to clearly state that this DOES NOT refute the point that this comment section is in fact NOT freedom of speech as pointed out by yourself. I dont believe youtube is to be considered unbiased in its moderation simply by the virtue of your word, if we asked well known youtuber’s whom have been completely banned from the platform for their views they’d disagree with your point about youtube being the only fair moderation tool with “no dog in the fight”. I also don’t accept THAT YOU get to decide what is “fairer” why cant i through my own subjective interpretation of whats going decide that having youtube as a moderation tool is NOT “fairer” do you have objective evidence that backs the claim that having youtube as a moderation tool is “fairer” than using another company? If you dont then i dont accept the claim. And lastly my final point is that you have absolutely no idea what has been removed from hijab’s youtube comment section you have no idea what type of moderation or algorithm is in place, so your ASSUMPTION is that his page is heavily modded but couldn’t it also be the case the he simply receives low comment engagement? Couldn’t it also be the case that alot of his comments breach youtube’s policies and are thus removed. You’re making a baseless assumption that hijab removes any comment that disagrees with him when its just as likely that he simply has low comment engagement on his posts.

Nope, the edits are there. The mysterious mic dying at the most opportune times is still there. Remember, Hijabs was in charge of the video edits and the master copy.

@@celiamoreno7745 Who's brilliant idea was that?

Lol, roasted

Cosmic says he doesn’t have access to the full video.

Celia Moreno hijab was not in control of the mics as he was the one debating he can’t control everything going on in making this debate happen

He was perfectly valid, what are you talking about?

Not surprised a Cosmic Atheist fan would agree with him despite him not addressing the main argument but focussing on stuff so obvious in the very first video (the editing to fit in a Quran verse)!

@Sam Taylor he does. You should watch the video and listen more

Ah this was nothing. I much prefered his meltdown at muslims _"having doubts"_ about the Quran, and how _"they are were they are because they sit and watch Netflix instead of reading the books of Islam"._

@@MrTrialandError shut up golden Shower boy

And that's why facts hurt my friend.

@@n.k.w. its called a doctored comment section bro not facts

@@leokruse38 Did you read my comment? I'm not siding with Hijab 😂

@@n.k.w.oh lol i thought you were trying to say hijab was speaking facts so no one had a reason to comment and question him. my bad man

@@leokruse38 Don't worry bro, no hard feelings, I despise the bloody bastard as much as you bro

Kya islam me female ko lessmind bataya gya ? Two female ki gawahi ek male ke barabar hai ? Is it true or false mam .. Plz guide me

@@hemantsahuraj yeah that's true

@@cokguzeladam thanks 👍🙏

Those who are willing to learn ,listen to words and sentences not pitch and amplitude

@@moi2961 read my comment again and tell me how what you said is relevant.

That's the real content for his audience: The unwarranted confidence. They get lost easily in trying to follow a logical argument, but if they see a guy smugly, loudly, aggressively declare victory? That they'll connect with on a low, primitive level no matter what is said. He truly might as well just be hooting and screaming and beating his chest, the element of human thought is entirely secondary.

Lol. Your cosmic guy couldn't refute him. Go on give it a try tell me where did he not make any sense

Wrong Turn I‘m pretty sure “my Cosmic guy” did refute him. But of course @Irontiki is right. I don’t blame you for being the most drawn to “your guy Hijab”, because he is using demagoguery. Thats cheating! Haha I would say he could very well be categorised as one in someway.

@@JanLaalaa The fact that are saying this demonstrates you're in the "confused" category as referenced above, and thus any attempt to engage with you is likely to be doomed to end in frustrating circles of tail-chasing, frequent topic-changes, magically moving goalposts, and (if you're anything like MH from the video) blatant intellectual dishonesty. If you engage at all. So just so you're aware: You don't automatically *deserve* this. But I'm giving it to you anyways. MH starts out with and maintains an angle of somewhere between dishonesty/confusion regarding the "position of atheism". The prototypical atheist does not by definition bring active claims to the table, he/she simply doesn't buy THE OTHER GUY'S yet. Ergo the burden of proof is on the claimant: "There is a god -> it's also the Islamic flavor specifically". That MH or others get all clenched in the butt about what it "means" to not claim to KNOW that there's a god, and simply be open to the idea that there might not be one, is irrelevant. You have to bring GOOD reasons to believe before you get to complain about the fact that someone else doesn't believe. That being established, we move on to MH's weak attempts to claim a "necessary entity". The First Mover argument is weak, simply put, from the get-go. It fails to account for the possibility of an eternal universe, it fails to account for causality breaking down prior to the existence of time, and it fails in an epic degree of special pleading for claiming nothing can be un-caused or infinite, and pointing to an entity that is un-caused and infinite as the solution. Simply put, "God" is a non-explanation for a question that was posed before we knew enough about the universe to show that the question itself is absurd. Secondarily, after presuming his stupid answer to a stupid question is enough on its own, MH dares to take it a step even further and slap a mind onto his non-answer. There's no reason to do such a thing, let alone assume it's necessary, except that he already believes it to be the case. The tail of his religion is wagging him. Even if we granted the stupid answer to the stupid question, why can't it be a mindless force? Again, MH's low-level of understanding of the topic matters he touches on betrays itself and he feels comfortable just blundering smugly on ahead. Thirdly, he then takes his stupid addition to his stupid answer to his stupid question, and boldly lies in claiming this necessarily resembles what Islam's god is described as. Except the quran also tells us that Allah has feet and hands and eyes. And sends visions to prophets, supposedly. So the argument that a formless, timeless entity is a match doesn't work at all. What this means is that you need to do more work to attach a stupid book to your stupid addition of a mind to your stupid answer to a stupid question. Otherwise those of us who don't buy it thus far have ZERO reason to take time out of our lives to entertain the notion, and you have to acknowledge that simply not buying it is a valid position. At least until a better effort is made to produce acceptable epistemic paths to Islam specifically, rather than "our book says so".

@@JanLaalaa every point

To quoque fallacy... not the best but I'll assume you're just pointing out the hypocrisy for the sake of it.

If they read Quran and stay honest, they would not remain muslim for a day.

@@matthieub3973 That its a fallacy is beside the point. The point was the lack of self-awareness of those making that claim

@@amirsarwari3289 not necessarily true. When you're so brainwashed, it all starts to make perfect sense in the head. I should know, I've been there.

Not like any of you guys read it. Resorting to cheap insults instead of trying to counter what the proposition said shows that you're just ultracrepidarians.

Your statement is valid for both side. Still some converter to islam come to know islam by internet with open heart

AgénT believe is a matter of conviction . We may indoctrinated as kid but we have the ultimate freedom when grow to believe what we convince about. About number I don’t have any figures but I’m sure the one who converted to Islam are much better than those who leave Islam (example the first muslim speaker on the debate )

When you're indoctrinated during your childhood days with fears of eternal hell, you cant call 'the ultimate freedom to believe convincingly' as you grow up

AgénT first all we have been indoctrinated by society media and family but still we have the ability to distinguish between good and bad from early age

Umai Rafiro believe is in heart no one know what you believe in so you have to believe whatever you want even if you been forced to show something else

Mohamed Hijab won that debate fair and square

@@veins2820 You'd have to be dense to think so. :P

@@Mojo_Radio niqqas are so biased lmao nobody won. nobody's mind was changed, nobody did anything. how dumb do you have to be to moan and whine without even knowing what happened in the debate

As an atheist I agree - that would have been so much better. It seems like he also came to have an honest debate, actually describing what he understands atheism to be and what he considers to be its flaws.

The second guy pretty much just deflected instead of answering Alex's points

@@mykaelajones7780 that’s why not a lot of Muslims follow the 2nd guy he’s abit odd

I can appreciate that - However the second Islamic defender is just short of being a middle of the road shoe salesman. He should've chosen a different path - He'd have excelled as an American lawyer or Realtor.

F Muslims why do you act so surprised when one acts appropriately ? That is wrong Muslims are wrong all religion is wrong f religion get with science or go pray to your god !!!

give me your best argument against islam - im interested ya sheikh al-islam

@@MrTrialandError Burden of proof.

@@MrTrialandError why do you guys hate GAYS?

@@MrTrialandError the fact that acourding to islam i should get killed because i left a religion i was born into and left it when i had reasons to. Its not like i choose to be a muslim . But still a just god wouls never condemn apostasy and mohamed used this methode to keep his new territories under his control by threatening to kill anyone who questions islam.

Nobody cares that you're ex Muslim. Stop defining yourself by your ex identity. It's honestly pathetic.

that is what we are seeing here haha

Most pigeons are smarter and more pleasant to look at than that bearded guy.

@@oliveryt7168 imagine being so cringe and salty that you care about someones beard

@@mugen8455I know this is from 2 years ago but did you miss the point on purpose or something? It's very obvious he's not insulting the beard he's using it as a descriptor of who he is talking about

Please don’t do that. No one can survive that amount of alcohol. Not even Russians. 🤣

I have cirrhosis because of you ! Yes you

I'M cLoseR tO g0D n0w

Mohammad hijab beat david wood

XSplasherGame What males you say that? Is it your belief by any chance?

@my name alex is crying like a baby lol

Seriously dude the least you can do is put a time stamp for where he ignored the question

@my name the one about Aisha being 6

@Ninja FEESE, Aisha, muhammad was a pedophile

@my name, so you’re whole justification of your prophet being a pedophiel is that, people aged faster back then? He was a 50 year old that had sex with a 9 year old, not even old enough to get pregnant... you’re calling me brainwashed but you’re the muslim here buddy, you’ve been brainwashed your whole life, you were brainwashed to believe that a warmonger, pedophile was a “prophet” lol, I’ll tell you what if hell is real muhhamad shit be upon us buring there

"Why buy tomorrow, when you can buy today?" - Merchant in Oxenfert (Witcher 3)

Ah, I'm not alone. I feel a bit less guilty. 😌

same here, I couldn't fucking take the cringe, it really was too much for me

I wouldn't buy a carpet from that guy.

@@bloccoaspirale1867 made me laugh :))))

For real. He seems way more pathetic compared to everyone in the room. Within seconds it was clear his arguments were void

its much more intresting this way. the topic is already so complicated that nobody would listen if it was talked without passion. also its not threatening.. i think everybody in the room knows nobody is going to start to hurt anyone nor attack them personally verbally. thats all that matters :)

@diana mehl Bruh I'm just saying that yelling/talking over others doesn't give them a chance to respond in decorum that is proper for philosophical, moderated debates. I'm glad everyone is passionate and vocal about topics! But, not when it discourages discussion. My family is also Italian, and I have gotten so heated I smashed a pizza in my brother's face. But that still wouldn't be okay for a moderated debate. For real, vocal expression is a great and wondrous thing. But not when it is used as a weapon to silence another when the point is discussion :)

@@makishimashogo2164 Oh, I agree to an extent. But when yelling is used to silence their opponent, not allowing a discussion to take place, it can become abuse of power. Passion is wonderful! But, it must be not used to destroy the purpose of a philosophical debate: not for a victor but for a gaining of knowledge/understanding. :)

@عبدالملك نواف The meaning behind interrupting is to silence an opponent actually and to provide a biased view of a discussion! To me, taking over a philosophical debate to gain victory, no matter the cost to knowledge, defeats the purpose of philosophical debates -- to gain more understanding of the world. Calling someone shallow has a rude meaning too, so maybe you should be more careful with your meanings. I'm sorry my comment offended you, and it should be noted that humans communicate as much through gestures, body language, and tone as they do through literal language!

@diana mehl True, Egyptians are very loud people.

Zorodzai MMK Everyone? Like who? I’ll be shocked if I recognize a single name.

People discuss ideas not people. You hate him that's all just say it

@@Medmed-pg4iv There would be a reason for that hate which he just basically told you those reasons. Dishonest, arrogant and ignorant.

@@Medmed-pg4iv i hate both his ideas and himself.

@Zorodzai MMK who's everyone?

Ok

Specially North Korea

@@talalalkandari9867 They pray to communism.

@@talalalkandari9867 North Korea is dictatorship with dictator being worshiped like a god, thus they aren't atheists.

Like China and North Korea

Bruh

Lol alxe is the broken record right?

Thats not nice

@poxy poo Aayisha believed him as prophet and given her whole for him,she preached his religion. She narrated so many hadeeths. She was teacher. Aayisha was the legend of Islam. If i take your argument that,Aayisha was the biggest victim of prophet,then how greatest prophet Mohammad was that his greatest victim given her whole life for him. Can u tell me about any man on earth whose biggest victim sacrifice his/her for him/her. U can not find. So,u prooved that,prophet was the greatest man.

@@rabbaniansari4224 A strange way to justify pedophilia. Really weird.

@Cedar tree one is not eniugh,he must always atracted to child ,he must not atracted to old women and middle age women. And ,when child become at middle age then he must go for another child ,ok. What a fucking people u r.

I also liked the killer blow Hijab delivered to the atheist side with his powerful "hold on hold on, hold on hold on, hold on".

Upon checking the debate again, I forgot to add one more last "hold on" in my quotation of Hijab's word delivery. It is integral to the profundity of the argument.

@@useienglish he had to be sure that they didn't let go.

@@useienglish Ah yes the "hold on"s really convinced me as well. I mean, what could Alex even do to compete?

I was really convinced with Alex's argument where he offered basically nothing

where did he go wrong? tell us rather then appealing to emotion. it is called the Contingency argument.

So that's make him wrong !!

So do we laugh 😐

Damlad Channel It is up to the claimant (theist) to meet the burden of proof for the theist claims.

Hahahaha amazing

I’m no Muslim, but previous consensus was that universe was infinite. Scientists thought that it had a beginning.

He is an Abdul 🥔..

they are just very persuasive in their speaking.

Wait wait sorry. Scientists thought university had no beginning.

What's more painfull is how many times alex changed his postion about the universe coming out of nothing

rand is pretty cool. I’m iffy on objectivism tho

"Sweep aside those parasites of subsidized classrooms, who live on the profits of the mind of others and proclaim that man needs no morality, no values, no code of behavior. They, who pose as scientists and claim that man is only an animal, do not grant him inclusion in the law of existence they have granted to the lowest of insects." ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-4wYR6e9Z6es.html

Is that why atheists invent fantasies like more than two genders and women can have dicks and men can give birth?

@@chomo54andbabyaisha97 The New Testament was written in 3 genders, dolt

@@chomo54andbabyaisha97 Oh, those guys aren't atheists, they're idiots man, be them atheists or Hindus

Look at history instead

​@@StanbyModeeven more terrible

@viniyellow1635 colonialism lmao you should have defended your own ground but I guess a gun met a bow. They have oil. It's just the worst culture and the worst religion combined. We flew to the moon and back while they still touch goats.

​@viniyellow16351) Islam is such a massive religion because of colonialism from Islam 2) you cannot say that the Soviet union is an atheist country the same way you can with a Muslim country, because to be a good Muslim you have to follow a long list of rules put together in the Quran for every day of your life, meaning that 2 Muslim countries are gonna be pretty similar because of things like sharia law, however this does not happen with atheist countries as to be a good atheist you only got to believe in the absence of good, there is no quran for the atheist, 2 different atheist can have nothing in common apart from the fact that they are atheist, however, Muslims don't have that, since they have to follow the quran, example, the Soviet union and the Czech Republic are very different countries apart from being atheist, but you can't name 2 different muslim countries like that without falling into contradictions

@viniyellow1635The Soviet Union was built on Orthodox Christianity.

That's neither a useful or witty contribution.

Yes. One filled with lies and evil. It's a satanic religion.

Yes. It means the BS starts.

@@believejesuschristislord1100 lol a Christian talking about satanic religion. Somebody teach this fool his own history 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Dahir Hussein Should he ? I think not .

This is how the debate is won - Alex made them scream and shout. No reason for him to be frustrated.

Hijab is out of context most of the time

MK Hmm, where to begin? He cut out Alex’s mic when Alex pointed out that the Quran says you can beat your (probably underage or even prepubescent) wives, he doesn’t allow comments he doesn’t approve of on the video of the debate, he edited in additional video and audio into the debate video he posted pretending as if he said it during the debate, he edited out a section of the video where he misquoted the Quran, he straw-manned his opponent, he took quotes out of context presenting them as Alex’s beliefs when in fact Alex was speaking hypothetically, he shouted over his opponents because he was unable to rebut the arguments. Come to think of it, I’m struggling to see how he could have been more dishonest if he tried his hardest and dishonesty was the goal.

@@MichaelBohnJr Then why muhammed hijab is nearly 2 hours While cosmic video is 46 munites Wich one is editing heh? As for beating in quran Yes beating a.k.a slight taping with a miswak (arabic toothbrush) But age isn't mentioned Tell me where marrying a prebuscent girl is mentioned in quran

@@hassanlabyad4082 Alex was only allowed to upload opening statements by Muhammad H, no the quran does not specify with what object to beat or strike your wife with, and underage girls were mentioned when it was brought up that Muhammad married a 6 year old girl and had sex with her when she was 9.

point out just one of his invalid argument

@I'm Jamie lmao read carefully. 'invalid argument'. not interested in supposed threats.

@@Ayd1th promoting Islam in itself is wrong lmao all religions are stupid

@@andrewherrera6744 why is promoting Islam wrong and why are all religions stupid?

@@Ayd1th because Islam like other religions are backward dogmatic repulsive pieces of crap. Especially Christianity and Islam. I despise those 2 religions with a passion

@Adolf Hitler Oh no, I though you blew your own brains out, how are you alive?

That certainly is true, it's ridicolous how lacking just one valid proof for their case, they go on attacking a position, that essentially isn't even one.

Atheism says: I do not believe in a god's existence. The reason to argue against those that do is because we see harm in believing things that are not true and actions taken in the name of falsehood.

What I might add to this, is that in that sense, Atheism is the initial state of mind for all of us really. I don't see sufficient reason to believe in something, therefore I don't. This is the starting point. The reason why we're initiating in debate is because religious people are framing it as if it was already clear that there is sufficient evidence. We're trying to show that it is perfectly reasonable to dismiss so-called evidence for eg the existence of Allah, to all but most importantly to the people who we're indoctrinated into thinking the case was already clear.

To be clear, atheists don't necessarily make any claims. The atheist simply REJECTs claims of the theists due to lack of any and all good evidence.

Wow first profound comment that's not about how the comments' section is open. Don't get me wrong I loved those, but THIS is a comment that should go in the complete debate video! But of course, it would've been deleted...

I don't get why Alex and other intellectuals would waste their time on such absolute morons to be fair.

You're right. An undergraduate like Alex should not debate others who are on another level. He couldn't address any of their arguments and he gave a half-assed response about cause and effect which wasn't even brought by any of them. He expected a typical Kalaam cosmological argument but they made a Contingency argument instead and let's be honest, it completely overwhelmed him. And I'm not gonna address his cliched and emotional moral arguments against Islam that had nothing to do with the debate.

I 100% would have lost it and probably walked off, I couldn't handle being treated like shit for so long by that guy.

@dimmy dunk i dont know if by "emotional arguments" it means those "allah helped me when I was depressed" "Allah is helping everyone" " I could feel allah" and all of this isn't acceptable in a debate because it's subjective, someone's personal feelings don't have any place in the debate room because it's not a fact nor an argument..you can't even know if the person is lying or not and you don't have any idea about the mental state of that person.. And also when a person says "I've experienced allah" for example, Christians did experience Jesus and jews experienced Yahweh..it doesn't make much of a sense.. (I hope I explained it well 😊)

Infinite regress is from Aquinas anyway. Islam steals all the mediocre arguments for gods existence from the Catholic Church of all places.

No it does not believe that God is 3 in 1 and 3 is 1 some pagan mathematical bullshit

Polytheism nonesense

@@Aliali-vc3pk start reading about trinity url are fed bs so ur brains are turned to porks skin thick to penetrate