Oh my God, I had seen the Beyoncé line referenced before but didn't know what the context of it was. It got me crying with laughter when it came up. Absolutely brilliant. 😂😂
Oh hey. The audience can shut out the players. Again. Never mind that the players were unanimous against the audience, and the audience was nearly down the middle. Why do they even bother to let the players vote, at that rate? Don't mind me, I'm just going to go over here and dispense enough salt to buy ancient China... On a more positive note, I'd totally be the guy to just respond with "no" or some such. Just, troll the people who get my answers. There would be much yelling, as friends, they yell.
@@Tiggeralt I know. I still don't care for it; it just encourages players to appeal to the lowest common denominator, rather than each other, and I find it tends to lead to the jokes becoming unoriginal and occasionally repetitive, because the audience loves their referential humor.
@@biologynerd3 i dunno that that gives enough weight to the audience members individually, though. My thought was that the audience should get a number of votes equal to the number of players - if the players are unanimously against all of the audience, I think a dead tie is fair. It'd get a little iffy at extreme audience splits (like 99%-1%), but it's better than "the people streaming the game are only there to host and break ties."
