Israel-Hamas War | ICJ to hear SA's case against Israel for additional measures: Dr Mia Swart 

What nonsense! Israel has complied with its obligations in terms of court order. If it had not then the ICJ would have forwarded the matter for further action. This has not happened. As stated by former Chief Justice Donague it is apparent that South Africa has not interpreted the initial order properly. Biased reporting.

Why don't the Muslim countries don't support Palestinians

The SABC has got the story upside down

Waste of time!!

Get the facts straight plse s.a

What every judge can determine with certainty: the person who starts the fight is also guilty of harming him, the court in The Hague court is unable to understand.

CrapTrap! 1950 - A month after the People’s Liberation Army pierced the Eastern frontier of Central Tibet in October 1950...1961 - “The Question of Tibet” once again for consideration by the United Nations. .. Tibet’s case was bolstered by the ICJ’s second report Tibet and the Chinese People’s Republic. Upon examining Tibet’s legal status, and violations of human rights there, the report concluded that “acts of genocide had been committed”, and that “Tibet was at the very least a de facto independent State” before its annexation by the Chinese government in 1951. With the support of 56 member states, Resolution 1723 (XVI) was passed in the General Assembly on December 20. Tibet at the UN General Assembly. Save Tibet ORG.

South Africa has not learned that ICJ belongs to certain people

Nonsense. Far from what the ICJ did. Hahaha. Sorry it's just amazing word salad.