That's like comparing a musket to a high powered sniper rifle. Everything advances, you're stuck in the past. that's not to say there's anything wrong with traditional archery; it's absolutely fine. But if that's what you like watch videos of that, don't hate on this just because the tech is more advanced.
It's like 3 people are talking at the same time, very annoying and hard to listen! I want to listen to something but I cant. Turned the video off, can't watch.
He's/she's complaining because "real archery" is considered to be completely bare bow; no sights, pins, stabilizers, kissers, all the "bells and whistles" so to speak are gone so the shot is purely down to the skill of the archer. But look at my response to his comment for my own opinion- I admit it takes less skill, but it still takes a LOT.
Olympic sight is nothing different than a static reference point, just a thing to refer... No technology. It does not do any help to shoot better. Stabilizer set is just like a piece of weight that barebow shooters got, just that. All kinds of archery are equally hard and require a TON of effort. If anyone not believe me, try one yourself. And see what score you can do. Oh this comment is for anyone, not actually to the thread :))
@@blizzbee if it doesn’t help them shoot, then why is it on the bow? If it didn’t make it easier to shoot the arrow where you want to, it wouldn’t be on every single Olympic Recurve or Compound. I’m not a bare bow purist, but don’t try and say a sight doesn’t make it easier to be more accurate
@@abnormallynormal8823 when i say it doesn't help them shoot, i said in aspect of a "reference point". That means the sight can be replaced with anything solidly attached to the bow for the eye to look through.. that's it. The sight itself has no spaceship technology to help shooting better. It's just a reference point. That's what i mean.
